EPTWell done, bad townies and scum. You have driven me nuts with your pointless accusations.
If it will get me lynched at least you'll have more info than is available and can be obtained through the people you want dead now.
BC's Arkham City - Page 33
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
Well done, bad townies and scum. You have driven me nuts with your pointless accusations. If it will get me lynched at least you'll have more info than is available and can be obtained through the people you want dead now. | ||
|
hiro protagonist
1294 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On February 08 2012 04:30 hiro protagonist wrote: Everyone should ignore Bill until he starts making sense. Anyone doing otherwise at this time is very bad for town atmosphere. hey there hiro. Where have you been all day? | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On February 08 2012 04:25 Tobberoth wrote: Isn't it a bit weak to attack timing from a person who hasn't been all that active? it's just funny that ico unvoted him 10 minutes ago who's to say he isn't active in his mafia quicktime? On February 08 2012 04:27 Toadesstern wrote: Oh and BM sry for calling it stupid as well. I'm getting carried away with all those insults. So if you really got it as an insult I'm sorry about that and will stop it. I just don't know if I'm believing a word you say so rephrase "stupid" with "weird" or "bullshit" (bullshit in like you're making it up). Will try to keep the insults on wbg only from now on. It's alright, man. I don't mind my ideas being called stupid, as long as it's not a personal attack, because that makes me want to backlash (and i can't afford that, nor do i want that, on the internet) I understand what you're saying. you don't know if you can trust me. The thing is, I don't know if i can trust any of you all, either. I am always pushing people claiming to me in PM (we dont have PMs this game) as a blue, and that's essentially what i'm doing here look at haunted mafia, where i was modkilled for aggressively posting just like this as a mad hatter look at my first game of mafia ever where i was a detective and claimed to 3 people in pm d1 look at this game where i could have claimed in the neighborizer, but i chose to out that id rather claim here, before claiming the neighborizer exists whatsoever we have 5-7 vig shots, plus batman wanting hugo dead, PLUS our lynches if we massclaim and reduce the scum to the wiggle room of either making it a one person vs one person lynch on "no i'm the riddler" "no you're not, i am!", or claiming townie, then that's great for town, and we can organize our blues freely, right in their faces. One thing people don't realize about teamliquid is there are too many powerroles in a game, and it is unfairly balanced for the town because of all the modkills that occur (whether we want to admit it or not) i am merely wanting to abuse the fact that we are on tier 3 tech before them On February 08 2012 04:30 hiro protagonist wrote: Everyone should ignore Bill until he starts making sense. Anyone doing otherwise at this time is very bad for town atmosphere. ok? why? you're also contradicting yourself, and being hypocritical. Am I not the only name you spoke of, here? I am not seeing your protown play that I saw from you as a detective in L, why not? nervous? | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
If we have 16 blues claiming We don't know how many blues there are though... Note: Some names appear under 2 categories. These players will have to decide to be one or the other for their role. They are not both. Some roles might also have slight alterations to the "standard" although nothing game breaking. Not all names listed are guarenteed to be in this game, however only names listed will be in this game. Each role, much like Asylum, will have unique flavour text to make the gf style roles have more fun with the game. See Arkham Asylum for flavour text examples that I used for when you submit your role choice. | ||
|
incifan
Germany138 Posts
On February 08 2012 04:36 Bill Murray wrote: it's just funny that ico unvoted him 10 minutes ago It is especially "funny" because I never voted for him in the first place, and still don't. I probably should have on page 14. But I missed that opportunity aswell. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
How is he in line for a mod-kill when hes already posted, and got his vote in? How was that post "timed perfectly"? I wrote shit, I clicked post. It is hardly a delayed OMGUS. Since hes called me out once, does that bar me from ever voting him for the rest of the game or be branded as an OMGUS'er? He posts his 'reads', but are they really reads? he titles it 'lets discuss current votes' and then regurgitates what everyone has already said about the leading vote-getters. Lets take a look at them shall we: + Show Spoiler + On February 08 2012 03:47 ico wrote: @kitaman27 to be honest, I had to take a step back from the thread and figure out whether or not all the spam/trolling was normal for a game here. Let's discuss current votes: rgTheSchworz: I do not think he is scum. His case against kenpachi is weak, which is weird considering how easy a vote for kp is to justify. Because of that, I give him the benefit of the doubt and consider him a townie who is in over his head. Cyber_Cheese actually makes a decent vote, I'll repeat myself and say how scummy I find him being very active during a time he excused himself for prior. He is also fishing for the Joker. And he enabled DoctorSpamalot going on and on about batman, littering the thread. After his vote on RG gains some following he vanishes. Adam4167: Already talked about him, by the time he posts there are options for real/pressure votes available, yet he elects to go with a "random" vote on someone who had not posted by that time. He is in turn directly defended by DoctorSpamalot, which is weird. I really don't like how many pointless posts I had to read because of him. But dislike does not make a good case, so I can not vote for DoctorHelveticus at this time. Should he keep spamming I'll have to reconsider. I missed my opportunity to go after him 15 pages ago, which sucks. Sheth: I really can't read his behaviour so far. It is scummy, but he isn't the only one posting pointless rabble. For now he got the benefit of the doubt. So for now: ##Vote Cyber_Cheese @BM: what are taking? @Kitaman27: Why did you just write your vote down here and not in the actual vote thread? Alright, back to catching up with the thread. -He states that RGSchworz is probably not scum due to his case on Kenpachi being crap. RGSchowrz entire case revolved around Kenpachi's townie claim, something which Ico took offense to originally. How does this make his case crap then, if they share points of view? -Cheese. Well i mean just look at it. He calls cheese scummy for declaring his inactivity, then when cheese actually DOES go inactive, he calls him out for 'vanishing'. This is making something out of nothing. -His argument against me is 'ive already talked about it', then regurgitated what you said. -He says DrH spams a lot, and if he 'should continue to spam, ill have to rethink him not being scum'. Its a nothing read, capped off with 'i missed my opportunity to go after him 15 pages ago, which sucks'. Its never too late to scum hunt, if you think there's anything there, follow it up. -His line on sheth contradicts itself at the outset. 'I cant read his play, its scummy'. Well is it null ... or scummy? pick. Giving someone the benefit of the doubt after you've just called them 'scummy' is lazy. There's hardly an original thought in here. All of his reads are lazy and or contradictory. He tries to highlight 'bad play' and label it as a 'threat to town', a scum tactic. My vote stands. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
risk.nuke called me a maniacal egocentric in the quicktopic, so im a bit flustered, and potentially modkilled as a power role, because it made me erase a message asking him to stop using ad hominem. I didn't want to get into discussion of it, and I was even going to delete the "fuck you" post, but you can't delete two posts previous in there... if i don't get modkilled, I will probably be posting less than I have been, considering noone is biting on the "massclaim and simply win" strategy that we could easily employ chaoser, I understand it might be ~12-15 and not 16, but there is no way it's under 10-12  | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
1) How were you introduced to mafia? 2) How would you describe your playstyle? 3) Are you better as mafia, or town? RVS is overrated. I personally prefer RQS, and having a questionnaire. As such, I will initiate that: I'll go first. 1) I first started here, on Teamliquid 2) I would say that I'm erratic, with unique and creative ideas 3) I am better at getting people to listen to me as mafia, but sometimes I am obvious. I would say I am better overall at being town, though, like this game, people rarely listen to me. I am actually a very good scumhunter, which is why I was kind of nervous when I got a power role. @adam, on page 14 you voted for someone who, having not posted, was in line to be modkilled in that post you had legit reasoning to vote kurumi why would you vote for someone you had to have a null read on, unless he's your scumbuddy, when you may end up being stuck with that vote if you can't get back on before the deadline? (internet problems, family problems, zombie apocalypse) wouldnt it be better to have a vote on someone you have reasoning on, regardless of when it occurs within the game? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On February 08 2012 04:57 Bill Murray wrote: I want everyone to answer these: 1) How were you introduced to mafia? 2) How would you describe your playstyle? 3) Are you better as mafia, or town? RVS is overrated. I personally prefer RQS, and having a questionnaire. As such, I will initiate that: I'll go first. 1) I first started here, on Teamliquid 2) I would say that I'm erratic, with unique and creative ideas 3) I am better at getting people to listen to me as mafia, but sometimes I am obvious. I would say I am better overall at being town, though, like this game, people rarely listen to me. I am actually a very good scumhunter, which is why I was kind of nervous when I got a power role. @adam, on page 14 you voted for someone who, having not posted, was in line to be modkilled in that post you had legit reasoning to vote kurumi why would you vote for someone you had to have a null read on, unless he's your scumbuddy, when you may end up being stuck with that vote if you can't get back on before the deadline? (internet problems, family problems, zombie apocalypse) wouldnt it be better to have a vote on someone you have reasoning on, regardless of when it occurs within the game? Random questions like this could very easily allow Mafia to hollowly contribute to the (drowning) thread. Please do something relevant or spam your 'mason network' with this BS. I'm really starting to get a red feel from BM because of shit like this. Can we just lynch it? Sheth has at least come back and this is destroying the town atmosphere. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [Click me!] + Kenpachi (0): rgTheSchworz (5): ]Cyber_Cheese, Kenpachi, Jaybrundage (0/1): Adam4167, Tunkeg (0): Slardar (0): Visveraeyes (0): Kitaman27 (0): -_-Quails (1): rgTheSchworz, layabout (1): Cyber_Cheese (6): layabout, Toadesstern, DoctorHelvetica, Slardar, Kurumi, ico Toadesstern (1): Liquid'Sheth (4): Katina, "Palmar" (wrong voting pattern), forumite, Adam4167 (1): Bill Murray, DoctorHelvetica (1): JayJay54, Chaoser (1): Tobberoth, Ico (0/1): Adam4167 (did not unvoteJaybrundage), | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
im going to vote sheth on deductive reasoning, an itching feeling, and meta feel based upon his scum game ##unvote: adam ##vote: sheth | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On February 08 2012 04:34 Toadesstern wrote: hey there hiro. Where have you been all day? Also repeating myself to get an answer. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
Me and jay have a history of trying to get each other killed. So far i'm winning. Last game I got my votes in, from another state, while at a funeral and drunk 95% of the time. I make it happen because I care. I was always coming back to change that vote on JB. Zombie Apocalypse or no. If my case on Kurumi was so 'solid','decent' and 'legit', why not pick it up and run with it yourself? I still think he has a chance of flipping scum, but he also has good town play, as evident in TL50. It'll shine through in a day or two, or we hang him, pretty simple. Currently I'm focusing on someone who I see doing nil for town, while Kurumi proves his 'worth'. | ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
I sense that I am about to be lynched, if not today maybe tomorrow. Also the atmosphere is turnin mafia-favored rapidly. Votes flying left and right, dispersed votes makin it easy for scum to lynch town today. Due to that, I am claiming: I am a Detective .Unless people insist that I claim my name, I won't do it due to obvious reasons : I may or may not be Catwoman's target. I have not had the chance to investigate yet. I will probably be roleblocked.untill we can find the roleblocker. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On February 08 2012 05:17 rgTheSchworz wrote: Not Random anymore. I sense that I am about to be lynched, if not today maybe tomorrow. Also the atmosphere is turnin mafia-favored rapidly. Votes flying left and right, dispersed votes makin it easy for scum to lynch town today. Due to that, I am claiming: I am a Detective .Unless people insist that I claim my name, I won't do it due to obvious reasons : I may or may not be Catwoman's target. I have not had the chance to investigate yet. I will probably be roleblocked.untill we can find the roleblocker. you will probably be killed by catwoman because you claimed DT. The only reason not to kill you instantly as catwoman is the wifom you created because he might think that a DT is not going to claim DT. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
| ||
