EPTGrackaroni, what's with your vote on rayn? And where did you go?
II Titanic Mini Mafia - Page 37
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
Grackaroni, what's with your vote on rayn? And where did you go? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
purple, Grackster, Spaghetticus, Cora (when he comes back) -> far more better targets of discussion atm imo. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On December 10 2013 23:55 raynpelikoneet wrote: I suggest you both let each other do your own stuff and discuss other things as at least i think your rant is not going anywhere and other people are not feeling strongly in a way or another regarding your cases on each other. purple, Grackster, Spaghetticus, Cora (when he comes back) -> far more better targets of discussion atm imo. Unfortunately they're all AFK / lurking. I'll need to look through their filters when I get back home though. How would you analyze their play so far? (besides the obvious lackluster LSB-vote with purple) | ||
|
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
Spaghetticus is more interested in defending himself than contributing onto anything that's been going on in the game. He just pops in and gives some irrelevant comments about something. Cora needs to answer Plutarch's case on him. I think i've been pretty clear in what i think about purple. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On December 11 2013 00:04 Spaghetticus wrote: I'm right here. Your scumreads are still XigXag and Corazon? Anything new? | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On December 10 2013 14:05 JarJarDrinks wrote: Very scummy post. You're actually saying that you may sit on your vote regardless of what happens in the thread? Basically giving yourself an built-in excuse to make your vote not matter (and unable to be analyzed) if slam isn't one of the leading wagons? So never got an answer to this Spag. And how come when you finally came back to the thread, you totally ignore slam? Did you find his posts in that time to be usefull? | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On December 11 2013 00:11 raynpelikoneet wrote: Grackaroni has not offered any insight into anything that has happened in this game. He did not comment on my "shitty case" before i asked him to. If he thinks the case in fact was shitty why would he not shoot it down in the first place? Townies should not let shitty cases lie around because it distracts from actual scumhunting. Then he OMGUSes me (for what?) and leaves. Spaghetticus is more interested in defending himself than contributing onto anything that's been going on in the game. He just pops in and gives some irrelevant comments about something. Cora needs to answer Plutarch's case on him. I think i've been pretty clear in what i think about purple. Hm. That seems to mirror my thoughts pretty well. I'll have to reread yet though. What about Kush? I think that, weirdly enough, he's started to move from the policy lynch category into somewhat useful. That list post though... So easy for Mafia to do something like that. So pretty null for now IMO. | ||
|
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
On December 11 2013 00:12 Xatalos wrote: Your scumreads are still XigXag and Corazon? Anything new? Other than thinking slam scum, and Reyn town, not really. A few more slight scum reads but nothing worth mentioning. I'm up to p.26 of my reread. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On December 11 2013 00:18 Xatalos wrote: Hm. That seems to mirror my thoughts pretty well. I'll have to reread yet though. What about Kush? I think that, weirdly enough, he's started to move from the policy lynch category into somewhat useful. That list post though... So easy for Mafia to do something like that. So pretty null for now IMO. What Vayne says about kush is most likely true. While i hate it i can't say he's scum for it. I would love to see something other than "these dudes are town because of activity" - even a piece of kush-logic-scumhunting. If he remains useless vigi's shoot him. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On December 11 2013 00:20 Spaghetticus wrote: Other than thinking slam scum, and Reyn town, not really. A few more slight scum reads but nothing worth mentioning. I'm up to p.26 of my reread. I'd be interested to hear these scumreads. Do catch up with the thread as well, though. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On December 11 2013 00:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: What Vayne says about kush is most likely true. While i hate it i can't say he's scum for it. I would love to see something other than "these dudes are town because of activity" - even a piece of kush-logic-scumhunting. If he remains useless vigi's shoot him. Well, he definitely has improved his posting from the start. I agree though, that his reads are somewhat superficial so far. | ||
|
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
On December 11 2013 00:16 JarJarDrinks wrote: So never got an answer to this Spag. And how come when you finally came back to the thread, you totally ignore slam? Did you find his posts in that time to be usefull? Yes I did, but not by way of explanation. On December 10 2013 22:41 Spaghetticus wrote: Have you any more thoughts on me now? I explicitly stated I was going to ignore slam. He makes me furious. He's stopped spamming, but hasn't really done much. Once he's a contributing member I'll reconsider. My vote is already locked in, it's up to him now to make sure other votes don't fall the same way. So far I don't think he's doing a great job. Why do you think it more scummy that I would policy vote scummy play, than someone effortfully attempting to break the too scummy to be scum barrier? | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On December 10 2013 09:42 sidesprang wrote: And lastly he asked for people to vote for him if they found him scummy, which is very Anti-Town. OK this sentence just reeks of a scum mindset w/ the knowledge that cora is town. Because yes, asking someone to vote for yourself is anti-town when you are actually town. But if you're scum then it's just a kinda dumb, ballsy move. But it isn't anti-town. | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
I've already stated how I think the Corazon lynch is just a huge bandwagon, so I won't vote for him. I'm glad to see someone feels that Purpletrator is being overly defensive On December 10 2013 17:47 raynpelikoneet wrote: EBWOP: Why we should lynch purpletrator: He votes for LSB based on this: First of all the first contribution is never going to achieve anything. What's LSB supposed to answer as town or as scum and how does purple gain something from it? There is no way it's going to do anything. Then he calls the question hypothetical, but still it somehow gives him a reason to vote for LSB. Why? And how does this tell him LSB "does not give shit about the lynch"? This whole interaction makes no sense from the beginning because there is no possible way purple is going to gain any sort of information on LSB by this. Then this happens: This is why he unvotes LSB. Does this look like a reason to unvote? Because "LSB does not read properly in either of the games". This makes him town how? Regardless of LSB's alignment in PYP game this certainly does not make him town because not reading properly is not alignment indicative and doing something in both of these games does not make LSB town here. On top of that, nobody is even allowed to agree/diagree with that "meta-read" because the PYP game is going on. The whole evolution of his LSB-read and interactions with him are completely nonsensical, can't possibly achieve anything and do not even have any sort of logic behind them. Rather than being nonsensical I saw it as being paranoid and believing there was a serious case on him and a need to defend himself. He handled that far too poorly, I chalked it up as bad play at the time, but this paranoia does bother me. ##unvote ##Vote Purpletrator | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
Don't you think this way you effectively refrain from contributing towards any lynch and therefore towards scumhunting? Do you think this is townie? Because to me you are as useless as Slam atm.. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On December 11 2013 00:30 Spaghetticus wrote: The scummy part is what I bolded. Saying that your vote "is not changing at all regardless of anything that comes afterwards." is what's scummy. Why do you think it more scummy that I would policy vote scummy play, than someone effortfully attempting to break the too scummy to be scum barrier? Like, what if nobody else is voting slam close to the deadline? Are you planning on wasting it and leaving it on him? | ||
|
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
On December 11 2013 00:34 raynpelikoneet wrote: Spaghetticus why do you want to waste your vote instead of just agreeing vigi should shoot Slam unless he starts playing the game? Don't you think this way you effectively refrain from contributing towards any lynch and therefore towards scumhunting? Do you think this is townie? Because to me you are as useless as Slam atm.. It's regrettable. How big of an issue is this though? I'm not as useless as slam. You're exaggerating. The fact that I'm pressuring slam makes me more useful than slam. I never said that me parking my vote on Slam would stop me scumhunting. That I haven't turned up any results yet is coincidental. For the record I could easily bandwagon to look more townie, but I'd prefer to think for myself ty. | ||
|
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
On December 11 2013 00:40 JarJarDrinks wrote: The scummy part is what I bolded. Saying that your vote "is not changing at all regardless of anything that comes afterwards." is what's scummy. Like, what if nobody else is voting slam close to the deadline? Are you planning on wasting it and leaving it on him? I don't see the issue. Well... I see it, but I don't see why you see it as such a big deal. It's sort of a minor offense, considering the caliber of misdemeanor hoodie-swaggering around the thread. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
##Unvote Lynching purpletrator seems fine based on his play so far. What I'm most bothered by is his completely aimless and apathetic playstyle. He has pretty much done nothing so far except throwing a vote on LSB, taking it back for some impossible-to-prove reason, and responding to some questions. Is he really trying to find scum? Doesn't look like it. It's time for a Wagon of Justice. ##Vote purpletrator | ||
| ||
