Mission Mini Mafia - Page 11

On September 02 2014 11:11 kushm4sta wrote:
Long nonsense post - possibly satisfying a mission. (templar also did a super long shitty post hmm)

On September 02 2014 11:11 Tehpoofter wrote:


Fair enough on the elaboration but your post looked like it would normally be made at the later stage of the day 1 or 2. Not something mere 2-3 hours into day 1. I don't really feel like any substantial could have come out of the first couple hours their reads wise and as any setup talk is purely neutral.

On September 02 2014 11:16 Tehpoofter wrote:


I can see that a little bit. What did you think of bunnies reaction to my initially troll voting her?

On September 02 2014 11:14 kushm4sta wrote:


Day 1 scum mission - make a post with a bazillion words in it

On September 02 2014 11:19 kitaman27 wrote:


And how would the mafia team every fail the mission? There is no challenge here...

On September 02 2014 11:14 Vivax wrote:
That's exactly the feeling I got from Templar's post and the feeling I get from you is that you're trying to shove it under a carpet after feeling the same.

On September 02 2014 11:19 Vivax wrote:


That's not the reason I even found kita suspicious initially. Me pushing that notion comes from the fact that I found him suspicious just for his entrance, so what you mention is a consequence and not a cause.

On September 02 2014 05:25 kitaman27 wrote:


True, though at this point nobody has any proper reads for at least a few more hours. I'd prefer to to speculate to see if we can come up with any policies to break the system.

For example, if we all agree to cut the day cycle short by one hour as if that were the deadline and then all move our votes to whoever had the majority at that point, we might be able to trigger a failure on a vote related mission.

Something else to keep in mind may be getting baited into using certain trigger words. For instance, perhaps the mafia player needs 3 people to say the phrase "OMGUS" during the cycle or something.

On September 02 2014 10:33 kitaman27 wrote:


Well that idea would be that the day cycle would be like any other game, except 47 hours instead of 48 hours. You still would have 2 wagons and voting analysis could still be done since the player with the most votes after 47 hours would be lynched. The only difference would be that everyone moves to that player in the last hour. On second thought, people aren't really reliable enough to be around and now that the day is a few hours old, its not really worth discussing policy like that which isn't incredibly important so I say we should probably just drop the idea.

Templar's long post wasn't all that interesting, but I won't fault him for sharing thoughts. It will be important to see if he continues to share thoughts rather than making disconnected catch up posts.

batsnacks is around, but has chosen not to post so I wouldn't mind a couple of votes on him. Micchan is a reasonable alternative if he doesn't have anything to say either.



I see batsnacks voting templar after a large low quality post, but I don't see how you automatically come to this conclusion that his is town based on his vote and assume he is playing provocative. It makes me suspicious of you and I wonder if you may know he is town and are attempting to come up with an suggestion that explains his play without the information being there.