|
Brunei Darussalam622 Posts
On November 21 2012 13:35 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 13:34 iamperfection wrote:On November 21 2012 13:34 Clarity_nl wrote:On November 21 2012 13:33 Dienosore wrote:On November 21 2012 13:29 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 21 2012 13:27 Dienosore wrote: I'm friendly and wise, so really there is no reason NOT to vote for me :D No, you don't get to come in here all nice guy and shit. What do you think of what has happened so far? Reads? Thoughts on who should be party leader? Tip: it's not you. I don't think anything has happened so far, because it hasn't. Just mindless dribble pouring out from people trying to turn nothing into something. Why don't we let the game develop a little first so at least we know what we have to work towards? Because if we all have your attitude nothing would get done. yes thats true but what do you think town or scum for him. No noob gonna do what he did right? If you're new you don't do that, no. But do we know he's not a smurf?
Well, I am new... so... there goes that bit of logic out the window lol
|
So you don't want to play the setup speculation game...fine I'm taking by ball and going home
|
|
On November 21 2012 13:36 Hopeless1der wrote:Greetings all. You'll notice that we're currently in 600 AD Guardia. You're also playing a themed game hosted by none other than Greymist. Please keep that in mind. (Hi Mementoss, you're cool too). Basic vote mechanics for this game seem to boil down to -identify town -vote town to lead the party -Profit -Kill Mafia/Lavos -More Profit
What are people's thoughts on claiming that their character belongs to the 600 AD era and selecting the leader based on that. (YOU ONLY CLAIM "600 AD") Possibly selecting the entire party from within the era, assuming enough of a pool emerges. I linked Chronopedia above in case anyone feels the need to check it out. ~17ish native characters from 600 AD. I think our hidden numbers are influenced by the current era, and events can have varying degrees of success or failure depending on which specific players (not just town or scum) are in the party. Come play the setup speculation game with me please!
No. Setup speculation is for chumps.
I'd like to hear your thoughts on who we should choose for a party leader and why.
|
@Hapahauli Yes, it's definitely two different things. In one instance he has his vote on marv until he gets scummy vibes, and in the other, his vote is not on marv until he finds him town. Obviously it's not intentional, but it 100% is not the same thing. I was about to dismiss it as just poor wording when he explained it later, but he just said:
On November 21 2012 13:37 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 13:31 Keirathi wrote:On November 21 2012 13:25 Hapahauli wrote: 1) "I'm not going to vote marv unless I have a town read on him." 2) "I'm going to vote someone unless he's giving me a 'scummy vibe.'"
Those two statements mean very different things. The first expresses reservation - that you're not going to vote someone UNLESS you have a town read on them. The second expresses no hesitancy - that you're vote is determined unless marv shows you otherwise. Okay, I guess I see what you're getting at. Just poor wording on my part, I guess. But really, there is no "neutral" ground for me when it comes to marv. Either I believe that he is town, or he is giving off scummy vibes that give me pause. EBWOP: No, you know what. It wasn't poor wording. It's just you trying to poke holes where there aren't any. If marv isn't giving me scummy vibes, then I'm going to have a town read on him. If I have a town read on him, I will vote him today 100%.
Trying to make out this flip-flop. Wth? He's not even referring to his vote in this latest post, just on whatever he thinks of marv.
Kei, is your vote on marv or not ffs.
|
He's explained quite clearly. He generally gets a read on marv quite fast, and if he gets a town read he'll vote for him.
|
On November 21 2012 13:41 Z-BosoN wrote:@HapahauliYes, it's definitely two different things. In one instance he has his vote on marv until he gets scummy vibes, and in the other, his vote is not on marv until he finds him town. Obviously it's not intentional, but it 100% is not the same thing. I was about to dismiss it as just poor wording when he explained it later, but he just said: Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 13:37 Keirathi wrote:On November 21 2012 13:31 Keirathi wrote:On November 21 2012 13:25 Hapahauli wrote: 1) "I'm not going to vote marv unless I have a town read on him." 2) "I'm going to vote someone unless he's giving me a 'scummy vibe.'"
Those two statements mean very different things. The first expresses reservation - that you're not going to vote someone UNLESS you have a town read on them. The second expresses no hesitancy - that you're vote is determined unless marv shows you otherwise. Okay, I guess I see what you're getting at. Just poor wording on my part, I guess. But really, there is no "neutral" ground for me when it comes to marv. Either I believe that he is town, or he is giving off scummy vibes that give me pause. EBWOP: No, you know what. It wasn't poor wording. It's just you trying to poke holes where there aren't any. If marv isn't giving me scummy vibes, then I'm going to have a town read on him. If I have a town read on him, I will vote him today 100%. Trying to make out this flip-flop. Wth? He's not even referring to his vote in this latest post, just on whatever he thinks of marv. Kei, is your vote on marv or not ffs. Wat..?
The whole thing was about who I *PLAN* on voting. I'm not voting anyone right now, nor will I probably vote anyone in the next 24 hours. However, my current plan is to vote for marv, but if I decide that I don't trust him to be most likely town, I will instead vote for someone that I do think is town.
|
On November 21 2012 13:41 goodkarma wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 13:36 Hopeless1der wrote:Greetings all. You'll notice that we're currently in 600 AD Guardia. You're also playing a themed game hosted by none other than Greymist. Please keep that in mind. (Hi Mementoss, you're cool too). Basic vote mechanics for this game seem to boil down to -identify town -vote town to lead the party -Profit -Kill Mafia/Lavos -More Profit
What are people's thoughts on claiming that their character belongs to the 600 AD era and selecting the leader based on that. (YOU ONLY CLAIM "600 AD") Possibly selecting the entire party from within the era, assuming enough of a pool emerges. I linked Chronopedia above in case anyone feels the need to check it out. ~17ish native characters from 600 AD. I think our hidden numbers are influenced by the current era, and events can have varying degrees of success or failure depending on which specific players (not just town or scum) are in the party. Come play the setup speculation game with me please! No. Setup speculation is for chumps. I'd like to hear your thoughts on who we should choose for a party leader and why. Choose town. Win events. Kill Lavos. This has already been covered. I don't have any strong townreads yet. So in the meantime, I want to plant some ideas about how the setup works because you can bet your ass its going to matter.
|
Brunei Darussalam622 Posts
|
Brunei Darussalam622 Posts
vote Dienosore 2012
|
Dieno do you have any intention of being taken seriously this game?
|
Vote Hopeless1der 600AD <-- Do it right guys
|
as much as i would love stay up with you fine chaps it is past my bed time
For those who have played with me before comment on me.
you know i have an easy town meta to read so say what you already know to be true iamperfection should be on the team
|
Brunei Darussalam622 Posts
Are you under the impression that I'm not serious about wanting to be elected?
|
Hopeless, how would scum fakeclaiming 600 AD help town? Also I am against roleclaims of any kind.
|
On November 21 2012 13:49 Dienosore wrote: Are you under the impression that I'm not serious about wanting to be elected?
So you don't care what we'll think about your future reads or opinions, then?
|
On November 21 2012 13:46 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 13:41 goodkarma wrote:On November 21 2012 13:36 Hopeless1der wrote:Greetings all. You'll notice that we're currently in 600 AD Guardia. You're also playing a themed game hosted by none other than Greymist. Please keep that in mind. (Hi Mementoss, you're cool too). Basic vote mechanics for this game seem to boil down to -identify town -vote town to lead the party -Profit -Kill Mafia/Lavos -More Profit
What are people's thoughts on claiming that their character belongs to the 600 AD era and selecting the leader based on that. (YOU ONLY CLAIM "600 AD") Possibly selecting the entire party from within the era, assuming enough of a pool emerges. I linked Chronopedia above in case anyone feels the need to check it out. ~17ish native characters from 600 AD. I think our hidden numbers are influenced by the current era, and events can have varying degrees of success or failure depending on which specific players (not just town or scum) are in the party. Come play the setup speculation game with me please! No. Setup speculation is for chumps. I'd like to hear your thoughts on who we should choose for a party leader and why. Choose town. Win events. Kill Lavos. This has already been covered. I don't have any strong townreads yet. So in the meantime, I want to plant some ideas about how the setup works because you can bet your ass its going to matter.
Of course it will matter. But talking about how certain deliberately hidden variables could or could not work that are outside our control is a waste of time. The one thing we presently can control is who we choose for our party, and that's where are focus should be.
So please stop shitting up the thread advocating setup speculation.
|
On November 21 2012 13:49 iamperfection wrote: as much as i would love stay up with you fine chaps it is past my bed time
For those who have played with me before comment on me.
you know i have an easy town meta to read so say what you already know to be true iamperfection should be on the team Quit asking for people to read you and play naturally.
You did that shit in GSL 3, where you specifically asked me to give a read of you since I am very good at picking up when you are town or not.
Just don't.
|
On November 21 2012 13:31 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 13:25 Hapahauli wrote: 1) "I'm not going to vote marv unless I have a town read on him." 2) "I'm going to vote someone unless he's giving me a 'scummy vibe.'"
Those two statements mean very different things. The first expresses reservation - that you're not going to vote someone UNLESS you have a town read on them. The second expresses no hesitancy - that you're vote is determined unless marv shows you otherwise. Okay, I guess I see what you're getting at. Just poor wording on my part, I guess. But really, there is no "neutral" ground for me when it comes to marv. Either I believe that he is town, or he is giving off scummy vibes that give me pause.
I still don't understand this. This implies that you would never be unsure about your read on marv - on D1 of all days.
Part of me has a really hard time believing that this is the same Kei as in GSL III - the one who was uber reluctant and helpless on D1 to make a read on anyone in the game.
On November 21 2012 13:32 iamperfection wrote: also by the way i have a town read on Dienosore no nooby scum gonna come in here like that.
Yeah Dieno has to be town. I know I semi-attacked GK for similar reads but hell, I can't resist.
He's so cuddly.
|
On November 21 2012 13:51 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 13:49 iamperfection wrote: as much as i would love stay up with you fine chaps it is past my bed time
For those who have played with me before comment on me.
you know i have an easy town meta to read so say what you already know to be true iamperfection should be on the team Quit asking for people to read you and play naturally. You did that shit in GSL 3, where you specifically asked me to give a read of you since I am very good at picking up when you are town or not. Just don't. i ask you to give your read on me in almost every game we play.
|
|
|
|