|
On October 29 2013 00:40 Pandain wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2013 00:31 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 29 2013 00:19 Seuss wrote:On October 29 2013 00:09 Oatsmaster wrote:Sorry man Seuss, I have problems explaining myself coherently The Prome and WoS was something I was thinking about. It's alright, it doesn't help that my pace is apparently half that of the thread so I'm constantly playing catch up. I agree with you that Pandain's vote on rayn is bullshit, but what are you going to do if Pandain drops it? How critical is that vote to your read? With how the argument is set up Pandain looks pretty damned either way. If he keeps his vote there he's scum because it's stupid, but if he retracts his vote it was under duress and you can still paint him as scum. I'm curious because outside of Pandain's odd vote and "emotional late at night" excuse I don't read his actions are particularly scummy. It doesnt matter that he drops it now. Its that he didnt drop it when it became very very clear that Rayn was joking. Yet problem is I found other reasons which were good to me and still were until he upped his game. First half Rayn was real poor play overall lol no. Address the case please.
|
Glad to see everyone agrees with my reads for the most part, time to get put this game in the bag day 1.
##Yolo Promethelax
##Refudiate Oatsmaster
##Twerk
So does anyone disagree with my sentinel case at this point? He came back to the thread and just apologized and says he waiting on his power? Gotta pressure this guy.
##Vote: Sentinel
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
I really just wanna see what this power of his is :x
Why you twerk when I say not to twerk yet :<
|
and I don't understand why everyone is in deep distress over clarity_nl's first post, there was no "just desserts" about it, and he gave 2 pretty strong reads, one of which clashes with thread sentiment. I guess you take it as him trying to disrupt the town circle, but it was a weak attempt if that. He can join my null circle.
|
On October 29 2013 01:08 marvellosity wrote: I really just wanna see what this power of his is :x
Why you twerk when I say not to twerk yet :<
You said that a day ago, and I really wanted to get this stuff out of the way so we can just play the game. (not bitter or anything)
|
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 29 2013 01:10 HotCottonCandy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2013 01:08 marvellosity wrote: I really just wanna see what this power of his is :x
Why you twerk when I say not to twerk yet :< You said that a day ago, and I really wanted to get this stuff out of the way so we can just play the game. (not bitter or anything) It was like 16 hours ago, and we're not even halfway through Day 1 yet. I also said I had reasons for wanting to delay it, based on my developing reads. The fact you ignored this makes me pretty sad, when I think you've been generally attentive to other stuff so far.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 29 2013 01:09 HotCottonCandy wrote: and I don't understand why everyone is in deep distress over clarity_nl's first post, there was no "just desserts" about it, and he gave 2 pretty strong reads, one of which clashes with thread sentiment. I guess you take it as him trying to disrupt the town circle, but it was a weak attempt if that. He can join my null circle. I've seen countless mafia who introduce themselves to the thread with a terrible case. I think even Clarity himself has done it.
I mainly take umbrage because I think Clarity knows better, and Oats actually looks *better* than he usually does in game. I'm finding it hard to believe that Clarity believes in this case at all.
|
On October 29 2013 01:14 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2013 01:10 HotCottonCandy wrote:On October 29 2013 01:08 marvellosity wrote: I really just wanna see what this power of his is :x
Why you twerk when I say not to twerk yet :< You said that a day ago, and I really wanted to get this stuff out of the way so we can just play the game. (not bitter or anything) It was like 16 hours ago, and we're not even halfway through Day 1 yet. I also said I had reasons for wanting to delay it, based on my developing reads. The fact you ignored this makes me pretty sad, when I think you've been generally attentive to other stuff so far.
That's fine, I let a minor annoyance affect my play and it will cost me. Moving on and I assume we will be pals again later.
I guess what I'm getting at here with the clarity thing is: Look at how StrongandBig re-entered the thread and compare it to how clarity_nl entered the thread, it is essentially almost identical but people are praising strongandbig and shunning clarity. Seems like a case of double standards here that I would like to pursue.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 29 2013 01:21 HotCottonCandy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2013 01:14 marvellosity wrote:On October 29 2013 01:10 HotCottonCandy wrote:On October 29 2013 01:08 marvellosity wrote: I really just wanna see what this power of his is :x
Why you twerk when I say not to twerk yet :< You said that a day ago, and I really wanted to get this stuff out of the way so we can just play the game. (not bitter or anything) It was like 16 hours ago, and we're not even halfway through Day 1 yet. I also said I had reasons for wanting to delay it, based on my developing reads. The fact you ignored this makes me pretty sad, when I think you've been generally attentive to other stuff so far. That's fine, I let a minor annoyance affect my play and it will cost me. Moving on and I assume we will be pals again later. I guess what I'm getting at here with the clarity thing is: Look at how StrongandBig re-entered the thread and compare it to how clarity_nl entered the thread, it is essentially almost identical but people are praising strongandbig and shunning clarity. Seems like a case of double standards here that I would like to pursue. It's simple from my perspective - I don't think Clarity should be believing what he wrote as town, whereas I have no such issue with s&b.
|
On October 29 2013 01:22 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2013 01:21 HotCottonCandy wrote:On October 29 2013 01:14 marvellosity wrote:On October 29 2013 01:10 HotCottonCandy wrote:On October 29 2013 01:08 marvellosity wrote: I really just wanna see what this power of his is :x
Why you twerk when I say not to twerk yet :< You said that a day ago, and I really wanted to get this stuff out of the way so we can just play the game. (not bitter or anything) It was like 16 hours ago, and we're not even halfway through Day 1 yet. I also said I had reasons for wanting to delay it, based on my developing reads. The fact you ignored this makes me pretty sad, when I think you've been generally attentive to other stuff so far. That's fine, I let a minor annoyance affect my play and it will cost me. Moving on and I assume we will be pals again later. I guess what I'm getting at here with the clarity thing is: Look at how StrongandBig re-entered the thread and compare it to how clarity_nl entered the thread, it is essentially almost identical but people are praising strongandbig and shunning clarity. Seems like a case of double standards here that I would like to pursue. It's simple from my perspective - I don't think Clarity should be believing what he wrote as town, whereas I have no such issue with s&b.
So it is based on their metas then correct? I would like to hear from other people why snb = town clarity = bad all the same.
Any questions for me before I go get lunch?
|
Hmm. Only 13 players in this game. I am going to go with 9 town + 1 3p with his own wincon or town wincon with a twist + 3 scummers.
I got to say I have a hard time pointing out 3 scummers. D:
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 29 2013 01:27 HotCottonCandy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2013 01:22 marvellosity wrote:On October 29 2013 01:21 HotCottonCandy wrote:On October 29 2013 01:14 marvellosity wrote:On October 29 2013 01:10 HotCottonCandy wrote:On October 29 2013 01:08 marvellosity wrote: I really just wanna see what this power of his is :x
Why you twerk when I say not to twerk yet :< You said that a day ago, and I really wanted to get this stuff out of the way so we can just play the game. (not bitter or anything) It was like 16 hours ago, and we're not even halfway through Day 1 yet. I also said I had reasons for wanting to delay it, based on my developing reads. The fact you ignored this makes me pretty sad, when I think you've been generally attentive to other stuff so far. That's fine, I let a minor annoyance affect my play and it will cost me. Moving on and I assume we will be pals again later. I guess what I'm getting at here with the clarity thing is: Look at how StrongandBig re-entered the thread and compare it to how clarity_nl entered the thread, it is essentially almost identical but people are praising strongandbig and shunning clarity. Seems like a case of double standards here that I would like to pursue. It's simple from my perspective - I don't think Clarity should be believing what he wrote as town, whereas I have no such issue with s&b. So it is based on their metas then correct? I would like to hear from other people why snb = town clarity = bad all the same. Any questions for me before I go get lunch? It's to do with the fact that Clarity literally just got out of a game with townOats, where most of the things he pointed out (such as "this marv townread is baseless") he did in that game too. Oats actually looks quite a bit better than he did in that game (World Heavyweight Championship mafia if you want to look) so this case feels like a massive stretch. I actually have zero idea how he can come into this game making that case having played in the game I just mentioned.
I don't know if s&b is town, I just know he hasn't done something egregious.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
I've talked myself into this vote. I can't reconcile that play right now with town.
##Vote: Clarity_nl
|
alright I will take a look at that game when I get back. Maybe that's the missing piece I am searching for.
For now, toodles cuties
|
Pandain keeps popping in and out. Whats up with that?
|
On October 29 2013 01:38 HotCottonCandy wrote: alright I will take a look at that game when I get back. Maybe that's the missing piece I am searching for.
For now, toodles cuties Dandel Ion?
|
Koshi, who do you think is scum?
|
On October 29 2013 01:41 Oatsmaster wrote: Koshi, who do you think is scum? No idea. YET.
|
Find out Koshi. Come on. About 25+ pages of posts, and you dont have a single scumread?
|
|
|
|