|
On April 25 2012 14:00 hacklebeast wrote: can't tell if you are asking me, or questioning my american spelling of "steaks" rather than "stakes". Actually, I didn't even notice the typo till you pointed it out. ;;
|
On April 25 2012 14:15 Eywa- wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2012 14:00 hacklebeast wrote: can't tell if you are asking me, or questioning my american spelling of "steaks" rather than "stakes". Actually, I didn't even notice the typo till you pointed it out. ;; well, in that case, I don't really care as long as it is something everyone can see afterwords, but If i had to think of something off the top of my head:
1. Winner of each set gets loser's signature rights for a month (regardless of overall match results)
2. because MLP was already introduced earlier in the thread, losing captain must sing an MLP song of winning capitan's choice. I sugest this one:+ Show Spoiler +
A three person panel consisting of the winning captain, me, and my cocaster will decide on whether it's good enough. (not looking for musical perfection, but if you mumble/ just talk normally/ start laughing 1/3 of the way through and just giggle for the rest of the song you need to do it over.)
|
On April 25 2012 14:21 hacklebeast wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2012 14:15 Eywa- wrote:On April 25 2012 14:00 hacklebeast wrote: can't tell if you are asking me, or questioning my american spelling of "steaks" rather than "stakes". Actually, I didn't even notice the typo till you pointed it out. ;; well, in that case, I don't really care as long as it is something everyone can see afterwords, but If i had to think of something off the top of my head: 1. Winner of each set gets loser's signature rights for a month (regardless of overall match results) 2. because MLP was already introduced earlier in the thread, losing captain must sing an MLP song of winning capitan's choice. I sugest this one: + Show Spoiler +http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNrXMOSkBas A three person panel consisting of the winning captain, me, and my cocaster will decide on whether it's good enough. (not looking for musical perfection, but if you mumble/ just talk normally/ start laughing 1/3 of the way through and just giggle for the rest of the song you need to do it over.)
Yeah, you have to belt your song out with pride!
Also, another one of the stakes is that you have to buy t-shirts for everyone on the opposing team that say "raise the steaks!"
|
On April 25 2012 14:21 hacklebeast wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2012 14:15 Eywa- wrote:On April 25 2012 14:00 hacklebeast wrote: can't tell if you are asking me, or questioning my american spelling of "steaks" rather than "stakes". Actually, I didn't even notice the typo till you pointed it out. ;; well, in that case, I don't really care as long as it is something everyone can see afterwords, but If i had to think of something off the top of my head: 1. Winner of each set gets loser's signature rights for a month (regardless of overall match results) 2. because MLP was already introduced earlier in the thread, losing captain must sing an MLP song of winning capitan's choice. I sugest this one: + Show Spoiler +http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNrXMOSkBas A three person panel consisting of the winning captain, me, and my cocaster will decide on whether it's good enough. (not looking for musical perfection, but if you mumble/ just talk normally/ start laughing 1/3 of the way through and just giggle for the rest of the song you need to do it over.) I accept these terms. Number one should be if a player loses more than they win, they get their sig owned by the opposition.
|
On April 25 2012 14:36 ninazerg wrote: Yeah, you have to belt your song out with pride!
On April 25 2012 14:47 Eywa- wrote: I accept these terms. Number one should be if a player loses more than they win, they get their sig owned by the opposition.
Boom, there you have it. Everyone chastise the shit out of the loser if they don't follow through in a timely manner.
|
All that's left is for Shimy to accept this ridiculousness, then it's off to the races!
|
Wow an interesting-looking grudge match. More interestingly though, Eywa and nina are getting along pretty well.
My proposal:
- If Team Eywa loses, Eywa must get along with nina just as well for a month. He has to treat her well, must not oppose anything that nina says. In short, eywa becomes nina's manslave for a month. And Eywa's teammates get a free disneyland vacation for a week each.
- If Team Eywa wins, Eywa and nina are free to do whatever they want. TAKK members get a free disneyland vacation for a week each.
|
I think it is a safe assumption that Eywa will go down 6-0 or something along this result.
Not to be to harsh, but (and since this is allowed) Eywa is totally trash in BW.
Let us make it harder, Team TAKK plays Mouse only to give Eywa a chance?
|
On April 25 2012 18:39 chrisolo wrote: I think it is a safe assumption that Eywa will go down 6-0 or something along this result.
Not to be to harsh, but (and since this is allowed) Eywa is totally trash in BW.
Let us make it harder, Team TAKK plays Mouse only to give Eywa a chance? Cool talk, but I generally allow TAKK players to get a ling runby in to kill my main just to make it more challenging... Win rate still 100% with this occurrence.
|
|
On April 26 2012 02:31 randomKo_Orean wrote: This isn't a real grudgematch... this is lame.
Do not taint the name of grudgement for your blogging purposes.
Only grudgematch I'd accept from you is ninazerg vs Tesla.
I'm personally afraid that my cyberbullying would drive her to suicide, and I don't want that on my conscience for the rest of my life, like what happened with Shade[AoV].
@ EVERYONE ELSE
THE STAKES HAVE BEEN RAISED AGAIN
The loser will request to have their TL account nuked.
Have a nice day.
|
On April 26 2012 01:28 Eywa- wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2012 18:39 chrisolo wrote: I think it is a safe assumption that Eywa will go down 6-0 or something along this result.
Not to be to harsh, but (and since this is allowed) Eywa is totally trash in BW.
Let us make it harder, Team TAKK plays Mouse only to give Eywa a chance? Cool talk, but I generally allow TAKK players to get a ling runby in to kill my main just to make it more challenging... Win rate still 100% with this occurrence.
Now you are saying that you allowed it, but we all know that our Ling Run-Bys would get in anyways and end the game 100%.
We can also make it like that: Bo11, if you win one map you win a set in the Bo11, but one guy from TAKK need to get three consecutive wins to win the set in the original Bo11. I think this is fair. Even you would luck in one map in 100.
Edit: What means nuked? Permbanned?
|
On April 26 2012 02:37 chrisolo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2012 01:28 Eywa- wrote:On April 25 2012 18:39 chrisolo wrote: I think it is a safe assumption that Eywa will go down 6-0 or something along this result.
Not to be to harsh, but (and since this is allowed) Eywa is totally trash in BW.
Let us make it harder, Team TAKK plays Mouse only to give Eywa a chance? Cool talk, but I generally allow TAKK players to get a ling runby in to kill my main just to make it more challenging... Win rate still 100% with this occurrence. Now you are saying that you allowed it, but we all know that our Ling Run-Bys would get in anyways and end the game 100%. We can also make it like that. Bo11, if you win one map you win a set in the Bo11, but one guy from TAKK need to get three consecutive wins to win the set in the original Bo11. I think this is fair. Even you would luck in one map in 100. Edit: What means nuked? Permbanned? I'm sorry, I have proof behind my claim whereas you have none of yours. So... I'd say you're pretty much just. Fake and/or Gay.
|
On April 26 2012 02:42 Eywa- wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2012 02:37 chrisolo wrote:On April 26 2012 01:28 Eywa- wrote:On April 25 2012 18:39 chrisolo wrote: I think it is a safe assumption that Eywa will go down 6-0 or something along this result.
Not to be to harsh, but (and since this is allowed) Eywa is totally trash in BW.
Let us make it harder, Team TAKK plays Mouse only to give Eywa a chance? Cool talk, but I generally allow TAKK players to get a ling runby in to kill my main just to make it more challenging... Win rate still 100% with this occurrence. Now you are saying that you allowed it, but we all know that our Ling Run-Bys would get in anyways and end the game 100%. We can also make it like that. Bo11, if you win one map you win a set in the Bo11, but one guy from TAKK need to get three consecutive wins to win the set in the original Bo11. I think this is fair. Even you would luck in one map in 100. Edit: What means nuked? Permbanned? I'm sorry, I have proof behind my claim whereas you have none of yours. So... I'd say you're pretty much just. Fake and/or Gay.
I am Gay in the sense of happy
Happy that I will play Terran and still win :D
|
On April 26 2012 02:51 chrisolo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2012 02:42 Eywa- wrote:On April 26 2012 02:37 chrisolo wrote:On April 26 2012 01:28 Eywa- wrote:On April 25 2012 18:39 chrisolo wrote: I think it is a safe assumption that Eywa will go down 6-0 or something along this result.
Not to be to harsh, but (and since this is allowed) Eywa is totally trash in BW.
Let us make it harder, Team TAKK plays Mouse only to give Eywa a chance? Cool talk, but I generally allow TAKK players to get a ling runby in to kill my main just to make it more challenging... Win rate still 100% with this occurrence. Now you are saying that you allowed it, but we all know that our Ling Run-Bys would get in anyways and end the game 100%. We can also make it like that. Bo11, if you win one map you win a set in the Bo11, but one guy from TAKK need to get three consecutive wins to win the set in the original Bo11. I think this is fair. Even you would luck in one map in 100. Edit: What means nuked? Permbanned? I'm sorry, I have proof behind my claim whereas you have none of yours. So... I'd say you're pretty much just. Fake and/or Gay. I am Gay in the sense of happy Happy that I will play Terran and still win :D Maybe if you get the rest of your team to play the imbalanced/cowardly race, you might just win!
|
|
On April 26 2012 05:14 Artanis[Xp] wrote: What is this I dont even know how to make a full coherent sentence?
It's a Grudge Match, I would have hoped that you'd be able to gather that much.
|
On April 26 2012 02:37 chrisolo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2012 01:28 Eywa- wrote:On April 25 2012 18:39 chrisolo wrote: I think it is a safe assumption that Eywa will go down 6-0 or something along this result.
Not to be to harsh, but (and since this is allowed) Eywa is totally trash in BW.
Let us make it harder, Team TAKK plays Mouse only to give Eywa a chance? Cool talk, but I generally allow TAKK players to get a ling runby in to kill my main just to make it more challenging... Win rate still 100% with this occurrence. Now you are saying that you allowed it, but we all know that our Ling Run-Bys would get in anyways and end the game 100%. We can also make it like that: Bo11, if you win one map you win a set in the Bo11, but one guy from TAKK need to get three consecutive wins to win the set in the original Bo11. I think this is fair. Even you would luck in one map in 100. Edit: What means nuked? Permbanned?
Yes, a nuke is a permban from Teamliquid for all of eternity. They will be banished to post on Gosugamers forever.
|
On April 26 2012 07:57 ninazerg wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2012 02:37 chrisolo wrote:On April 26 2012 01:28 Eywa- wrote:On April 25 2012 18:39 chrisolo wrote: I think it is a safe assumption that Eywa will go down 6-0 or something along this result.
Not to be to harsh, but (and since this is allowed) Eywa is totally trash in BW.
Let us make it harder, Team TAKK plays Mouse only to give Eywa a chance? Cool talk, but I generally allow TAKK players to get a ling runby in to kill my main just to make it more challenging... Win rate still 100% with this occurrence. Now you are saying that you allowed it, but we all know that our Ling Run-Bys would get in anyways and end the game 100%. We can also make it like that: Bo11, if you win one map you win a set in the Bo11, but one guy from TAKK need to get three consecutive wins to win the set in the original Bo11. I think this is fair. Even you would luck in one map in 100. Edit: What means nuked? Permbanned? Yes, a nuke is a permban from Teamliquid for all of eternity. They will be banished to post on Gosugamers forever. Permaban is harsh, but it won't be me so idgaf.
|
Woah, im in a grudgematch? Should be fun.
|
|
|
|