|
On July 07 2011 02:29 Mataza wrote:If I read the rules correctly Show nested quote +Only one missile may be fired at a time, unless it is in response to another nuke being fired or otherwise specified. The way I see it, I am allowed to nuke back at anyone who nukes me. Please caller explain if this is right. yes
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On July 07 2011 02:32 TheAwesomeAll wrote: caller is a baller
Already used that one like 3 times
Caller is like pluto except he can never be demoted.
|
On July 07 2011 02:33 youngminii wrote:okay mataza if you nuke anyone, i WILL intercept it however, that is forcing me to waste a valuable resource that is priceless for town hence, if you do nuke, you are undoubtedly going against your win condition as a townie Show nested quote +Play to win. This means you play your best to help your team win while you are alive and in the game. However, this does not mean that you should try to win by being a jerk to the other players so they all want to quit playing.
unless you're the scum and not him
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On July 07 2011 02:33 youngminii wrote:okay mataza if you nuke anyone, i WILL intercept it however, that is forcing me to waste a valuable resource that is priceless for town hence, if you do nuke, you are undoubtedly going against your win condition as a townie Show nested quote +Play to win. This means you play your best to help your team win while you are alive and in the game. However, this does not mean that you should try to win by being a jerk to the other players so they all want to quit playing.
Please do not waste your counter nukes unless we tell you to do we can not afford to.
Mataza Nuke anyone and Ill see to it that you die by a fist descending from the heavens.
oh yeah. caller is made of gold.
|
ask me anything i'm being as transparent as i can
|
On July 07 2011 02:36 youngminii wrote: ask me anything i'm being as transparent as i can who is scum, and why?
|
i can feel the tension building, while Mataza has to make the heartbreaking decision that might change this game.
|
The fact that minii anti-nuked sandroba I think is a little bit odd. Think about what happened in WaW1, the only nukes that were shot down were aimed at mafia members (and I believe a mason). Why?
If you're a townie, you don't know anything about anyone, and if you have any anti-nukes, they're in very limited supply. Why would you use them to save someone that you don't know is townie, when instead you can use them as self-defence, on someone you know is townie (yourself). Obviously mafia and masons can (and did) do so, because they know that they're saving a teammate.
Just a thought...
|
On July 07 2011 02:39 JeeJee wrote: The fact that minii anti-nuked sandroba I think is a little bit odd. Think about what happened in WaW1, the only nukes that were shot down were aimed at mafia members (and I believe a mason). Why?
If you're a townie, you don't know anything about anyone, and if you have any anti-nukes, they're in very limited supply. Why would you use them to save someone that you don't know is townie, when instead you can use them as self-defence, on someone you know is townie (yourself). Obviously mafia and masons can (and did) do so, because they know that they're saving a teammate.
Just a thought...
Someone who already randomly claimed out of nowhere information about the mafia KP that isn't in the OP.
|
On July 07 2011 02:33 youngminii wrote:okay mataza if you nuke anyone, i WILL intercept it however, that is forcing me to waste a valuable resource that is priceless for town hence, if you do nuke, you are undoubtedly going against your win condition as a townie Show nested quote +Play to win. This means you play your best to help your team win while you are alive and in the game. However, this does not mean that you should try to win by being a jerk to the other players so they all want to quit playing.
I instantly don´t believe you. First, I hate sudden claims as substitutes for talking.
Do you actually dare me and try to just point to the OP as reason for me not to do it? I hate getting mixed signals, you know. I have nothing to lose. If that´s a bluff it´s the riskiest bluff I´ve ever seen.
What made you nuke me? Did you think I am scum? Are you in love with the goddarn policies? What about the part where you actually liked what I wrote? Mixed signals again. Please explain.
|
On July 07 2011 02:37 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2011 02:36 youngminii wrote: ask me anything i'm being as transparent as i can who is scum, and why? GMarshal His actions don't add up
He supported/started the 'no random nuking' strategy then goes on to vote for the weakest and most contradictory campaign with the former strategy.
His play is different.
He just reeks of scumminess, I don't feel like doing a full blown analysis but he's the best bet imo.
|
he bases everything on WaW1 which is a pretty good source i would say, also that is some pretty important information. However i think YM is being pro town with his nuking/ antiing. Sandy is obv no scum and the nuke was very uncalled for. it Had to be antied imo
|
On July 07 2011 02:42 TheAwesomeAll wrote: he bases everything on WaW1 which is a pretty good source i would say, also that is some pretty important information. However i think YM is being pro town with his nuking/ antiing. Sandy is obv no scum and the nuke was very uncalled for. it Had to be antied imo
how is he "obv no scum"?
|
On July 07 2011 02:42 TheAwesomeAll wrote: he bases everything on WaW1 which is a pretty good source i would say, also that is some pretty important information. However i think YM is being pro town with his nuking/ antiing. Sandy is obv no scum and the nuke was very uncalled for. it Had to be antied imo
How the hell is sandroba obviously pro-town, to the point it warrants a save?
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On July 07 2011 02:41 Mataza wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2011 02:33 youngminii wrote:okay mataza if you nuke anyone, i WILL intercept it however, that is forcing me to waste a valuable resource that is priceless for town hence, if you do nuke, you are undoubtedly going against your win condition as a townie Play to win. This means you play your best to help your team win while you are alive and in the game. However, this does not mean that you should try to win by being a jerk to the other players so they all want to quit playing. I instantly don´t believe you. First, I hate sudden claims as substitutes for talking. Do you actually dare me and try to just point to the OP as reason for me not to do it? I hate getting mixed signals, you know. I have nothing to lose. If that´s a bluff it´s the riskiest bluff I´ve ever seen. What made you nuke me? Did you think I am scum? Are you in love with the goddarn policies? What about the part where you actually liked what I wrote? Mixed signals again. Please explain.
Please please don't nuke I know it's frustrating but deal with it if your town you go down and we can deal with minii tomorrow.
Caller created the universe.
|
On July 07 2011 02:41 Mataza wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2011 02:33 youngminii wrote:okay mataza if you nuke anyone, i WILL intercept it however, that is forcing me to waste a valuable resource that is priceless for town hence, if you do nuke, you are undoubtedly going against your win condition as a townie Play to win. This means you play your best to help your team win while you are alive and in the game. However, this does not mean that you should try to win by being a jerk to the other players so they all want to quit playing. I instantly don´t believe you. First, I hate sudden claims as substitutes for talking. Do you actually dare me and try to just point to the OP as reason for me not to do it? I hate getting mixed signals, you know. I have nothing to lose. If that´s a bluff it´s the riskiest bluff I´ve ever seen. What made you nuke me? Did you think I am scum? Are you in love with the goddarn policies? What about the part where you actually liked what I wrote? Mixed signals again. Please explain. don't believe what that i have counter nukes?
i nuked you because i too have a trigger finger and you seemed to be the only person in this game to have a finger triggier (that's totally a word) than mine which can only mean bad things
whether or not you are scum is irrelevant, you might be you might not be
i don't care about the policies; disagreeing with the policies is one thing, going around nuking random people at the slightest whim is another
i like your philosophy on this game, i signed up for this game for some light hearted fun, however town winning is more important than getting to nuke people (i actually got to nuke you anyway so i win)
|
+ Show Spoiler +On July 06 2011 09:44 sandroba wrote:Okay, I'm going to try to explain this once more, very slowly. When balancing a game the host takes into consideration the number of night kills by mafia compared to the number of people playing the game. The more lynches we have per day the less kill mafia has. That's easy and simple, anyone refusing to see this should take a step back and think it through again. If we push this to the limit we have all lynches in one day and no mafia night kills. With most players in the game being town aligned you can see how it's extremelly dificult for mafia to win. This game has a deterrent to that though, which is the conspirator. It prevents us from simply nuking all players and having infinite "lynches" per day. Also there is the time constraint, each day having 48hrs prevents us from discussing and agreeing on multiple targets per day. Nevertheless it IS extremelly advantageous to town to lynch more than one player per day, and making it 2 per day is a conservative way to prevent conspirator from winning and leaving enough time for discussion. It's ridiculous to argue otherwise. "Mafia can influence the lynch and kill more town players per day". Yes they can, but they also have COMPLETE control over their night kills and the lynch is our main weapon to defeat mafia. It really comes to skill from town as a whole vs skill from mafia when determining the outcome of a lynch, but it tends to favor town as town always has more players. With that out of the way let me explain to all of you why Palmar is NOT town-aligned this game: If you have not followed the discussion from when I the plan initially came up till now I sugest you do so. When I first proposed my plan, palmar said it was terrible and he wanted "individual thinking" from town. First let me say that Scum absolutelly does not want us to use the plan. It fucks them in many ways and it fucks them hard. So what's scum behaviour in that scenario? They want to dismiss it, but they want to do so without drawing uneeded suspicion onto them. It would be foolish for them to start attacking the plan hard before it even gets momentum. And that's exactly what palmar does: Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 18:41 Palmar wrote:Time to stop the insanity and explain this. Sandroba's is slightly less bad, but still wrests control away from townies. I'm a big advocate of the "shoot early, shoot independently, shoot scum and shoot often" vigilante policy. Clearly with the radiation thing this has to be scaled back a little bit, but for the most part, it still applies, just chill a bit and think again before you shoot. So, without further ado, I introduce an alternative to all the dumb shit that's been going on. I will require every major nation in the world to sign this agreement. The Palmar Agreement:
1. Article - Nuke Scum
2. Article - Don't be an idiot
3. Article ##Vote: GMarshal
Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 19:18 Palmar wrote:On July 05 2011 19:12 sandroba wrote: @Curu Based on last game. I thought I read it in the op, but it says "night kills", so I'm probably wrong. Still all the more incentive to have double lynches every day. Vigs work well because they are hidden and can claim their shot in thread afterwards to confirm themselves etc (since they are protown in most setups). Nukes are NOTHING like that because they have to be announced in thread, which tends to generate hate and retaliation when the player flips green and turn into a chain reaction of townie deaths. Independant thinking is gonna lead us to disaster, you can mark my words (or read WaW 1). If you want to nuke a player that badly just fucking explain us why and we will vote on it. Whatever. I'm not gonna shit up the thread by discussing a bad plan, I'm going to rely on people not being dumb as fuck. But hey, if anyone wants to play your little stifling game, then all the power to you. Bear in mind that Palmar claimed later to have 0 nukes. He wants independent though from "pros and great analystis" while putting blind faith on their aligment. Needless to say that has lead to disaster in all previous games using a similar setup. Also we still have blue roles who have night actions (the equivalent of vigs/medics/dts, we did in previous games and if we don't in this game palmar has no reason to believe that's the case), and it's completely up to them how to use them. Lets look at this other post shall we: Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 18:58 Palmar wrote:On July 05 2011 18:52 sandroba wrote: @palmar except that if this game is like the previous both scum and town have nukes. Nukes are not like vig shots because they lead to 3rd party win. Also probably have a fuckton of players with nukes and if every one "tries to hit scum" with it we are screwed.
That's why I said "just chill a bit" in my text. yes, scum probably has nukes. You're working under the misconception that somehow allowing people to vote or agree on a nuke is bending to the town's will, this is incorrect. The town is, and will always be, controlled by few vocal members that are charismatic and convincing enough to lead the rest along with them on crusades. Vigilante shots (or nukes) provide a great alternative to that. If the town "council" of people who lead the town are missing something or even in worst case being messed with by scum, that's when we really need independent vigilante shots.
Don't try to control town.Also, if everyone signs my agreement, then there's a clause that says "Don't be an idiot", and thus we will not have stupid or useless nukes. In RTM where Palmar was town aligned, he strived to take leadership, took scumhunting into his own hands while trying to keep town focused (even if he was wrong about he's suspects sometimes). He refused to deposit blind faith in anyone and kept scum on their toes all game. Lets look at the results: It produced a ton of good information, which allowed players to be extremelly acurate with their blue powers and lynches and became the one of the most one sided town victories so far in this forum. We can't say it didn't work out for him, quite the oposite. Now in this game, we not only see a complete 180 in his mentality, but also a change that's extremelly pro-mafia and anti-town, judging by not only mine, but his own standards: He doesn't want leadership and wants to trust in players that, if he was town aligned, he would have no knowledge of their aligment. That's only going to lead into dozens of nukes being fired at random and most of the hits will be townie deaths. Mafia knows who their players are so they can use their nukes/counter-nukes strategically while we cannot. That's a extremelly mafia favored field. He compares nukes to vigilante shots when everyone and their mother knows they are NOTHING simillar. As a town this makes absolutely no sense, but as mafia it sure as hell does. Lets move on to later in the discussion. The plan starts gaining strengh and many players start agreeing with it. When Palmar notices this he starts to opose it more vocally since mafia is absolutelly screwed if we agree on this. His arguments are that we should not trust the town circle, which is clear bullshit when everyone is allowed to vote on the targets and that players should be allowed to use independent thought. But look at this, it's not like palmar wants to take matters into his own hands and nuke scum. He has no fucking nukes (at least he claims). He wants to blindly trust other players to make their decisions on who to nuke. That's not the town aligned Palmar which we all know, which would have jumped on the opportunity of having two lynches per day and kick scum's sorry ass, by trying to lead town based on his beliefs. All this so far 100% proves that palmar is not town aligned this game. But lets continue so you can notice Palmar change in behaviour. Suddenly I pop in the thread and say I know he's scum and have all the info I need to prove it (presented above). From this moment on Palmar gradually changes his opinion from "terrible plan" to "really decent plan" and he abandons his previous beliefs for the terrible reasoning "my previous plan does not allow role claims". As GM pointed out roles have absoulutelly no bearing on aligment, and that alone should never be enough for you to change your mind about something you were fighting so strongly against. This only makes sense as a desperate attempt by scum to remedy their complete exposure and try to hide again. Palmar has already shown us his true colors and now is trying to back down like a misbehaved child providing weak excuses (something town palmar would never do). PALMAR IS SCUM##Vote: Palmar##Dunkirk Operation We are using his plan, also most of his posting is really constructive and in depth. He was one of the first to start posting analysis and accusations.
|
Yea this adds up to me. JeeJee's argument is pretty good and Palmar jumps on youngminii after two seconds and that kinda removes my suspicions about him. youngminii knows that he's fucked up by anti-nuking and now he's soft claiming mass anti-nukes to save himself from a lynch. His meta arguments against GMarshal also seem a bit off since GMarshal has explained that numerous times. It adds up to me.
##Unvote Palmar ##Vote youngminii
|
he might be conspirator but definetly not scum. Btw i think conspirators have no priority at all. Unless they have 10 nukes i see no reason in hunting them.
|
We are trying to use his plan, but half the town seems unable to follow it. That includes you.
At this point I'm ready to lynch YM or Sandroba.
|
|
|
|