|
On August 17 2013 18:50 LoneMeow wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 18:41 iVLosK! wrote:On August 17 2013 18:17 reps)squishy wrote:On August 17 2013 16:12 LoneMeow wrote:
I really need reps)squishy and Squibbles to start participating more and that has to happen right now, otherwise I might have to start driving for lynching one of you. Post your top 2 scum reads with some reasoning, thanks. My Suspicious list. 1. justanothertownie He seems to be posting enough to stay under the radar. Posts like this " I'm around." make the suspicion flair. 2. Squibbles Makes the IRL excuse. Then says he reads the messages all day long but does not post. People I am not suspicious of. DeusX super agressive as a townie last game XLV and is playing somewhat the same. And in your opinion, is Deus playing to this meta he's established? My burning question is, why aren't you playing like you did in XLII? I remember you being far more aggressive and attacking people, now you seem to be content to just drop remarks from the sidelines...
Go reread XLII. You're holding me to a D1 meta in a game that lasted several days.
I think deadline is in a few hours, no? Lets see some votes get thrown out and see where people really stand.
|
On August 17 2013 16:12 LoneMeow wrote:
I really need reps)squishy and Squibbles to start participating more and that has to happen right now, otherwise I might have to start driving for lynching one of you. Post your top 2 scum reads with some reasoning, thanks.
On August 17 2013 18:37 LoneMeow wrote:
Ok, that's better. Careful with meta in newbie games though.
Now, Squibbles needs to start posting. Or I'll have him hung.
##Vote: Squibbles
I have a question, sir. Why are you pushing these 2 while completely ignoring Xzavier who didn't post anything at all?
|
On August 17 2013 22:32 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 16:12 LoneMeow wrote:
I really need reps)squishy and Squibbles to start participating more and that has to happen right now, otherwise I might have to start driving for lynching one of you. Post your top 2 scum reads with some reasoning, thanks. Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 18:37 LoneMeow wrote:
Ok, that's better. Careful with meta in newbie games though.
Now, Squibbles needs to start posting. Or I'll have him hung.
##Vote: Squibbles I have a question, sir. Why are you pushing these 2 while completely ignoring Xzavier who didn't post anything at all?
Because it's utterly useless to pressure someone who isn't participating in the game and will be modkilled/replaced? Now if he does a last minute post/vote he can be sure I shall dump my righteous fury on him, but until then I'd rather concentrate on those who I can actually pressure into talking.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, Squibbles should speak up then.
##Vote: Squibbles
|
I'd like to get more reads from almost everyone, please.
My current top scum suspects, in no particular order:
Squibbles - is participating in the game, but hasn't really produced any content nor reads
iVLosK! - it seems to me that his play is different from last time, but that's weak so I'm prepared to watch him for now
reps)squishy - although he finally gave some reads that only happened after being pressured so I'm still suspicious
Had a relatively strong town read on Holyflare, but his useless (and very non-committal) vote on Xzavier makes me a little worried I might be misreading.
|
Ok, did you play with reps before? Did he play like that in the past?
I mean his posts are horrible but I don't think they are alignment indicative. He should definitely post some more though.
You are right about Squibbles. No reads as of yet.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 17 2013 23:20 LoneMeow wrote:
I'd like to get more reads from almost everyone, please.
My current top scum suspects, in no particular order:
Squibbles - is participating in the game, but hasn't really produced any content nor reads
iVLosK! - it seems to me that his play is different from last time, but that's weak so I'm prepared to watch him for now
reps)squishy - although he finally gave some reads that only happened after being pressured so I'm still suspicious
Had a relatively strong town read on Holyflare, but his useless (and very non-committal) vote on Xzavier makes me a little worried I might be misreading.
If he posts at 6.59 he will not be modkilled, hence the placeholder vote, it can be moved anytime I feel like it onto someone more suspicious. It is also madatory to vote for someone otherwise you will also probably be warned/modkilled, if I was to suddenly become inundated with things to do later at least my vote would be on a worthy person. It is more suspicious that people have not voted at all with only 3 hours left to go. This is also a plurality lynch meaning that the person with the most votes, not majority will be voted off. Do you really want to vote off the guy that has at least said something rather than the person that has said nothing?
|
On August 17 2013 23:48 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 23:20 LoneMeow wrote:
I'd like to get more reads from almost everyone, please.
My current top scum suspects, in no particular order:
Squibbles - is participating in the game, but hasn't really produced any content nor reads
iVLosK! - it seems to me that his play is different from last time, but that's weak so I'm prepared to watch him for now
reps)squishy - although he finally gave some reads that only happened after being pressured so I'm still suspicious
Had a relatively strong town read on Holyflare, but his useless (and very non-committal) vote on Xzavier makes me a little worried I might be misreading. If he posts at 6.59 he will not be modkilled, hence the placeholder vote, it can be moved anytime I feel like it onto someone more suspicious. It is also madatory to vote for someone otherwise you will also probably be warned/modkilled, if I was to suddenly become inundated with things to do later at least my vote would be on a worthy person. It is more suspicious that people have not voted at all with only 3 hours left to go. This is also a plurality lynch meaning that the person with the most votes, not majority will be voted off. Do you really want to vote off the guy that has at least said something rather than the person that has said nothing?
A last second vote from Xzavier would be tantamount to admitting he is scum. If he does, we just lynch him D2. I would much prefer to allow him to be modkilled and we can see what his replacement has to say.
I much prefer reps or sqibbles for the lynch and will vote squibbles because multiple players have stated that reps is always like this.
##Vote: Squibbles
|
On August 17 2013 23:39 justanothertownie wrote:
Ok, did you play with reps before? Did he play like that in the past?
I mean his posts are horrible but I don't think they are alignment indicative. He should definitely post some more though.
You are right about Squibbles. No reads as of yet.
I obsed reps' last game before this and yes, there are similarities. He was town in that one and mislynched D1 for playing pretty much like this. That's why I'm cutting him some slack, he's such obvious lynchbait. However, that kind of meta makes it very easy to hide as scum, so I will keep him on my list of people to watch closely for now.
In other news: It's very worrying that we're only a few hours from lynch and there are no real wagons, or even scum reads from most of the players. If you fit either of the descriptions above, please do something about fixing that.
|
Vote Count:
Squibbles (3): LoneMeow, Justanothertownie, iVLosK!
Xzavier (1): Holyflare
iVLosK! (0): Alakaslam
Not Voting (5): Alakaslam, reps)squishy, Squibbles, DeusXmachina, Xzavier
Voting is mandatory. Deadline is in 3 hours.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
+ Show Spoiler +On August 17 2013 08:04 iVLosK! wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 08:00 justanothertownie wrote:
Hm? I meant the posts he listed.
Relying on modkills for lurkers is really scummy btw. Good thing you say you would vote them if they keep lurking Holyflare. D' Oh. Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 07:51 Holyflare wrote:
All his posts are pretty much non contributory. I genuinely think reps is afk if he hasn't posted yet, no idea about xzavier but it frustrates me, if they don't talk at all it's a double modkill and therefore we should focus on the people who are talking. I swear to god if another bs lurker happens like last game with a post a day I'm voting them off straight anyway
I think this is the post JAT is referencing above. I noticed it too.
Wasn't this the post where you said you were using it to build a 'case'? You agreed with JAT that relying on modkills would be bad so why have you gone 180 on squibbles when you originally liked his first post? (here: + Show Spoiler +On August 17 2013 01:20 iVLosK! wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2013 03:15 iVLosK! wrote:
Has this game started?
Shall I begin the rape? No, past iVlosK!. Not yet. But soon... very soon. Show nested quote +On August 16 2013 12:03 Squibbles wrote:
Right? Odd. Backtrackin a bit for Policy, even if you wanted to lynch lurkers, liars, and those who post pointless stuff, should there be a level at which the lynch begins. For example yalls version of Lurking could be completely different from each other, where one might thinking lurking is more than 12 hours another might think a day.... We should establish some context, As far as lying, in any sense what if they are lying because they are unsure about you? Wouldnt that make you both the suspects vs just the person that lied, i think depending on the question there should be a level limit there, and those who post pointless stuff, well if you're dodging a question, you're dodging a question, enough said. This is Squibbles only game post but I like the content on multiple points. I spare thee, and await further posts.
+ Show Spoiler +On August 17 2013 23:55 iVLosK! wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 23:48 Holyflare wrote:On August 17 2013 23:20 LoneMeow wrote:
I'd like to get more reads from almost everyone, please.
My current top scum suspects, in no particular order:
Squibbles - is participating in the game, but hasn't really produced any content nor reads
iVLosK! - it seems to me that his play is different from last time, but that's weak so I'm prepared to watch him for now
reps)squishy - although he finally gave some reads that only happened after being pressured so I'm still suspicious
Had a relatively strong town read on Holyflare, but his useless (and very non-committal) vote on Xzavier makes me a little worried I might be misreading. If he posts at 6.59 he will not be modkilled, hence the placeholder vote, it can be moved anytime I feel like it onto someone more suspicious. It is also madatory to vote for someone otherwise you will also probably be warned/modkilled, if I was to suddenly become inundated with things to do later at least my vote would be on a worthy person. It is more suspicious that people have not voted at all with only 3 hours left to go. This is also a plurality lynch meaning that the person with the most votes, not majority will be voted off. Do you really want to vote off the guy that has at least said something rather than the person that has said nothing? A last second vote from Xzavier would be tantamount to admitting he is scum. If he does, we just lynch him D2. I would much prefer to allow him to be modkilled and we can see what his replacement has to say. I much prefer reps or sqibbles for the lynch and will vote squibbles because multiple players have stated that reps is always like this. ##Vote: Squibbles
You do NOT want to accidently vote off a town member if they have contributed, even 1 or 2 posts, compared to somebody who has done none for now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I honestly do not understand how people can think you are acting town when you flip flop all over the place on almost every post you make:
+ Show Spoiler +On August 17 2013 01:27 iVLosK! wrote:
Anyway, if Xzavier and reps haven't done anything meaningful by the time the Chiefs game ends tonight, I will lower the boom on whichever I deem most worthy.
Nothing has been noted in your posts since then that implies you'd even think about modkills or squibbles voting, you just seem to be bandwagoning with no valid reason for the easy lynch.
|
|
|
Good morning everyone. I agree with Holyflare's stance first of all
##Vote: Xzavier
As a placeholder.
However the squibbles voting is intriguing. It is a policy lynch based on what may be IRL circumstances. Is there actually something wrong with his posting, other than the lack of it?
If not, may want to reconsider...
... As according to his own deadlines, he will likely be modkilled. It is 9:15 on the west coast.
Any better reasons though? As the same goes for Xzavier... So if squib is preferable guess what
|
Indeed, iVLosK! Looks bad after reading up on HolyFlare, but are there enough reasons to voteswitch? Shall he defense hisself?
|
On August 17 2013 14:15 DeusXmachina wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 14:10 Alakaslam wrote:
Well actually I should do as deus is doing. Sleeping?
Haha yes
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 18 2013 01:22 Alakaslam wrote:
Indeed, iVLosK! Looks bad after reading up on HolyFlare, but are there enough reasons to voteswitch? Shall he defense hisself?
I would rather get rid of the guy that says nothing than the person who can defend himself and (hopefully) contribute.
|
I said I spared him on condition of more posts from him and he's posted like once since then. Not exactly a 180 by any stretch of the imagination.
|
On August 18 2013 01:17 Alakaslam wrote:
Good morning everyone. I agree with Holyflare's stance first of all
##Vote: Xzavier
As a placeholder.
However the squibbles voting is intriguing. It is a policy lynch based on what may be IRL circumstances. Is there actually something wrong with his posting, other than the lack of it?
If not, may want to reconsider...
... As according to his own deadlines, he will likely be modkilled. It is 9:15 on the west coast.
Any better reasons though? As the same goes for Xzavier... So if squib is preferable guess what
I'm definetly willing to switch if Squibbles posts something useful or a better target appears. It mostly is his lack of posting but the 2 posts he made also added nothing to the thread.
Yeah, I guess iVlosk should explain himself - doesn't look to good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
