|
On August 24 2011 20:30 TT1 wrote: puzzle kept defending allin after allin but in the end he died LOL
I don't even think you can call that an all-in with the response it forces. :/
Like in PvP, 4 Gate is very often not all-in, because of how strong it is and what it forces your opponent to do in order to defend.
|
On August 24 2011 20:32 TheKefka wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Full credits go to L3g3nd. You sir, have made my day :D
Gogo Puzzle beat Ryoung!
|
On August 24 2011 20:32 jellyjello wrote: that wasn't the 1-1-1. dont know if you guys were watching the same game... variation. basically terran makess those 3 buildings and stays on one base econ
|
On August 24 2011 20:32 aresendez88 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 20:30 Binabik wrote:On August 24 2011 20:28 Tomasy wrote:this game looks like this for me oh boy this is way to funny hahaha OMG that is so amazing. Full of win sir.
wah, i am super impress with this!!!!!!!! well done
|
On August 24 2011 20:29 Merfyn wrote: oh.... Puzzle, Go watch Mana vs Naama At DH Game 3 Please.
he is 3 times better than MaNa used to be (yea both of them are better now) it was just naama push that wasn't as strong as ryung's
|
The amount of Ryung hate is astounding. He played well, give him some freaking credit.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On August 24 2011 20:33 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 20:32 Drazerk wrote:On August 24 2011 20:31 Drazerk wrote:Game Two on Dual sight In the top right is Puzzle While in the bottom left is Ryung 2:10Barracks / Gateway + first gas on the way 2:50Core + orbital in production
3:30
Reactor for ryung
Second gas for Puzzle
|
On August 24 2011 20:31 Zorgaz wrote: That game was kinda entertaining atleast. And it showed that Protoss can withstand Terrran when both go 1 base.
Although that wasn't ''The''1-1-1 really
That was entertaining? That was watching this game played at the lowest point of it's potential. PvT is regressing to the least watchable matchup at an amazing speed. At this rate it's going to be worse than PvP soon.
|
On August 24 2011 20:31 paradox_ wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 20:29 DertoQq wrote: Puzzle is really good, he almost beat a 1-1-1, impressive. that wasn't marine tank banshee version of 111... not all 111 is "imbalanced", its just that very specific timing window with a specific composition
Who care ? Puzzle played very well and I was impressed by what he did. You can call Ryung build whatever you like, it doesn't rly matter.
|
FE instead of 1/1/1. I am disappoint.
|
On August 24 2011 20:31 xN.07)MaK wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 20:29 DertoQq wrote: Puzzle is really good, he almost beat a 1-1-1, impressive. Not b/c ppl say it more, it becomes true. It's been said a thousand times: 1-1-1 refers to banshee/raven + tanks + rines + scvs, not to have the three buildings. No man! If a Terran gets a starport at any point in the game its a 1-1-1 all-in.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On August 24 2011 20:33 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 20:33 Drazerk wrote:On August 24 2011 20:32 Drazerk wrote:On August 24 2011 20:31 Drazerk wrote:Game Two on Dual sight In the top right is Puzzle While in the bottom left is Ryung 2:10Barracks / Gateway + first gas on the way 2:50Core + orbital in production 3:30Reactor for ryung Second gas for Puzzle
4:10
Expansion on the way for Ryung
|
On August 24 2011 20:33 Tommie wrote: Here is to all the 5IQ people who dont know what we mean by 1-1-1. 1-1-1 refers to Marine Tank Raven Banshee. The raven is optional. Sometimes it comes with stim or combat shields, sometimes it doesnt. Last game was not 1-1-1. It was a failed Marauder Helion brainfart by Ryung who then swithed to Marine Tank Raven. Now stop being so dumb please. Ok so 1-1-1 doesn't mean 1 Barracks, 1 Factory, 1 Starport? Because that seems to be the meaning it has had since 1 year.
|
On August 24 2011 20:32 jellyjello wrote: that wasn't the 1-1-1. dont know if you guys were watching the same game... the 1-1-1 that many consider imbalanced really needs a new name. the 1-1-1 is such a flexible build and which ryung did build a 1-1-1 it was a vastly different composition
|
On August 24 2011 20:33 Medrea wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 20:32 jellyjello wrote: that wasn't the 1-1-1. dont know if you guys were watching the same game... One barracks one factory one starport?
Are all zerg builds the same for you too?
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On August 24 2011 20:34 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 20:33 Drazerk wrote:On August 24 2011 20:33 Drazerk wrote:On August 24 2011 20:32 Drazerk wrote:On August 24 2011 20:31 Drazerk wrote:Game Two on Dual sight In the top right is Puzzle While in the bottom left is Ryung 2:10Barracks / Gateway + first gas on the way 2:50Core + orbital in production 3:30Reactor for ryung Second gas for Puzzle 4:10Expansion on the way for Ryung
4:40
Warpgate + robo on the way for puzzle
|
On August 24 2011 20:32 DusTerr wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 20:29 Micket wrote: This is why you cannot 1 base vs 1 base vs Terran. sure the expos were delayed, but they did expand. Well, I mean they were mined out of their mains. They expanded but Terran has mules and both had 1 mining base, aka, Protoss loses.
|
On August 24 2011 20:32 poorcloud wrote: puzzle cld have gotten charge, no excuse for him there. With charge, he could have beaten the tanks up really bad, then let his colossus do the dmg.
Exactly what I was thinking, instead he invested in just a couple of phoenix.
|
Ryung goes for 1-1-1 again (CC/Rax/Depot)
|
On August 24 2011 20:34 jmbthirteen wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 20:32 jellyjello wrote: that wasn't the 1-1-1. dont know if you guys were watching the same game... the 1-1-1 that many consider imbalanced really needs a new name. the 1-1-1 is such a flexible build and which ryung did build a 1-1-1 it was a vastly different composition
People could start calling THE 1-1-1.
|
|
|
|