|
On October 05 2013 01:21 Risen wrote:
I said I would read over everything and I am, I am not upset about my case being ignored. I am upset about Oats coming in and dropping something like that then leaving, how is this fucking hard to understand. How are both of you being so obtuse
But you think marv is scum. So oats is town. So why do you care?
|
Like, that's totally scummy, but I'm finding it hard not to find Clarity and marv not scummy because they're not seeing that. How do you now see this?
|
On October 05 2013 01:25 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2013 01:21 Risen wrote:
I said I would read over everything and I am, I am not upset about my case being ignored. I am upset about Oats coming in and dropping something like that then leaving, how is this fucking hard to understand. How are both of you being so obtuse But you think marv is scum. So oats is town. So why do you care?
No one is confirmed until they flip. You know this, why tare you asking me this?
|
I need John Mayer in my life right now.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 05 2013 01:25 Risen wrote:
Like, that's totally scummy, but I'm finding it hard not to find Clarity and marv not scummy because they're not seeing that. How do you now see this?
the fact you tihnk this is an error in your own thinking, not other people's.
as is the case 95% of the time when one person believes something from everyone else in mafia.
|
Then what is it oh masterful marv, what is it when someone comes in and admits to the world they haven't been reading the thread?
|
Ok. I've come to the conclusion.
Do we agree with a slOosh - marv - dirk lynch order? I'm ok with that if I can guarantee the 1 for 1 with marv, which will be the trickest part.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
it's whatever, because he's very unlikely to be mafia, he's just being Oats.
like literally you making your case on me and not addressing the case that's already in the thread is significantly worse.
you just don't see it that way because it's YOU doing YOUR thing. Works both ways and every which way.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 05 2013 01:32 slOosh wrote:
Ok. I've come to the conclusion.
Do we agree with a slOosh - marv - dirk lynch order? I'm ok with that if I can guarantee the 1 for 1 with marv, which will be the trickest part.
how is it tricky? i've guaranteed it personally.
|
From my standpoint, its a lot easier. Eliminate the people who voted rayn, and so I get a pool of marv, Oats, dirk.
Rayn built his main case on dirk and dirk pointed out rayn pretty early in the game (~pg 20).
Oats is gut feels, and my town read on him remarkably stronger than my read on marv.
|
This game is dumb. Like just imagine a world where both sloosh and marv are town and they're saying they both want to be lynched. That's basically what's happening right now.
"lynch us" they say.
|
I apologize if I'm acting stupid, this is the first time I've had a non-activity case built against me as town, and so in my mind I've dismissed it as incorrect / misled. I'll give it an honest go with upcoming post.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 05 2013 01:34 slOosh wrote:
From my standpoint, its a lot easier. Eliminate the people who voted rayn, and so I get a pool of marv, Oats, dirk.
Rayn built his main case on dirk and dirk pointed out rayn pretty early in the game (~pg 20).
Oats is gut feels, and my town read on him remarkably stronger than my read on marv.
you only have to find one mafia, don't eliminate ANYONE.
Find that one mafia and push the case. it's really easy.
|
On October 05 2013 01:36 slOosh wrote:
I apologize if I'm acting stupid, this is the first time I've had a non-activity case built against me as town, and so in my mind I've dismissed it as incorrect / misled. I'll give it an honest go with upcoming post.
Nothing about the case on your is based on non-activity. It's based partially on you doing nothing though.
There's a difference.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
that's not what he said clarity.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Literally slOosh, given there's only one to find, I don't know why you'd arbitrarily eliminate anyone. that's silly.
|
On October 05 2013 01:38 marvellosity wrote:
that's not what he said clarity.
" this is the first time I've had a non-activity case built against me as town, and so in my mind I've dismissed it as incorrect / misled."
What am I misunderstanding?
Also why has sloosh dismissed the case on him as incorrect on anything other than the fact that in his eyes he's town? :D
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 05 2013 01:43 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2013 01:38 marvellosity wrote:
that's not what he said clarity. " this is the first time I've had a non-activity case built against me as town, and so in my mind I've dismissed it as incorrect / misled." What am I misunderstanding? Also why has sloosh dismissed the case on him as incorrect on anything other than the fact that in his eyes he's town? :D
it means that normally the cases on him are based on non-activity
this is the first time there's a proper case based on other things
|
On October 05 2013 01:44 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2013 01:43 Clarity_nl wrote:On October 05 2013 01:38 marvellosity wrote:
that's not what he said clarity. " this is the first time I've had a non-activity case built against me as town, and so in my mind I've dismissed it as incorrect / misled." What am I misunderstanding? Also why has sloosh dismissed the case on him as incorrect on anything other than the fact that in his eyes he's town? :D it means that normally the cases on him are based on non-activity this is the first time there's a proper case based on other things
Oh.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
i think it's a weird english negative sorta thing. and you're not native. our laziness probably :p
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
