|
On November 02 2011 06:28 WesleyLok wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2011 06:26 1Eris1 wrote:On November 02 2011 06:25 ffadicted wrote:On November 02 2011 06:19 1Eris1 wrote: Lost a ton of respect for MMA today. lol what? Also, sC vs. Nestea is what it is guys, tons of people have lost to all-ins when they didn't prepare and react properly, idk why everyone's making such a big deal out of it, sC clearly deserved the number 1 spot in the group and earned it. Nice to see MC advancing as well! Screwing over his teammate? Yeah, seems like a really cool guy. The SlayerS team heard gossip that alot of players were planning to pick yugioh because they felt that he was weak. MMA jokingly mentioned that to MVP and MVP said that he was going to pick yugioh. MMA picked yugioh to spare him from MVP. This sounds completely ridiculous. As if you are trying to defy logic and end up with a totally irrational way to justify MMA. MMA picked Yugioh to spare him ????????waaaaahtt? Bottom line is that it is bad sportsmanship to select a teammate for you group, and even more so selecting a teammate who is universally accept as inferior , as you imply.
|
On November 02 2011 06:41 1Eris1 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2011 06:34 bittman wrote:On November 02 2011 06:26 1Eris1 wrote:On November 02 2011 06:25 ffadicted wrote:On November 02 2011 06:19 1Eris1 wrote: Lost a ton of respect for MMA today. lol what? Also, sC vs. Nestea is what it is guys, tons of people have lost to all-ins when they didn't prepare and react properly, idk why everyone's making such a big deal out of it, sC clearly deserved the number 1 spot in the group and earned it. Nice to see MC advancing as well! Screwing over his teammate? Yeah, seems like a really cool guy. Individual league + enough SlayerS players to ensure they will most likely end up in the same group somewhere + SlayerS players making in house rivalries to increase skill + whoreallycaresareyouserious? Would you never want to play your friends on the big stage? It doesn't mean you purposely pick your teamamte knowing there is probably a 99% chance you are screwing him over. If they ended up in the group by chance, fine whatever, that happens. But purposely picking him? Especially when you know it's going to be an easy win for you? Thats pretty low. Can't believe you guys are supporting MMA here. He made a dick move and fucked over his teammate. Maybe if Yugioh had just won the past GSL or whatever, or was already a very sucessfull player, but the dude just made it into Code S after how many seasons? And then you just decide to knock him back into Code A? Not cool. I'd feel pretty betrayed if I was Yugioh.
Read my post above. Also, nobody in the Slayers house is upset about it, so I don't know why you should be.
|
On November 02 2011 06:25 ffadicted wrote:lol what? Also, sC vs. Nestea is what it is guys, tons of people have lost to all-ins when they didn't prepare and react properly, idk why everyone's making such a big deal out of it, sC clearly deserved the number 1 spot in the group and earned it. Nice to see MC advancing as well!
In no way did SC clearly deserve the number 1 spot. 2port banshee is the definition of a coin-flip strategy.
|
Where/which match is the tastosis charades at?
|
On November 02 2011 06:45 JJH777 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2011 06:25 ffadicted wrote:On November 02 2011 06:19 1Eris1 wrote: Lost a ton of respect for MMA today. lol what? Also, sC vs. Nestea is what it is guys, tons of people have lost to all-ins when they didn't prepare and react properly, idk why everyone's making such a big deal out of it, sC clearly deserved the number 1 spot in the group and earned it. Nice to see MC advancing as well! In no way did SC clearly deserve the number 1 spot. 2port banshee is the definition of a coin-flip strategy. Coinflip is risk. He risked it and he succeeded so he deserves the win. Risktaking is acceptable.
|
On November 02 2011 06:43 Abrafred wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2011 06:28 WesleyLok wrote:On November 02 2011 06:26 1Eris1 wrote:On November 02 2011 06:25 ffadicted wrote:On November 02 2011 06:19 1Eris1 wrote: Lost a ton of respect for MMA today. lol what? Also, sC vs. Nestea is what it is guys, tons of people have lost to all-ins when they didn't prepare and react properly, idk why everyone's making such a big deal out of it, sC clearly deserved the number 1 spot in the group and earned it. Nice to see MC advancing as well! Screwing over his teammate? Yeah, seems like a really cool guy. The SlayerS team heard gossip that alot of players were planning to pick yugioh because they felt that he was weak. MMA jokingly mentioned that to MVP and MVP said that he was going to pick yugioh. MMA picked yugioh to spare him from MVP. This sounds completely ridiculous. As if you are trying to defy logic and end up with a totally irrational way to justify MMA. MMA picked Yugioh to spare him ????????waaaaahtt? Bottom line is that it is bad sportsmanship to select a teammate for you group, and even more so selecting a teammate who is universally accept as inferior , as you imply.
Pffft. I think everyone's making WAYYY too big a deal of this (well, it's not as bad as the whole Milkis affair, at least). YuGiOh didn't have much chance wherever he went, and he knew it. I think MMA knew that, and the rest of the SlayerS team knew it too. This is the individual league - not the team league. They practice together and they support each other emotionally, but that doesn't mean that you can't take a free win from a team-mate if you know you can to advance.
|
Whoo MC advancing finally might be making in a comeback in the GSL. I just hope all the other protoss can too.
|
On November 02 2011 06:47 Abrafred wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2011 06:45 JJH777 wrote:On November 02 2011 06:25 ffadicted wrote:On November 02 2011 06:19 1Eris1 wrote: Lost a ton of respect for MMA today. lol what? Also, sC vs. Nestea is what it is guys, tons of people have lost to all-ins when they didn't prepare and react properly, idk why everyone's making such a big deal out of it, sC clearly deserved the number 1 spot in the group and earned it. Nice to see MC advancing as well! In no way did SC clearly deserve the number 1 spot. 2port banshee is the definition of a coin-flip strategy. Coinflip is risk. He risked it and he succeeded so he deserves the win. Risktaking is acceptable.
It shows a flaw in a BO1 format, though. You should not be able to be number 1 off of taking a crazy risk like that and getting lucky once against a far superior player.
|
WoW, sC DESTROYED his group!
|
It's acceptable sure but the phrase 'clearly deserved' implies he showed higher skill which he didn't at all.
|
|
On November 02 2011 06:52 AndaSC wrote: WoW, sC DESTROYED his group!
Did he hell. Sure, he got 2-0. But vs Nestea he just scraped the win with some incredibly lucky 2port Banshee cheese. He looked completely outmatched before that.
Sure, props to him for coming back from a scarily bad condition, but he definitely didn't "destroy" his group, not by my definition.
|
Just realized Ryung is in Code A now... I feel sorry for the other guys in Code A. lol
|
On November 02 2011 06:45 JJH777 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2011 06:25 ffadicted wrote:On November 02 2011 06:19 1Eris1 wrote: Lost a ton of respect for MMA today. lol what? Also, sC vs. Nestea is what it is guys, tons of people have lost to all-ins when they didn't prepare and react properly, idk why everyone's making such a big deal out of it, sC clearly deserved the number 1 spot in the group and earned it. Nice to see MC advancing as well! In no way did SC clearly deserve the number 1 spot. 2port banshee is the definition of a coin-flip strategy.
sC knew he was fucked and there was only a few ways he could win now, he made the right play, nestea made the wrong one in his attempt to defend it and lost
|
Wooh, gogo MC (the NaDa dance was golden )! All of the people I wanted to advance made it through as well.
Also, Winter Bel'Shir Beach looks amazing.
|
Why do people think because someone won they deserved to win..there is a difference...and it may exist that no one actually "deserves" to win.
|
On November 02 2011 07:16 Sc2Null wrote: Why do people think because someone won they deserved to win..there is a difference...and it may exist that no one actually "deserves" to win.
Because the game is balanced enough so that if you lost than it was your fault lol
|
On November 02 2011 07:20 ffadicted wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2011 07:16 Sc2Null wrote: Why do people think because someone won they deserved to win..there is a difference...and it may exist that no one actually "deserves" to win. Because the game is balanced enough so that if you lost than it was your fault lol
does that automatically mean the other person "deserved" to win or simply won...once again, there is a difference.
|
On November 02 2011 07:20 ffadicted wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2011 07:16 Sc2Null wrote: Why do people think because someone won they deserved to win..there is a difference...and it may exist that no one actually "deserves" to win. Because the game is balanced enough so that if you lost than it was your fault lol
If someone played 100 games against someone else and won 99 of them but the 1 they lost just happened to be in a bo1 tournament did the person who won really deserve it?
|
On November 02 2011 07:22 Sc2Null wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2011 07:20 ffadicted wrote:On November 02 2011 07:16 Sc2Null wrote: Why do people think because someone won they deserved to win..there is a difference...and it may exist that no one actually "deserves" to win. Because the game is balanced enough so that if you lost than it was your fault lol does that automatically mean the other person "deserved" to win or simply won...once again, there is a difference.
Well the way I see it is that if you won, you probably made less mistakes than the other guy. I don't consider the overall better player winning = deserved to win, I consider whoever played better/made less mistakes in that single match = deserved to win. Just cuz you're the underdog and you won in an unconventional way doesn't mean you didn't deserve it or played better/smarter/whatever that match.
That's how I see it anyway
|
|
|
|