|
On December 16 2013 13:18 Plutarch wrote: I think sideprang is town. He attacked purple a lot and those attacks felt genuine. Dude in xatA's filter, look.
If side spring is town talk about new
|
Why is xata town? I dont really understand it from the posts you linked.
And if you are insinuating that i'm new, then you are correct. I am quite new!
|
On December 17 2013 01:54 sidesprang wrote: Why is xata town? I dont really understand it from the posts you linked.
And if you are insinuating that i'm new, then you are correct. I am quite new! I'm not insinuating I am stating.
Xata is town because the feels.
Now lynch him because I was null on purple!
|
|
On December 16 2013 13:07 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2013 12:09 VayneAuthority wrote: implying I care about the town or anything else besides surviving Show nested quote +On December 16 2013 12:16 VayneAuthority wrote: nah, you are fucking trash at this game kid Show nested quote +On December 16 2013 12:19 VayneAuthority wrote: You are basing a scumread off a joke I made you dumb cum dumpster. I'm sorry but we can't have this any longer. I explicitly warned you, and everyone in this thread, that these personal attacks have to stop. You have failed to do so and have blatantly stopped playing to your win condition, giving the assumption that you did not heed my previous warning, and leaving me no choice but to modkill you.
Please learn how to control your temper more. We're all here to have fun.
VayneAuthority the Civilian (Vanilla Townie) has been modkilled for insulting multiple players despite public warning for his and for others' actions in-thread.
There are 12 people remaining in the game. Day ends in .Show nested quote + Inappropriate posts: If you want to post something insulting or inappropriate and know the TL mods would have a problem with it elsewhere, don't post it here. If you do, a host will warn you or modkill you and request that you be banned from future games. The hosts have the final say on what is inappropriate. If you do not like how someone is talking to you, please PM a host, Flamewheel, or Mig before involving the TL staff. If you are unsatisfied with how the situation is resolved, then you can appeal to the TL staff normally.
+ Show Spoiler +I was originally going to have BAN SKEWERING at the top of this, but I don't feel it's appropriate for this post.
This gives me a flashback to Mocsta from GoT.... Pro-town in a way, but pretty lame.
On December 17 2013 01:02 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2013 19:58 Xatalos wrote:On December 11 2013 19:47 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yeah i agree with that Xatalos. ##unvote The risk is that the Vigi(s) will just shoot someone else and Alakaslam will live to LYLO. That wouldn't be a good situation, since it's clearly difficult to say anything about his alignment. And he's being harmful to the discussion... But even so, I think he's such a likely Vigi shot that it's better to lynch someone else. purpletrator hasn't still posted, and the pressure on him has died almost completely. Hopefully he comes back soon. It'd be sad if he was scum and slipped away by just lurking. Hopefully bum has some explanations soon as well. This is understandable except now the vig shot has been wasted. Do you now feel I should be lynched? Show nested quote +On December 11 2013 20:15 Xatalos wrote:On December 11 2013 20:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: Slam starts contributing in English or we lynch him. purple starts contributing or we lynch him.
In case both of those do not happen one gets lynched other one vigged. In case both of those happen we lynch the scummiest dude. I'd prefer lynching someone like Artanis or Corazon over Alakaslam. Anti-town/lurker lynches tend to be just giant bandwagons where nobody learns anything. Even if the coin-flip is a success and he flips scum, it doesn't tell almost anything about the voters/non-voters. It's easy to vote for a player like that no matter what alignment the player or his voter is... Rayne am I doing the bold? Is this why I am not being lynched? Town is just confusing me right now.
I thought you were a good Vigi shot during D1, but then you started contributing somewhat starting from N1... Would have still been better than HF lol. Anyways, I don't want to lynch you now. There are far, far better lynches.
I wonder though, why am I town for those posts?
- - -
Artanis felt more towny after he went for purple instead of VA (and now VA flipped town so it couldn't have even been a choice between two scum). I still think there's a good chance he flips Mafia, but I doubt that his lynch is happening today especially after how the purple lynch went down.
I think LSB is scum/SK, maybe more likely SK. Why? Because he's just coasting by and doesn't appear to care about anything that's happening. Plutarch seemed to think that he just doesn't care about the game at all - but I think he does, just not really about the thread. He's made sure to appear at specific times to quickly cast his vote or to talk about something irrelevant, but he seems to play just for himself, not for any greater purpose (town/scum). And if I'm right and he's SK, lynching him would also reduce anti-town KP by 1 and thus almost seal the deal.
##Vote LSB
|
On December 17 2013 02:02 Alakaslam wrote: Oh yeah
##Vote: xigxag
I think XigXag is just AFK and will get modkilled soon. If he comes back just to vote again, he's probably scum, but otherwise he's probably going to die to a modkill anyways.
LSB all the way!
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Xigxag is obviously going to come back and vote to avoid being modkilled, we get rid of him now rather than at lylo. He's done it before, he'll do it again. Don't rely on the mods, do your own work. yada yada
##vote: xigxag
|
On December 17 2013 02:47 Blazinghand wrote: Xigxag is obviously going to come back and vote to avoid being modkilled, we get rid of him now rather than at lylo. He's done it before, he'll do it again. Don't rely on the mods, do your own work. yada yada
##vote: xigxag
Does he do this as scum or as either alignment? If it's not alignment indicative, it's a coin-flip and we'd be better off reducing scum/SK.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter what xigxag's freaking "motivations" are or whether this is "alignment indicative", you mealy-mouthed monopede mangler, what matters is that his actions cannot stand, cannot be accepted, and CANNOT be analyzed. He is a lurker, the lurkest of lurkers, unreadable, uncaseable, only lynchable by policy. If he's scum what the heck do you want me to say? "oh I didn't like his most recent vote" well freaking fiddlesticks man his most recent vote was that he was voting, AND I QUOTE, I QUOTE,
On December 14 2013 21:37 xigxag wrote: I am avoiding a possible mod kill with this vote. Actual analysis will follow when I return from work.
now wait bh you say, how was his analysis?
On December 14 2013 21:39 xigxag wrote: xatalos would be my read of xat by the way. I see some votes on him. He seemed like town or sk, not scum from earlier readong. Just my 2c.
yes, that was his analysis 2 minutes later, and since then he has not posted. At all. The fact that any of you find his activity even remotely acceptable is unbe-flipping-lievable.
unless someone LITERALLY claims scum, i'm not voting anyone else.
|
Right.. Don't you think that LSB has posted barely more than XigXag - and what LSB has posted has been way more suspicious?
|
I agree its annoying. Tho I do feel we are a bit to far into the game to just go after someone cause they are inactive. Like coag is no better, and we deffo cant spend 2 days getting rid of them both.
That being said I might get behind a xigxag lynch, I did not like his analysis on purple. Might be a bit biased now that I know purple was scum, tho I got the feeling he was that before the flip and so did a lot of others.
ATM i'm thinking the best lynches are
Grack Xata
then
Xigxag / coag, tho I really wish we had more information from those two.
|
@Xat - You really think all that Purple/LSB interaction was faked? LSB pushed really hard for Purps lynch.
|
On December 17 2013 03:14 Xatalos wrote: Right.. Don't you think that LSB has posted barely more than XigXag - and what LSB has posted has been way more suspicious?
Well, LSB atleast got purple correct, so he got that going for him. How he has acted outside of that I would agree is not very towny, he could have fought better for his cases and presented them better. I just find it hard to believe a mafia member would act that way, I also dont think an SK would be that reckless. I'm not trying to say he's town, I just dont really buy that he's scum either atm.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On December 17 2013 03:14 Xatalos wrote: Right.. Don't you think that LSB has posted barely more than XigXag - and what LSB has posted has been way more suspicious?
LSB has posted much more than xigxag in the past day, though his activity is also low. I don't see how this is even remotely relevant though, since nothing is more suspicious than what XigXag is doing. You're either xcum and trying to protect your xcumbuddy or you're being blinded by the availability heuristic. The fact that LSB's post seem more suspicious is not relevant given that xigxag has actually not been posting. You can't say his posts are more suspicious than xigxag's have been, you just remember him posting more and therefore he sticks out in your mind. Get your HEAD IN THE GAME.
If LSB seems scummy because he's at least making a trivial effort to play the game, THAT MEANS HE CAN BE ANALYZED. That means he is NOT our lynch for today. You're basically arguing that we should lynch LSB because he's a worse lynch. Come on man. COME ON.
|
On December 17 2013 03:19 JarJarDrinks wrote: @Xat - You really think all that Purple/LSB interaction was faked? LSB pushed really hard for Purps lynch.
Worth noting is that LSB voted for VA and didn't vote for purple, when it came to be between purple/VA. Especially considering that he didn't have VA as a red read, but he was after purple all game:
On December 12 2013 05:38 LSB wrote: I filtered VA and I don't get the red read. If someone could link me a post explaining why you think he is scum I might rethink it.
That's really shady.
In case there's some IRL reason or something for not switching to purple, then he's just SK.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
LIKE REALLY MAN THINK ABOUT IT. for all we know xigxag's posts would be way scummier than LSB's, but WE DONT KNOW. WE DONT BECAUSE HES NOT POSTING.
nobody has a townread on xigxag. You want to know why? the motherflipper has been lurking. We can't rely on a cop in a game with 2 docs and a vigi. We can't rely on anything but the lynch, our best and first tool for destroying scum. You want xig around in LYLO? cuase that's what's gonna happen unless we lynch him before then. Scum sure as dicks aint gonna shoot him. SK won't shoot him since he doesn't know whether he's shooting scum or town when he shoots xig.
Xigxag will make it to lylo unless we stop him. The ONLY argument against lynching him that makes sense is "I think he'll get modkilled" but even then we can't rely on it, he is playing to avoid getting modkilled. Everyone's like "well I don't have a scumread on him" but shitake mushrooms, man, that ain't gonna change. What you think he's gonna somehow do something that makes him a townread for you? If so I got a bridge to sell you, real cheap, I promise.
Lynch Xigxag. it's the only move. Everyone talks about how we should lynch out the lurkers to avoid BS like this but nobody has the cojones to do it.
come on guys. have cojones. make the right play for once.
|
On December 17 2013 03:34 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2013 03:14 Xatalos wrote: Right.. Don't you think that LSB has posted barely more than XigXag - and what LSB has posted has been way more suspicious? LSB has posted much more than xigxag in the past day, though his activity is also low. I don't see how this is even remotely relevant though, since nothing is more suspicious than what XigXag is doing. You're either xcum and trying to protect your xcumbuddy or you're being blinded by the availability heuristic. The fact that LSB's post seem more suspicious is not relevant given that xigxag has actually not been posting. You can't say his posts are more suspicious than xigxag's have been, you just remember him posting more and therefore he sticks out in your mind. Get your HEAD IN THE GAME. If LSB seems scummy because he's at least making a trivial effort to play the game, THAT MEANS HE CAN BE ANALYZED. That means he is NOT our lynch for today. You're basically arguing that we should lynch LSB because he's a worse lynch. Come on man. COME ON.
I'd think that barely posting above the lurker definition, and being scummy in those few posts, is more scummy than not posting at all.......
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On December 17 2013 03:40 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2013 03:34 Blazinghand wrote:On December 17 2013 03:14 Xatalos wrote: Right.. Don't you think that LSB has posted barely more than XigXag - and what LSB has posted has been way more suspicious? LSB has posted much more than xigxag in the past day, though his activity is also low. I don't see how this is even remotely relevant though, since nothing is more suspicious than what XigXag is doing. You're either xcum and trying to protect your xcumbuddy or you're being blinded by the availability heuristic. The fact that LSB's post seem more suspicious is not relevant given that xigxag has actually not been posting. You can't say his posts are more suspicious than xigxag's have been, you just remember him posting more and therefore he sticks out in your mind. Get your HEAD IN THE GAME. If LSB seems scummy because he's at least making a trivial effort to play the game, THAT MEANS HE CAN BE ANALYZED. That means he is NOT our lynch for today. You're basically arguing that we should lynch LSB because he's a worse lynch. Come on man. COME ON. I'd think that barely posting above the lurker definition, and being scummy in those few posts, is more scummy than not posting at all.......
Okay, great idea, let's not lynch xigxag i'm sure that will just work itself out.... oh wait no the opposite of that
|
On December 17 2013 03:42 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2013 03:40 Xatalos wrote:On December 17 2013 03:34 Blazinghand wrote:On December 17 2013 03:14 Xatalos wrote: Right.. Don't you think that LSB has posted barely more than XigXag - and what LSB has posted has been way more suspicious? LSB has posted much more than xigxag in the past day, though his activity is also low. I don't see how this is even remotely relevant though, since nothing is more suspicious than what XigXag is doing. You're either xcum and trying to protect your xcumbuddy or you're being blinded by the availability heuristic. The fact that LSB's post seem more suspicious is not relevant given that xigxag has actually not been posting. You can't say his posts are more suspicious than xigxag's have been, you just remember him posting more and therefore he sticks out in your mind. Get your HEAD IN THE GAME. If LSB seems scummy because he's at least making a trivial effort to play the game, THAT MEANS HE CAN BE ANALYZED. That means he is NOT our lynch for today. You're basically arguing that we should lynch LSB because he's a worse lynch. Come on man. COME ON. I'd think that barely posting above the lurker definition, and being scummy in those few posts, is more scummy than not posting at all....... Okay, great idea, let's not lynch xigxag i'm sure that will just work itself out.... oh wait no the opposite of that
Do you want LSB at LYLO either?
Though I agree that it's impossible to analyze XigXag, so it might be safer to lynch him now rather than at LYLO.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On December 17 2013 03:46 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2013 03:42 Blazinghand wrote:On December 17 2013 03:40 Xatalos wrote:On December 17 2013 03:34 Blazinghand wrote:On December 17 2013 03:14 Xatalos wrote: Right.. Don't you think that LSB has posted barely more than XigXag - and what LSB has posted has been way more suspicious? LSB has posted much more than xigxag in the past day, though his activity is also low. I don't see how this is even remotely relevant though, since nothing is more suspicious than what XigXag is doing. You're either xcum and trying to protect your xcumbuddy or you're being blinded by the availability heuristic. The fact that LSB's post seem more suspicious is not relevant given that xigxag has actually not been posting. You can't say his posts are more suspicious than xigxag's have been, you just remember him posting more and therefore he sticks out in your mind. Get your HEAD IN THE GAME. If LSB seems scummy because he's at least making a trivial effort to play the game, THAT MEANS HE CAN BE ANALYZED. That means he is NOT our lynch for today. You're basically arguing that we should lynch LSB because he's a worse lynch. Come on man. COME ON. I'd think that barely posting above the lurker definition, and being scummy in those few posts, is more scummy than not posting at all....... Okay, great idea, let's not lynch xigxag i'm sure that will just work itself out.... oh wait no the opposite of that Do you want LSB at LYLO either? Though I agree that it's impossible to analyze XigXag, so it might be safer to lynch him now rather than at LYLO.
xigxag is obviously the better lynch today, you have not raised any serious objections to: 1) xigxag will never be readable 2) xigxag will not die unless we lynch him 3) #1 and #2 are more true for xigxag than any other player in this game, so we should lynch him today.
|
|
|
|