EPT[GSL] Nov Code S RO32 D1 - Page 159
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
SgtPepper
United States568 Posts
| ||
|
Warlock40
601 Posts
On November 02 2011 01:51 Sein wrote: I asked Cella about this.. Apparently, it seemed that quite a few players were looking to pick Yugioh before the group selection started. MMA jokingly suggested to Mvp to pick Yugioh just to kind of see what Mvp's thinking, but when it really looked like Mvp was going to pick him, MMA just picked Yugioh himself since Slayers have 7 players in Code S and it was highly likely that some of them would end up in a same group anyway. Thanks for finding out. I guess that makes sense. Yugioh the martyr :[ | ||
|
SpecFire
United States1681 Posts
 ((((((((((((((((((((((( | ||
|
pewpew444
United States121 Posts
On November 02 2011 02:59 SpecFire wrote: Ryung (((((((((((((((((((((((Good sir I believe you mean MC!!!!!!! | ||
|
KanoCoke
Japan863 Posts
| ||
|
Arcanne
United States1519 Posts
| ||
|
bobwhiz
United States725 Posts
| ||
|
s3rp
Germany3192 Posts
On November 02 2011 03:14 KanoCoke wrote: At least it isn't NesTea vs MC in the round of 16. MC would be quickly sent back to Code A. Against sC on the other hand, MC actually has a chance (unless he tries to go for timing attacks again, instead of macro games). Idk he got destroyed by sC in a macrogame in the WCG-Quali. Depends on the map. MC's best chance is 6 Gate or some sort of early push. He hasn't looked solid in big macrogames for quite a while. He allways takes his thirds pretty late and tends to get behind in upgrades and then just dies horribly in the first engagement. | ||
|
koolaid1990
831 Posts
On November 02 2011 03:46 s3rp wrote: Idk he got destroyed by sC in a macrogame in the WCG-Quali. Depends on the map. MC's best chance is 6 Gate or some sort of early push. He hasn't looked solid in big macrogames for quite a while. He allways takes his thirds pretty late and tends to get behind in upgrades and then just dies horribly in the first engagement. i love how everyone says he sucks at macrogames, but the reason for this is because he is ALWAYS doing some kind of 2 base timing attack, which fails, which leads MC to continue the game with a huge disadvantage, then he gets crushed, then people only look at the last engagement and say "wow he sucks at macro games" | ||
|
Sub Zero
Poland117 Posts
On November 02 2011 00:05 cold- wrote: lol im trying to argue with people who have 0 clue about not only how this system works, but also basic logic that you learn in 5th grade. simply stating that nestea and sc would advance from the group gives us the following cases: case 1: nestea > sc losira > asd nestea > losira sc > asd sc > losira case 2: sc > nestea losira > asd sc > losira nestea > asd nestea > losira So taking into account my flawless 5/5 mc and mma prediction , I was correct for 4/5 set for the second group. this makes 90% success and yes I can brag about it np. I admit I should have said that I am 100 % correct for the prediction that I cared about as I'm only interested to see who would advance and not who would advance 2-1 and who would advance 2-0. You are so good man! On topic: So sad that Ryung is knocked down Hope he can get back to to code S! But he will have to beat Max or Brown, and later Losira/Fruitdealer/Alicia. Wow, so many pssible teamkills. Very sad for a Slayers fanboy... Hope all of them at least go to Up&downs. | ||
|
LeopoldStotch
United States158 Posts
On November 02 2011 03:54 koolaid1990 wrote: i love how everyone says he sucks at macrogames, but the reason for this is because he is ALWAYS doing some kind of 2 base timing attack, which fails, which leads MC to continue the game with a huge disadvantage, then he gets crushed, then people only look at the last engagement and say "wow he sucks at macro games" Uh, according to that logic he does suck at macro games. Sure he's played plenty of macro games in the past, but look at all his recent games. | ||
|
Sphen5117
United States413 Posts
| ||
|
Talionis
Scotland4085 Posts
On November 02 2011 03:46 s3rp wrote: Idk he got destroyed by sC in a macrogame in the WCG-Quali. Depends on the map. MC's best chance is 6 Gate or some sort of early push. He hasn't looked solid in big macrogames for quite a while. He allways takes his thirds pretty late and tends to get behind in upgrades and then just dies horribly in the first engagement. Destroyed? Really? That game was insanely close, especially given the amount of damage MC took from SCs first attack. Well, maybe not insanely close, but still an impressive performance from MC. | ||
|
Tomken
Norway1144 Posts
| ||
|
s3rp
Germany3192 Posts
On November 02 2011 04:14 Talionis wrote: Destroyed? Really? That game was insanely close, especially given the amount of damage MC took from SCs first attack. I just rewatched that game cause i wasn't sure about the game anymore. That games was not all that close .... | ||
|
SeaSwift
Scotland4486 Posts
On November 02 2011 04:19 s3rp wrote: I just rewatched that game cause i wasn't sure about the game anymore. That games was not all that close .... It was the attack in the first 1-2 minutes that really ruined MC's chances - he was insanely far behind after that, with no option to put pressure on (which was his intention). When your opponent is down workers and can't put pressure on you can do what you like. Of course, because it is far harder for Protoss to come back when being behind than Terran that played a part too, but I certainly wouldn't use that example to say "MC sucks at macro games". As for why MC gets behind in upgrades and takes late thirds, look at some of my posts. I'm no pro, but I've explained that, at least how I see it, the reasons for this are not because of his playstyle, but because it is necessary to win at the highest level - as Protoss, taking a fast third or going for early double-Forge upgrades leaves you open to a giant window of timing in which a decent Terran can cripple you. | ||
|
Trowa127
United Kingdom1230 Posts
| ||
|
Chocobo
United States1108 Posts
| ||
|
parazice
Thailand5517 Posts
| ||
|
double620
China804 Posts
On November 02 2011 04:32 parazice wrote: dam mma and nestea again + bo1 again Bo 1 is really a problem. Image if you have a group of Mc, Sc, Nestea and MMA. Bo1 is not likely to show you who should advance in terms of skill. | ||
| ||
