|
On June 30 2012 10:50 ghost_403 wrote:People I don't want in LYLO with me: I vote we start this game off by lynching one of them, because getting a solid read on any one of them is rather difficult. This list has been generated based on my experience with them in previous games, which means at worst, we've got a 22% chance of hitting scum. And if not, I don't want them in my town at lylo anyways. Who's with me? lol
|
I am town. Lets kill scum.
VE can you please wait till day 2 before you thread ruiningly tunnel a townie
Also, VE, to confirm your towniness, can you point out the one obvi town person in the thread to me?
|
On June 30 2012 10:03 BroodKingEXE wrote: I want to start out discussing newbies. How are we as a town going to deal with players that are not as strong (as we do have a couple in the game)? Personally I think that these players need to be examined for the intent of their posts more than the evidence that they provide. Newbies still need to figure out what types of evidence are valid for examining a person, and we need to look at whether they are trying to draw out info from nothing or if there was actually a scummy read behind it. In the last few games I have played newbies have been lynched from poor evidence when they in fact were legitimately trying to help the town. I want everyone to take this in mind as we deal with newbies. Aren't you a newbie?
|
|
On June 30 2012 11:05 VisceraEyes wrote: Why, you of course. nope... someone else that isn't me, there is someone in my opinion that is like blatantly bet my life / eat my hat town, please point them out to me
|
On June 30 2012 10:39 VisceraEyes wrote:Waitwaitwait. LMAO Okay, hold up. First of all, My very first post opened with "Hi I'm town". Not to mention the fact that I just explained why loads of posting is going to be detrimental for town (which could be construed as 'dodging posting responsibility'). Now, s0Lstice is relatively new, and you're the one who posted Show nested quote +On June 30 2012 10:03 BroodKingEXE wrote: I want to start out discussing newbies. How are we as a town going to deal with players that are not as strong (as we do have a couple in the game)? Personally I think that these players need to be examined for the intent of their posts more than the evidence that they provide. Newbies still need to figure out what types of evidence are valid for examining a person, and we need to look at whether they are trying to draw out info from nothing or if there was actually a scummy read behind it. In the last few games I have played newbies have been lynched from poor evidence when they in fact were legitimately trying to help the town. I want everyone to take this in mind as we deal with newbies. .......I'm kinda having a hard time accepting that you don't have an agenda considering all these factors. FoS: BKEYou better watch your P's and Q's buster. You're now on my radar and trust me...no one likes being there.
My reply to you was that I wasn't newb. How many games have I played?: 5. Clearly we have a difference in definition for experienced players. I dont see how one can consolidate a post(as your post says) without losing content. ie if I have three facts and I post them in one big post, does that really save more space than three smaller posts?
|
Mattchew I'm not sure if you can trust what I think you're trusting.
|
You're probably referring to laya though I'd argue I'm townier than that dude.
|
On June 30 2012 10:21 s0Lstice wrote: Hello folks. I'll be joining the ranks of the scum hunters once again (5th time in a row!). This is my first large game, so it's going to be an adjustment...but one I'm capable of making. Being that it's friday night I will be scarce, but I'll be active on saturday, and I'm sure I'll have plenty of material to analyze. Stay tuned.
Expectations.
BKE, I still consider myself a newbie and I've played way more games than you, lol.
|
|
On June 30 2012 11:09 austinmcc wrote: Mattchew I'm not sure if you can trust what I think you're trusting. what are you talking about?
|
No, I don't think he is.
I'm going to stop my spam, though I expect you guys to not stop. Consider it.
|
For anybody who thought I was drunk earlier. They were wrong! Lets lynch VE!!!
ET, you with me?
Also, I think austinmcc is onto something. The bit about not trusting someone saying that something trustworthy is untrustworthy is completely unintelligible. Trust me, I have a doctorate in that shit. That clearly makes one of austinmcc and Mattchew scum! Or both! Or neither! Ah fuck, it's bedtime!
|
I'm not kidding, my role PM is like "you're a Role Name.".
Let's kill this guy:
On June 30 2012 10:12 mKmKmK wrote:vague post is vague...
##vote mKmKmK
|
oh apparently I'm a freak now
well that sucks
|
So, EschelonTee, you have a better plan for our Day 1 lynch? What do you think we should be doing?
|
Not lynching me or VE thats for damn sure
|
or you cause i doubt scum would be that bold to suggest something that dumb
|
Hi all. First game + first post playing mafia so bare with me.
On June 30 2012 11:28 NoSmurfHere wrote:I'm not kidding, my role PM is like "you're a Role Name.". Let's kill this guy: Show nested quote +On June 30 2012 10:12 mKmKmK wrote:On June 30 2012 10:06 NoSmurfHere wrote: I am a Role Name.
how quaint. vague post is vague... ##vote mKmKmK
My role PM also said I'm a "Role Name". So NoSmurfHere is definitely town in my books.
|
On June 30 2012 12:14 drwiggl3s wrote:Hi all. First game + first post playing mafia so bare with me. Show nested quote +On June 30 2012 11:28 NoSmurfHere wrote:I'm not kidding, my role PM is like "you're a Role Name.". Let's kill this guy: On June 30 2012 10:12 mKmKmK wrote:On June 30 2012 10:06 NoSmurfHere wrote: I am a Role Name.
how quaint. vague post is vague... ##vote mKmKmK My role PM also said I'm a "Role Name". So NoSmurfHere is definitely town in my books. I can confirm that both of these men are town.
............
|
|
|
|