BC's Arkham City - Page 32

On February 08 2012 03:56 risk.nuke wrote:
##Vote Toadesstern
Behold Sir. Spam-alot from the kingdom of no-content. I got scumvibes from him earlier as I was reading the thread. Nothing in his filter tells me otherwise. I like him more then other lynch-candidates.
Meta: I've seen him under suspicion before and he acted calm and reserved, nothing like this.

I reserve the right to change my mind at any time.

On February 08 2012 04:03 Bill Murray wrote:

im not a mason
ive been neighborized
mason = you know alignment
neighbor = you dont know alignment
you all are killing me with calling it a mason....

1) the benefit is that scum have no will to out the simple fact of its existence
2) of course there could be scum in the network, like i said, it ISNT A MASON, it's a neighborizer
3) ... your case on doctorhelvetica is pretty bad

On February 08 2012 03:51 Toadesstern wrote:
sheth you're pretty wishy washy this game imo. More than you're usually. Maybe that's because of the third party and you don't know what to talk about (hell, first game with 3rd parties for me as well) But don't worry, there's a bunch of people voting CC and since he's still my #1 I'm probably going to unvote you and vote him instead.

On February 08 2012 04:11 Bill Murray wrote:

this sounds like toadesstern is consoling his scumbuddy he has a vote on

adam4147
toadesstern
sheth
cybercheese
kenpachi
jackal

^ list of scum

On February 08 2012 04:14 Jayjay54 wrote:
also, as you are claiming a power role, aren't you afraid of our precious catwoman?

"With her honed skills she is able to eliminate one player a night regardless of protections".

That doesn't look smart to me.

On February 08 2012 04:10 Jayjay54 wrote:


1) if it's so good for town to get the fact of a network out there, why are you the only one claiming? And why just now?
2) I know, that you know it, so why on earth is it pro town to keep information from town which scum already probably has. It creates a information deficit.
3) yea, Palmar said so already, but no one really can say why. He's spammy, has zero content, vote switches (even without posting in the thread) and enforces third party discussions. How the hell is that a bad case? Please enlighten me.

On February 08 2012 04:14 Jayjay54 wrote:
also, as you are claiming a power role, aren't you afraid of our precious catwoman?

"With her honed skills she is able to eliminate one player a night regardless of protections".

That doesn't look smart to me.

On February 08 2012 04:15 Palmar wrote:
BM is insane.

That's the only logical explanation to this mess. For what it's worth he's probably not scum, or at least not a super obvious one.

On February 08 2012 04:15 Toadesstern wrote:

he's what I thought VE was last game. Or he's stupid. Noone knows

On February 08 2012 04:17 Adam4167 wrote:
@BM

You may have buddied the shit out of me in TL50, but it was the buddying that alerted me to your bullshit early on in the piece. If it weren't for your bodyguards, I was vig'ing you out of that game N1.

You make it out like me voting for jaybrundage is so scummy because "ZOMG he hasn't posted yet!". This might actually mean something if I hadn't declared I was voting for someone who hadn't posted yet when I placed the vote.

I am not going to cast a serious vote with my first post of the game. I wanted reactions from the people I questioned and then I would vote based on the additional information (ie their responses).

You're claiming meta of me after one game which I half-played and three posts in this game? Come on.

Your 'case' involves repeating the same 2 things over and over, and is crap as a result.



I like how Ico sheeps your (bad) case BM, then says you're on drugs in the same post. Stinks of scum.

##Vote: Ico

On February 08 2012 04:18 Jayjay54 wrote:


difference is that there is a third party in the game with the sole purpose to kill blue power roles regardless of protection. VE's move was stupid. BM's move is just plain out dumb.

and I still want to hear from him and palmar why my case on Doc is bad. Seriously.
I love discussions about scum candidates, they are always town favoured (unlike third party discussions). => Just saying "you are stupid" is not pro town.

On February 08 2012 04:23 Bill Murray wrote:

ok, so you'd rather waste your vote on someone potentially modkilled, for instance if you end up not being able to log back on due to relationship issues (im assuming you have a relationship), and cant make more than one post, versus having it on someone you have decent, if not solid, reasoning on? I'm not buying it.

I also am not buying the fact that you didn't time this post perfectly
It is a delayed OMGUS on ico

On February 08 2012 04:16 Bill Murray wrote:
I havent read from, say, 22-26, so i wasnt sure noone had claimed it. i consider towncred in claiming it, so if someone else had, great.

one guy has gained town cred from the neighborizer, one guy has gotten my eye more than he has in the thread, and another is confirmed town. How is outting information to the thread creating an information deficit? 1

I do NOT want to handle everything there. I am letting the town know about its existence, so that they're not left derpily in the dark. Asylum vs that game flamewheel had with the ninjas, world of difference

doctorhelvetica has contributed more than nearly everyone within the thread, do you not see that? would scum not advocate talking about 3rd party, then do so, in a direct contradiction? he's also being really up front.2

if you want to vote on a contradiction, why don't you vote for adam, who had reasoning, yet still chose to cast an RVS vote. That's a contradiction.3


i've already stated there is no way i would be outting if i was one of their targets 4

my role can't afford to die n1, given flavor text. I really need to be kept alive, so I had to out, especially given that I was #1 on the neighborizer list, so if another town PR knew I was town given my case on Kenpachi, mafia already had a HUGE target on my back 5

On February 08 2012 04:18 Jayjay54 wrote:


difference is that there is a third party in the game with the sole purpose to kill blue power roles regardless of protection. VE's move was stupid. BM's move is just plain out dumb.

and I still want to hear from him and palmar why my case on Doc is bad. Seriously.
I love discussions about scum candidates, they are always town favoured (unlike third party discussions). => Just saying "you are stupid" is not pro town.

On February 08 2012 04:20 Palmar wrote:
okay, I'll rephrase.

You're not insane.

However, what you're doing doesn't make any sense at all, it's completely useless and bad. It's one of the more stupid things I've seen in a mafia game. This is nothing personal, I have the right to criticize your actions because they affect the game. I'm not saying you're dumb, just that everything you're doing is dumb.