EPTProleague 2011-2012 Format - Page 3
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Sawamura
Malaysia7602 Posts
| ||
|
MaV_gGSC
Canada1345 Posts
 | ||
|
kdgns
United States2427 Posts
| ||
|
e_i_pi_1_0
933 Posts
| ||
|
dtvu
Australia687 Posts
| ||
|
Ryusei-R1
United States2106 Posts
| ||
|
hmmm...
632 Posts
On November 17 2011 14:51 r3z3nd3 wrote: No Ace Match? FINALLY. That means a TEAM should be strong and not just one player. And I speak this sincerely, I am a Jaedong fan and a Oz fan, but I found extremely annoying a team like that reaching 08-09 finals just because of this ACE Match system. No finals? You're kidding me right? there are going to be two finals. one for each season | ||
|
Crunchums
United States11143 Posts
Bo7 was so much better ugh oh well | ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
no bo7 sad panda. | ||
|
Black[CAT]
Malaysia2589 Posts
| ||
|
Pelopidas
Canada225 Posts
| ||
|
Eun_Star
United States322 Posts
On November 17 2011 14:47 Doraemon wrote: flash/kt is the biggest loser out of this format i reckon, no Ace and no WL Not really, judging from Grand Finals 10-11, KT is solid. Not to mention same should be said for SKT1 as well. no Ace and no WL. | ||
|
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
On November 17 2011 15:02 Eun_Star wrote: Not really, judging from Grand Finals 10-11, KT is solid. Not to mention same should be said for SKT1 as well. no Ace and no WL. WL saved your asses so you could get a Playoff spot as #3, your regular PL format record in the first 2 rounds was terrible.(last rounds also not amazing) | ||
|
Sawamura
Malaysia7602 Posts
On November 17 2011 15:02 Black[CAT] wrote: This is really2 bad for the growth of new players. Limiting number of sets...This is wrong... Cat , maybe these is kespa response to audience complaining that sets are too long , so they are going to get bored by having bo7 plus an ace option . I think bo5 is not that bad but taking out ace option is really a bad idea for team's like kt T_T . On another note, if shin han bank is no where in sight as sponsors who else will be sponsoring proleague ? | ||
|
Hyde
Australia14568 Posts
On November 17 2011 14:54 Eun_Star wrote: bo5? what was the vote for? i thought bo7 received the highest votes? Bo7 on weekends when it's back to back (2 matches) casting could last up to 7 hours. That's probably why they opted for Bo5 instead. | ||
|
Bwenjarin Raffrack
United States322 Posts
On November 17 2011 14:25 Kiett wrote: T___T why Bo5, no Ace? I feel like that's actually going to make people less likely to stay until the end, if their favorite player (Flash, Jaedong, Bisu, etc.) has already played. Moreover, those favorite ace players can now only play a maximum of 42 games over the whole year, it seems, as opposed to close to double that. Not only that, but no ace vs. ace means significantly fewer superlative Starcraft matches will be fought this year in favor of simple sniping. On the whole, it seems like good Starcraft just got downsized. | ||
|
Zona
40426 Posts
I'm also really happy players don't have to prepare for as many as 2 PL matches a week anymore. That was f'n insane. | ||
|
Eun_Star
United States322 Posts
On November 17 2011 15:03 Kipsate wrote: WL saved your asses so you could get a Playoff spot as #3, your regular PL format record in the first 2 rounds was terrible.(last rounds also not amazing) "your asses" whoaaah. why so much hate? don't need to get so aggressive judging from Grand Finals 10-11, KT is solid (and games leading to that point..when KT zergs were doing well) | ||
|
red4ce
United States7313 Posts
| ||
|
Navi
5286 Posts
tl;dr: rookies don't get exposure in bad teams, and in good teams they already did, all this does is remove fan excitement about ace match in the possibility that their favorite player/the best player on their team could come out and have an epic match / rematch | ||
| ||
