On September 02 2014 11:30 kushm4sta wrote:
Seriously templar? you want kita to talk about his retarded mission ideas more?
Seriously templar? you want kita to talk about his retarded mission ideas more?
yes...
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
The_Templar
your Country52796 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:30 kushm4sta wrote: Seriously templar? you want kita to talk about his retarded mission ideas more? yes... | ||
The_Templar
your Country52796 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:31 kitaman27 wrote: @Templar, if you read my earlier post I did say to drop it for that exact reason. I don't feel that setup speculation is worth talking about anymore. It was fine at the start to get input from guys like Damdred who had a fairly town reaction, but that was mostly a conversation starter. Blech, I even quoted it and stated your exact opinion -.- That's what I get for not reading. You changed your opinion damn fast though. | ||
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:30 Vivax wrote: Show nested quote + On September 02 2014 11:23 kitaman27 wrote: On September 02 2014 11:14 Vivax wrote: That's exactly the feeling I got from Templar's post and the feeling I get from you is that you're trying to shove it under a carpet after feeling the same. So you're saying that I uncovered a scummy post from my scum buddy templar, pointed it out, and then decided to minimize the severity by "shoving it under a carpet"? meh I called the post a disconnected catchup post because it was. I shared my displeasure about those type of posts, decided that it's not significant enough to push right now, and pushed templar in the direction to not do it again. You didn't seem displeased, you gave us a reason for you to not pursue it further. If you were displeased I'd expect you to be more confrontational than that, where you give yourself a reason to ignore it. Why bring it up at all if it's of no relevance for you afterwards? That's what I also don't understand from a town pov. I'd expect you to mention things you find worthwhile mentioning and if you mention that but don't apply it at all to your templar read cause apparently it doesn't say enough for you then it just looks like an issue you would find scummy usually, but here you play it down. Well I found 3d12 and batsnacks more scummy and mentioned that in the exact same post. Templar was kinda scummy, but not a huge deal to me if it was a one time thing, as I stated. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
Vivax
21682 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:36 kushm4sta wrote: I don't think 3d is all that scummy considering he's new to forum mafia. It explains the awkward feels people are getting/ Nice! (no sarcasm) | ||
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 02 2014 08:39 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Also, I'd really like to point out that this isn't the game to be posting stupid gifs/random useless shit. Is Obi typically a player who enforces a non-nonsense policy from the start of the game as town? I'll probably check myself at some point, but going to bed now. On September 02 2014 08:39 ObiWanShinobi wrote: I actually really want to kill batsnacks for posting his wall because I really can't see any kind of town/goofy reason for him to put it up there unless the host made him. If you can't see any reason for him to post that as town, it makes me wonder why you don't consider the possibility that he could just be trolly posting. I'm not saying that's the most likely explanation, but that post doesn't make him guilty in my opinion. His lack of response when questioned about the templar vote is the bigger deal. | ||
Vivax
21682 Posts
Why was kita just white and not pink if you didn't just disagree previously, instead found him suspicious according to your recent opinion? | ||
The_Templar
your Country52796 Posts
| ||
The_Templar
your Country52796 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:43 Vivax wrote: Btw Templar you didn't comment on kita's posts in a way explaining what you found scummy about them, you only disagreed with his suggestions and only now called it suspicious for you. Why was kita just white and not pink if you didn't just disagree previously, instead found him suspicious according to your recent opinion? When I made my post he was white because he had not yet justified his questionable post. I misread his followup and thought he seemed suspicious (a mistake on my part), but he actually immediately redacted his idea. That is not suspicious to me any more. On September 02 2014 11:23 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On September 02 2014 11:14 Vivax wrote: That's exactly the feeling I got from Templar's post and the feeling I get from you is that you're trying to shove it under a carpet after feeling the same. So you're saying that I uncovered a scummy post from my scum buddy templar, pointed it out, and then decided to minimize the severity by "shoving it under a carpet"? meh I called the post a disconnected catchup post because it was. I shared my displeasure about those type of posts, decided that it's not significant enough to push right now, and pushed templar in the direction to not do it again. However, I don't like this post because he seems to think that it was clearly bad for me to summarize my thoughts and post them, and that he was taking charge to make sure I didn't do it again when this is actually how I play this game normally. Post referred to was: It will be important to see if he continues to share thoughts rather than making disconnected catch up posts. On September 02 2014 11:10 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On September 02 2014 10:42 Vivax wrote: Templar's long post wasn't all that interesting, but I won't fault him for sharing thoughts. It will be important to see if he continues to share thoughts rather than making disconnected catch up posts. Also kita I want a followup to this now. Disconnected catch up post sounds like something you would scumread him for and I don't like how you willingly put a caveat in here. I wanna talk about templars post some more. It would be a scum read if he does this repeatedly. It's too early to go after that for a single post. If he starts interacting with the thread, then I'm not as concerned. Who do you find worse, 3d12 or batsnack? So, if I repeatedly summarize my thoughts on how the thread has developed, I must be scum. Got it. | ||
The_Templar
your Country52796 Posts
(adds sentence) | ||
Tehpoofter
United States2911 Posts
Templar seeing what I saw in bunnies was good as I didn't like her reaction. Although his long post was weird as fuck. Vivax looks scummy for the post he made to kush seeing if he could buddy him. Bunnies reaction really bad earlier anyone else think that besides templar? OR am I looking too much into it? | ||
Tehpoofter
United States2911 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:43 The_Templar wrote: I don't think 3d12 is particularly bad yet. Agreeing with people that look like they know what they're doing as a newbie is perfectly normal so far. He hasn't done much up to this point atm so I have no read on him, his not agreeing with the setup talk felt newbish but all setup talk=null to me. I agree with you on this. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
Vivax
21682 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:53 kushm4sta wrote: dude aren't you married to bunnies or some shit Did you ask her if she wants to be your gf yet. | ||
Vivax
21682 Posts
| ||
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:48 The_Templar wrote: So, if I repeatedly summarize my thoughts on how the thread has developed, I must be scum. Got it. If you repeatedly do it in a catch up, disconnected way, then yes probably. | ||
Tehpoofter
United States2911 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:53 kushm4sta wrote: dude aren't you married to bunnies or some shit no | ||
Vivax
21682 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:57 Tehpoofter wrote: Show nested quote + On September 02 2014 11:53 kushm4sta wrote: dude aren't you married to bunnies or some shit no Such a dry answer. | ||
Tehpoofter
United States2911 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:58 Vivax wrote: Show nested quote + On September 02 2014 11:57 Tehpoofter wrote: On September 02 2014 11:53 kushm4sta wrote: dude aren't you married to bunnies or some shit no Such a dry answer. yep | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
| ||
WardiTV Invitational
Group D
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney 29227 Dota 2Sea 2574 Flash 1543 Bisu 1513 Larva 1183 Zeus 753 Mini 729 actioN 368 BeSt 294 Leta 293 [ Show more ] firebathero 195 Light 169 ZerO 59 Sexy 46 Mind 32 HiyA 26 sSak 24 ajuk12(nOOB) 20 Yoon 17 Free 15 IntoTheRainbow 12 scan(afreeca) 12 Shine 6 eros_byul 0 Counter-Strike Other Games singsing2040 Beastyqt962 crisheroes491 Mew2King488 B2W.Neo443 Mlord428 XBOCT355 Lowko322 Hui .271 Liquid`VortiX133 RotterdaM104 KnowMe92 ToD77 Trikslyr72 NotJumperer2 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • AfreecaTV YouTube StarCraft: Brood War• intothetv • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel • sooper7s Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
SOOP Global
NightMare vs GuMiho
Classic vs SHIN
SOOP
NightMare vs Oliveira
SC Evo Complete
WardiTV Invitational
CSO Cup
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] SC Evo Complete
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
StarCraft2.fi
OlimoLeague
StarCraft2.fi
StarCraft2.fi
The PondCast
|
|