TL Mafia LXI - Page 37
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
I really need some people who can actually think here. I'm not interested in continuing this discussion with kush/Hopeless/Sylencia because they clearly can't read. | ||
getmoript
1016 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On April 22 2013 21:03 TheRavensName wrote: Sharrant's done that a lot this game. As for Rayn, I guess I don't know what to think about him right now. It doesn't help the two real people until this oint that have been attacking my town read on him are people I dislike so... there is that. But when I read Rayn's statement about the miller lynch being more of a scummy time to claim then because hes a miller it makes more sense to me, especially when you couple with BM lurked for quite a bit after his claim then coming back and calling it a joke when he comes back and see people were upset with it and it lends itself to the gamble of: "I'm mr Mafia, please don't check me cause I am the miller and don't worry about me guys cause I'm town and you all bought that right?" But that is just my opinion. he didn't lurk, he clearly said he was sleeping :\ and I'm not saying millers shouldn't get lynched at some point, I was saying there's better days in choosing to do so. Doing it on day 1 is literally asking to On April 22 2013 21:04 kushm4sta wrote: @Sylencia I'm having trouble understanding your scumread/vote on rayn. Right now it looks like you are voting him because he wanted to lynch BM due to his claiming, but said it wasn't a policy lynch. Is that it? Rayn thinks the claim makes BM scum. That is why he doesn't consider it a policy lynch. I get how it can seem like a contradiction, but it all comes down to how you define the phrase "policy lynch." It really didn't seem phrased that way when it was first put down, if you're going to say he's scummy by posting a claim wouldn't you say it straight rather than "all miller claims should be lynched"? On April 22 2013 21:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: EBWOP: Above was to Hopeless. I really need some people who can actually think here. I'm not interested in continuing this discussion with kush/Hopeless/Sylencia because they clearly can't read. On April 22 2013 01:16 raynpelikoneet wrote: Because the OP clearly states there can be multiple number of same roles, so discussing if there are one or more self-aware millers in stupid in the first place. Anyone who claims miller on D1 should be lynched. ##Vote: Bill Murray Again, where do I see "Bill Murray is scummy" in this? | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On April 22 2013 06:35 raynpelikoneet wrote: I read BM's post as a miller claim. If it wasn't, he needs to explain this: - What was the purpose of making that post? There is no reason for a townie to say anything that does not lead into finding scum or proving their towniness. I don't see that post achieving either of those things. If the claim was actually real, i want BM to explain why he thought it was a good idea to claim miller D1. Millers should not claim. All it does is that it tells the thread that they will give out a red result if checked by a cop. Why would you be a good cop check in the first place if you are town? You should prove you are town by your actions so that there is no reason for anyone to assume you are mafia, and the cops should check suspicious people instead. Claiming miller on D1 is extremely suspicious because it already shows you are afraid of being checked by a cop. If you are a miller, and are checked, so what? Tough luck, then you claim and town will believe you or not. But the place to claim is not the start of D1. This is not a policy lynch, BM's miller claim post is scummy. About Sharrant. Sharrant accuses TRN of things. The case in itself is not scummy and i could see someone seeing TRN's posts in that light, i just don't get the same feeling from TRN's posts. Having played with him on NMXXXIX, i can tell that he has no idea how to act in the start of the game. Here he seems to be trying to figure out things and share his thoughts about stuff he is asked about. Fine, why is Sharrant scummy? - He's discussing the "policy lynch BM" matter but does not reach any kind of a conclusion that points towards this particular situation. - Asks TRN about his last games. It's not TRN's job to find those games to him. It's Sharrant's job to find out TRN's affiliation and TRN wasting time on telling him about his last games is a waste of time that does not help TRN find mafia. Seems like Sharrant is lazy and does not want to find out things on his own. Townies should not do that. | ||
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
Sharrant
Canada543 Posts
Let's get this out of the way quickly because I have to leave, and there's more important things to do when I'm back. The reason I looked into you is because of your chainsaw defense of TRN. That fit exactly what I was looking for, so I went through your filter. I am not trying to lynch you on the merit of you defending TRN, get that through your head. I am going to get you lynched because you are scum. You claim that after posting several times about how miller claims should be a policy lynch, you say that it's not a policy lynch you're pushing on BM. The closest you come to make to a case is "This isn't a miller lynch policy, I'm lynching him because he claimed miller which is scummy" which is exactly the same as saying "No, this isn't a lurker lynch, I'm just lynching because his low activity is scummy". It's just attempting to disguise that you were trying to policy lynch him. The post I voted for you details exactly why I have you as a scum read. The possibility that you were a townie who made some crazy defense on TRN went out the window when I read through your filter. If you can't understand that, I can't help you. | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On April 22 2013 13:40 Bill Murray wrote: and idc if they're unhappy. i have 1 vote on me. i didnt "pull any stunts". I was entering the thread in the random voting stage, and goofing off mildly, because I am happy that I rolled a good role for my win %. Town: 10-6 Scum: 4-1 3p: 1-1 Great scum win % = scum??? (relax, i'm joking) | ||
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
Bill Murray getmoript (QT thing) Vivax slot machine dude hopeless list of maybe town: Ace grush cheesecake kush Sylencia TheRavensName list of who knows: WaveofShadow Tube Drazak Clarity_nl Sharrant Yamato77 ShiaoPi list of bloodycobblers: BloodyCobbler list of somewhat scummy fuckers (based on absolutely nothing): DoctorHelvetica ObviousOne Oatsmaster giggles | ||
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
That's how I feel about him right now. | ||
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
##Vote VisceraEyes | ||
Vivax
21686 Posts
I feel mixed about Rayn, hopeless spends his energies on arguing why a heuristic that doesn't matter at all was wrong, when the point about him being scummy is precisely that discussing the heuristic is entirely unproductive and shouldn't concern town. The point about him being scum is not the heuristic, it's about being interested in stuff that shouldn't concern townies. | ||
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
Vivax
21686 Posts
Palmar, care to tell me why hopeless is town in your opinion? It might help me shorten my list of possible scum. | ||
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
GOO HAMMER NOW | ||
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
| ||
| ||