BC's Arkham Asylum - Page 59

On July 21 2011 05:52 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
Also, nice slip with the bolded part. So you're an SK, right? And Ra'as is the "other"?

On July 21 2011 06:24 VisceraEyes wrote:



I read that more as a typo that should've read "the other SK's picked up..."

He's just speculating about the SK's like you claimed to be doing at the beginning of the game Wiggles. Remember that? When it wasn't such an indication of role or alignment?

On July 21 2011 06:31 bumatlarge wrote:
Yeah iirc wiggles is playing like kav did in insane as black, but its completely possible he is green/blue. So we should let the other parties trouble each other with this thought and reap the benefits of having a very useful protown person. That's how I see it.

On July 21 2011 06:41 ketomai wrote:
I'm gonna be gone till about maybe 1 hour before the deadline or not at all, so I really hope you guys agree on a vigi hit list. Some that are on my mind right away are:

traitors: CB, VE, Kav would be my order of importance

some suspicious from voting/previous: Pyo, Nazgul, TheAwesomeAll, RoL, Kenpachi

Alright I'm out guys, please do something to organize vigi hits tonight because we need to know which ones are in the game and which ones are active so we can use it as a weapon every night. There's way too many targets right now for them to efficiently use their hits on their own. BC gave them unique names so we have to use this town advantage he's given us.

We can't do much about medics because IMO there aren't not too many people we can say are absolutely innocent ATM, but I can only request that they please don't hero protect someone they think is wrongly being vigi'd. A lot of these kills are loaded kills and will give us a lot of information regardless of flip on top of already being likely mafia. If you guys have some reason to protect them, don't because it will completely confuse the town.

As for DT's, you guys should check out suspicious voters from yesterday and use a mouthpiece to strongly bring up their case if you happen to find mafia.

On July 20 2011 23:51 Kurumi wrote:
well prplhz need a bullet that's for sure
g6 under the radar

On July 21 2011 07:29 Liquid`Nazgul wrote:
I guess out of the three II I distrust CB the most by now but it is more instinct than solid reasoning.

Also I would really like to know the reasoning from Kav and notasmurf why you picked each other specifically and not someone else to share PMs for this? I assume you're not just sharing your plans completely randomly because if Kav is town and notasmurf turned out to be mafia he could just not have admitted to receiving that PM and get a very suspect townie killed without any issues.

What do you two know about each other that we don't?

On July 21 2011 05:52 Mr. Wiggles wrote:

It says batman is immune to ALL night hits. The only exception, is where it says that Ra'al's hit kill batman.

Do Joker's hits kill batman?

Also, if you read the OP, then why ask if Ra'as/Joker's hits go through protection? It's pretty obvious it says nothing about that, so why ask, and especially when it's directed at the thread and not the mods? It's non-contributory.

So you're saying I think like a third-party? You never actually stated it. If yes, then of course I think like a third party, when I'm trying to hunt them. Same way I try to think like scum to hunt scum. You're using the logic, that those who talk about the third-parties are third party. I pointed out that it's wrong, because then those who talk about scum i.e. scumhunt, are scum, by that same logic. Also, blues that think like blues are bad, same with scum who think like scum. Scum want to think like greens, blues want to think like greens, and third-parties want to think like greens. The only difference between them is how good they are at it.

I'm repeating what I said, for a couple reasons. First, when I'm accused of being a third party, simply for bringing them up, I'm somewhat forced to talk about third parties, aren't I? In the same way that someone accused of being scum must talk about scum and their behaviour. Next, I'm bringing them up, because no one seems to be worried about them at all besides me. They are a threat to town, just the same as scum are. Do you want them to stick around? No? Then why do you try to quash any discussion about them?

Hmmm? Check the bolded parts. You ask why I need to talk about them, implying that I shouldn't, then say you never inferred we should ignore third parties. What is not discussing third parties at all, besides ignoring them? You haven't stated it explicitly, but you can see it in the actions and posts of certain individuals. Those who are nervous about addressing third parties, those who want to stop discussion about them, or try to attack the credibility of those who do talk about them.

Why do you ask for scum hunting? Did I ever promise you any? I don't think so. Don't worry though, I'm doing it. The point is it's just in private, and not the thread right now, until I can form a strong case against someone. Why throw out pointless accusations if I can't realistically get that person lynched yet?

Mr. Wiggles wrote:
We always want people to scum-hunt. There's never an excuse not to scum-hunt; everyone can do it. This provides us with many benefits. First, it's the primary method for actually finding scum. It also means that people have to give their actual thoughts, and have to come up with things beyond "I agree". This gives us information, and information is good. It lets us know what you're thinking, and it puts pressure on mafia to have to contribute. Also, forcing mafia to scum-hunt means that there's a good chance of catching them just based on their analysis, because it's hard to find people who are scummy, when you know they aren't scum.

Also, it's very hypocritical of you to call me out for lack of scum-hunting in the thread, when the only analysis you've done yourself is calling me scum, which is incorrect. So, you haven't been able to finger a single scum yet, in other words, and only have an analysis calling a townie scum.

Also, are you saying that posting the PM from VE was anti-town? That's incredibly silly. What do you suggest I should have done? Held onto it and let a possible traitor accuse me of being mafia later because it wasn't revealed? By posting that, we've netted ourselves at least one traitor, which is a gain.