|
Calgary25955 Posts
Guidelines have been updated, so now on to work for the recommended threads.
I'm trying to update and organize the recommended threads. However, there is literally too much information in this forum for me to organize. I can often remember threads I posted in that were good, and I imagine you guys are the same! So if you remember a good guide/discussion, please post the link either in this thread, or the above Recommended Threads. Eventually that old recommended threads will be replaced with the new one and this "input" thread will be closed.
You don't need to post anything that was in the original recommended threads - I've gone through the original post and all the replies and taken the good stuff into my new recommended threads.
Please, if you aren't sure if you should post something, post it. Seriously. I don't want to miss ANYTHING. In the end, we're only going to put the best of the best in the Recommended Threads, but I'd still like to collect as much as possible.
Thanks.
|
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
|
Wow awesome, thank you. This will for sure make the entire strategy forum better for everyone!
|
Nice!
I've seen many (not closed) threads when someone has som sort of strategical idea, and just want to discuss it. Like "I've owned a lot of D+ newb with this new strat i've not seen anyone use before, do you think it could be viable also at highr levels?". Sometimes those threads are formulated more in terms of "W00t I've invented the NEW 1337 ZtrAt >>>>>> all!!!11one", but still.
Should those thread be in [Q], or get an own category like [I] for idea (with risk of being to wide and letting in unwanted threads...), or should they just not be created in the first place?
|
Cool, this will stop confusing and pointless threads hopefully. The updated recommended threads will be nice as well.
|
Calgary25955 Posts
Interesting. I think it would be beneficial to have the [I] tag (Idea), which fills in the gap between [G] and [Q]. You're not asking a question but it's not a tried and true guide.
Sounds good, I'll see what haji thinks. This will all go into effect Monday, so hopefully there's some more feedback over the weekend.
|
I find it a bit annoying sometimes when people say TvZ help but they are actually asking help for ZvT. Good work though.
|
YEAAAHH!
GO CHILL!
edit: Question: what happens to the threads that don't have such a tag (or a wrong one)? Will they be closed or will they just be changed to have the tag?
|
Calgary25955 Posts
At the start I'll edit them. As I grow tired of noobs ignoring my hard work, I'll just close them.
|
Valhalla18444 Posts
On September 29 2007 07:37 Chill wrote: Interesting. I think it would be beneficial to have the [I] tag (Idea), which fills in the gap between [G] and [Q]. You're not asking a question but it's not a tried and true guide.
Sounds good, I'll see what haji thinks. This will all go into effect Monday, so hopefully there's some more feedback over the weekend.
how about T for Theorycraft
|
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
On September 29 2007 07:37 Chill wrote: Interesting. I think it would be beneficial to have the [I] tag (Idea), which fills in the gap between [G] and [Q]. You're not asking a question but it's not a tried and true guide.
Sounds good, I'll see what haji thinks. This will all go into effect Monday, so hopefully there's some more feedback over the weekend.
you're the man in charge here, and what you think is good won't be doubted unless something really sucks.
(btw I support this)
|
Canada7170 Posts
Thanks so much for modding the strategy forum.
Thumbs WAY up!
|
maybe if u no0bs are really lucky there will be an EvetS TvZ guide in the not too distant future
|
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
|
On September 29 2007 23:06 thedeadhaji wrote: Legendary Bump
Legendaryier Bump
We gotta keep this on the hotlist so that everybody knows what's going on here
|
Baltimore, USA22250 Posts
Um, it's stickied... how much more you need to bump it? ^_^
|
A lot more because this forum needs a change ;p
|
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
ETT I have concrete evidence that people don't use forum view!
|
|
|
|
|
|