|
Nirvana Gabo, what are those quick reads? Oh, and... ?
+ Show Spoiler +а Иван Маркович не будет сотрудничать сегодня. что неудача, это может занять в два раза дольше. Этот парень заставит меня сойти с ума, если он не сложится в ближайшее время.
I swear the contents in the spoiler are spoilered for a reason.
Shed a tear for NG, I don't think WoS was stupid as at that time it made more sense.
pointing out town mistakes can be scummy. However, I don't think Ace is scum. Mind=blown and I need to get back to work.
|
Can people please stop posting in foreign languages? The rules in the OP don't forbid it, but most games now come with a "don't encrypt" warning, and some past game involved people speaking in a foreign language as a form of soft-encryption.
Especially when we're converting things like "Chezinu" to other languages, there's no reason to bother doing that and it just makes things more complicated than they need to be.
|
On July 09 2013 03:14 austinmcc wrote: Can people please stop posting in foreign languages? The rules in the OP don't forbid it, but most games now come with a "don't encrypt" warning, and some past game involved people speaking in a foreign language as a form of soft-encryption.
Especially when we're converting things like "Chezinu" to other languages, there's no reason to bother doing that and it just makes things more complicated than they need to be. Ok. I will stop 100%.
Will put "Russian <whatever the hell I would have said>". Actually posting it in Russian was only mildly important to me, and none of this is role required, so at the cost of being detrimental to town it isn't worth it.
|
On July 09 2013 03:01 Ace wrote: @Boson: what was the actual case for Austin?
1) Town austin is involved. Town austin makes cases and is aggressive. Here is absolutely passive and non-committing.
2 Austin blatantly lied here:
On July 08 2013 05:56 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2013 05:51 Xatalos wrote: I'll go ahead and vote austinmcc now.
##Vote austinmcc
He's been basically just asking (filler) questions and not scumhunting or showing effort so far. At least he's less lurky than in PTP, but that's not a hard feat, and it's still not even close to how I remember his townie self. Just comparing his town meta to this game (or PTP) makes it feel like he has to be scum or 3rd party etc. I didn't push this stance hard enough in PTP, but I'm not going to repeat the same mistake now - unless he starts appearing townish ASAP.
geript, you still want to lynch WoS or whom? What is my town meta? More specifically, my town meta in a large game?Also, do you have interest in the answers to the questions that I have asked, but have not gotten answers to?
He's alluding to the fact that his town meta in a large game is pretty much the same as in this game. Here I explain this is just not true:
On July 08 2013 22:51 Z-BosoN wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2013 06:15 austinmcc wrote:On July 08 2013 06:06 Xatalos wrote:On July 08 2013 05:56 austinmcc wrote:On July 08 2013 05:51 Xatalos wrote: I'll go ahead and vote austinmcc now.
##Vote austinmcc
He's been basically just asking (filler) questions and not scumhunting or showing effort so far. At least he's less lurky than in PTP, but that's not a hard feat, and it's still not even close to how I remember his townie self. Just comparing his town meta to this game (or PTP) makes it feel like he has to be scum or 3rd party etc. I didn't push this stance hard enough in PTP, but I'm not going to repeat the same mistake now - unless he starts appearing townish ASAP.
geript, you still want to lynch WoS or whom? What is my town meta? M ore specifically, my town meta in a large game?Also, do you have interest in the answers to the questions that I have asked, but have not gotten answers to? Paranoia Mafia. That's the only game where we've played together as town so far, I think. Actually I suspected you there for some time (role-related stuff) but I didn't think your overall posting was scummy. In fact, I mentioned at several points how townish your posting was, and ultimately I came to the right and simple conclusion that you were indeed town. I can't say I get any of that same feeling in this game so far though. What does your last sentence mean? As far as I can tell, you gave three reasons for thinking I'm scummy. I'm basically just asking filler questions I'm not scumhunting/putting in effort I am not my townie self/I am not playing in accordance with my town meta My last sentence is in relation to your first reason for thinking I'm scum. If my questions are filler, they don't matter, and I'm not going anywhere with them. However, if you're actually interested in the answers to my questions, then they don't seem like they are filler. If you're not interested in the answers to my questions, I ... I dunno, I think you should be. As far as meta, go look at any larger game. Especially a larger game where I don't know 1/2 or 2/3 the people. My play in a single medium-size game, where I was blue, and almost got lynched because I was an idiot, doesn't seem like the perfect point of comparison. Or go look at my scum games. I was interested in what exactly you were pulling meta from, seeing as it appears to be a large part of your reason for voting me. That's it, was just poking at your reasons for voting me. austin, I don't think you can get away with justifying your play here with a "go look at my town meta in a larger game". Here's your filter from Liquid City: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=371260&user=austinmccYou seemed a ton more interested in the game. Here the only part where I felt you interested is when you were defending yourself. Can you give me something on Alaskaslam? You had some interaction with him, and I'd like to know your opinion on him atm.
As scum, it's very easy and convenient to say: "just look at my meta and you will see that [ . . . ]", because obviously no one is gonna open his earlier games and check on whether that's true or not.
I feel that if he were town, he would more likely admit that his meta was different in this game, rather than imply that it is the same.
Funnily enough, he later admits to being lazy/reactive, even though he tried to meta-defend himself earlier. Makes little sense to me.
3. Austin's posts so far have little substance. They contain a high amount of fluff and are generally not what I would expect from a townie him.
"stop posting so much!!!", for example, I have never seen him display that sort of feeling: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=418049¤tpage=30#593
I view this more as a "look at me, I'm reading the thread and am being pained by how many useless posts there are", to show that he's interested. As it stands, what his filter tells me is in exact contrast, that he doesn't really feel interested in the game.
These are the reasons so far I think he is a good lynch. I want him to respond though.
|
On July 09 2013 03:03 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2013 02:55 Xatalos wrote:On July 09 2013 02:48 Ace wrote: Look at who was leading when I posted that. Dandel didn't have many votes, and Chezinu was leading. I then voted from Chezinu to Dandel.
Why would I be trying to save the people I'm voting for? :/ Hmm. Well, I guess that's not such a likely scenario (I'd put it in the same category as scum launching a fake nuke at scum Meapak). I don't know why town Ace would advocate a no-lynch even instead of a random lurker though. Why is that your FIRST thought is to advice no-lynching if we can't get a clear consensus? Shouldn't you be pushing your own opinion right now instead of waiting for a consensus or softly pushing a no-lynch? It feels overall scummy. If Ace is scum and we don't have one super mega leading candidate because of good case/trustable check/etc. etc., why would he advocate no-lynching? Given the lack of clear target, scum could easily push a lynch onto a townie with a small amount of work and like...two or three votes max probably. Because it's just plurality lynch and is currently dis-organized, there's no reason for scum to try for a "no-lynch" when they could get a lynch on a townie. Moreover, I don't read Ace's post as pushing for a no-lynch. - Within THIS GAME, if we can trust xatalos's claim, we know that some people can survive some nukes
- Within OTHER GAMES, we have seen fake nukes. They get the host confirmation in thread, don't kill
- Within THIS GAME, we have seen silent nukes AND the ability to re-direct/defend against nukes. It's entirely possible someone can silently defend/re-direct a nuke, meaning that a nuke on scum doesn't always equal dead scum.
While we THINK that anyone getting nuked will be dead, we don't actually know that, and just within the last like...12 hours, we've discovered that two people we all assumed would be dead from nukage (xat, MZ) are no longer going to be dead from nukage (we think). We don't know all the roles and rules here, but we DO know that Dude X getting nuked does not mean that Dude X will die, for a number of reasons.
Hm. Well, okay. I can see him posting that as town as well, but it's still weird to focus on stuff like that instead of scumhunting (and why so early on anyway?). On to more important matters for today however...
|
On July 09 2013 03:09 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2013 03:00 Z-BosoN wrote:On July 09 2013 02:55 Xatalos wrote:On July 09 2013 02:48 Ace wrote: Look at who was leading when I posted that. Dandel didn't have many votes, and Chezinu was leading. I then voted from Chezinu to Dandel.
Why would I be trying to save the people I'm voting for? :/ Hmm. Well, I guess that's not such a likely scenario (I'd put it in the same category as scum launching a fake nuke at scum Meapak). I don't know why town Ace would advocate a no-lynch even instead of a random lurker though. Why is that your FIRST thought is to advice no-lynching if we can't get a clear consensus? Shouldn't you be pushing your own opinion right now instead of waiting for a consensus or softly pushing a no-lynch? It feels overall scummy. Focus. He's unlikely to get lynched today. I'm glad you agree that he is scummy, but I feel time is better spent discussing this after the lynch time. Right now, aside from a policy lynch, who are your top lynches? Whatever, I guess it's a waste of time atm to talk about Ace. I still feel like austinmcc has a good chance of being scum. See my earlier (2 I think) case-posts about him. It's not making me feel any better that he still hasn't done anything after hastily defending himself against me. He hasn't really done anything remarkable at all besides defending my pressure. But he's not getting lynched today clearly. I'm fine with either Chezinu or Dandel Ion, who are the top lynch candidates atm. Chezinu for nuking me and not doing anything after that despite requests and Dandel Ion for playing very differently from his town meta and quite much like his scum meta (inactive and useless).
Well, doesn't it make sense for a scum chezinu to make some bullshit reason up for sending a nuke towards you? I don't really understand his play, and like I said earlier, I feel he is better suited for blues.
|
Oh, and another thing, Is dandel ion's meta as scum = inactive and useless? As I remember, he played a decent scum in some newbie game a while back. Are there any records of him being inactive as town?
|
Actually, regarding #2 in my case of austin. After rereading, he's not necessarily alluding that it is the same, but it's still an attempt to meta-defend himself, in my eyes. The rest of the point I made remains though. Keep this in mind when answering.
|
On July 09 2013 02:59 Stutters695 wrote: SnB nuke fishing doesn't mean he's not town though, could be something as simple as a vet to God knows how crazy.
if he wanted to get nuked so he would gain power and he was town he would just tell town "hey i get this power by being nuked, who wants to nuke me" not try and draw nukes by trolling
|
On July 09 2013 02:57 Z-BosoN wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2013 02:48 WaveofShadow wrote: Ok this has been bugging me a little. Who has played with Boson before/ Boson why do you tend not to contribute to conversations taking place and help us out with those and instead follow your own trains of thought and lines of questioning all game? Can you not do both? I'm still lagged behind, and I don't see the purpose of your conversation. You are hinting aggression towards ace with few hours left on the vote deadline, when he is clearly not getting lynched We should be focusing on whether or not we are going through a policy lynch or if we should try to find a better suspect. I don't like a policy lynch and I want to find a better suspect to suggest we lynch. Austin seems like a solid choice, and I am prompting for him to answer before I go balls out. Also, just stfu about chezinu. So much pointless discussion on someone who is so random and hard to read. If he were scum, why wouldn't he also explain his "bad nuke"? I can't make sense from his play and I feel it's just a wasted effort, and thus will not bother with it. I may be dead wrong here, but he is better suited for blue roles (checks and such). I feel austin is the better choice here. Veyne is also good, but I want to save him for later.
what do you mean by the bolded
|
On July 09 2013 03:27 strongandbig wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2013 02:57 Z-BosoN wrote:On July 09 2013 02:48 WaveofShadow wrote: Ok this has been bugging me a little. Who has played with Boson before/ Boson why do you tend not to contribute to conversations taking place and help us out with those and instead follow your own trains of thought and lines of questioning all game? Can you not do both? I'm still lagged behind, and I don't see the purpose of your conversation. You are hinting aggression towards ace with few hours left on the vote deadline, when he is clearly not getting lynched We should be focusing on whether or not we are going through a policy lynch or if we should try to find a better suspect. I don't like a policy lynch and I want to find a better suspect to suggest we lynch. Austin seems like a solid choice, and I am prompting for him to answer before I go balls out. Also, just stfu about chezinu. So much pointless discussion on someone who is so random and hard to read. If he were scum, why wouldn't he also explain his "bad nuke"? I can't make sense from his play and I feel it's just a wasted effort, and thus will not bother with it. I may be dead wrong here, but he is better suited for blue roles (checks and such). I feel austin is the better choice here. Veyne is also good, but I want to save him for later. what do you mean by the bolded
I mean that I don't want to lynch him today ^^
|
probably that scum wants to try and mislynch me tomorrow lawl.
|
On July 09 2013 02:57 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2013 02:51 strongandbig wrote:On July 09 2013 02:34 Xatalos wrote:On July 09 2013 02:30 strongandbig wrote:On July 09 2013 02:25 Z-BosoN wrote: Ace, how is "not calling you "probably town" taking things way too far? cause he town Name your top scumreads and reasons for them now that you're finally here. umm, idk. lets look at the playerlist for a second and cross-reference with my emotional impressions... okay vayne authority cause of the thing with the xatalos nuke but more importantly cause hes got two pages of filter and none of it is really interesting or relevant except for attackign caucasianasian's drunk post, plus the old timey favorite scum line "Even if johnny does flip town, there's been a lot of decent discussion on it so it gives us a bit to work with as a day 1 lynch." apparently people think gumshoe is town, why is that? i still think he was nuke fishing and has a role that gains power when he gets nuked. who was the guy with a name that was kind of like geript who was just absolutely terrible? marv do you remember who i am talking about? he was in a couple games last year while i was in switzerlandwhat about oatsmaster being scum? his antinuke target on xatalos is very poorly explained and he justifies it by saying that he thinks its more likely that chezinu is scum than jhonnywups rather than saying anything about the target. like, seriously? you nuke someone cause you think they're scum, you save someone cause you think theyre town, and maphack_z looked way more townie than xatalos ... Wow this is true, that would be a great way for town cred and pushing agenda all in one post! Just one question........ .... What scum role has that power, and why save either townie? Is the cred really worth it?
i have no clue what scum role has what power but in a game with (presumably) a bajillion town nukes, it makes a lot of sense for there to be a scum antinuke.
as for the other part, why save as scum - first, i'm not sure that xatalos isn't scum as well, and second, getting a lot of town cred now (which lets you not get lynched or nuked) could have been something he thought was worth using up the antinuke (which would probably get him lynched if he used it later to save a teammate) for. Or he just yolo'd it, idk. point is, i can imagine reasons for that as scum, but the way he thought about it doesn't make sense to me if hes town.
|
On July 09 2013 03:28 Z-BosoN wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2013 03:27 strongandbig wrote:On July 09 2013 02:57 Z-BosoN wrote:On July 09 2013 02:48 WaveofShadow wrote: Ok this has been bugging me a little. Who has played with Boson before/ Boson why do you tend not to contribute to conversations taking place and help us out with those and instead follow your own trains of thought and lines of questioning all game? Can you not do both? I'm still lagged behind, and I don't see the purpose of your conversation. You are hinting aggression towards ace with few hours left on the vote deadline, when he is clearly not getting lynched We should be focusing on whether or not we are going through a policy lynch or if we should try to find a better suspect. I don't like a policy lynch and I want to find a better suspect to suggest we lynch. Austin seems like a solid choice, and I am prompting for him to answer before I go balls out. Also, just stfu about chezinu. So much pointless discussion on someone who is so random and hard to read. If he were scum, why wouldn't he also explain his "bad nuke"? I can't make sense from his play and I feel it's just a wasted effort, and thus will not bother with it. I may be dead wrong here, but he is better suited for blue roles (checks and such). I feel austin is the better choice here. Veyne is also good, but I want to save him for later. what do you mean by the bolded I mean that I don't want to lynch him today ^^ but you think hes scum?
|
On July 09 2013 03:29 VayneAuthority wrote: probably that scum wants to try and mislynch me tomorrow lawl.
You. Check this out. What do you think of Alakaslam? He kinda wants you dead dude.
|
On July 09 2013 03:10 raynpelikoneet wrote: This lynch looks so bad and we should be lynching Chezinu. why is chezinu more likely scum than dandyloin
ps 'because chezinu did something stupid' is not a good reason until we know whether or not the stupid thing targeted townies or other scum. since chezinu is so willing to play badly as town, its impossible to tell his alignment until we have flips to analyze his actions in relationship to. or until someone vigs him.
|
Xatalos, tell me more about gumshoe. I remember that I didn't like some of his posts, and I also remember that you played with him before. Any thoughts?
|
On July 09 2013 03:35 strongandbig wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2013 03:10 raynpelikoneet wrote: This lynch looks so bad and we should be lynching Chezinu. why is chezinu more likely scum than dandyloin ps 'because chezinu did something stupid' is not a good reason until we know whether or not the stupid thing targeted townies or other scum. since chezinu is so willing to play badly as town, its impossible to tell his alignment until we have flips to analyze his actions in relationship to. or until someone vigs him.
If anyone disagrees with this bit on chezinu, please step up.
Regarding dande lion, why do so many people want to lynch him for being useless and not Abenson and caucasianasian, who are even more useless? Can anyone please be clear on this?
|
On July 09 2013 03:32 Z-BosoN wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2013 03:29 VayneAuthority wrote: probably that scum wants to try and mislynch me tomorrow lawl. You. Check this out. What do you think of Alakaslam? He kinda wants you dead dude.
I don't see a case in his filter so I assume he's just sheeping. His posts are plentiful and annoying to read so if I have to deal with him endgame then so be it but right now I am just ignoring him.
After all, it's not in either of our interests to try to convince the other that they are scum; rather efforts should be made to convince others.
Until he starts doing the latter then he is not really threatening if he's scum.
|
##vote caucasianasian
The Dandel lynch looks pretty heavily like a convenient mislynch wagon. Chezinu could be legit scum. I still don't trust WoS and would love to lynch him but I doubt that's happening. So I vote that we start getting rid of some of the fluff. Biggest fluffy scummy lurker is CA
|
|
|
|