| Blogs > Jimmy Raynor |
|
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
On February 22 2012 06:06 Kipsate wrote: I would play Warcraft 4 for the singleplayer alone probably. Really? The campaign in TFT was pretty awful, the multiplayer is really the only reason a lot of people played the game. Strangely, I've been thinking of WC3 lately, I might have to hop on ladder later and play some games.... (if I can remember how to play O.O) | ||
|
kuresuti
1393 Posts
On February 22 2012 06:52 TheToast wrote: Really? The campaign in TFT was pretty awful, the multiplayer is really the only reason a lot of people played the game. Strangely, I've been thinking of WC3 lately, I might have to hop on ladder later and play some games.... (if I can remember how to play O.O) Saying it was awful is a bit harsh though don't you think? I played it through without getting the feeling of grinding until the next story segment, which made it enjoyable for me. I hope you don't run into lossbots on the ladder  Also... + Show Spoiler + Blizzard has been making Warcraft 4 for five years already.+ Show Spoiler + Probably... | ||
|
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
On February 22 2012 07:17 kuresuti wrote: Saying it was awful is a bit harsh though don't you think? I played it through without getting the feeling of grinding until the next story segment, which made it enjoyable for me. I hope you don't run into lossbots on the ladder Also... + Show Spoiler + Blizzard has been making Warcraft 4 for five years already.+ Show Spoiler + Probably... Me either, but if I go onto ICCup I'm going to get destroyed. Also I don't feel like installing the ICCup client. | ||
|
nikj
Canada669 Posts
| ||
|
Gheed
United States972 Posts
On February 22 2012 07:29 nikj wrote: I'd prefer WC4 to be more like WC2 in all honesty. With regard to the story or the gameplay? | ||
|
Mingle
United Kingdom26 Posts
| ||
Falling
Canada11182 Posts
Personally I'd see atmosphere or art style similar to WC2. If you ever thought about it, the storylines for WC3 seemed somewhat dark, but they never felt dark like in WC2. I don't know, whatever muse that Blizzard was using in the 90's (Warcraft, Diablo, and Starcraft) seemed darker than it is today. While they have gotten MUCH better at designing single player levels, there's a more subtle shift away from something I can't quite put my finger on. That and they need to start adding more cutscenes back in. We used to get one every 4 missions, now its one at the very end of the campaign. I'd settle for several lower quality ones for cost sakes, but they really helped build the atmosphere as you played the game. The graphics haven't aged well, but that intro has been burned into my mind. Ah, and I miss the old narrator But I would love to see a Warcraft IV in any event. Warcraft 2 introduced me to Blizzard games and I've finally played through WC3. I never played those games multiplayer, but I legitimately enjoyed the campaigns of both. | ||
|
Hyren
United States817 Posts
On February 22 2012 08:40 Falling wrote: really helped build the atmosphere as you played the game. The graphics haven't aged well, but that intro has been burned into my mind. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPceWwNia6I Ah, and I miss the old narrator omg yes <3 | ||
|
Mobius_1
United Kingdom2763 Posts
I was kind of young to properly have enjoyed WC3 but it was nonetheless a good time and we wouldn't have Dota etc without it. WC3 was a monumental game and I hope WC4 can be so as well. | ||
|
mrGRAPE
Singapore293 Posts
| ||
|
TheDougler
Canada8297 Posts
On February 22 2012 06:37 babylon wrote: The WC3 single-player is fucking amazing. I'd do the same. The SC2 single-player makes me cry at how much lost potential there is. Goddammit, Blizzard. Whyyyyy? Absolutely. Though Gheed raises a valid point. I think ultimately the reason WC4 will never exist is because they screwed up and forgot this was the age of simplification, thus DoTA and MOBAs happened and so WC4 never will I hope I'm wrong. Edit: Also, this: | ||
|
deathly rat
United Kingdom911 Posts
Edit: Nobody cares about the lore. They can make it in a alternative reality universe as far as I am concerned. | ||
|
GARO
United States2255 Posts
Fuck WoW lore forever | ||
|
babylon
8765 Posts
On March 06 2012 10:29 deathly rat wrote: I think that Blizzard really was shocked and unprepared for how popular WoW was, and they just got completely sucked into concentrating on it. Now they have a team working on SC2, and Diablo3 (i guess small teams since everything takes so long), when they are finished with these projects I wouldn't be surprised if they made WC4. I just think it is awesome that they decided to finally get back to the kind of games they used to make before WoW. I mean, even if they decided to make a new MMO, it wouldn't have the same impact on the business as it did before because they already have the infrastructure in place. I played WC3 when it first came out (I still have the game), but only single player because tbh back in the day not everyone had internets available to them and online play was not a common thing like it is now. Maybe I will give WC3 online a try sometime, it seems like there are some people who still play it. Edit: Nobody cares about the lore. They can make it in a alternative reality universe as far as I am concerned. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=317133 Come join us~ | ||
| ||
BSL: GosuLeague
RO24 - Group B
Squizen vs TBD
Semih vs TBD
KwarK vs TBD
Jumper vs TBD
Radley vs TBD
HBO vs TBD
[ Submit Event ] |
|
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
WardiTV Invitational
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
WardiTV Invitational
OSC
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
SOOP
NightMare vs Oliveira
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
