|
Neither do I want wiggles nor do I want MZ do be vigged. If you want to vig someone shoot Kita or hold your fire for today.
No need to vig Wiggles when surely he can explain that odd lynch himself tomorrow and we decide wether or not that's odd enough to lynch him. I'd say it's making him look weird and somewhat scummy but I don't want to see him vigged before he has a chance to explain that. And I don't want him to explain that today. Neither do I want MZ vigged at all because I am not sure that guy has to be mafia.
|
On May 30 2012 03:59 Toadesstern wrote:
Neither do I want MZ vigged at all because I am not sure that guy has to be mafia.
why not?
|
On May 30 2012 04:03 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On May 30 2012 03:59 Toadesstern wrote:
Neither do I want MZ vigged at all because I am not sure that guy has to be mafia.
why not? I actually have a townread on that guy and I don't like compulsive vigs, especially not if we got no information at all due to a policy lynch d1.
|
Superstar have you even looked at Kita? I think he's a better vigi target than either of wiggle or MZ if we are talking about vigging vets all of a sudden. Whatever happened to shooting into lurkers anyway?
|
Hey guys,
seems like I have a lot of reading to do. I'll try my best and get a fair impression as soon as possible.
|
hey supersoft, do something useful and write an analysis on me and wiggles.
|
kita isn't doing anything? Where shall I look at?
|
On May 30 2012 04:08 VisceraEyes wrote: Superstar have you even looked at Kita? I think he's a better vigi target than either of wiggle or MZ if we are talking about vigging vets all of a sudden. Whatever happened to shooting into lurkers anyway? vets are easy to read, that's why
|
On May 30 2012 04:10 supersoft wrote: kita isn't doing anything? Where shall I look at? you've basically just admitted to not reading the thread.
|
btw I decided to start a diary :3
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On May 29 2012 23:31 strongandbig wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 20:17 Blazinghand wrote:On May 29 2012 20:05 Zealos wrote:On May 29 2012 19:06 supersoft wrote: does anyone disagree that zealos needs to be vigged? I explained that I didn't have the time to post yesterday, so vigging me will be killing a townie. Any reason you're so keen to do that? Good point! It's actually literally impossible for a mafia player to do that, and by saying "I was busy for 48 hours" you're doing something that only a town player could do! That really DOES excuse your D1 play :D Furthermore, your VT claim TOTALLY makes sense, was 100% useful to town, and definitely won't help scum target the blues. As a final note, when people make weird claims like that, post nothing for 48 hours, then make non-reasons to defend themselves not posting any reads or pressure D1, that's unbelievably helpful, and really is how all TL townies should play. You are not suspicious at all. Look, BH - I understand that you were offended, and I shouldn't have said what I said. I apologized to you twice, and tried to explain what I meant/should have said. Can we move on now? Posts like the one I quoted and the one before it in your filter aren't helping the town atmosphere. Let's also clear something up so we can move on. Are you satisfied with how I responded to your pressure on my aborted pardoner campaign or do you still want me to explain myself? @stofu: Your long reads post reminds me a lot of what I would have posted in my first scum games. I ended up subconsciously being very noncommittal that game, even though I didn't mean to. So how about you commit to something - who is your number 1 scum read? If you were a compulsive vigilante (had to shoot someone tonight) who would you shoot? (those don't have to be the same person.)
??? My post wasn't directed at you. You've quoted a post of me talking to zealos. The fact that I think zealos' D1 play has been sub-par has nothing to do with you. It's not all about you bro doosk.
|
@supersoft:
Lynching zealos was in no way the town consensus. It may have been the consensus of two or three players who were around and talking near deadline, but the doesn't make it the town consensus. There had been much more discussion about lynching either me or Sinensis.
And I explained why your plan is scummy. I don't agree that votes would automatically congeal around a few people if everyone just voted their strongest town read, and my evidence is twofold: 1, votes were already congealing around et and wiggles, and your plan would have strongly diluted them, and 2, town reads really do diverge a great deal. Apparently you got a town read from toad somehow after his mason claim. Apparently forumite thinks you're town for some reason.
I think it looks like a scum win-win to post your plan when you did. Either you get people off of the two main candidates and increase the coordination of scum, or you get to park your vote on someone who wasn't running for anything, thus getting to do exactly what you are doing now: avoid taking a position on the day1 lynch, and then Monday morning quarterbacking it later.
|
BH: I thought you were making fun of him because you were mad about him bringing up the fight between you and ET. I was responding to that post and the one you posted before it in context together, but I'm on my phone ATM so it's hard to quote more than one post at a time.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
It's not all about you bro
|
On May 30 2012 04:10 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: hey supersoft, do something useful and write an analysis on me and wiggles.
what is this? "write an analysis" I already posted what I think about you an wiggles. Why don't you tell me what you think about wiggles? Do you think it's normal townbehaviour, to be elected to chose the lynch and not participate at the final discussion about it?
And another question: Do you REALLY think I am scum?! Or do you even know I am not.
|
BH what are your thoughts on the super thing?
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
I think his overuse of [bold] and [color] is obnoxious. I also think his attempt to discredit Wiggles when he didn't do anything D1 is scummy. His response to Wiggles' reply is horrible as well. His excuse for not defending Sin was that he didn't read the thread D1, which... well, it doesn't make sense.
What are your thoughts.
|
In short, I think he's suspicious. I'll go into detail when I get to a computer but like you I've been underwhelmed with his posts since the flip and he was pseudo suspicious yesterday.
|
Catching up right now.
If anyone needs anything specific let me know, but it'll be a couple hours at the least before I can respond.
|
On May 30 2012 04:40 wherebugsgo wrote: Catching up right now.
If anyone needs anything specific let me know, but it'll be a couple hours at the least before I can respond.
no need. I already managed to make sure everyone knows I'm the most important guy in this game and more so, I am mod confirmed town! Just do as I say :3
|
|
|
|