The way marv claimed makes perfect sense to me if he is town. The way marv claimed makes zero sense to me as scum, because i would never myself claim as scum, and that's why i think marv is town.
Basterd Mini Mafia - Page 28
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
The way marv claimed makes perfect sense to me if he is town. The way marv claimed makes zero sense to me as scum, because i would never myself claim as scum, and that's why i think marv is town. | ||
Vivax
21678 Posts
| ||
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On July 02 2013 01:27 Vivax wrote: Don't you think that post is analysis? Why would scum try to cover up that they're agreeing with me? Is it dangerous for them to agree with me? It's nothing so much to do with you as both the difficulty in making a genuine case as scum coupled with the fact that sheeping is a null tell as opposed to making it look like original thought to get town cred. | ||
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
He has this perpetually scum feeling for me which is why I always suspect him at some point, so I am gonna stay away from any stutters analysis. NULL | ||
Vivax
21678 Posts
On July 02 2013 01:43 raynpelikoneet wrote: The point is Fuba, if i had been miller i would have done just what marv did, i would have not claimed my role name in case some scum wants to claim miller aswell. If i was scum i would never ever claim miller in fear of that someone claims and i have to contest them in "who tells their rolename first" which could result in 50% outright chance of me being outed. The way marv claimed makes perfect sense to me if he is town. The way marv claimed makes zero sense to me as scum, because i would never myself claim as scum, and that's why i think marv is town. 40 % chance of there being counterclaimed. 50 % chance of having to say your name last and picking the one you want. 40/100 * 50/100 = 2000 /10000 = 1/5 chance of the claim failing like you say. If anything the other rolename makes it easier coz you can claim to be the other miller. Fact of the matter, marv told you he fakeclaimed in another game. You didn't care. Fact of the matter, you were hostile towards miller claims in Roulette. And you want to tell us that you were acting all differently than in Roulette just cause here you can have two different millers with two different names? | ||
Stutters695
2610 Posts
Care to respond to my case Fuba, why shouldn't we lynch you? | ||
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
On July 01 2013 07:35 Stutters695 wrote: Well I would still be for JJD but Jesus Fuba either needs to explain or die. Why can't you get a read on me? Comparing me to someone with a different playstyle while softing I'm scummy but starting I'm town isn't going to cut it. Where's your usual good analysis? ROFL Out of that entire post, you choose only the bit about yourself to comment on? I'm noticing a pattern, here. First, to answer your questions: 1) I don't think I've ever had a read on you D1. Pretty much always been null, iirc. I mentioned you because you were a significant topic of conversation during the day. 2) I didn't compare you to vayne at all. I compared my read on you this game to my read on vayne last game. It's the feeling behind the read, not the player. 3) Going along with #2, it's the fact that you're doing a lot of "potentially scummy" things that I've also seen people do as town. It wasn't the overall scumminess of your actions, but the pervasiveness of possibly scummy actions. 4) I never said you were town. 5) I'm not really sure what you mean by my usual good analysis. If you're referring to D1 of Roulette, then that was apparently a fluke, because I proceeded to be wrong about almost everyone else for the rest of the game. If you're talking about the end of Doctor Who, then that was because it was the last day and I had a whole series of night actions and days of pondering night actions and day interactions to help me decide. Aside from those, I typically find a case I like from someone else and add to it if I can, or just sheep it if not (in Roulette, I actually thought I was just sheeping slOosh, but when people started saying I was confirmed I just kind of went with it). Now, on to you. Why are you questioning this stance regarding yourself this game when you didn't question it when I said the same thing about vayne in Roulette? Why is it only what I posted about you that makes me scummy? Why are you so defensive? | ||
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
| ||
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On July 02 2013 01:48 Vivax wrote: 40 % chance of there being counterclaimed. 50 % chance of having to say your name last and picking the one you want. 40/100 * 50/100 = 2000 /10000 = 1/5 chance of the claim failing like you say. If anything the other rolename makes it easier coz you can claim to be the other miller. I don't know what do you mean with the probabilities but i try to say what i think compared to a normal, similar sized semi-open setup: - The fact that the setup introduces 2 different millers means for me that there could be one miller, that's highly likely, probably not 2 cos that would be scum nightmare. Maybe 0, but highly unlike. - Now, if i was mafia, what does that mean to me? If i fakeclaim miller, this is what happens. I get probably cc'd. What happens next? People start talking about who should claim their role-name first. It puts high pressure on me + the townie to prove our towniness compared to only each other. I am at a bad spot, obviously, as i am mafia and he is town. I MUST accuse him somehow of being mafia, what if i am not able to? If i am not able to, and need to claim first, i have a 50% chance of getting insta-outed. - Even if i do not get insta-outed, i am at best null. Now if we compare this to a normal game with as many people as here where we know there are 0-2 self aware millers, i really do not it's easier to get away with a miller claim here. Fact of the matter, marv told you he fakeclaimed in another game. You didn't care. Yes, i did not. The setup is different so i did not care. I don't waste time in figuring what he was thinking there, because i know it makes no sense for scum to fakeclaim in this setup we are playing right here. That being said i am not familiar with C9++ setup and i don't know how it randoms the roles. I also skimmed through the game and saw that scum lost, so i do not think the claim paid off, regardless of if the claim did/did not keep marv/yamato alive longer than they should be without it. Fact of the matter, you were hostile towards miller claims in Roulette. No i wasn't. It was in Carnival Cruise and LXI. Carnival Cruise was 21 players, LXI was 25 (if i remember correctly). - It's already expected there are millers, self-aware, or unself-aware (which also helps mafia fakeclaiming). - It's not expected that there is only one miller as there are many players. - The number of millers depends on the number of cops (balancewise). We did not know how many cops there are, and we would not know until much later into the game. - The game setup and the situation is in the first place entirely different compared to this game, and i don't really understand how you all fail to see that. And you want to tell us that you were acting all differently than in Roulette just cause here you can have two different millers with two different names?[/QUOTE] | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
And you want to tell us that you were acting all differently than in Roulette just cause here you can have two different millers with two different names? Basically yes. and what i said before. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
I don't want to claim my rolename, because i am fairly confident i can find scum and have already done so. I'm really interested in seeing what fuba has to say. Ask him about WoS. I still don't want to lynch Vivax, he has shown some interest in looking into other people than me aswell, and he is asking good questions. I'm going to take a relook into Lazer if i am able to when i get back, because i just realized something. scum have fucking 2 KP. That makes sense in a way that it doesn't really matter which townie they lynch on D1 if the town is enough on the wrong track, because they can get rid of 2 during the night. His defence on me makes sense from scum PoV aswell.. I think our best bet for scum lynches today are WoS/Fuba/Lazer. I still don't think Stutters qualifies as a good lynch because he was trying to divert the attention from rayn-miller-discussion into other things when he would have no need to do so as mafia. cya in a couple of hours. | ||
Vivax
21678 Posts
On July 02 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote: 'm going to take a relook into Lazer if i am able to when i get back, because i just realized something. scum have fucking 2 KP. Wat wat. I don't see ANYTHING in the OP written about scum KP. Where did you get that information? | ||
Vivax
21678 Posts
| ||
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On July 02 2013 01:02 gumshoe wrote: OK so here he's trying to sow seeds of doubt in the mass roleclaim plan even though it's been pretty much agreed on that it's an incredibly powerfull play. Like why mention those things and then vote yes?On the one hand I think well be doing scums job for them by revealing our blues. On the other, sure, it could work, but the decision needs to be semi unanimous(like 5-8 people) or it wont be of much use to town, and it'll be a huge boon to scum(who can weed out blues). I vote yes, if five or so more people agree then I'll reveal at around the same time as them, shall we say six hours before the vote(not sure how to juggle pst and what not)?. And yes, name revealing feels broken and cheap and would actually lessen my enjoyment of this game. So then why vote yes? Vayne voted against it for this same reason. The only reason to vote yes is because he's scared to post anything that would apear to be anti-town.He's knows the mass roleclaim is detrimental to scum. He'd trying to use 2 seperate excuses as to why we shouldn't do it and hoping that one of em sticks. The problem is those excuses directly clash with each other. Either it's a huge boon to scum or it's broken and cheap. How can it be both? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
Vivax
21678 Posts
While I feel that what he did after the claim was scummy, I feel he is so stubborn in his defense that I'll rather judge him by the coming play, being confident that he will stay active. But mostly I like that he announced he'd take a closer look at LM, and WoS looks like a good lynch to me as well, and I feel that he is compatible with a scum Lazer given the nature of Lazer's comments on WoS. Hence, today I'm going to vote for Lazer or Wos probably. But I need to reread and see which one is probably the better call. I'm still kinda suspicious of stutters for his too-careful-for-my-taste posts in regards to Rayn but he has been fairly active lately. ##Unvote @ Stutters What's your opinion on a WoS/Lazer lynch? | ||
Stutters695
2610 Posts
I'll read up on WoS/Lazer but is there a particular thing you don't like about my Fuba case? | ||
| ||