|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 28 2014 08:16 thrawn2112 wrote: every time i reach a point where I think my read or reads my be getting somewhere useful, something f'd up happens. my reads have been reset to null 3 times so far.
and i don't think i'm playing against wincon. i spent a real long time reading the entire thread and posting all those notes, tbh the only reason I did that was because I knew I needed to in order to not get lynched. i wish something more productive would have come out of it, and I was working on part 4 and then I read your palmar case, and decided i liked it better than anything I'd thought of so far.
so I don't know what you mean by trolling unless you're only talking about my ramen comment
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 28 2014 20:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: Holyflare you can't prove thrawn lied. It's certainly possible he didn't. Huuuuuuuh?
|
On March 28 2014 20:54 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 20:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: Holyflare you can't prove thrawn lied. It's certainly possible he didn't. Huuuuuuuh? Him posting / asking a question from me between my "tone read" post and voting for me does not necessarily mean he lied.
|
Like yes, it implies so, but it's not 100% certain.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 28 2014 20:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 20:54 Holyflare wrote:On March 28 2014 20:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: Holyflare you can't prove thrawn lied. It's certainly possible he didn't. Huuuuuuuh? Him posting / asking a question from me between my "tone read" post and voting for me does not necessarily mean he lied.
He said he voted you on tone before caring about content, he asked you questions about content and only voted you after you replied?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
And marv you asked what he gained by changing his reads? He enables himself to not be lynched and he falls into town consensus that everyone had already been talking about.
|
On March 28 2014 20:56 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 20:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 28 2014 20:54 Holyflare wrote:On March 28 2014 20:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: Holyflare you can't prove thrawn lied. It's certainly possible he didn't. Huuuuuuuh? Him posting / asking a question from me between my "tone read" post and voting for me does not necessarily mean he lied. He said he voted you on tone before caring about content, he asked you questions about content and only voted you after you replied? Yes i know. And yes, it implies he lied. But tbh i don't see why would he not just give both tone/content reasons for a vote instead of lying. Like he has both of the reasons in his case, so lying does not even achieve anything in that case.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On March 28 2014 20:57 Holyflare wrote: And marv you asked what he gained by changing his reads? He enables himself to not be lynched and he falls into town consensus that everyone had already been talking about. Actually if rayn is accurate, then going from you town to much less town is the opposite of going towards town consensus
|
On March 28 2014 21:00 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 20:57 Holyflare wrote: And marv you asked what he gained by changing his reads? He enables himself to not be lynched and he falls into town consensus that everyone had already been talking about. Actually if rayn is accurate, then going from you town to much less town is the opposite of going towards town consensus But the problem is he has himself (as town as he claims) agreed with literally everything Holyflare says in the game. After re-read he disagrees with almost everything Holyflare says. I find it very unlikely some alarm bells do not ring in his head regarding question "could town!Holyflare do these things?".
I could understand if there were some red flags in Holyflare's play after his re-read, but it's basically everything Holyflare has done is not any more townie but scummy.
|
Actually i gotta check if this happens before or after marv's "maybe HF is mafia" post.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
|
On March 26 2014 22:15 marvellosity wrote: I came across this. 8008135.
rofl
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
|
see
people miss posts
both giant mspaint posts and small one liners
|
On March 27 2014 19:21 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2014 19:01 Holyflare wrote: this is nothing to do with palmar it's all about you
if he could prove to you that he was towny for you to mention that point in the first quote then all the stuff that happened in the game before that quote wouldn't be actual scum palmar points because then they must be stuff towny palmar can do too otherwise that statement wouldn't be qualified with "so I'd prefer it if you were actually town and could show me." Are you actually mafia? I'm finding it hard to believe you are genuinely this idiotic Yeah you said this but thrawn's re-read starts ~14 hours before this so it doesn't mean anything.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
oh. That wasn't really me calling him mafia, that was me getting frustrated at an exceptionally silly line of questioning.
It was super silly.
|
On March 28 2014 21:15 marvellosity wrote: oh. That wasn't really me calling him mafia, that was me getting frustrated at an exceptionally silly line of questioning.
It was super silly. yeah but thrawn has already demonstrated he is not reading properly at times so..
|
On March 28 2014 10:42 gumshoe wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 10:40 marvellosity wrote: As far as I'm concerned, rayn is totally solved as a player to me and I haven't got his alignment wrong in a very long time spanning a great deal of games. And I'm still not digging him as mafia. So yeah. That's not to say I cannot be wrong, but you're gonna have to sell it pretty good. I'll probally make a case on him, itll be bad, and then later on you'll realize I was wright with the wrong reasons, then you just make a better one and well lynch him : D ez pz. gumshoe is this what: 1) town!gumshoe would do 2) you think town!gumshoe would do 3) make up your own answer
??
|
For the record last time you answered (2).
|
|
|
|