News from Kespa President - Page 10
Forum Index > BW General |
Stop being jerks to each other please. Stop talking about seperate TL sites, BW vs SC2, or which fan base is retarded/ignorant/elitist/old/constipated. Don't post in the thread unless you take the time to read the situation. Don't post in the thread to let others know that they should have been banned longer. Don't post in the thread to claim that kespa is the evil empire based on you reading the translated musing of a random Chinese blogger. Honestly people, this is common sense. I hate the fact that I have to moderate to the lowest common denominator. Make my job easier please. | ||
Arnstein
Norway3381 Posts
| ||
KameZerg
Sweden1745 Posts
| ||
saritenite
Singapore1680 Posts
| ||
mdb
Bulgaria4058 Posts
| ||
arbiter_md
Moldova1219 Posts
| ||
setzer
United States3284 Posts
| ||
shucklesors
Singapore1176 Posts
| ||
MagusPage
114 Posts
Brood War Hwaiting!!!! | ||
bgx
Poland6595 Posts
On September 28 2011 17:02 arbiter_md wrote: I don't understand much of these news, but since most of the people say it's good news I will consider that BW is saved! basically it says that Sponsors still holds interest in BW, which is incredibly good news | ||
pred470r
Bulgaria3265 Posts
| ||
Torpedo.Vegas
United States1890 Posts
Also, whats the public opinion of KeSPA in recent memory? I know in the past they were in a bit of a negative light, but while this news is certainly a good change of pace from norm lately, isn't this kind of bitter sweet in a way? | ||
Ikonn
Netherlands1958 Posts
On September 28 2011 18:15 Torpedo.Vegas wrote: Also, whats the public opinion of KeSPA in recent memory? I know in the past they were in a bit of a negative light, but while this news is certainly a good change of pace from norm lately, isn't this kind of bitter sweet in a way? They make questionable decisions with rules and such which gets them some (often deserved) flak, but they have always been incredibly important for the stability of pro BW. This is more proof of that | ||
Ribbon
United States5278 Posts
On September 28 2011 16:35 ICanFlyLow wrote: I wish they would atleast have 1 foreign team or a few foreign players onboard Like who? Are there any foreign players who can realistically compete in Korea, let alone a whole team? | ||
Game
3191 Posts
On September 28 2011 18:55 Ribbon wrote: Like who? Are there any foreign players who can realistically compete in Korea, let alone a whole team? Sziky and Kolll. If LRM) was in Korea, and training in Korea, with a couple additions of the strongest player from the following best 2 foreign teams, then yes. | ||
Air2gear
177 Posts
| ||
Sawamura
Malaysia7602 Posts
On September 28 2011 18:58 Game wrote: Sziky and Kolll. If LRM) was in Korea, and training in Korea, with a couple additions of the strongest player from the following best 2 foreign teams, then yes. This is nonsense ,no way kespa is going to give you exemptions unless you have pro gaming license . If you guys seriously want to establish your own team , you could have at least win a courage tournament and say okay I am a pro gamer now . Look I have the credentials to play these game good and I am up to the level of korean pro gamers . Sponsors will flock to you obviously and no doubts from kespa will even accept your team in to the league . | ||
RvB
Netherlands6157 Posts
On September 28 2011 17:25 bgx wrote: basically it says that Sponsors still holds interest in BW, which is incredibly good news But they don't say to what extend the companies are willing to sponsor for all we know there's only 1 big sponsor and 5 very small ones. If that's the case it gives a whole other message than 6 big sponsors. I'm glad they found some sponsors though ^^. | ||
Pippah
Denmark353 Posts
| ||
Legatus Lanius
2135 Posts
| ||
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
What could realistically be better? The Pope, Barack Obama, Dave Beckham, and Blizzard all saying BW is their highest priority and committing half of the resources under their control to it? This is awesome news imo. Will be interesting to see how it unfolds. | ||
| ||