|
On January 06 2012 00:03 Cwave wrote:
Posted earlier that i believe that he leans to much towards the Angel/Demon question and tries to steer away from Angels being our only threath. I think that goes without saying so it's just fluff to look like contributing by him. That and the focus on when it becomes night. Got told by Palmar that means nothing but i don't agree with that!
Got any cases yourself yet Syllo which are worth sharing?
I know Palmar already asked this, but how am I different from BH, HoD or Refallen who all focused on Angels being the ones we should focus on. Especially Refallens post here:
On January 04 2012 16:52 Refallen wrote:
Finally started! Hype!
My first thoughts on the setup;
Obviously, I think the best way to go about this game is to focus on killing angels in the early game. Once we get rid of the acolyte, the seer has an infinitely easier job in cleansing corruption because we can actually claim if we got corrupted and not get targetted right now as we get closer to the late game lynching demons obviously becomes more and more important, but town would have a huge benefit if we can reduce angel KP early on in the game, as this has a building effect of letting more townies live = demon corrupt has less of an impact.
This post is way more Anti-Angel then my post is being Anti-demon.
From my post:
That is why I think that killing any angel or demon is good. Not one over the other.
Trying to build a case on me with reason(s) others have done worse. Scummy?
|
I would like to hear some thoughts on Grackaroni/tyrran/refallen, all of which I would be interested in lynching today.
All have been around, posted nothing useful and I've small issues with the way they've approached the game so far. Grackaroni for going after bluelightz in a very questionable manner, Refallen for being supposedly very excited about the game and then disappearing (I also don't particularly like this post overall) and Tyrran for not reading in his haste to attempt to seem like he is contributing. Tyrran you have shown that you can be useful, do you intend to post anything at all today?
|
@DIrkzor
This post is way more Anti-Angel then my post is being Anti-demon.
what on earth is that even supposed to mean?
as far as i am aware the only way to be anti angel or anti demon is to act in a way that reveal angels or demons or kills them.
in that sense neither of your posts meet the criteria of anti-angel/demon because they are empty hypothetical's about events that we cannot choose between.
we don't know who the demons are, we don't know who the angels are, how can we focus on lynching one faction over the other? the fact that we cannot distinguish between them in the thread and we cannot chose between lynching an angel or a demon also means that regardless of which team "poses a bigger threat" town's goal is still lynch one of them so the "threat" they present isn't even a factor to consider when making the decision.
|
So since Cwave wants me dead i took a look at his filter.
On January 04 2012 19:54 Cwave wrote:
Wahee, the game started and i'm loving the potential dynamics of this game and my excel sheet is ready for it!
To continue on this strategy "discussion" that has started and wheter or not we should discuss this, i think as town we have too as its our only communication platform. Angels and Demons can discuss outside the thread so people hammering on the fact we shouldnt discuss strategy have it wrong in my opinion.
As its not relevant at the moment but will be after night one, i agree on the fact that claiming corruption means giving yourself on a platter to the acolyte unless our town sage illumanates you or channeler banishes you.
We also have a seer who in my opinion has the most important power of the game, namely the identification of angels! As of such, please don't roleclaim for now as mentioned in the pre-game discussion for with 3 factions in this game, 2 factions will instantly try to kill you.
Other thing, is there any way to see the vote count from the Zbot or do we only get a result when the majority happens?
His first post seems pretty townish. The thing that stands out is what i bolded. Why is the seer more important then say, the sage? The sage can also cleanse corruption aswell as finding demonscum whereas the sage can only find angelscum.
The only reason it stands out is because he targeted me because i pointed out that demons are just as big of a threat that angels are. Are you demon Cwave?
|
@layabout
Maybe that sentence didn't come out as it was meant. What i meant was that Refallen paints the Angels as a much bigger threat then I painted the demons to be. (For the record my first post was meant to make the demons just as much a threat as the angels)
And I agree with you. Angel or Demon lynches/kills are good either way. Which i also posted.
|
I have a question for people in the thread:
Why would a player publicly state, or post to imply that they are bad at certain aspects of mafia? + Show Spoiler +this could be to do with the quality of their scum play; their ability to analyse; their irrational fears about the game set-up; or even pretending to not understand the game mechanics or asking really stupid questions + Show Spoiler +town seem to do this last one a lot so even if somebody were pretending it would be a null tell
Consequences of calling yourself bad or being highly apologetic:
people may think that you are bad, subsequently they:
-lower their expectations for you, they do not expect you to play or be trying hard to play optimally
-may forgive you for playing sub-optimally or not contribute wrong
-may expect you to make mistakes and allow you to do so
-they might ignore you, because if you don't have any confidence in your ability why should they?
When publicly calling yourself bad would you make do you make those (or similar) considerations?
If you are a townie and you thinks you are bad then it seems unlikely that you would post like that had you considered the effects, because it makes it harder for you to convince people of your reads + Show Spoiler +or if you are a blue your investigation results
If you are not a townie then you are scum and you have more information than town has. You are trying to beat town and having additional information is one of your key assets. It could very well be in your best interests to be ignored or get away with mistakes because helping town goes against your win condition.
In my opinion then; such behaviour seems to be bad play from blues, bad but understandable play from some greens, and potentially good but often bad scum play.
Therefore things like this are making me suspicious:
+ Show Spoiler +On January 04 2012 17:46 Dirkzor wrote:
Game on!
This setup scares the living shit out of me. So many nuances to keep track of. Anyway...
I agree that Angels appear to be strongest in the beginning with 1/2 KP. But what haven't been mentioned is that Angels can kill the demon for us aswell. If we lynch Angel of Death and Angelic Acolyte we will have to lynch/Demon hunter the Demons. Since I don't know the Demon hunter or how good that person is, he could just aswell kill 3 town people the first 3 nights which of course would not be very favourable for us. It basicly means we would need to do more correct lynches while having a good demon hunter that don't fuck us over with continously town kills.
Demons also have the Twist ability which basicly makes one (1) of their members immune to night actions, rendering the demon hunter to be less useful.
What i wanted to point out that even if we get 3 correct Angel lynches (unlikely) the first 3 nights. The demons are equally capable to fuck us over. That is why I think that killing any angel or demon is good. Not one over the other. If we knew which angel or demon, it would be a different matter. On January 04 2012 18:22 Dirkzor wrote:Hehe... I must admit I didn't think that strat through. It kinda just came to me while writing  + Show Spoiler +has he not read the tl commandments? 3. THOU SHALL THINK BEFORE POSTING 4. THOU SHALL CONTRIBUTE TO THE SITE TOWN and BH + Show Spoiler +5. THOU SHALL NOT SPAM THE MAFIA THREAD Also this stuffwhy does it take BL 4 posts to answer the question of who he would shoot? On January 06 2012 00:27 Bluelightz wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2012 00:21 Palmar wrote:On January 06 2012 00:20 Bluelightz wrote:On January 06 2012 00:19 Palmar wrote:
Me talking to syllo doesn't mean I don't want to hear your answer to my hypothetical question Bluelight. with the game on the line, and your gun loaded, who takes the bullet and why? Hmm, if it was that i'd re-evaluate everyone other then RoL and if i find someone else scummier then him I wouldn't shoot RoL but If I didn't find anyone scummier i'd shoot RoL. Wait, didn't you just read everyone's filter? What's there to re-evaluate? Do you not like your conclusion of everyone being null? Okay, First, I Assumed that I didn't do the analysis of everyone Next, I would re-evaluate all the possible things Lastly, even though I still have null reads I dont really trust my ability to analyze people's post's. Though if there we're more post's I could make a more accurate analyisisNow, my if I would answer your hipotethical situation given with the analysis I had I would shoot RoL. whilst new townie seems like a valid explanation for the bolded, it is still concerning (additionally all null null/town seems very strange) Thing s that i don't think are is a tell s but that i will note for completeness and to avoid accusations of cherrypicking that might allow people to ignore the actual point i am making: + Show Spoiler +On January 04 2012 23:24 xsksc wrote:Hi guys. First multi-factional game for me as well, not really sure how we should proceed strategy-wise. Lynching an angel day 1 would obviously be ideal, although getting a demon is definitely better than a townie. Show nested quote +On January 04 2012 21:13 Refallen wrote:
Is this some kind of metagame thing again? Dosen't Palmar always troll around in day 1? I remember that in TLXLVIII. Yeah, and then he went on to be one of the only useful townies that actually read the game and used his brain. Show nested quote +On January 04 2012 21:07 syllogism wrote:
We should probably lynch palmar today, he appears to be some sort of scum and hating his life right now Syllo, if Palmar does decide to mess around on day one again, would it not be better to wait and see how he behaves later on (like in TLXVIII), rather than just lynching him?
P.S.thank you for answering so fast dirkzor
|
Think this makes me 3/3 of me being discussed as lynching on day 1 as a townie, my play sure is good /sarcasm.
Honestly though, was at a friends birthday party, just got home, about to sleep.
Syllo, and others, I don't see how showing angels were a bigger threat than demons would paint me as anti-town. Keep in mind that the context of the post when it was made; all of us were discussing the setup (mainly because it was start of day 1 and it served as a topic of discussion.) Obviously the point about us not being able to tell who was demon/angel makes the whole discussion basically practically useless, but it provided a topic for us to start talking about the game (if you want useless posts, see palmars kite claim)
With that said, I'll be reading through the thread tomorrow and posting who I think are suspicious. Right now at least my previous suspicion of Palmar has been assuaged at him posting and being his usual bullying town self.
|
@layabout
Why would a player publicly state, or post to imply that they are bad at certain aspects of mafia?
They do that because new players fear making mistakes. However it is NOT the best way to approach it.
Just keep an eye on Dirkzor later on, and don't lower your expectations. AKA. ignore his "noob claim".
Bluelightz looks weird, especially his wishywashness on who to shoot. The principal is the fact that he is a new player and held a tunneling pretty damn well. Too well, as if he had three heads instead of one. You get my point? And to be honest, no point in making that hugeass list if he wasn't going to say someone is scum.
I found Palmar's game fun. layabout, who would you shoot if you had to, and why?
|
@layabout
How is the statement that the setup scares me = me saying i think i'm bad? This setup is very interesting because it is not a straight up mafia game. It scares me becausei think its harder to figure stuff out...
and your 2nd quote of mine. Read the context and the strat (wasn't important how the strat went) that i actually posted and you will see that your point is completely useless.
And please lay, stop using spoilers when you are just making an extra sentence (inserted sentence? Mid sentence?) Don't know the english expression.
Edit before posting: Zerphirdd: I did NOT noob claim =(
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On January 06 2012 02:23 Refallen wrote:
Syllo, and others, I don't see how showing angels were a bigger threat than demons would paint me as anti-town. Keep in mind that the context of the post when it was made; all of us were discussing the setup (mainly because it was start of day 1 and it served as a topic of discussion.) Obviously the point about us not being able to tell who was demon/angel makes the whole discussion basically practically useless, but it provided a topic for us to start talking about the game (if you want useless posts, see palmars kite claim)
With that said, I'll be reading through the thread tomorrow and posting who I think are suspicious. Right now at least my previous suspicion of Palmar has been assuaged at him posting and being his usual bullying town self.
You are aware that demons have the same effective KP as angels right ._. every other night they "kill" two town votes with corruption, one by a townie no longer being able to vote, and one by the demons getting an extra vote. Look, just lynch hella mafia and our problem here is solved anyways. More lynching more win.
On January 06 2012 01:28 Dirkzor wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2012 00:03 Cwave wrote:
Posted earlier that i believe that he leans to much towards the Angel/Demon question and tries to steer away from Angels being our only threath. I think that goes without saying so it's just fluff to look like contributing by him. That and the focus on when it becomes night. Got told by Palmar that means nothing but i don't agree with that!
Got any cases yourself yet Syllo which are worth sharing? I know Palmar already asked this, but how am I different from BH, HoD or Refallen who all focused on Angels being the ones we should focus on.
What the dicks is this. You wanna go? I'll go. I'm fucking crazy I'll do it. "oh hey BH thinks we should focus on angels"
BULLSHIT. I'm calling you out right now for bullshit. QUOTE ME. Oh no wait you didn't cause you can't cause I didn't say we should be all up on angels business and not be on corrupted business.
"oh whats that blazinghand are you a sexy beast"
why yes yes I am let me share some quotes with you, discussing what I intially discussed coming into the game. BTW most of this stuff I was discussing was not exactly captain helpful but on the other hand I wasn't captian wrong here.
things I said:
On January 04 2012 16:02 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2012 15:34 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
If we lose our demon hunter or sage, then we need to start worrying about the demons more, and if we lose both then they become a threat on par with the angels, if not a greater threat. Now, I am not really sure how to distinguish between angel and demon rather than just town or not town until we get an angel or a demon to flip, but if you have a leaning toward one or the other, remember that killing angels is more important for now.
I'm guessing we'll just identify scum and kill them. Also, although angels have the KPs, it's possible to kill an angel while eliminating 0 kps or just eliminating their "semi" kp while conserving their masked KP. Demons are a much bigger threat long run with their lynch control.
"But wait blazinghand isn't this the same problem but with Demons clearly you are a moron"
Whoa whoa no need to be quick to judge, my friend. Check this out:
On January 04 2012 16:57 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2012 16:52 Refallen wrote:
Finally started! Hype!
My first thoughts on the setup;
Obviously, I think the best way to go about this game is to focus on killing angels in the early game. Once we get rid of the acolyte, the seer has an infinitely easier job in cleansing corruption because we can actually claim if we got corrupted and not get targetted right now as we get closer to the late game lynching demons obviously becomes more and more important, but town would have a huge benefit if we can reduce angel KP early on in the game, as this has a building effect of letting more townies live = demon corrupt has less of an impact. This sounds super correct. Once the Angel of Death or Angelic Acolyte is dead, claiming corrupted won't result in instant death since even if the Angelic Acolyte is still alive, at that point it'll be easier to just Slay rather than try to pick up a KP via Stalk.
"Blazinghand you are weird what is going on here"
Well, what's going on here is I'm trying to figure stuff out. In doing so I rhetorically pass across many positions before I come to one. For a while I was wondering if we should, if possible, be more worried about a particular faction. I thought it might be Angels, I thought it might be Demons.
"Man I totally thought I had something on you. I guess I'm just dumb-- you actually have a nuanced position on this issue, huh. "
Hey, no need to feel down on yourself. We all make mistakes. I think we can work together to do well here
"oh thanks man. Just out of curiosity, how would you characterize your strategy RE: angels and demons in an unequivocal way? just for future reference"
man you are quite the badger-er, imaginary person who talks to me, but I think this post best sums up my position:
On January 04 2012 16:02 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2012 15:51 Bluelightz wrote:
Well, helo guys anyway what do you think on how should we approach the day 1 lynch? step 1) find scum step 2) lynch them step 0 is get everyone to talk so we can get reads.
On January 06 2012 02:29 Zephirdd wrote:@layabout Show nested quote +Why would a player publicly state, or post to imply that they are bad at certain aspects of mafia? They do that because new players fear making mistakes. However it is NOT the best way to approach it. Just keep an eye on Dirkzor later on, and don't lower your expectations. AKA. ignore his "noob claim". Bluelightz looks weird, especially his wishywashness on who to shoot. The principal is the fact that he is a new player and held a tunneling pretty damn well. Too well, as if he had three heads instead of one. You get my point? And to be honest, no point in making that hugeass list if he wasn't going to say someone is scum. I found Palmar's game fun. layabout, who would you shoot if you had to, and why?
OOOH OOH PICK ME
I'd shoot dirkzor because he's BSing me.
Also being a noob doesn't make you bad-- i'm a noob and i'm incredibly good at mafia.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Actually maybe I'd shoot Bluelightz. Yeah, actually, the more I think about it, the more I'd shoot Bluelightz as day-vig. All the waffling on this very same question by him is pretty aggravating. He must work in landscaping because he hedges a LOT
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On January 06 2012 01:56 syllogism wrote:I would like to hear some thoughts on Grackaroni/tyrran/refallen, all of which I would be interested in lynching today. All have been around, posted nothing useful and I've small issues with the way they've approached the game so far. Grackaroni for going after bluelightz in a very questionable manner, Refallen for being supposedly very excited about the game and then disappearing (I also don't particularly like this post overall) and Tyrran for not reading in his haste to attempt to seem like he is contributing. Tyrran you have shown that you can be useful, do you intend to post anything at all today?
OK I'm gonna be real Grackaroni has mostly been chilling I believe *I* am the massive nerd baller who put together the sweet original "case" (in scare quotes because BL had made like 4-5 lines of text so far at the time) against BL. Grackaroni, on the other hand, was sitting around being like "man maybe someone should make this case" and generally not helping. That being said, I don't think there's anything wrong with the way I've presented my evidence, against BL. I think I've done well. I'm gonna poke through the Grack filter and see what I can fine.
(Grack n Cheese Grack and Field Grackalope Grackenspiel Heart a Grack Grack in Black oh the list goes on but Grackaroni is just such a good name)
|
Hi refallen when were you suspicious of palmar and why didn't you bother expressing your suspicion
Is this some kind of metagame thing again? Dosen't Palmar always troll around in day 1? I remember that in TLXLVIII.
Non committal
For now, I don't have a lynch target.
I want Palmar to start posting.
Non comittal
Right now at least my previous suspicion of Palmar has been assuaged at him posting and being his usual bullying town self.
Non committal
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On January 06 2012 02:21 layabout wrote:+ Show Spoiler ++ Show Spoiler +has he not read the tl commandments? 3. THOU SHALL THINK BEFORE POSTING 4. THOU SHALL CONTRIBUTE TO THE SITE TOWN and BH + Show Spoiler +5. THOU SHALL NOT SPAM THE MAFIA THREAD
Say what you want about spam, at least you don't have to open THREE spoilers in my posts to see this kind of BS. Cmon man wheres your respect at. I didn't even notice you calling me out the first time I read through this! Stop it with the spoilers it makes it hard to search your posts. Usually my strat is to open a filter then use Control+F to find stuff but if you put everything in spoilers I need to like go through and CLICK THEM ALL.
It's like a game of osu! but instead of fun pop music and video game music it's just the strumming of my tears hitting the desk as I click all these dumb spoiler tags.
|
I would lynch/shoot/violently murder Grackaroni if i had to kill someone now
at the beginning he talks about hypotheticals involving roles, serveral players did this and it was largely irrelevant and so cannot really be used in analysis.
he then wrote
On January 05 2012 02:59 Grackaroni wrote:
As you already mentioned the game only started 10 hours ago so I'm sure people would post if they could.
If we can't be sure that a player is an angel/demon I think the safe lynch is bluelightz.
His play in Student mafia was weak and so far this game he has posted nothing but one liners. Hopefully he will have solid content when he returns but I am not too optimistic. I just don't think I will get a good read on him and he's not somebody I would want at lylo, the only downside to lynching him is that it may not give us as much information as many other lynches.
Perhaps he would be a good n1 target for the town demon hunter?
If we can't be sure that a player is an angel/demon I think the safe lynch is bluelightz.
very confusing to be pushing a lynch and saying that a lynch was safe (which implies the existence of reasons why the case is safe but does not offer them)
I just don't think I will get a good read on him
if we paraphrase then including this last bit results in "i think we should lynch a player that i do not think i will be able to get a good read on"
it may not give us as much information as many other lynches
lynch to kill scum not to get information
Perhaps he would be a good n1 target for the town demon hunter?
here grack suggests using towns KP on a player he doesn't think he can read who hasn't posted more than a couple of lines by this point in the game.
It has also already been explained why he shouldn't have suggested BL would be useless
The above post seems a lot more reasonable if there are scum goals behind it.
it should be self evident this is why this is so, but i will say that most of those statements don't make sense if grack is town.
On January 05 2012 08:26 Grackaroni wrote:
KK I'm back. I suggested the Bluelightz lynch and it looks like BH took a lot of shit because of me
he (kind of) tries to take credit for pressuring BL and takes the blame for "BH taking shit for him"
I am pretty sure BH "taking shit" was not because of grack and that grack is possibly trying to "buddy" up with BH and paint himself in a good light for taking blame.
+ Show Spoiler +this is't particularly incriminating but reading that sentence did bug me
There isn't much to analyse but he is a reddest shade of grey in my eyes
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On January 05 2012 07:42 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2012 07:31 Blazinghand wrote:
There's also a way for greens to be anti-town, you know-- "non-contributing" can actually be worse then "useless" because it provides cover for reds to hide. Look, if I think a guy is anti-town I'm gonna try to lynch him. If he flips green, then so be it. If I could lynch a red guy instead I would gladly do that, but I really don't know until i see the color of his blood, do I?
Bluelightz deserves the case I have against him and deserves my vote. And if he fails to contribute and there are no other scum reads, and all he's doing is stopping by every now and then to say "brb" and generally confuse our blues, then he also deserves to die. Greens can be anti-town, but if you read them as green, you don't lynch them. If they're non-contributing, then you pressure them to contribute, like you're trying to do by voting Bluelightz. Then they should be forced to do something, and give you information from which to get a better read. We're in agreement about that. However, you have to do this with multiple players, because you still have to separate the greens from whatever scum might be hiding among them. In your case, you didn't sound like you really thought that he was scum, just that he was not contributing. That might be what's throwing me off about you, as in my experience, if someone wants to pressure someone to contribute, they just vote them, and ask them to contribute, not make a case and call them maybe scum maybe town and then say we should kill them either way. I'll help pressure, but I'm not going to vote him now, as he claims he went to bed two hours ago. If he's not back and posting by tonight, I'll vote him, until he gives us something.
So it's been like 20 hours Mr. Wiggles. Where you at homie. Here let me bring you up to date on the Bluelightz situation:
On January 05 2012 14:27 Bluelightz wrote:
Okay, ill just give my thoughts on LA-Lurkers
First,
I don't think that lynching lurkers benefit town in any way.
Usually it results in a townie lynched(BByte lynch in student mafia as an example)
Also,
Here's the list of people I want posting
xsksc
Cwave
risk.nuke
Errandor
That is all.
"Hey guys stop lurking plz"
Meaningless. Might be helpful, but meaningless.
In this serious of long posts he shows us he has no reads:
On January 05 2012 20:45 Bluelightz wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Okay my thoughts on the lynch
I think we should avoid lynching a lurker unless we have no other option left.
Next, my reads on people
Blazinghand, Town: From the way he is posting I assume that he is Town
Cwave, Null: He only has 2 posts so I can't determine his allignment yet.
Dirkzor, Null: When comparing his post's from Mr.Wiggles Mini and Here he acts differently, In Mr.Wiggles Mini he analyzes
other people's post, etc that is town Dirk. But here, he discusses Strategy,etc but this is a new/ diffrent setup
"Blazinghand, my accuser, is clearly town. wink wink"
On January 05 2012 21:36 Bluelightz wrote:Okay here's the continuation of my reads + Show Spoiler +Errandor, Null: Lurking cannot determine alignment Grackaroni, Null: His posting contains his case against me and discussing about the lurkers in this game. HarbingerOfDoom, Null/Leaning Town: His posting contains discussion of strategy for town, Discussing LA-Lurkers Jackal58, Null: 2 posts since the start of the game cannot determine alignment. Layabout, Leaning Town: When I compare when Layabout was town in Student and if he is town here his posting style is much the same being aggressive and starting discussion Mr.Wiggles, Leaning Town: His posts while not alot has very good content. Palmar, Leaning Town/Null: His post's generate discussion and he starts discussion himself. RebirthOfLeGenD, Null: Lurking cannot determine alignment. Refallen, Null: His posts contain discussion about the lurkers,etc risk.nuke, Null: Has not posted alot syllogism, Leaning Town/Null: His post's generate discussion and he also shares his reads with others. Tyrran, Null: While lurking a little I can't determine his alignment xsksc, Null: Needs to start posting Zepphird, Null: His post's discuss about LA-Lurkers and strategy Okay I'm done if you have a question about my reads go for it  ! Now, I have many town reads because this is day 1 and also people haven't posted much(including me) So, here it is!
"I have no idea what's going on in this game."
THE JOURNEY CONTINUES:
see, back in the old country we called Palmar "fire hydrant"... why did we call him this you ask? no, not because dogs piss on him, but because he puts on the pressure. Let's see how BL responds.
On January 05 2012 21:46 Bluelightz wrote:Right now, since we have no real option I would like to lynch a lurker.
Hedge
On January 05 2012 21:59 Bluelightz wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2012 21:49 Palmar wrote:On January 05 2012 21:46 Bluelightz wrote:On January 05 2012 21:42 Palmar wrote:
So who would you lynch Bluelightz? Right now, since we have no real option I would like to lynch a lurker. Yes, but which lurker, and why? At this point, I would wait if xsk starts posting, risk.nuke too. But if they don't i'm all ears for lynching them I would lynch RoL right now because he hasn't posted anything when I searched for RoL post's in the thread I haven't found any post's by him
Hedge
On January 05 2012 23:38 Bluelightz wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2012 22:24 Palmar wrote:
So consider this scenario.
You are now a day-vigilante, if you kill a townie, you will lose the game for town immediately, so you have to shoot scum, everything is on the line. You HAVE to hit scum with the information you have now.
Would you shoot RoL? If I was in that situation then no. Because I lack sufficient information to make a correct move.
Hedge
On January 06 2012 00:20 Bluelightz wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2012 00:19 Palmar wrote:
Me talking to syllo doesn't mean I don't want to hear your answer to my hypothetical question Bluelight. with the game on the line, and your gun loaded, who takes the bullet and why? Hmm, if it was that i'd re-evaluate everyone other then RoL and if i find someone else scummier then him I wouldn't shoot RoL but If I didn't find anyone scummier i'd shoot RoL.
Minor Hedge
On January 06 2012 00:27 Bluelightz wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2012 00:21 Palmar wrote:On January 06 2012 00:20 Bluelightz wrote:On January 06 2012 00:19 Palmar wrote:
Me talking to syllo doesn't mean I don't want to hear your answer to my hypothetical question Bluelight. with the game on the line, and your gun loaded, who takes the bullet and why? Hmm, if it was that i'd re-evaluate everyone other then RoL and if i find someone else scummier then him I wouldn't shoot RoL but If I didn't find anyone scummier i'd shoot RoL. Wait, didn't you just read everyone's filter? What's there to re-evaluate? Do you not like your conclusion of everyone being null? Okay, First, I Assumed that I didn't do the analysis of everyone Next, I would re-evaluate all the possible things Lastly, even though I still have null reads I dont really trust my ability to analyze people's post's. Though if there we're more post's I could make a more accurate analyisis Now, my if I would answer your hipotethical situation given with the analysis I had I would shoot RoL.
Finally pushed out of hedge
On January 06 2012 01:14 Bluelightz wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2012 01:12 Palmar wrote:On January 06 2012 01:07 Bluelightz wrote:
Okay Palmar, I'm about to sleep.So, ask me what you want to ask now :3 Well, I'm not sure what I should be asking you, apparently you're happy with fencesitting through the lynch, throwing your vote randomly against some lurker. Your entire scumhunting process is "This guy has not posted, so he must be scum". And I have a problem with that. Don't let me keep you up, there's still another day. You better come up with something better tomorrow, even if it's only a measurement of your neck. Okay i'll adress this post then go to sleep so, we have 2 days and 9 hrs from when I post this. Hopefully when I wake up I can make a more accurate analysis.
Bails
We are back in a classic situation of "terrible or scum? A GAME OF GROANS"
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
In case it's not clear: Mr Wiggles cmon man where you at???
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Ok I hate to triple post but I only just remembered this: why are people saying i'm WBG's smurf??
|
somehow your posts resemble WBG a bit but it also lacks cursing so its okay.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Well we both played in XLVII and i've been on TL for over a year so if I'm his smurf this is the most elaborate smurf ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
