|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On May 13 2012 04:36 Synwave wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2012 03:09 beetlelisk wrote:On May 13 2012 03:05 Cokefreak wrote:Lorch was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-06-27 17:58:17 and had 1232 posts.
Reason: I only read the part where you said you were going to be banned. Martyring = instant ban. How does someone that's been here for almost a year not know what martyring results into ._. but I guess he was trying to use it to prove his point as demonstrated below. On May 13 2012 02:34 Lorch wrote:
The fact that JP was warned for his post on tl is such a fucking joke, I feel like the tl dictatorship needs to loosen up a bit and not run around banning/warning for totally retarded reasons.
Other than that I feel really bad for JP. He just wanted to allow the community to ask sundance some questions about this huge announcement, personally I really enjoyed the show and thought it was really cool that they put it together so quickly. The sc2 community nowadays really needs to pull the stick out of their asses and chill out more, the fact that sponsors are getting messaged on a almost weekly base for some random shit, tournaments are flammed for stuff instead of praised for the fact that we even have these amazing tournaments all over the planet and now we also bitch about free content? I really wish I could go back in time and kick the morrons who led up to orbs loosing his job/destiny getting shitted on/jp raging on the community (rightful imo) in their fucking asses.
The most ironic part is that I'm probably gonna get banned from tl for expressing my opinion, cool censorship guys.
User was temp banned for this post. I don't get what was the point of adding the last line. I could express my opinion and question Nazgul's ban once and there was no problem at all Nothing to see here, move it along folks
I see what you did there. 
|
|
|
I think it would be hilarious if R1CH posed for this whilst wearing a wizard hat.
|
On May 13 2012 06:34 Anacletus wrote:I think it would be hilarious if R1CH posed for this whilst wearing a wizard hat.
Umm... He is wearing an invisible wizard hat in that pic.
|
Based on those photos, there is a direct correlation between the attrativeness of a staff member and how much they scare me. With few exceptions. /runs away
|
I find this thread to be about all moderation actions taken and so I have a question.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=337114¤tpage=13#252
On May 13 2012 06:54 Acritter wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2012 06:38 Theovide wrote:On May 13 2012 06:33 babybell wrote:
I don't understand why people are so focused on Scarlett getting a new team after all 4 players went teamless. Personally, I don't like Scarlett as a starcraft player. Her winning all the female tournaments is not very fair from my standpoint. Wouldn't be too thrilled to see her on Team Liquid or EG. So she should deny the invitations? Also, she showed very good results at IPL4 aswell. One thing that always confuses me aswell, is that the critics of Scarlett seems to think she's transgendered as a choice to win female tournaments, and that's just absurd. Afaik there is genetic studies that has showed that transgendered peoples brains are more like those of the gender they are not born as, than the gender they are born as, and from there it comes that they start feeling like they are a man trapped in a womans body or the otherway around. Allow me to preface this by saying I support Scarlett, and am interested to see where she takes her career. Although it is obvious that Scarlett's choice to undergo a prolonged surgery to restructure the most fundamental aspect of human identity was not prompted by anything as petty as winning SC2 tournaments, there is a bit of a conundrum there regarding whether to treat her as a female or not. It is well-known that men on average do in fact have faster reaction times than women, and it's not entirely clear what effect the surgery has on this fact. Given that Scarlett has been leaving all the other female competitors in the dust, it isn't completely out of the question that her male birth gives her an innate advantage. If this is the case, it may not be appropriate to let her compete in the female-only tournaments, as she isn't really playing the same game as the rest of them. Then again, she could just be Tossgirl 2.0. We simply don't have any conclusive evidence either way. I'm not sure which side of the issue I come down on, but I think it's something that'll have to be discussed at some point or other. We'll have to wait and see. As far as Scarlett herself is concerned, I think she should keep on collecting free wins against lower-skilled opponents. She's a progamer. She does this for a living. As long as she isn't cheating or in any other way degrading the scene, I don't care WHAT she does to make money, just like I don't care what any other progamer does to get their prize money. That'll be the end of my little monologue. I find it very interesting, and it's what makes Scarlett such a fascinating player to me. User was warned for this post
Was this user warned for offtopic or something else?
|
On May 13 2012 14:05 beetlelisk wrote:I find this thread to be about all moderation actions taken and so I have a question. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=337114¤tpage=13#252Show nested quote +On May 13 2012 06:54 Acritter wrote:On May 13 2012 06:38 Theovide wrote:On May 13 2012 06:33 babybell wrote:
I don't understand why people are so focused on Scarlett getting a new team after all 4 players went teamless. Personally, I don't like Scarlett as a starcraft player. Her winning all the female tournaments is not very fair from my standpoint. Wouldn't be too thrilled to see her on Team Liquid or EG. So she should deny the invitations? Also, she showed very good results at IPL4 aswell. One thing that always confuses me aswell, is that the critics of Scarlett seems to think she's transgendered as a choice to win female tournaments, and that's just absurd. Afaik there is genetic studies that has showed that transgendered peoples brains are more like those of the gender they are not born as, than the gender they are born as, and from there it comes that they start feeling like they are a man trapped in a womans body or the otherway around. Allow me to preface this by saying I support Scarlett, and am interested to see where she takes her career. Although it is obvious that Scarlett's choice to undergo a prolonged surgery to restructure the most fundamental aspect of human identity was not prompted by anything as petty as winning SC2 tournaments, there is a bit of a conundrum there regarding whether to treat her as a female or not. It is well-known that men on average do in fact have faster reaction times than women, and it's not entirely clear what effect the surgery has on this fact. Given that Scarlett has been leaving all the other female competitors in the dust, it isn't completely out of the question that her male birth gives her an innate advantage. If this is the case, it may not be appropriate to let her compete in the female-only tournaments, as she isn't really playing the same game as the rest of them. Then again, she could just be Tossgirl 2.0. We simply don't have any conclusive evidence either way. I'm not sure which side of the issue I come down on, but I think it's something that'll have to be discussed at some point or other. We'll have to wait and see. As far as Scarlett herself is concerned, I think she should keep on collecting free wins against lower-skilled opponents. She's a progamer. She does this for a living. As long as she isn't cheating or in any other way degrading the scene, I don't care WHAT she does to make money, just like I don't care what any other progamer does to get their prize money. That'll be the end of my little monologue. I find it very interesting, and it's what makes Scarlett such a fascinating player to me. User was warned for this post Was this user warned for offtopic or something else?
My guess would be a trying to start a gender debate.
|
On May 13 2012 14:05 beetlelisk wrote:I find this thread to be about all moderation actions taken and so I have a question. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=337114¤tpage=13#252Show nested quote +On May 13 2012 06:54 Acritter wrote:On May 13 2012 06:38 Theovide wrote:On May 13 2012 06:33 babybell wrote:
I don't understand why people are so focused on Scarlett getting a new team after all 4 players went teamless. Personally, I don't like Scarlett as a starcraft player. Her winning all the female tournaments is not very fair from my standpoint. Wouldn't be too thrilled to see her on Team Liquid or EG. So she should deny the invitations? Also, she showed very good results at IPL4 aswell. One thing that always confuses me aswell, is that the critics of Scarlett seems to think she's transgendered as a choice to win female tournaments, and that's just absurd. Afaik there is genetic studies that has showed that transgendered peoples brains are more like those of the gender they are not born as, than the gender they are born as, and from there it comes that they start feeling like they are a man trapped in a womans body or the otherway around. Allow me to preface this by saying I support Scarlett, and am interested to see where she takes her career. Although it is obvious that Scarlett's choice to undergo a prolonged surgery to restructure the most fundamental aspect of human identity was not prompted by anything as petty as winning SC2 tournaments, there is a bit of a conundrum there regarding whether to treat her as a female or not. It is well-known that men on average do in fact have faster reaction times than women, and it's not entirely clear what effect the surgery has on this fact. Given that Scarlett has been leaving all the other female competitors in the dust, it isn't completely out of the question that her male birth gives her an innate advantage. If this is the case, it may not be appropriate to let her compete in the female-only tournaments, as she isn't really playing the same game as the rest of them. Then again, she could just be Tossgirl 2.0. We simply don't have any conclusive evidence either way. I'm not sure which side of the issue I come down on, but I think it's something that'll have to be discussed at some point or other. We'll have to wait and see. As far as Scarlett herself is concerned, I think she should keep on collecting free wins against lower-skilled opponents. She's a progamer. She does this for a living. As long as she isn't cheating or in any other way degrading the scene, I don't care WHAT she does to make money, just like I don't care what any other progamer does to get their prize money. That'll be the end of my little monologue. I find it very interesting, and it's what makes Scarlett such a fascinating player to me. User was warned for this post Was this user warned for offtopic or something else?
Mod note
The gender discussion ends on page 16.
The starcraft discussion resumes on page 16.
Thank you.
|
On May 13 2012 14:10 Jisall wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2012 14:05 beetlelisk wrote:I find this thread to be about all moderation actions taken and so I have a question. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=337114¤tpage=13#252On May 13 2012 06:54 Acritter wrote:On May 13 2012 06:38 Theovide wrote:On May 13 2012 06:33 babybell wrote:
I don't understand why people are so focused on Scarlett getting a new team after all 4 players went teamless. Personally, I don't like Scarlett as a starcraft player. Her winning all the female tournaments is not very fair from my standpoint. Wouldn't be too thrilled to see her on Team Liquid or EG. So she should deny the invitations? Also, she showed very good results at IPL4 aswell. One thing that always confuses me aswell, is that the critics of Scarlett seems to think she's transgendered as a choice to win female tournaments, and that's just absurd. Afaik there is genetic studies that has showed that transgendered peoples brains are more like those of the gender they are not born as, than the gender they are born as, and from there it comes that they start feeling like they are a man trapped in a womans body or the otherway around. Allow me to preface this by saying I support Scarlett, and am interested to see where she takes her career. Although it is obvious that Scarlett's choice to undergo a prolonged surgery to restructure the most fundamental aspect of human identity was not prompted by anything as petty as winning SC2 tournaments, there is a bit of a conundrum there regarding whether to treat her as a female or not. It is well-known that men on average do in fact have faster reaction times than women, and it's not entirely clear what effect the surgery has on this fact. Given that Scarlett has been leaving all the other female competitors in the dust, it isn't completely out of the question that her male birth gives her an innate advantage. If this is the case, it may not be appropriate to let her compete in the female-only tournaments, as she isn't really playing the same game as the rest of them. Then again, she could just be Tossgirl 2.0. We simply don't have any conclusive evidence either way. I'm not sure which side of the issue I come down on, but I think it's something that'll have to be discussed at some point or other. We'll have to wait and see. As far as Scarlett herself is concerned, I think she should keep on collecting free wins against lower-skilled opponents. She's a progamer. She does this for a living. As long as she isn't cheating or in any other way degrading the scene, I don't care WHAT she does to make money, just like I don't care what any other progamer does to get their prize money. That'll be the end of my little monologue. I find it very interesting, and it's what makes Scarlett such a fascinating player to me. User was warned for this post Was this user warned for offtopic or something else? My guess would be a trying to start a gender debate.
He wasn't the first to use word "gender". I'm not sure if that's it.
On May 13 2012 14:13 Shana wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2012 14:05 beetlelisk wrote:I find this thread to be about all moderation actions taken and so I have a question. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=337114¤tpage=13#252On May 13 2012 06:54 Acritter wrote:On May 13 2012 06:38 Theovide wrote:On May 13 2012 06:33 babybell wrote:
I don't understand why people are so focused on Scarlett getting a new team after all 4 players went teamless. Personally, I don't like Scarlett as a starcraft player. Her winning all the female tournaments is not very fair from my standpoint. Wouldn't be too thrilled to see her on Team Liquid or EG. So she should deny the invitations? Also, she showed very good results at IPL4 aswell. One thing that always confuses me aswell, is that the critics of Scarlett seems to think she's transgendered as a choice to win female tournaments, and that's just absurd. Afaik there is genetic studies that has showed that transgendered peoples brains are more like those of the gender they are not born as, than the gender they are born as, and from there it comes that they start feeling like they are a man trapped in a womans body or the otherway around. Allow me to preface this by saying I support Scarlett, and am interested to see where she takes her career. Although it is obvious that Scarlett's choice to undergo a prolonged surgery to restructure the most fundamental aspect of human identity was not prompted by anything as petty as winning SC2 tournaments, there is a bit of a conundrum there regarding whether to treat her as a female or not. It is well-known that men on average do in fact have faster reaction times than women, and it's not entirely clear what effect the surgery has on this fact. Given that Scarlett has been leaving all the other female competitors in the dust, it isn't completely out of the question that her male birth gives her an innate advantage. If this is the case, it may not be appropriate to let her compete in the female-only tournaments, as she isn't really playing the same game as the rest of them. Then again, she could just be Tossgirl 2.0. We simply don't have any conclusive evidence either way. I'm not sure which side of the issue I come down on, but I think it's something that'll have to be discussed at some point or other. We'll have to wait and see. As far as Scarlett herself is concerned, I think she should keep on collecting free wins against lower-skilled opponents. She's a progamer. She does this for a living. As long as she isn't cheating or in any other way degrading the scene, I don't care WHAT she does to make money, just like I don't care what any other progamer does to get their prize money. That'll be the end of my little monologue. I find it very interesting, and it's what makes Scarlett such a fascinating player to me. User was warned for this post Was this user warned for offtopic or something else? Mod note Show nested quote +The gender discussion ends on page 16.
The starcraft discussion resumes on page 16.
Thank you.
Yep, except the post is from page 13.
|
|
|
On May 13 2012 14:19 beetlelisk wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2012 14:10 Jisall wrote:On May 13 2012 14:05 beetlelisk wrote:I find this thread to be about all moderation actions taken and so I have a question. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=337114¤tpage=13#252On May 13 2012 06:54 Acritter wrote:On May 13 2012 06:38 Theovide wrote:On May 13 2012 06:33 babybell wrote:
I don't understand why people are so focused on Scarlett getting a new team after all 4 players went teamless. Personally, I don't like Scarlett as a starcraft player. Her winning all the female tournaments is not very fair from my standpoint. Wouldn't be too thrilled to see her on Team Liquid or EG. So she should deny the invitations? Also, she showed very good results at IPL4 aswell. One thing that always confuses me aswell, is that the critics of Scarlett seems to think she's transgendered as a choice to win female tournaments, and that's just absurd. Afaik there is genetic studies that has showed that transgendered peoples brains are more like those of the gender they are not born as, than the gender they are born as, and from there it comes that they start feeling like they are a man trapped in a womans body or the otherway around. Allow me to preface this by saying I support Scarlett, and am interested to see where she takes her career. Although it is obvious that Scarlett's choice to undergo a prolonged surgery to restructure the most fundamental aspect of human identity was not prompted by anything as petty as winning SC2 tournaments, there is a bit of a conundrum there regarding whether to treat her as a female or not. It is well-known that men on average do in fact have faster reaction times than women, and it's not entirely clear what effect the surgery has on this fact. Given that Scarlett has been leaving all the other female competitors in the dust, it isn't completely out of the question that her male birth gives her an innate advantage. If this is the case, it may not be appropriate to let her compete in the female-only tournaments, as she isn't really playing the same game as the rest of them. Then again, she could just be Tossgirl 2.0. We simply don't have any conclusive evidence either way. I'm not sure which side of the issue I come down on, but I think it's something that'll have to be discussed at some point or other. We'll have to wait and see. As far as Scarlett herself is concerned, I think she should keep on collecting free wins against lower-skilled opponents. She's a progamer. She does this for a living. As long as she isn't cheating or in any other way degrading the scene, I don't care WHAT she does to make money, just like I don't care what any other progamer does to get their prize money. That'll be the end of my little monologue. I find it very interesting, and it's what makes Scarlett such a fascinating player to me. User was warned for this post Was this user warned for offtopic or something else? My guess would be a trying to start a gender debate. He wasn't the first to use word "gender". I'm not sure if that's it. Show nested quote +On May 13 2012 14:13 Shana wrote:On May 13 2012 14:05 beetlelisk wrote:I find this thread to be about all moderation actions taken and so I have a question. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=337114¤tpage=13#252On May 13 2012 06:54 Acritter wrote:On May 13 2012 06:38 Theovide wrote:On May 13 2012 06:33 babybell wrote:
I don't understand why people are so focused on Scarlett getting a new team after all 4 players went teamless. Personally, I don't like Scarlett as a starcraft player. Her winning all the female tournaments is not very fair from my standpoint. Wouldn't be too thrilled to see her on Team Liquid or EG. So she should deny the invitations? Also, she showed very good results at IPL4 aswell. One thing that always confuses me aswell, is that the critics of Scarlett seems to think she's transgendered as a choice to win female tournaments, and that's just absurd. Afaik there is genetic studies that has showed that transgendered peoples brains are more like those of the gender they are not born as, than the gender they are born as, and from there it comes that they start feeling like they are a man trapped in a womans body or the otherway around. Allow me to preface this by saying I support Scarlett, and am interested to see where she takes her career. Although it is obvious that Scarlett's choice to undergo a prolonged surgery to restructure the most fundamental aspect of human identity was not prompted by anything as petty as winning SC2 tournaments, there is a bit of a conundrum there regarding whether to treat her as a female or not. It is well-known that men on average do in fact have faster reaction times than women, and it's not entirely clear what effect the surgery has on this fact. Given that Scarlett has been leaving all the other female competitors in the dust, it isn't completely out of the question that her male birth gives her an innate advantage. If this is the case, it may not be appropriate to let her compete in the female-only tournaments, as she isn't really playing the same game as the rest of them. Then again, she could just be Tossgirl 2.0. We simply don't have any conclusive evidence either way. I'm not sure which side of the issue I come down on, but I think it's something that'll have to be discussed at some point or other. We'll have to wait and see. As far as Scarlett herself is concerned, I think she should keep on collecting free wins against lower-skilled opponents. She's a progamer. She does this for a living. As long as she isn't cheating or in any other way degrading the scene, I don't care WHAT she does to make money, just like I don't care what any other progamer does to get their prize money. That'll be the end of my little monologue. I find it very interesting, and it's what makes Scarlett such a fascinating player to me. User was warned for this post Was this user warned for offtopic or something else? Mod note The gender discussion ends on page 16.
The starcraft discussion resumes on page 16.
Thank you. Yep, except the post is from page 13.
likely why it was just a warning. Derailing a scarlett thread into a gender discussion is an old trick. The thread is about 4 players leaving a sc2 team.
Lmfao, not sure what's better that thread or the link to white-ra's thread:
http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=332663
|
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
How so? I banned him before I closed his thread. 
|
what the f did i just read.
|
On May 13 2012 14:38 EvilTeletubby wrote:How so? I banned him before I closed his thread.
Oh, it just didn't show up until a bit later. I had checked the thread right when it was closed, didn't see a ban post, then it wasn't until I posted that I had seen it show up. I didn't realize there was a bit of a lag on the bot there.
|
|
|
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
sorry I haven't had the chance to formulate a proper reply in your thread and I didn't want to half-ass it on ya
|
On May 13 2012 14:51 EvilTeletubby wrote:sorry I haven't had the chance to formulate a proper reply in your thread and I didn't want to half-ass it on ya
Thank You. I will be waiting, don't you forget to do that! 
|
On May 13 2012 14:19 beetlelisk wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2012 14:10 Jisall wrote:On May 13 2012 14:05 beetlelisk wrote:I find this thread to be about all moderation actions taken and so I have a question. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=337114¤tpage=13#252On May 13 2012 06:54 Acritter wrote:On May 13 2012 06:38 Theovide wrote:On May 13 2012 06:33 babybell wrote:
I don't understand why people are so focused on Scarlett getting a new team after all 4 players went teamless. Personally, I don't like Scarlett as a starcraft player. Her winning all the female tournaments is not very fair from my standpoint. Wouldn't be too thrilled to see her on Team Liquid or EG. So she should deny the invitations? Also, she showed very good results at IPL4 aswell. One thing that always confuses me aswell, is that the critics of Scarlett seems to think she's transgendered as a choice to win female tournaments, and that's just absurd. Afaik there is genetic studies that has showed that transgendered peoples brains are more like those of the gender they are not born as, than the gender they are born as, and from there it comes that they start feeling like they are a man trapped in a womans body or the otherway around. Allow me to preface this by saying I support Scarlett, and am interested to see where she takes her career. Although it is obvious that Scarlett's choice to undergo a prolonged surgery to restructure the most fundamental aspect of human identity was not prompted by anything as petty as winning SC2 tournaments, there is a bit of a conundrum there regarding whether to treat her as a female or not. It is well-known that men on average do in fact have faster reaction times than women, and it's not entirely clear what effect the surgery has on this fact. Given that Scarlett has been leaving all the other female competitors in the dust, it isn't completely out of the question that her male birth gives her an innate advantage. If this is the case, it may not be appropriate to let her compete in the female-only tournaments, as she isn't really playing the same game as the rest of them. Then again, she could just be Tossgirl 2.0. We simply don't have any conclusive evidence either way. I'm not sure which side of the issue I come down on, but I think it's something that'll have to be discussed at some point or other. We'll have to wait and see. As far as Scarlett herself is concerned, I think she should keep on collecting free wins against lower-skilled opponents. She's a progamer. She does this for a living. As long as she isn't cheating or in any other way degrading the scene, I don't care WHAT she does to make money, just like I don't care what any other progamer does to get their prize money. That'll be the end of my little monologue. I find it very interesting, and it's what makes Scarlett such a fascinating player to me. User was warned for this post Was this user warned for offtopic or something else? My guess would be a trying to start a gender debate. He wasn't the first to use word "gender". I'm not sure if that's it. Show nested quote +On May 13 2012 14:13 Shana wrote:On May 13 2012 14:05 beetlelisk wrote:I find this thread to be about all moderation actions taken and so I have a question. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=337114¤tpage=13#252On May 13 2012 06:54 Acritter wrote:On May 13 2012 06:38 Theovide wrote:On May 13 2012 06:33 babybell wrote:
I don't understand why people are so focused on Scarlett getting a new team after all 4 players went teamless. Personally, I don't like Scarlett as a starcraft player. Her winning all the female tournaments is not very fair from my standpoint. Wouldn't be too thrilled to see her on Team Liquid or EG. So she should deny the invitations? Also, she showed very good results at IPL4 aswell. One thing that always confuses me aswell, is that the critics of Scarlett seems to think she's transgendered as a choice to win female tournaments, and that's just absurd. Afaik there is genetic studies that has showed that transgendered peoples brains are more like those of the gender they are not born as, than the gender they are born as, and from there it comes that they start feeling like they are a man trapped in a womans body or the otherway around. Allow me to preface this by saying I support Scarlett, and am interested to see where she takes her career. Although it is obvious that Scarlett's choice to undergo a prolonged surgery to restructure the most fundamental aspect of human identity was not prompted by anything as petty as winning SC2 tournaments, there is a bit of a conundrum there regarding whether to treat her as a female or not. It is well-known that men on average do in fact have faster reaction times than women, and it's not entirely clear what effect the surgery has on this fact. Given that Scarlett has been leaving all the other female competitors in the dust, it isn't completely out of the question that her male birth gives her an innate advantage. If this is the case, it may not be appropriate to let her compete in the female-only tournaments, as she isn't really playing the same game as the rest of them. Then again, she could just be Tossgirl 2.0. We simply don't have any conclusive evidence either way. I'm not sure which side of the issue I come down on, but I think it's something that'll have to be discussed at some point or other. We'll have to wait and see. As far as Scarlett herself is concerned, I think she should keep on collecting free wins against lower-skilled opponents. She's a progamer. She does this for a living. As long as she isn't cheating or in any other way degrading the scene, I don't care WHAT she does to make money, just like I don't care what any other progamer does to get their prize money. That'll be the end of my little monologue. I find it very interesting, and it's what makes Scarlett such a fascinating player to me. User was warned for this post Was this user warned for offtopic or something else? Mod note The gender discussion ends on page 16.
The starcraft discussion resumes on page 16.
Thank you. Yep, except the post is from page 13.
It was clearly off topic and trans/gender discussion has been done to death and never ends well anyway. I guess the mod note was added afterwards because there were too many posters to warn and the mesage would not have gotten across.
|
|
|
Lol this thread might have a future. As long as people stop taking the thread title literally. lmfao
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
it's not like I claim the right to your free time but you could PM me back 
