On February 04 2014 12:15 Oatsmaster wrote:
I dont like koshi's policy shit though, it makes it easy for scum just to avoid it and lynch a townie that doesnt give a shit
Koshi's policy is bad
On February 04 2014 15:32 Oatsmaster wrote:
suki nullish, dunno why she is attacking you though, bad reasons but not inherently scummy.
Cakeman also null. Same with johnny. i mean, nobody is really pushing shit and its hard to figure out if they are posting for the sake of it or posting to find scum. Literally throughout the whole 7-8 pages there is no concerted effort to push someone by anyone.
Koshi scum for suggesting a really bad policy about post counts and nothing else. It feels like bait for scum to jump on but there is no followup.
There's 2 things here:
1) Koshi's policy is so bad that he is scum
2) Koshi's badness was actually bait FOR the scumteam (i.e. Koshi totes town)
Now it seems that 1 follows 2 because Koshi didn't
follow up on his
bad policy. Because of his "shitposting" after his first post.
There's a bunch of no-context one-liners in Oats' filter where he goes back and forth with Koshi. This starts on
Page 12, the majority is on page 13.
On February 04 2014 22:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
1 good post doesnt make the rest not shitposts.
Do you have a conclusion about what people said about your policy? Since you apparently did it to create discussion, you must have some kind of idea what you think about the people that commented on it either positively or negatively.
Its important to realize that this is in the context of responding to Koshi saying his policy was
not useless. This isnt a contradiction to earlier
yet.
On February 05 2014 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
1. Scum will go and shit on Koshi for it because its bad and scummy.
2. yeah suki and some other dudes.
3. My first thought was why is koshi proposing such a useless policy.
mannnn Koshi's shitposting is AFTER his first post.
Okay now I think Oats has stuffed his foot into his mouth. Read his emphasis here and compare with the second post I've quoted where Oats explicitly states that Koshi STARTED off bad and continued to post poorly.
[b]Oats has completely flipflopped on story where his initial read on Koshi goes from
A - "Koshi is/was scum"
into
B - "Koshi was laying a trap"
On February 05 2014 08:59 Oatsmaster wrote:##unvote Koshi
##Vote hopelessI never said Koshi's policy to catch scum was a good one.
I dont get it though, the cases against me just seem to be summarizing my play.
Oats is right, he never said the policy was good. He also never really came around to the fact that Koshi was likely town either.
How did Oats arrive at the conclusion that Koshi was town?]I don't see the progression in his reads. I see him commenting on his
initial reactions a lot and saying how he
thought Koshi could be laying a trap
at first.
HOWEVER, since Koshi didn't follow up, he was convinced Koshi was scum. --->Where did this reasoning change or go away? Oats is content to just bandwagon on to me because thread sentiment will let him. He doesn't need to stick his neck out. I wouldn't mind the switch onto me except that he avoids fleshing out his read of Koshi at the same time.
Suki's case / Oats' internal response:
On February 05 2014 09:04 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 02:24 suki wrote:So right now Oats is super scummy to me.
His "case" against Koshi is bad, and yet he continues to push it. He's also not consistent with his views:
On February 04 2014 15:32 Oatsmaster wrote:
suki nullish, dunno why she is attacking you though, bad reasons but not inherently scummy.
Cakeman also null. Same with johnny. i mean, nobody is really pushing shit and its hard to figure out if they are posting for the sake of it or posting to find scum. Literally throughout the whole 7-8 pages there is no concerted effort to push someone by anyone.
Koshi scum for suggesting a really bad policy about post counts and nothing else. It feels like bait for scum to jump on but there is no followup.
On February 05 2014 00:49 Balla24 wrote:On February 04 2014 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Its so bad, so if its town koshi, I assume he doesnt mean it seriously and has some reason for posting it. But no signs of that so far.
Can you explain a bit more?
1.
How does Koshi posting something "bad" make it bait for scum to jump on? Basically: what will scum do with it?
2. Did anybody jump on it?
3. Was this your first thought when you read it?
On February 05 2014 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
1. Scum will go and shit on Koshi for it because its bad and scummy.
2. yeah suki and some other dudes.
3. My first thought was why is koshi proposing such a useless policy.
mannnn Koshi's shitposting is AFTER his first post.
This is almost a scum claim right here. Oats is doing the exact thing that he says scum would do, and yet he's calling other people out for it.
Who is Oats willing to lynch today?
This whole point makes no sense to me, I said thats what I thought koshi mightve done if he was town, at that time I thought he was scum so thats like a non-point.On February 05 2014 01:39 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yeah Im not telling you my conclusions because I want to hear what you think without my conclusions coloring your analysis.
I really null on cake, what he posts when he comes back is really important and will probably decided my read. Hopeless is a useless piece of shit that we should lynch.
(... On a side note, I don't approve of the personal attack calling Hopeless a 'useless piece of shit'.)
Anyways. He suddenly thinks Hopeless is super scummy, without any reasoning. This is after LoneMeow has stated suspicions on Hopeless so it feels like a bandwagon. Hopeless was one of the people who
didn't shit on Koshi's policy, and said that the policy makes him feel motivated. So this big scum tell that Oats has been pushing the entire game doesn't apply to his choice of lynches?
He reads cake as null and yet it's cake and hopeless who he wants to discuss. Why not me, who you said was scummy for 'jumping on Koshi's policy' or those 'other dudes' that you so specifically called out?
Why is LoneMeow town even though he was the most vocal about probably not meeting Koshi's 40 post policy?
[green]Again, this presupposes I think Koshi is town. Regardless, hopeless was kidding and he can be useful as town but he hasnt done anything this game. I wanted to discuss people not being discussed.
Hm. Also this exchange just leaves a bad taste in my mouth:
On February 04 2014 12:10 Oatsmaster wrote:
Hi guys, [jay] probably town
On February 04 2014 12:30 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 04 2014 12:17 suki wrote:On February 04 2014 12:15 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 04 2014 12:13 suki wrote:
And what reasons do you have for saying Jay is town?
he's trying to advance the game to find scum duhhhh.
Sorry I must be a bit slow. Can you provide a few examples where you feel that he is advancing the game to find scum?
asking all those questions
Also, why does Oats avoid Balla's question here? He's not being transparent, and if he thinks Balla is town then why throw the question back at him?
I answered the question in the next post, I was making a joke.On February 05 2014 01:55 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 05 2014 01:53 Balla24 wrote:
Before I answer that can you answer me this:
Am I leaning town or scum? Same for LM.
I thought you disapproved of the asking questions before giving your own answers?
In summary, Oats is calling people scummy for something that he himself is actively doing. His reads on people seem random, rather than thought out. There's no logical progression on why he thinks Hopeless is super scummy and worth lynching (it feels like bandwagoning to try to push an easy lurker lynch). There's no explanation on why LoneMeow is town to him despite the dissonance with his 'Koshi policy' case.
When asked to explain himself he's extremely reluctant. He tries to deflect attention from himself. This all reads as scum to me.
So suki thinks that hopeless is town, interesting. Anyway this whole cases relies on the fact that I think Koshi's trap is good, which it isnt. So yeahhhhh not such a good case.##vote Oatsmaster Oatsmaster wrote:
This whole point makes no sense to me, I said thats what I thought koshi mightve done if he was town, at that time I thought he was scum so thats like a non-point.
I believe I've sufficiently rehashed this point above where I show that Oats is stuck in his hypothetical "Koshi is town" story and doesnt address his
ACTUAL read on Koshi ever. When he unvoted Koshi it was 1-line of "oh I never said that, you guys are silly" type of feeling. Totally non-committal scum posting.
Oatsmaster wrote:
I answered the question in the next post, I was making a joke.]
Balla has already made the point that Oats' fishing for reads was scummy. Joking after the fact doesn't change that. This point in suki's case is bad. The context around this point is good evidence for why Oats is scum.
Oatsmaster wrote:
So suki thinks that hopeless is town, interesting. Anyway this whole cases relies on the fact that I think Koshi's trap is good, which it isnt. So yeahhhhh not such a good case.
Okay, so at this point I believe (and correct me if I am wrong please) Oats has established a read of "Koshi is town and was laying a trap".
Does Oats have a townread on Koshi? (at the time of his unvote) If so, why?
Finally there is Oats' actual push against me:
First,
with absolutely no mention of me before this pointOn February 05 2014 01:39 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yeah Im not telling you my conclusions because I want to hear what you think without my conclusions coloring your analysis.
I really null on cake, what he posts when he comes back is really important and will probably decided my read. Hopeless is a useless piece of shit that we should lynch.
Woah there champ. Suki pointed out how this was a little over the top. There is no context, no explanation, just "LYNCH THIS FUCKER!!11!"
On February 05 2014 08:59 Oatsmaster wrote:##unvote Koshi
##Vote hopelessI never said Koshi's policy to catch scum was a good one.
I dont get it though, the cases against me just seem to be summarizing my play.
Still no actual reasons.
On February 05 2014 10:05 Oatsmaster wrote:
Anyway everyone should lynch hopeless because he started this game significantly differently from the past 2 town games he has been in.
In this post, Oats
eventually and after repeated prodding from Balla refers to my entrance meta of being light hearted and joking around early on. I dont think that is a good enough reason to call me out for being a "useless piece of shit". And it takes him sooo loonnnggg to make this point, Balla was pulling teeth.
On February 05 2014 12:03 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 11:58 Balla24 wrote:On February 05 2014 11:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
Suki's case was bad though, it all hinged on the point that I thought objecting to koshi's policy was scummy. Which I never said. All I said was that it was what I thought koshi was doing if he was town.
Hopeless, why are you playing scummily different from the past 2-3 games?
Can you please post what you are referring to. Quote some stuff from his entrances in this game and the other games. Compare and contrast for us please. It's annoying that you think we will go find it (not saying I won't but I can't say the same for everybody else). I already asked you to do it.
If it's good information then bring it forward, or are you just BSing?
Im on my phone. What annoys me is that you apparently dont care about hopeless's alignment. You could check on hopeless' games and then make a decision and see what I say. But no, you want to be spoonfed anything. Do you think hopeless is particularly town? If not, why are you indirectly defending him?
Oats' accuses Balla of Chainsawing me. I disagree. Draw your conclusions based on if you think this is a reasonable point for Oats to argue OR if it seems like he is stalling and trying to pawn off the responsibility to someone else.