|
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
On January 13 2012 19:53 EchelonTee wrote: When killed, do Bodyguards flip as Bodyguard(red or blue), or just Townie/Mafia Role? Town flip Bodyguard. Red flips Bodyguard in addition to any role he or she may have otherwise.
|
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
On January 13 2012 21:19 rgTheSchworz wrote: I support bumat's anaylysis of Adam, he is pro town for me. He has no previous history, and his first post is defo not scummy.What i don't agree is him giving advice for blue roles and ,,MASON ME''. Maybe blue, Maybe red, NOT TOWN. This guy is not town, he runs for mayor, gives advice Sandroba has so far made 1 post, not giving out a ton, i encourage him to be posting more.
Protactinium tries to have a fight on day 1 on the basis that mr wiggles' campaign is not stone-solid. My policy as town would'nt be Lynch all Liars, because non-newb mafia don't lie usually and that you may easily lynch a blue role, which has to make more use of lies than a townie.I would lynch all those unproductive enough to start a fight so easily as Protactinium has.
So, day 1 candidates for a lynch, in order: Risk.nuke Protactinium Bumat No editing, please.
|
On January 14 2012 07:17 Mattchew wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2012 07:14 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: This is an interesting conversation, you haven't convinced me but some good points have been brought up. What happens if a mason chooses not to claim when you all order them to? Do you lynch him the second he comes out on the policy of LaL? I just feel like this whole plan is very shortsighted.
And on that note I'd like to get back to the mayor/sheriff discussion. The last thing we want is to get completely sidetracked day 1. Bc's claim created good discussion and created a lot of material however we need to refocus and get done what needs to be done.
I still support BC to be my sheriff, however given that a lot of people are nervous of him because of his claim I'd like to remind people that Kita is my second choice. If you can't bring yourself to vote BC then vote kita. He's made some good points and he's probably best option behind bc.
I'd really like to hear from L right now. He's the only really good vet who hasn't checked in yet and I'd love to hear what he has to say about mayor. who is you? (curiosity not accusatory)
Meapak is a baller. Doesn't mean he's town, but he's pretty good.
|
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
On January 14 2012 01:15 Kurumi wrote: I assume Mafia can kill their own members? Yes.
|
United States2095 Posts
On January 14 2012 07:33 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2012 07:23 Liquid`Sheth wrote:On January 14 2012 07:10 ~OpZ~ wrote:On January 14 2012 07:01 Liquid`Sheth wrote:On January 14 2012 06:44 ~OpZ~ wrote:Sheth....For real? That is your reason for voting for someones who already stated that their activity will be waning? Would all it take to get you to change to BC or Sandroba be a declaration of lynching Ciry or is it just because he has already chosen his lynch target? Bill, I don't really think Sandroba is scum because he called for a mason mass claim. So did BC in a round-a-bout way. I personally don't view the role with much power, so I don't know. I've been trying all day to think of a way to make it useful, but seriously, just ignoring pms this game seems the most highly logical play I could think of. I mean, I'm still gonna try and pm you. <3 Ya Buddddddddy. Welcome back. They haven't stated their activity will be waning. No just switching to lynching Cir wouldn't cause me to switch my vote. That was stated prior to the game start. I'm just curious as to your reasons for voting for them and the only reason I find is he is willing to lynch ciry. You didn't really say as to why and I found that scummy, so I guess it begs the question, why are you voting for protact? You find a small point of my post, and call it scummy. You haven't complained about anyone else's votes and yet you consider that scummy. I wasn't even the first person to put my vote on him, but once its possibly gaining steam you point out that what I'm doing is scummy. You've also claimed to be our second Mason for those who missed it, as I didn't realize it until I read your filter. A small point? Voting for mayor...is a small point? I want to clarify that also AS YOU DODGE my question. And just because they did it without attracting my written attention means I can't address you without addressing them? Srsly. Bad argument is bad argument.
I posted why above your post. You're welcome to address me about it, it just seems out of place. And then your complaining about me calling it a "small" point, which has nothing to do with whether I'm mafia or not(I'm not saying who I'm voting for isn't important, just that whether or not I consider it small or not isn't leading to if I'm mafia) You also seem quite scared from this post.
|
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
Also if you haven't been doing so, send questions/requests to both myself and jcarlsoniv for faster responses.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On January 14 2012 00:50 Kurumi wrote: Why would someone create a campaign for someone else without seeing him post ever? If anyone is voting for someone partly with the reason of "he's a good player" then they are doing the same thing. Don't know why you choose to call me out instead of any of the other lackluster votes. At least I have a plan and reasoning.
|
I know someone already pointed it out but I'm going to point it out again: blahz0r do you mind joining the discussion? That's your filter: Klick me!
Not exactly looking good. Actually looking like a guy who is about to get modkilled but for some reason you already voted so you should know that the game has already started. I know there's a couple of people who are lurking right now but you already voted so that's why I'm asking you and not everyone else.
|
On January 14 2012 07:39 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2012 07:17 Mattchew wrote:On January 14 2012 07:14 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: This is an interesting conversation, you haven't convinced me but some good points have been brought up. What happens if a mason chooses not to claim when you all order them to? Do you lynch him the second he comes out on the policy of LaL? I just feel like this whole plan is very shortsighted.
And on that note I'd like to get back to the mayor/sheriff discussion. The last thing we want is to get completely sidetracked day 1. Bc's claim created good discussion and created a lot of material however we need to refocus and get done what needs to be done.
I still support BC to be my sheriff, however given that a lot of people are nervous of him because of his claim I'd like to remind people that Kita is my second choice. If you can't bring yourself to vote BC then vote kita. He's made some good points and he's probably best option behind bc.
I'd really like to hear from L right now. He's the only really good vet who hasn't checked in yet and I'd love to hear what he has to say about mayor. who is you? (curiosity not accusatory) Meapak is a baller. Doesn't mean he's town, but he's pretty good.
you should really try to post with more than one line.
I personally like Meapak's campaign and how he approaches the thread. Maybe he's outsmarting me, but I get town vibes.
After BC is not longer a mayor option for me, I'm thinking of voting Meapak...
|
So far most of the candidates haven't put a lot of effort into this game.
It should be noted, once again, that the GF is selected after the mayoral elections. Thus mafia can send whoever they want at the elected spots, and if any veteran or suspicious day 1 players get elected then they can put the GF on someone else.
|
can be not is. If not chosen by the start of night 1 their roles get randomed, role to appear as must be chosen day 1, but yes they can wait till the election is pretty much decided to decide.
Also I missed the fact it's not the bodyguards providing the role check immunity oops.
I'm new so in general against pm games, only joined this one after that was changed, so don't have a problem supporting the just ignore pms from masons bit not so convinced on the masons claiming though.
whoever is elected consider outing a bodyguard particularly if you think they could use medic protection.
For now despite the picture kitaman27 has my vote.
this bugged me a bit, from bc's mayoral bid, nonsense but enough I will not vote for him.
On January 13 2012 16:40 BloodyC0bbler wrote: I will actively harass lurkers to play in this game as opposed to lurking, failure to begin playing will result in advocacy of vig shots. Threaten to lynch sure, but try to get vigs to waste their shots?
|
I still think BC is quite towny, as he put himself quite into the spotlight and his posts didnt raise suspicions. I just cannot imagine he would risk his quite good shot at an elected role by claiming mason if he was scum. Therefore, I think for the time I'm going to vote BC for mayor. I could be totally outplayed, but so be it. Or maybe I put too much value into an elected scum.
I am a new player, so I can imagine that good scum team can manipulate a inexperienced player, but he will probably only influence the game with his single vote (if he's green), so I can see why masons staying hidden is advantageous for town.
Also, since I got ignored the first time, why is there so much hate towards Ciry? I dont think his posts are very scummy, but there are 3 people (sandroba, proactinium and sheth) pushing for his lynch. I also dont think this alone is a scumtell, but its still pretty irritatiting ..
|
On January 14 2012 07:44 flamewheel wrote: Also if you haven't been doing so, send questions/requests to both myself and jcarlsoniv for faster responses. I'm sending all mine to Proactinium.
|
Hmm. As this thread slowed down a bit, could all the candidates please say what their lynch plan for day one is and why? would be quite nice for the town!
|
On January 14 2012 07:51 Foolishness wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2012 00:50 Kurumi wrote: Why would someone create a campaign for someone else without seeing him post ever? If anyone is voting for someone partly with the reason of "he's a good player" then they are doing the same thing. Don't know why you choose to call me out instead of any of the other lackluster votes. At least I have a plan and reasoning.
I found Foolish's campaign to be both hilarious and appropriate and will support either BM or BC today. I still think people should vote for me, but the general consensus seems to be that I'm not experienced enough, which is totally fair. I don't think I'm totally out of the running though, so I'm not going to withdraw quite yet...but expect me to withdraw if I don't get any more support by 12 hours to deadline.
|
Alright, I've been at work all day and it's taken me quite a while to catch up in the reading.
I'm going to reiterate, that I support the Bodyguards being made public. There was a point raised earlier which suggested that if this plan were carried through, the elected officials would be more vulnerable. I don't think that is the case. I have already stated my reasoning but here is the idea again.
If at least one of the Bodyguards is Town, then they player has to die before our Mayor and/or Sheriff are vulnerable.
If both Bodyguards die, everyone will be on guard and can then start to protect the elected officials.
If at most one dies, then the Mayor and/or Sheriff are still safe. Why? Because the mafia will have to trade at least one of their own to kill the Mayor and/or Sheriff.
Next, I think the Mass Mason Roleclaim is a terrible plan. The mafia know the roles of 10 players out of 50, namely, their own players. If all of the Masons claim, then they know the roles of more players in the game. If they can, they will target our powerful Blue roles, like Town Jack, Medic, Detective.
Why are you guys okay with helping them to narrow down their targets?
|
I'm going to need to reread the thread holistically before I make a decision about the lynch, but it will be based on pushing anti-town ideas and relative experience - I'm not really going to lynch Palmar, I just wanted him to come play with us. He sucks ass as scum, so he'll be an easy catch later on if he doesn't shape up.
|
On January 14 2012 09:07 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2012 07:51 Foolishness wrote:On January 14 2012 00:50 Kurumi wrote: Why would someone create a campaign for someone else without seeing him post ever? If anyone is voting for someone partly with the reason of "he's a good player" then they are doing the same thing. Don't know why you choose to call me out instead of any of the other lackluster votes. At least I have a plan and reasoning. I found Foolish's campaign to be both hilarious and appropriate and will support either BM or BC today. I still think people should vote for me, but the general consensus seems to be that I'm not experienced enough, which is totally fair. I don't think I'm totally out of the running though, so I'm not going to withdraw quite yet...but expect me to withdraw if I don't get any more support by 12 hours to deadline.
alright my vote is on sale. Do you still intend to lynch palmar?
how do you feel about the second mason claim?
|
sorry bro you got me ninja's
|
voting BC
a mason claim scum plan seems too elaborate to come to fruition so fast. He has been active and explained his plan well.
plus all the games i've played lately he's had a plan day 0 and was town so he has my vote for sheriff
no other candidate has done anything this game to warrant my vote, seems like most are trying to pull in votes based on meta which i am not too interested in
I am still looking at a mayoral candidate for the lynch today. Theres been about 10 (or more?) people running and pretty much half of them have faded much in activity - again I believe scum almost always runs for mayor. Should work from there.
|
|
|
|