News from Kespa President - Page 12
Forum Index > BW General |
Stop being jerks to each other please. Stop talking about seperate TL sites, BW vs SC2, or which fan base is retarded/ignorant/elitist/old/constipated. Don't post in the thread unless you take the time to read the situation. Don't post in the thread to let others know that they should have been banned longer. Don't post in the thread to claim that kespa is the evil empire based on you reading the translated musing of a random Chinese blogger. Honestly people, this is common sense. I hate the fact that I have to moderate to the lowest common denominator. Make my job easier please. | ||
[Azn]Nada
United States275 Posts
| ||
friendbg
Bulgaria576 Posts
| ||
![]()
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES49496 Posts
On September 29 2011 01:53 friendbg wrote: "players will be destributed evenly" Does this mean teams won't pay for the players they'll get? no,of course they will pay. | ||
raviy
Australia207 Posts
| ||
amazingoopah
United States1925 Posts
| ||
HKriceboy88
United States248 Posts
BW Live on! | ||
Ubersturmfuhrer
Finland206 Posts
| ||
Kimaker
United States2131 Posts
On September 28 2011 04:35 Chill wrote: So the players' association also manages the players? That's strange to say the least. I could actually see that developing into a situation where there's a conflict of interest on the part of the association...but let's see what happens. | ||
villageidiot
353 Posts
On September 29 2011 02:33 amazingoopah wrote: everything sounds good except the kespa is gonna manage thing... I guess they mean the business side or something? don't see why they would replace the real managers who make the lineup decisions, could create some type of moral hazard would it not? They won't decide team linups for sure. New responsibilities for Kespa will be things like accommodation, PR and such... | ||
Jongl0
631 Posts
| ||
infinity2k9
United Kingdom2397 Posts
| ||
VirgilSC2
United States6151 Posts
Even though I'm not much of a Brood War follower, this is good news! | ||
IamAnton
Canada335 Posts
| ||
cYaN
Norway3322 Posts
| ||
Demonhunter04
1530 Posts
![]() | ||
Itachii
Poland12466 Posts
| ||
Chenz
Sweden1197 Posts
| ||
![]()
Headnoob
Australia2108 Posts
| ||
Mr Showtime
United States1353 Posts
On September 29 2011 02:37 Kimaker wrote: I could actually see that developing into a situation where there's a conflict of interest on the part of the association...but let's see what happens. I guess it technically could be considered a conflict of interest, but the idea of player's association managing the.... players..... is more non-sense than anything else. | ||
Torpedo.Vegas
United States1890 Posts
On September 29 2011 00:00 Taf the Ghost wrote: While I came in only with the SC2 scene, I think I've got the idea of what KeSPA is up to. For an American audience, they seem to be headed into a MLS-like system. In that system, KeSPA would actually "own" the teams. The teams wouldn't be run by KeSPA though. They'd have a team principal that makes those choices. They'd be doing this mostly so the title sponsors don't have to foot all of the bill for the costs. This also allows them to bring in more sponsors at a lower cost. The general idea is, just throwing out hypothetical numbers, that a team costs say 3 million USD a year. But the companies don't feel like they get that return anymore on that much money. But they might feel they'd be fine at 1.5 million USD per year. There is a problem, however, as team sponsorship is an "either/or" decision. With KeSPA actually owning the teams, they sponsors can buy in, for possibly multiple teams, at a lower cost. Say Korean Air wants to sponsor 4 teams @ 500 thousand USD a year? Now they could, and they'd have their logos show up in roughly 50% of all matches. That would make a lot of sense, but we're working with a double translated speculation. So, take it as that until we have more information. That is what I kind of thought, them consolidating and sort of selling BW as a package deal, to deal with any poor ROI's from less popular or successful teams. I am curious though now as to also what happens to like KT. If they are pooling finances, can they still justify paying someone like Flash his salary or will they have to sort of budget it out in such a way as to not take money away from less successful teams. A lot of unanswered questions.... | ||
| ||