• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:56
CEST 14:56
KST 21:56
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Evil Geniuses - shutting down6ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier3Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League51Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.164
StarCraft 2
General
How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Evil Geniuses - shutting down No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins Server Blocker
Tourneys
RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 548 Shining Bright The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train
Brood War
General
Do we even care about balance? BW General Discussion SCHNAIL now supports Remastered Rollback Netcode in Brood War SOOP Announces New Women's Monthly Tournament
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [$1250] International ShieldBattery League [BSL23] RO24 Group Stage [ASL22] Grand Finals
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Armies of Exigo - YesYes? Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Chess Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
How Much Genes Contribute to…
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7550 users

Bug with attack rate BC and reaper

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All
Dgotto
Profile Joined February 2012
Russian Federation210 Posts
July 17 2012 06:07 GMT
#1
Hi all!
For some days I test various terran's units ingame for their DPS and... I found that the attack rate of Battlecruiser and Reaper are lower than that in their tooltips.
Tests were done in "Unit test map" at "Faster" game speed.

At first, I will explain the method of calculation (sample test):
target - full HP and shields Nexus without any upgrades for armor or shields.
attacker - Marauder without any upgrades for attack or stimpack. Base damage = 20, attack cooldown = 1.5 seconds.

Nexus doesn't have any shield armor, so Marauder will hit for full 20 damage every 1.5 seconds until shields ends (from 1000 to 0). The calculations are 1000/20*1,5=50*1,5=75 seconds.

And then I test it ingame:
Start (8:00) - http://s019.radikal.ru/i600/1207/4a/2d945839128f.jpg
End (9:15) - http://s59.radikal.ru/i163/1207/60/9d9b6a45ae42.jpg

As you can see from screenshot 2 it takes exactly 75 seconds (as calculated before). So, go next!

Battlecruiser test:
#1 - Air-to-ground attack:
Base damage is 8 to ground, and tooltip says attack rate is 0.23 sec. But on teamliquid wiki there is more detailed information (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Battlecruiser). It says 0.225 sec (I check it with SC2Editor - 0.225).

target - Nexus with +3 graded shields.
attacker - Battlecruiser w/o grades for attack.
The point of calculation - the time needed to destroy 1000 shields.

Ingame test:
Start (34:20) - http://s015.radikal.ru/i333/1207/63/3d0ad5dc665c.jpg
End (35:18) - http://s017.radikal.ru/i428/1207/9b/7f077a53dbca.jpg

The test was done in 58 seconds, but BK hit one extra time. There are 1000/(8-3)=200 hits needed to remove shields, and 1 extra attack was done, so 201 attack in 58 seconds.
Time between attacks - 58/201=0,288557 seconds. That's far from stated 0.225 seconds. The difference is felt.
DPS of Battlecruiser is 8/0.225=35.55 (rounded up to 35.6 on teamliquid wiki).
Real DPS of Battlecruiser is 8/0,288557=27.72. That's 22% lower.
DPS per limit is 27.72/6=4,62... so low. Stimpacked marine deals 6*1,5/0,86=10,46 dps!

#2 - Air-to-air attack:
target - Battlecruiser with +2 armor grades, it totaly has 2+3=5 armor.
attacker - Battlecruiser without attack grades, damage =6 and the attack rate is the same = 0.225.
The purpose of the test - damage BCruiser up to 50 HP.

Start (34:10) - http://s61.radikal.ru/i174/1207/38/cf44b28912c8.jpg
End (36:34) - http://s015.radikal.ru/i333/1207/0f/b404adf9e07c.jpg

The time needed - 144 seconds.
Number of attacks done = (550-51)/(6-5)=499/1=499.
Time between attacks = 144/499=0,288557! It's equal to previous test's result!
DPS (for 0.225 attack rate) - 6/0,225=26,66
Real DPS - 6 /0,288557 =20,7931
20,7931/26,66=0,7799 - 22% lower dps, again.

Reaper test:
Attack to structures (with bombs):
target - Nexus w/o any grades.
attacker - Reaper, 30 damage to structures, 1.8 seconds attack cooldown from game tooltip.
The purpose of the test - damage shields for 990 points. 990/30=33 attacks done.

Start (2:00) - http://s48.radikal.ru/i120/1207/60/cd88dce53c1c.jpg
End (3:09) - http://s019.radikal.ru/i604/1207/b3/a8a6f6a34c60.jpg

It takes 69 seconds. Time between attacks - 69/33=2,09. One more time it's not as in tooltips!
DPS (for 1.8 attack rate) - 30/1,8=16,66
Real DPS - 30/2,09=14,35.
14,35/16,66=0,8613. ~14% lower from stated amount.

Some words after
The difference between reference and test data can not be explained by random +/-1 second or +/-1 attack. This affect results a little! Tests of other terran units grants perfectly matching values or very close ones to the stated data.

So, the main question - are there bugs or wrong tooltips?
© Glucodav (http://eu.battle.net/sc2/ru/forum/topic/4941225803)
PS Sorry for any mistakes in English
mrtomjones
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada4020 Posts
July 17 2012 06:09 GMT
#2
Did you test every unit or just those?
Malpractice.248
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States734 Posts
July 17 2012 06:12 GMT
#3
You should draw up a conclusion, and maybe format it better.
Otherwise, this is interesting results >.>
JustPassingBy
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
10776 Posts
July 17 2012 06:13 GMT
#4
Well, the bomb is a special attack, so it does not fall under the rule of the regular attack speed. no clue with the bc.
Malpractice.248
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States734 Posts
July 17 2012 06:15 GMT
#5
On July 17 2012 15:13 JustPassingBy wrote:
Well, the bomb is a special attack, so it does not fall under the rule of the regular attack speed. no clue with the bc.

Reg attack for reaper is 1.1
Nade is 1.8
FrozenFrotie
Profile Joined January 2011
Singapore156 Posts
July 17 2012 06:16 GMT
#6
I'm surprised this was only discovered 2 years after the release of sc2. Thanks.
-FoX
Profile Joined November 2010
United States479 Posts
July 17 2012 06:24 GMT
#7
Wow, if these numbers are accurate that's insane. 22% less DPS than stated? That's a huge disparity. Hopefully we can have some other people check on the numbers/method and see if this is valid.
Jarree
Profile Joined January 2012
Finland1004 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 06:27:15
July 17 2012 06:24 GMT
#8
So you discovered BC is even more shit than it's supposed to be?

But joking aside, is bc "balanced" around the stats, or actual game play dps? Because if those calculations are correct, -22% is a huge difference.

edit: i mean lets say those calculations are correct. How would Blizzard correct the problem. Increase the real attack speed to match the stats, or change the stated attack speed of the unit.
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
July 17 2012 06:26 GMT
#9
Interestingly, the random attack delay maximum amount is higher for these weapons than most weapons. Not sure if this is to blame, but it certainly could be. Most weapons have a random delay maximum of 0.125, while BCs have 0.1875.

Reaper's anti-structure, however, is more interesting. It has a random delay maximum of 0.5 (very big) but also a random delay minumum of 0.1, a positive number. Most weapons, including that of BCs, has a minimum delay of -0.0625.

You could add anywhere from -0.0625 to 0.125 to the time between attacks for a regular weapon. A BC should average to be a higher because it's between -0.0625 and 0.1875. The reapers, though, don't even have a chance to fire as fast as they should because you will always add at least 0.1, with as much as 0.5.

all's fair in love and melodies
Dgotto
Profile Joined February 2012
Russian Federation210 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 06:42:00
July 17 2012 06:26 GMT
#10
On July 17 2012 15:09 mrtomjones wrote:
Did you test every unit or just those?

Yes, all terran units(without sidge tank) have been tested, incorrect results are only bс and reaper
Moka
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada942 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 06:32:02
July 17 2012 06:27 GMT
#11
That is insteresting! Have you tried on other units than the Nexus for the reaper and the Ground to Ground attack for the battlecruiser? Maybe the Nexus has a hidden armor value, or the upgrades grants more than +3 in a hidden way, it would be very weird though Or have maybe the Maurauder do a dps test against a +3 shield Nexus, because for the maurauder you did it without shield upgrades, but for the others, you did
ヾ(@⌒_⌒@)ノ
Zariel
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Australia1312 Posts
July 17 2012 06:33 GMT
#12
Here's what you can do. Get a unit, modify it's attack speed and damage identical to a reaper or a BC, run the tester, see the difference.
sup
Dgotto
Profile Joined February 2012
Russian Federation210 Posts
July 17 2012 06:35 GMT
#13
Tests were also the СС, results are the same
ranjutan
Profile Joined November 2010
United States636 Posts
July 17 2012 06:35 GMT
#14
O_O
I have to assume Blizzard knew about this but failed to update the tooltips.... but that seems terrible... even worse if they had no idea though D:
http://i53.tinypic.com/1r3j0p.gif
BioTech
Profile Joined March 2011
Australia264 Posts
July 17 2012 06:36 GMT
#15
So basically BCs are even worse than we think! They need a buff, theyre useless!
I actually played the original WarCraft - Orcs v Humans back in 1995!
Flamingo777
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1190 Posts
July 17 2012 06:38 GMT
#16
This is a very interesting find.. I hope someone can use the map editor to modify the BC to see what it should function as. To be honest, the unit needs a buff. This is even coming from a zerg. x.x
kazie
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
258 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 07:27:54
July 17 2012 06:40 GMT
#17
you're completely disregarding the random attack delay. BC and reaper D8 are the only 2 attacks that have a different random attack delay from the default. real attack speed of a BC is 0.1625 to 0.4125 which is 0.2875 average
probably same with d8.

oh nvm i see you mentioned random delay at the end. the problem here is that the random delay doesnt average 0. also it is pretty small compared to majority of the units' attack speeds. BC is an extreme case because of its small attack speed value and bigger random delay resulting in a big disparity between the base value and the real value. same with D8 because of its special huge random delays
pmp10
Profile Joined April 2012
3401 Posts
July 17 2012 06:49 GMT
#18
On July 17 2012 15:40 kazie wrote:
you're completely disregarding the random attack delay. BC and reaper D8 are the only 2 attacks that have a different random attack delay from the default. real attack speed of a BC is 0.1625 to 0.4125 which is 0.2875 average
probably same with d8.

That doesn't change the problem that tooltip states incorrect values.
Nachtwind
Profile Joined June 2011
Germany1130 Posts
July 17 2012 07:05 GMT
#19
I hope the unit test map has nexus shield in fight regen disabled
then this would be an awesome thread for the bnet forum to get answeres from the staffs
invisible tetris level master
kazie
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
258 Posts
July 17 2012 07:19 GMT
#20
On July 17 2012 15:49 pmp10 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2012 15:40 kazie wrote:
you're completely disregarding the random attack delay. BC and reaper D8 are the only 2 attacks that have a different random attack delay from the default. real attack speed of a BC is 0.1625 to 0.4125 which is 0.2875 average
probably same with d8.

That doesn't change the problem that tooltip states incorrect values.

tooltips are correct in that blizzard chose to state base values, and that random delays are public knowledge. you can disagree with their decision i guess.

only thing i would say needs to be changed is liquipedia. it should at least have an attack speed page explaining the matter. if op went to another wiki like sc2pod, he would have known the cause of this.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Kung Fu Cup
20:00
2026 Week 28
IntoTheiNu 1026
RotterdaM577
TKL 250
SteadfastSC152
Rex125
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 577
Lowko360
TKL 250
SteadfastSC 152
Rex 125
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 37861
Jaedong 628
Soma 589
Horang2 567
Leta 545
EffOrt 455
Hyuk 391
Larva 333
Light 293
Mini 240
[ Show more ]
Stork 237
Snow 183
BeSt 169
Last 163
Soulkey 161
Rush 150
Hyun 77
Pusan 58
Mind 58
hero 49
sorry 32
Aegong 31
Free 24
Sexy 24
Creator 20
Shine 20
Sacsri 19
Bishop 18
Terrorterran 15
HiyA 14
Hm[arnc] 12
JYJ 10
Icarus 6
ToSsGirL 5
Dota 2
Gorgc3502
qojqva547
XcaliburYe260
syndereN70
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1469
edward55
Other Games
singsing2124
B2W.Neo817
hiko509
crisheroes297
DeMusliM287
Pyrionflax240
Mlord218
QueenE35
Chillindude18
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• maralekos17
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• ChaeLyn 5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV476
League of Legends
• Jankos1974
• TFBlade473
Upcoming Events
IntoTheTV X SOOP
22h 4m
Reynor vs Zoun
Neeb vs Rogue
OSC
1d 10h
FEL
2 days
Patches Events
3 days
AI Arena Tournament
3 days
FEL
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
5 days
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
[ Show More ]
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-20
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
IPSL Winter 2026-27
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
Acropolis #5 - GSC
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.