Titanic Mini Mafia! - Page 148
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
| ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
On August 02 2013 00:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: Except that he has done nothing that counts towards him being town after the first 24h of D1. How do you know what FT´s scumplay looks like? I dont recall that FT has rolled scum yet, I cant tell you what FT's scumplay looks like. He voted Malongo man, thats totally townie | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
On August 02 2013 00:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: Why don´t you point out the things FT has done that only town can do? I have already debunked your "townslip" argument pretty effectively. Now explain the actions that make FT town. The townslip is the thing that makes him town. | ||
justanothertownie
16316 Posts
On August 02 2013 00:23 Oatsmaster wrote: I dont recall that FT has rolled scum yet, I cant tell you what FT's scumplay looks like. He voted Malongo man, thats totally townie That's the easiest bus ever. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
On August 02 2013 00:24 Oatsmaster wrote: The townslip is the thing that makes him town. + Show Spoiler + On June 23 2013 03:05 raynpelikoneet wrote: lolol, did OO just claim scum? On June 23 2013 03:05 raynpelikoneet wrote: ##Unvote: Vote: ObviousOne On June 23 2013 03:08 raynpelikoneet wrote: that's like a 100% scumclaim in my eyes. On June 23 2013 03:13 raynpelikoneet wrote: Ehh.. Sloosh viewed you as scum as you asked some random person (Goag) about Oats. You are perfectly fine with that because you think it's true as you said to me. I hereby show you that scum are able to fake finding scumslips. You argue against that with "you are able to, but FT is not". You have never seen FT play scum. Do you see where your argument falls apart? Now, try some other posts of his. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
You didnt even quote the OO 'scumclaim'. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
On August 02 2013 00:29 Oatsmaster wrote: I dont see how my argument falls apart unless you quote a post made by a scumplayer about finding a scumslip in someones filter through 1 specific post that clearly isnt a scumslip if read properly. You didnt even quote the OO 'scumclaim'. You are fucking ridiculous. You don´t have to do anything, everyone needs to hand everything for you on a silver plate and waste time explaining you the most obvious stuff ever. You are not interested in finding mafia, you are not interested in playing this game. You are scum. Go look at Sloosh/OO filter from the game you played and probably very well remember the incident, because you have commented on it in that game! I encourage everyone else do so. Sloosh calls OO scum and talks about other stuff. OO calls Sloosh´s post "right and good", therefore he is basically calling himself scum. Funny thing is i was actually scum with OO in that game and knew people are not going to buy that scumslip theory and are going to argue against it. It´s not fucking hard to fake finding a scumslip as mafia, no matter how good or bad you are. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
On August 02 2013 00:35 raynpelikoneet wrote: You are fucking ridiculous. You don´t have to do anything, everyone needs to hand everything for you on a silver plate and waste time explaining you the most obvious stuff ever. You are not interested in finding mafia, you are not interested in playing this game. You are scum. Go look at Sloosh/OO filter from the game you played and probably very well remember the incident, because you have commented on it in that game! I encourage everyone else do so. Sloosh calls OO scum and talks about other stuff. OO calls Sloosh´s post "right and good", therefore he is basically calling himself scum. Funny thing is i was actually scum with OO in that game and knew people are not going to buy that scumslip theory and are going to argue against it. It´s not fucking hard to fake finding a scumslip as mafia, no matter how good or bad you are. No I dont have to do anything ever when you cant prove someone is scum. Wait so OO was scum? dude. like no contest man, FT's townslip about finding a scumslip was WAY FUCKING DIFFERENT. HOW MANY FUCKING TIMES DO I HAVE TO SAY THAT BEFORE YOU LISTEN? HOW MANY FUCKING TIMES HUH? rayn, so you played roughly 7-10 games with me, is this similar to, these 3 games? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=406168&user=Oatsmaster http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=407704&user=Oatsmaster http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=418049&user=Oatsmaster Or these 3 games? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=418641&user=iGrok&user=Oatsmaster http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=417453&user=Oatsmaster http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=420356&user=Oatsmaster | ||
IMCaptainJackSparrow
Bahamas303 Posts
On August 01 2013 22:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: Seriously, Oats, you can´t deduce from reading the thread why i voted for Malongo, nor you can deduce why i was angry? You are either so fucking terrible at this game or scum. i´d say 99% scum. I think you should stop giving out percentages on your reads... On August 01 2013 07:02 raynpelikoneet wrote: vayne, fuck you. seriously. vote for FT now, i am a cop who has a green check on you from N1, you need to fucking vote for FT so we can stop this bullshit, Malongo is 99% town. You are going to lose the game for us with your stubborness. If you are town Rayn, you need to face the music and realize that you were simply wrong. The fact that you are just bashing Oats and calling him scum even thought it has NOTHING to do with the vote or what happened or anything is super scummy. Are you trying to figure out who is scum and who is town, or are you just trying to shove your reads down everyone's throat. Every other post of yours looks like: SCUMTEAM IS CORA/FT/OATS/NOT MALONGO SO WE NEED TO LYNCH ALL OF THESE PEOPLE AND YOU NEED TO LISTEN TO ME BECAUSE I AM YELLING PLEASE You're playing super defensive. How come? | ||
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
On August 02 2013 00:58 exarezee wrote: I'm awake. Catching up. We need to start looking at groups of team that involve malongo now. so like everyone in the game then. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
On August 02 2013 00:42 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote: I think you should stop giving out percentages on your reads... If you are town Rayn, you need to face the music and realize that you were simply wrong. The fact that you are just bashing Oats and calling him scum even thought it has NOTHING to do with the vote or what happened or anything is super scummy. Are you trying to figure out who is scum and who is town, or are you just trying to shove your reads down everyone's throat. Every other post of yours looks like: You're playing super defensive. How come? Yet again Corazon amazes us with a post that has none scumhunting in it, only discrediting for bad reasons. For the record i am not defensive, i am aggressive and have been throughout the game. You have clearly no intention to find mafia this game, therefore you are scum. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
/sarcasm, see what i did there? I have to be confirmed town for you now. | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
You voted for your town reads. Twice. Do you understand how scummy that looks Rayn? It's ridiculous. You're trying to drive an FT lynch home so much that you basically hard-defended Malongo. Then you just 180 on your Malongo read and vote for him. What gives? You were so resistant to vote out scum, and that looks super suspicious. I have all the intention to find mafia this game. In fact, I already did. At least I'm smart enough to not vote for people I think are 95% town and 99% town, respectively. | ||
IMCaptainJackSparrow
Bahamas303 Posts
On August 02 2013 01:31 cDgCorazon wrote: Admit it Rayn, you are wrong. You've been using shitty heuristics all game (confirmation bias, association cases before flips, refusing to look at anyone's arguments). What do you expect to happen when you are wrong? You voted for your town reads. Twice. Do you understand how scummy that looks Rayn? It's ridiculous. You're trying to drive an FT lynch home so much that you basically hard-defended Malongo. Then you just 180 on your Malongo read and vote for him. What gives? You were so resistant to vote out scum, and that looks super suspicious. I have all the intention to find mafia this game. In fact, I already did. At least I'm smart enough to not vote for people I think are 95% town and 99% town, respectively. Filter | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
On August 02 2013 00:40 Oatsmaster wrote: No I dont have to do anything ever when you cant prove someone is scum. Wait so OO was scum? dude. like no contest man, FT's townslip about finding a scumslip was WAY FUCKING DIFFERENT. HOW MANY FUCKING TIMES DO I HAVE TO SAY THAT BEFORE YOU LISTEN? HOW MANY FUCKING TIMES HUH? How is it different? How? How did you know at that time they were not both scum? How do you know it now? How can you explain this, and what difference does it make if you are accusing your scumbuddy or a townie? rayn, so you played roughly 7-10 games with me, is this similar to, these 3 games? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=406168&user=Oatsmaster http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=407704&user=Oatsmaster http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=418049&user=Oatsmaster Or these 3 games? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=418641&user=iGrok&user=Oatsmaster http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=417453&user=Oatsmaster http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=420356&user=Oatsmaster - Ego: Everyone is a townread, let´s live happily ever after! <3 Same as here early on. - Dr Who: I dodn´t play in that game so i´m not even looking at it. - NWM: You are also far more cheery when you are town. In NWM you were accusing people throughout the game but you didn´t really want anyone lynched, ever. Your play is really similar here. - Basterd: First post is a vote on me, solid town!Oats. You are actually reasoning your reads and trying to lynch people. - Catch 22: Fourth post is a vote. You have strong opinions on every person you comment on. Definitely town. - Bluelightz game: You again want to lynch people throughout early D1. Strong opinions. Funny note: "Why are we even talking about lurkers when there is only like 7 pages???" Compare this attitude to this game, where you talk about lurker lynches for the first 24 hours. How much more i have to say? | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
On August 02 2013 01:31 cDgCorazon wrote: Admit it Rayn, you are wrong. You've been using shitty heuristics all game (confirmation bias, (1)association cases before flips, refusing to look at anyone's arguments). What do you expect to happen when you are wrong? (2)You voted for your town reads. Twice. Do you understand how scummy that looks Rayn? It's ridiculous. You're trying to drive an FT lynch home so much that you basically hard-defended Malongo. Then you just 180 on your Malongo read and vote for him. What gives? You were so resistant to vote out scum, and that looks super suspicious. (3)I have all the intention to find mafia this game. In fact, I already did. At least I'm smart enough to not vote for people I think are 95% town and 99% town, respectively. (1): Point me out to one single association case i have made. (2): I have fully explained why i did vote for Paper when i did. You believing/not believing me is another thing. You also did nothing to accomplish a mafia lynch on D1. (3): Show me where you have found mafia? Definitely not on D1. Definitely not on D2? If you are talking about me, definitely not on N2. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
| ||
| ||