On August 01 2013 22:24 justanothertownie wrote:
Does it kill you to read shit?
Does it kill you to read shit?
you quote it, I will read it man.
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
August 01 2013 13:24 GMT
#2861
On August 01 2013 22:24 justanothertownie wrote: Does it kill you to read shit? you quote it, I will read it man. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
August 01 2013 13:26 GMT
#2862
On August 01 2013 22:17 hzflank wrote: Rayn if you are scum you must be pissed off about Exar's claim. I just want to warn you just in case we do have a doctor: you will be even more pissed off if someone doc's Exar :p XRZ is a complete idiot if he checks me. And we do not have a doc. They would have docced Vivax on N1. | ||
justanothertownie
16316 Posts
August 01 2013 13:29 GMT
#2863
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
August 01 2013 13:35 GMT
#2864
| ||
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
August 01 2013 13:35 GMT
#2865
On August 01 2013 00:34 hzflank wrote: So what happens if: VT-Vayne claims cop with a guilty check on Malongo. Vig says: "Should I shoot Mal or Vaybe?" Real-Cop says: Well I am real cop so you should shoot Vayne Vig shoots VT-Vayne N2 Scum NK real cop N3 scum NK confirmed town expired Vig That's a really really bad fake-cop claim to make as a VT. See, I thought that Vayne made the claim because he was the real cop who checked me and got green. As real cop Vayne did not have to worry about a counter-claim. But you would think that a real cop would check the setup for a Framer before picking his N1 target. What's the chance of the real cop not checking for Miller when he checks for Framer? Do you really think that Vayne would of done that as VT? I can see Vayne doing it as cop or doctor, but not as VT. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
August 01 2013 13:38 GMT
#2866
On August 01 2013 22:35 raynpelikoneet wrote: I don´t have to quote anything. It´s Oats´job to read the thread and not mine to tell the same things multiple times. dick. | ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 01 2013 13:38 GMT
#2867
On August 01 2013 22:24 Oatsmaster wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 22:09 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 01 2013 21:58 Oatsmaster wrote: On August 01 2013 21:54 raynpelikoneet wrote: Oats is clearly not caring about the game at all. He has not read the thread which has been clear from D1 end. He is scum because town Oats cares about the game. Or because town/scum oats doesnt want to read 10 fucking pages of 1 liners close enough to obtain your proper intentions. Yeah why would town oats want to read the 10 pages leading up to the lynch. Because they're one-liners? oh... okay do you not read the part where it says 'close enough'? Not close enough to realize xrz had a red check on malongo? On August 01 2013 21:48 Oatsmaster wrote: So Rayn, why did you switch off FT onto Malongo? After not talking about Malongo AT ALL? Burn in hell scum | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
August 01 2013 13:40 GMT
#2868
On August 01 2013 22:38 Clarity_nl wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 22:24 Oatsmaster wrote: On August 01 2013 22:09 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 01 2013 21:58 Oatsmaster wrote: On August 01 2013 21:54 raynpelikoneet wrote: Oats is clearly not caring about the game at all. He has not read the thread which has been clear from D1 end. He is scum because town Oats cares about the game. Or because town/scum oats doesnt want to read 10 fucking pages of 1 liners close enough to obtain your proper intentions. Yeah why would town oats want to read the 10 pages leading up to the lynch. Because they're one-liners? oh... okay do you not read the part where it says 'close enough'? Not close enough to realize xrz had a red check on malongo? Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 21:48 Oatsmaster wrote: So Rayn, why did you switch off FT onto Malongo? After not talking about Malongo AT ALL? Burn in hell scum I realized that. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
August 01 2013 13:43 GMT
#2869
On August 01 2013 22:35 hzflank wrote: Rayn, what do you think of this Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 00:34 hzflank wrote: So what happens if: VT-Vayne claims cop with a guilty check on Malongo. Vig says: "Should I shoot Mal or Vaybe?" Real-Cop says: Well I am real cop so you should shoot Vayne Vig shoots VT-Vayne N2 Scum NK real cop N3 scum NK confirmed town expired Vig That's a really really bad fake-cop claim to make as a VT. See, I thought that Vayne made the claim because he was the real cop who checked me and got green. As real cop Vayne did not have to worry about a counter-claim. But you would think that a real cop would check the setup for a Framer before picking his N1 target. What's the chance of the real cop not checking for Miller when he checks for Framer? Do you really think that Vayne would of done that as VT? I can see Vayne doing it as cop or doctor, but not as VT. I think that any competent cop should have not CC´d vayne unless they had a red check on him. There is also no scum motivation for vayne to claim a red check on his scumbuddy. Your theory does not hold water. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
August 01 2013 13:45 GMT
#2870
| ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 01 2013 13:46 GMT
#2871
On August 01 2013 22:40 Oatsmaster wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 22:38 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 01 2013 22:24 Oatsmaster wrote: On August 01 2013 22:09 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 01 2013 21:58 Oatsmaster wrote: On August 01 2013 21:54 raynpelikoneet wrote: Oats is clearly not caring about the game at all. He has not read the thread which has been clear from D1 end. He is scum because town Oats cares about the game. Or because town/scum oats doesnt want to read 10 fucking pages of 1 liners close enough to obtain your proper intentions. Yeah why would town oats want to read the 10 pages leading up to the lynch. Because they're one-liners? oh... okay do you not read the part where it says 'close enough'? Not close enough to realize xrz had a red check on malongo? On August 01 2013 21:48 Oatsmaster wrote: So Rayn, why did you switch off FT onto Malongo? After not talking about Malongo AT ALL? Burn in hell scum I realized that. Then why ask rayn why he switched to malongo? Like wtf, I don't get you oats | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
August 01 2013 13:46 GMT
#2872
On August 01 2013 22:45 Oatsmaster wrote: k so rayn got really angry. Why were you so angry rayn? I am done talking to you scum. You are clearly not even trying to understand what you are reading. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
August 01 2013 13:46 GMT
#2873
On August 01 2013 22:46 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 22:45 Oatsmaster wrote: k so rayn got really angry. Why were you so angry rayn? I am done talking to you scum. You are clearly not even trying to understand what you are reading. so you werent angry? | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
August 01 2013 13:47 GMT
#2874
On August 01 2013 22:46 Clarity_nl wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 22:40 Oatsmaster wrote: On August 01 2013 22:38 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 01 2013 22:24 Oatsmaster wrote: On August 01 2013 22:09 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 01 2013 21:58 Oatsmaster wrote: On August 01 2013 21:54 raynpelikoneet wrote: Oats is clearly not caring about the game at all. He has not read the thread which has been clear from D1 end. He is scum because town Oats cares about the game. Or because town/scum oats doesnt want to read 10 fucking pages of 1 liners close enough to obtain your proper intentions. Yeah why would town oats want to read the 10 pages leading up to the lynch. Because they're one-liners? oh... okay do you not read the part where it says 'close enough'? Not close enough to realize xrz had a red check on malongo? On August 01 2013 21:48 Oatsmaster wrote: So Rayn, why did you switch off FT onto Malongo? After not talking about Malongo AT ALL? Burn in hell scum I realized that. Then why ask rayn why he switched to malongo? Like wtf, I don't get you oats Because I wanted him to explain? ??? | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
August 01 2013 13:48 GMT
#2875
On August 01 2013 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 22:46 raynpelikoneet wrote: On August 01 2013 22:45 Oatsmaster wrote: k so rayn got really angry. Why were you so angry rayn? I am done talking to you scum. You are clearly not even trying to understand what you are reading. so you werent angry? + Show Spoiler + On August 01 2013 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 08:26 Clarity_nl wrote: Ugh, okay I need to slow down. Rayn, it is a 1-1 trade if we lynch xrz as well. I do suppose that there is a chance he's telling the truth, and if he stays alive we have two cops = 1 check. YOU ARE LYNCHING A FUCKING COP OVER AN USELESS DUDE TO ENSURE 1-1?= On August 01 2013 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 08:26 Clarity_nl wrote: Ugh, okay I need to slow down. Rayn, it is a 1-1 trade if we lynch xrz as well. I do suppose that there is a chance he's telling the truth, and if he stays alive we have two cops = 1 check. YOU ARE LYNCHING A FUCKING COP OVER AN USELESS DUDE TO ENSURE 1-1?= On August 01 2013 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 08:26 Clarity_nl wrote: Ugh, okay I need to slow down. Rayn, it is a 1-1 trade if we lynch xrz as well. I do suppose that there is a chance he's telling the truth, and if he stays alive we have two cops = 1 check. YOU ARE LYNCHING A FUCKING COP OVER AN USELESS DUDE TO ENSURE 1-1?= On August 01 2013 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 08:26 Clarity_nl wrote: Ugh, okay I need to slow down. Rayn, it is a 1-1 trade if we lynch xrz as well. I do suppose that there is a chance he's telling the truth, and if he stays alive we have two cops = 1 check. YOU ARE LYNCHING A FUCKING COP OVER AN USELESS DUDE TO ENSURE 1-1?= On August 01 2013 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 08:26 Clarity_nl wrote: Ugh, okay I need to slow down. Rayn, it is a 1-1 trade if we lynch xrz as well. I do suppose that there is a chance he's telling the truth, and if he stays alive we have two cops = 1 check. YOU ARE LYNCHING A FUCKING COP OVER AN USELESS DUDE TO ENSURE 1-1?= Is it quoted enought times now? | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43211 Posts
August 01 2013 13:50 GMT
#2876
You are either so fucking terrible at this game or scum. i´d say 99% scum. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
August 01 2013 13:51 GMT
#2877
On August 01 2013 22:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: Seriously, Oats, you can´t deduce from reading the thread why i voted for Malongo, nor you can deduce why i was angry? You are either so fucking terrible at this game or scum. i´d say 99% scum. you were angry before that too. | ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 01 2013 13:53 GMT
#2878
On August 01 2013 22:47 Oatsmaster wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 22:46 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 01 2013 22:40 Oatsmaster wrote: On August 01 2013 22:38 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 01 2013 22:24 Oatsmaster wrote: On August 01 2013 22:09 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 01 2013 21:58 Oatsmaster wrote: On August 01 2013 21:54 raynpelikoneet wrote: Oats is clearly not caring about the game at all. He has not read the thread which has been clear from D1 end. He is scum because town Oats cares about the game. Or because town/scum oats doesnt want to read 10 fucking pages of 1 liners close enough to obtain your proper intentions. Yeah why would town oats want to read the 10 pages leading up to the lynch. Because they're one-liners? oh... okay do you not read the part where it says 'close enough'? Not close enough to realize xrz had a red check on malongo? On August 01 2013 21:48 Oatsmaster wrote: So Rayn, why did you switch off FT onto Malongo? After not talking about Malongo AT ALL? Burn in hell scum I realized that. Then why ask rayn why he switched to malongo? Like wtf, I don't get you oats Because I wanted him to explain? ??? You wanted him to explain why he switched his vote to the guy with the redcheck? Why don't you just ask why he believed xrz so quickly, like the rest of us. Maybe it's because you didn't read shit and just asked a dumb question and are now trying to rationalize it. If you are town you are putting 0 effort into this game. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
August 01 2013 13:53 GMT
#2879
On August 01 2013 22:51 Oatsmaster wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2013 22:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: Seriously, Oats, you can´t deduce from reading the thread why i voted for Malongo, nor you can deduce why i was angry? You are either so fucking terrible at this game or scum. i´d say 99% scum. you were angry before that too. You do realise you are approaching my level of trolling? You should type "umad bro?" "he mad" next time. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
August 01 2013 13:55 GMT
#2880
The thing with Oats is that if he is town, he calls everyone scum when he sees a scummy post. Then he starts questioning them. Here he is far more conservative about his reads. town!Oats does not have zero scumreads 24h into D1, no fucking way. Also the fact that Oats & Cora are not on each other´s throats makes them both very likely mafia. Those are the two players who tunnel the shit out of people (besides me) and when they get into an argument they will not let go, usually even when they are clearly wrong, because they believe in theirselves. Now they are both just dropping some questions or minor shit on each other and not interacting with each other at all. That´s fucking fishy and that´s not how it goes when at least one of them is town. LooooL Do I need to prove why this is wrong? He also never tried to push JAT lynch on D1, that´s not what Oats does. Oats as town wants his target lynched and is very vocal about that, always! In addition to that on D2 he had Koshi as his top 1 scumread, he has "tunneled" Koshi for the whole D2, and suddenly now for no apparent reason he is voting for XRZ who was his townread earlier. Yet again, he had no intentions to convince anyone Koshi is scum, he has no intentions to convince anyone XRZ is scum. LooooL wrong again. On August 01 2013 06:02 raynpelikoneet wrote: Malongo is going to flip town and you are all idiots or mafia. Do i need to tell you again why this is so very wrong target? Is there anyone who can think with their own brain? LooooooL | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney 29971 Dota 2Calm 5021 Flash 3149 Stork 1280 Soulkey 873 hero 798 Jaedong 659 Snow 435 TY 145 Rush 128 [ Show more ] firebathero 110 [sc1f]eonzerg 64 sSak 47 Yoon 28 ToSsGirL 27 Barracks 23 Rock 23 SilentControl 16 IntoTheRainbow 15 Heroes of the Storm Other Games B2W.Neo2732 ScreaM1893 Beastyqt598 Mlord449 Hui .443 DeMusliM427 Livibee349 Lowko304 FrodaN236 Fuzer 193 syndereN139 FunKaTv 70 LuMiX1 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • HeavenSC 188 StarCraft: Brood War• Berry_CruncH92 • Adnapsc2 21 • Kozan • AfreecaTV YouTube • sooper7s • intothetv • Migwel • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube Dota 2 League of Legends |
CranKy Ducklings
Defiler Tour
LiuLi Cup
CranKy Ducklings
OSC
MaNa vs SHIN
NightMare vs TBD
ByuN vs TBD
MaxPax vs TBD
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
OSC
LiuLi Cup
OSC
[ Show More ] SC Evo Complete
OSC
Master's Coliseum
Clem vs Oliveira
Oliveira vs Spirit
Clem vs Zoun
|
|