• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:24
CEST 09:24
KST 16:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall11HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles7[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China10Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL76
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Server Blocker RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 Last Minute Live-Report Thread Resource!
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Accidental Video Game Porn Archive Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 653 users

EPT Standings: Last Dash to the Final 36

Forum Index > SC2 General
70 CommentsPost a Reply
1 2 3 4 All last
sudete
Profile Joined December 2012
Singapore3054 Posts
December 07 2020 07:00 GMT
#52
On December 07 2020 09:01 warnull wrote:
Well that's unfortunate for Scarlett.

It's also unfortunate that the combined ranking shenanigans is what prevented Scarlett from qualifying to Ro24 in the first place. The DH Winter NA groups were seeded via the combined ranking, which artificially inflated Scarlett's seed and deflated Neeb's seed, resulting in Scarlett playing vs Neeb earlier in the playoffs than otherwise possible.

- Using the combined ranking, Scarlett was seeded into one group, and Neeb into the other. This resulted in Scarlett meeting Neeb in the semifinals. Scarlett lost that match, and again vs Neeb in the lower bracket finals, finishing in 3rd place.

- If the correct ranking were used, Scarlett and Neeb would have been seeded into the same group. The playoff bracket structure ensures that Scarlett would not meet Neeb in the semifinals. If we assume Scarlett wins every Bo5 against players other than Neeb, then regardless of her result vs Neeb, Scarlett would finish the tournament in at least second place.

Scarlett winning 1st or 2nd in DH Winter NA would have given her enough points to secure a Ro24 seed.

https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/ESL_Pro_Tour/2020/21/Masters/Winter/NA


The big problem here is assuming that Scarlett necessarily wins "every bo5 against players other than Neeb". Even if she dodges Neeb until the finals, what makes us know for sure that she won't lose to Astrea before that? She did win the bo7 against Astrea during the previous NA final but lost the last 2 Bo5 prior to that.
Year of MaxPax
hjpalpha
Profile Joined August 2017
Germany339 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-12-08 06:26:27
December 08 2020 06:19 GMT
#53
On December 07 2020 16:00 sudete wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 07 2020 09:01 warnull wrote:
Well that's unfortunate for Scarlett.

It's also unfortunate that the combined ranking shenanigans is what prevented Scarlett from qualifying to Ro24 in the first place. The DH Winter NA groups were seeded via the combined ranking, which artificially inflated Scarlett's seed and deflated Neeb's seed, resulting in Scarlett playing vs Neeb earlier in the playoffs than otherwise possible.

- Using the combined ranking, Scarlett was seeded into one group, and Neeb into the other. This resulted in Scarlett meeting Neeb in the semifinals. Scarlett lost that match, and again vs Neeb in the lower bracket finals, finishing in 3rd place.

- If the correct ranking were used, Scarlett and Neeb would have been seeded into the same group. The playoff bracket structure ensures that Scarlett would not meet Neeb in the semifinals. If we assume Scarlett wins every Bo5 against players other than Neeb, then regardless of her result vs Neeb, Scarlett would finish the tournament in at least second place.

Scarlett winning 1st or 2nd in DH Winter NA would have given her enough points to secure a Ro24 seed.

https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/ESL_Pro_Tour/2020/21/Masters/Winter/NA


The big problem here is assuming that Scarlett necessarily wins "every bo5 against players other than Neeb". Even if she dodges Neeb until the finals, what makes us know for sure that she won't lose to Astrea before that? She did win the bo7 against Astrea during the previous NA final but lost the last 2 Bo5 prior to that.


No the Problem is that this years EPT Rules are pretty unfair.

The original plans that ESL/DH had for EPT were pretty good:
- giving points only at the offline events and ESL Open Cups and not at Challenger events like in WCS
- letting Global points from Koreans also count in the foreigner Standings
This most likely would have resulted in 10+ EU players, 20+ KR players, 3-4 NA/LatAm and 1 Chinese players qualifying. It would have been fair and performance based.

But Covid happened and ESL had to switch to a way worse System with regional divisions and a lot of Cross-Server play. Even though there basically was no other way it still is a very bad system compared to the orig. plans. On top of that i think they could have done a way better job with the prize pool and seed allocations (aka giving the lower regions like e.g. OC less money and way less seeds to Katowice 2021 because these regions do not have players that should compete at Katowice 2021 based on their skill).
With the current system we have a player like Lambo (and i am not a fan of his, just using him as an example because he will most likely be the best player not getting a seed to IEM) probably not qualifying while a player like Probe will qualify. Probe might be a pretty awesome person (from what i heard), but skillwise he is years away from Lambo.
LiquipediaSCV ready | SC2-Liquipedia Admin, reviewer and editor | Wax called me a Liquipedia wizard in one of his articles for 2019 WCS Standings
AusProbe
Profile Joined July 2012
Australia235 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-12-08 06:37:01
December 08 2020 06:33 GMT
#54
On December 08 2020 15:19 hjpalpha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 07 2020 16:00 sudete wrote:
On December 07 2020 09:01 warnull wrote:
Well that's unfortunate for Scarlett.

It's also unfortunate that the combined ranking shenanigans is what prevented Scarlett from qualifying to Ro24 in the first place. The DH Winter NA groups were seeded via the combined ranking, which artificially inflated Scarlett's seed and deflated Neeb's seed, resulting in Scarlett playing vs Neeb earlier in the playoffs than otherwise possible.

- Using the combined ranking, Scarlett was seeded into one group, and Neeb into the other. This resulted in Scarlett meeting Neeb in the semifinals. Scarlett lost that match, and again vs Neeb in the lower bracket finals, finishing in 3rd place.

- If the correct ranking were used, Scarlett and Neeb would have been seeded into the same group. The playoff bracket structure ensures that Scarlett would not meet Neeb in the semifinals. If we assume Scarlett wins every Bo5 against players other than Neeb, then regardless of her result vs Neeb, Scarlett would finish the tournament in at least second place.

Scarlett winning 1st or 2nd in DH Winter NA would have given her enough points to secure a Ro24 seed.

https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/ESL_Pro_Tour/2020/21/Masters/Winter/NA


The big problem here is assuming that Scarlett necessarily wins "every bo5 against players other than Neeb". Even if she dodges Neeb until the finals, what makes us know for sure that she won't lose to Astrea before that? She did win the bo7 against Astrea during the previous NA final but lost the last 2 Bo5 prior to that.


No the Problem is that this years EPT Rules are pretty unfair.

The original plans that ESL/DH had for EPT were pretty good:
- giving points only at the offline events and ESL Open Cups and not at Challenger events like in WCS
- letting Global points from Koreans also count in the foreigner Standings
This most likely would have resulted in 10+ EU players, 20+ KR players, 3-4 NA/LatAm and 1 Chinese players qualifying. It would have been fair and performance based.

But Covid happened and ESL had to switch to a way worse System with regional divisions and a lot of Cross-Server play. Even though there basically was no other way it still is a very bad system compared to the orig. plans. On top of that i think they could have done a way better job with the prize pool and seed allocations (aka giving the lower regions like e.g. OC less money and way less seeds to Katowice 2021 because these regions do not have players that should compete at Katowice 2021 based on their skill).
With the current system we have a player like Lambo (and i am not a fan of his, just using him as an example because he will most likely be the best player not getting a seed to IEM) probably not qualifying while a player like Probe will qualify. Probe might be a pretty awesome person (from what i heard), but skillwise he is years away from Lambo.


http://aligulac.com/results/search/?search=&after=&before=&players=Lambo 4049
Probe 4120&event=&bestof=all&offline=both&game=all&wcs_season=&wcs_tier=
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
December 08 2020 06:44 GMT
#55
On December 08 2020 15:19 hjpalpha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 07 2020 16:00 sudete wrote:
On December 07 2020 09:01 warnull wrote:
Well that's unfortunate for Scarlett.

It's also unfortunate that the combined ranking shenanigans is what prevented Scarlett from qualifying to Ro24 in the first place. The DH Winter NA groups were seeded via the combined ranking, which artificially inflated Scarlett's seed and deflated Neeb's seed, resulting in Scarlett playing vs Neeb earlier in the playoffs than otherwise possible.

- Using the combined ranking, Scarlett was seeded into one group, and Neeb into the other. This resulted in Scarlett meeting Neeb in the semifinals. Scarlett lost that match, and again vs Neeb in the lower bracket finals, finishing in 3rd place.

- If the correct ranking were used, Scarlett and Neeb would have been seeded into the same group. The playoff bracket structure ensures that Scarlett would not meet Neeb in the semifinals. If we assume Scarlett wins every Bo5 against players other than Neeb, then regardless of her result vs Neeb, Scarlett would finish the tournament in at least second place.

Scarlett winning 1st or 2nd in DH Winter NA would have given her enough points to secure a Ro24 seed.

https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/ESL_Pro_Tour/2020/21/Masters/Winter/NA


The big problem here is assuming that Scarlett necessarily wins "every bo5 against players other than Neeb". Even if she dodges Neeb until the finals, what makes us know for sure that she won't lose to Astrea before that? She did win the bo7 against Astrea during the previous NA final but lost the last 2 Bo5 prior to that.


No the Problem is that this years EPT Rules are pretty unfair.

The original plans that ESL/DH had for EPT were pretty good:
- giving points only at the offline events and ESL Open Cups and not at Challenger events like in WCS
- letting Global points from Koreans also count in the foreigner Standings
This most likely would have resulted in 10+ EU players, 20+ KR players, 3-4 NA/LatAm and 1 Chinese players qualifying. It would have been fair and performance based.

But Covid happened and ESL had to switch to a way worse System with regional divisions and a lot of Cross-Server play. Even though there basically was no other way it still is a very bad system compared to the orig. plans. On top of that i think they could have done a way better job with the prize pool and seed allocations (aka giving the lower regions like e.g. OC less money and way less seeds to Katowice 2021 because these regions do not have players that should compete at Katowice 2021 based on their skill).
Woth the current system we have a player like Lambo (and i am nit a fan of his, just using him as an example because he will most likely be the best player nit getting a seed to IEM) probably not qualifying while a player like Probe will qualify. Probe might be a pretty awsome person (from what i heard), but skillwise he is years away from Lambo.


The system doesn't have the sole goal of getting the 36 best players to Katowice (determining who the 36 best players are given covid is pretty difficult but that's besides the point)--it also has the goal of supporting local scenes. The original system helped local scenes through allocation of Masters tournament qualifiers, with this system it helps local scenes partly through seeds to Katowice. You might not like it, but giving Oceania one Ro36 seed and giving players from SEA something to aim for adds more value to the SCII scene than giving that seed to European number eight.

It's all very well to call for a "fair and performance based" system, but let's not forget that it's Europeans that have disproportionately benefited from years of region-locking away Korean players. It's a bit hypocritical to call for a purely performance-based system as soon as promoting local scenes is no longer advantageous for Europeans.
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2655 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-12-08 08:02:59
December 08 2020 07:58 GMT
#56
On December 08 2020 15:44 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 08 2020 15:19 hjpalpha wrote:
On December 07 2020 16:00 sudete wrote:
On December 07 2020 09:01 warnull wrote:
Well that's unfortunate for Scarlett.

It's also unfortunate that the combined ranking shenanigans is what prevented Scarlett from qualifying to Ro24 in the first place. The DH Winter NA groups were seeded via the combined ranking, which artificially inflated Scarlett's seed and deflated Neeb's seed, resulting in Scarlett playing vs Neeb earlier in the playoffs than otherwise possible.

- Using the combined ranking, Scarlett was seeded into one group, and Neeb into the other. This resulted in Scarlett meeting Neeb in the semifinals. Scarlett lost that match, and again vs Neeb in the lower bracket finals, finishing in 3rd place.

- If the correct ranking were used, Scarlett and Neeb would have been seeded into the same group. The playoff bracket structure ensures that Scarlett would not meet Neeb in the semifinals. If we assume Scarlett wins every Bo5 against players other than Neeb, then regardless of her result vs Neeb, Scarlett would finish the tournament in at least second place.

Scarlett winning 1st or 2nd in DH Winter NA would have given her enough points to secure a Ro24 seed.

https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/ESL_Pro_Tour/2020/21/Masters/Winter/NA


The big problem here is assuming that Scarlett necessarily wins "every bo5 against players other than Neeb". Even if she dodges Neeb until the finals, what makes us know for sure that she won't lose to Astrea before that? She did win the bo7 against Astrea during the previous NA final but lost the last 2 Bo5 prior to that.


No the Problem is that this years EPT Rules are pretty unfair.

The original plans that ESL/DH had for EPT were pretty good:
- giving points only at the offline events and ESL Open Cups and not at Challenger events like in WCS
- letting Global points from Koreans also count in the foreigner Standings
This most likely would have resulted in 10+ EU players, 20+ KR players, 3-4 NA/LatAm and 1 Chinese players qualifying. It would have been fair and performance based.

But Covid happened and ESL had to switch to a way worse System with regional divisions and a lot of Cross-Server play. Even though there basically was no other way it still is a very bad system compared to the orig. plans. On top of that i think they could have done a way better job with the prize pool and seed allocations (aka giving the lower regions like e.g. OC less money and way less seeds to Katowice 2021 because these regions do not have players that should compete at Katowice 2021 based on their skill).
Woth the current system we have a player like Lambo (and i am nit a fan of his, just using him as an example because he will most likely be the best player nit getting a seed to IEM) probably not qualifying while a player like Probe will qualify. Probe might be a pretty awsome person (from what i heard), but skillwise he is years away from Lambo.


The system doesn't have the sole goal of getting the 36 best players to Katowice (determining who the 36 best players are given covid is pretty difficult but that's besides the point)--it also has the goal of supporting local scenes. The original system helped local scenes through allocation of Masters tournament qualifiers, with this system it helps local scenes partly through seeds to Katowice. You might not like it, but giving Oceania one Ro36 seed and giving players from SEA something to aim for adds more value to the SCII scene than giving that seed to European number eight.

It's all very well to call for a "fair and performance based" system, but let's not forget that it's Europeans that have disproportionately benefited from years of region-locking away Korean players. It's a bit hypocritical to call for a purely performance-based system as soon as promoting local scenes is no longer advantageous for Europeans.

Yes.
We see the same System working in pretty much any other Major Sports event as well.
Fifa World Cup - the Spots are based on the contienent
Olympic games - some quotaa are based on world champs, some in continental championships

These Big events habe two goals, one is obviously determining the best competitor of the world, but the other one is giving every region a Chance to be in the spotlight, even just for a Brief Moment.

Thats why I firmly beliefe that Region locking has been a good thing in the past. And is good now as well. Because it gives lower regions a incentive to catch up. Like African countries in Football. Like oce in SC2. Like any non European Country besides China and USA at the olympic games.

World Championships with Players from 3 different countries are pretty meaningless to me, even if those are the top Players. It s meant to bring the whole world together.

I ve a background in a more traditonal Sport. Wider friends of meine have been at the olympic and I ve been competing at European and world championships as an amateur in an Non- Olympic Sport. So trust me on these analogies.
MaxPax
hjpalpha
Profile Joined August 2017
Germany339 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-12-08 09:02:31
December 08 2020 08:55 GMT
#57
On December 08 2020 15:44 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
The system doesn't have the sole goal of getting the 36 best players to Katowice (determining who the 36 best players are given covid is pretty difficult but that's besides the point)--it also has the goal of supporting local scenes. The original system helped local scenes through allocation of Masters tournament qualifiers

The new system still does that with giving them spots to the global parts of the DHM Events. So i don't see any point in also giving them free seeds for IEM.
, with this system it helps local scenes partly through seeds to Katowice. You might not like it, but giving Oceania one Ro36 seed and giving players from SEA something to aim for adds more value to the SCII scene than giving that seed to European number eight.

I completely disagree. I want to see the best compete at the World Finals! I do not say OCE Players should have no option at all to qualify I just think maybe merging China, Asia and OCE regions and granting them 1 seed to Ro24 and 1-2 seeds to Ro36 together would be good. If then an OCE player is good enough that is fine, if not they just do not deserve to qualify.
It's all very well to call for a "fair and performance based" system, but let's not forget that it's Europeans that have disproportionately benefited from years of region-locking away Korean players. It's a bit hypocritical to call for a purely performance-based system as soon as promoting local scenes is no longer advantageous for Europeans.

I was never a fan of the region lock. That being said within the region locked Circuit System all regions were already given an advantage over EU players because of how the Challenger System worked with granting Points and EU still managed to get 5 out of 8 seeds in 2019 and 2018 (which makes 62.5%, while in the new System EU gets only 41.2%). The orig. 2020 EPT rules had the charm that Koreans were able to qualify via the Circuit Standings too.
LiquipediaSCV ready | SC2-Liquipedia Admin, reviewer and editor | Wax called me a Liquipedia wizard in one of his articles for 2019 WCS Standings
hjpalpha
Profile Joined August 2017
Germany339 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-12-08 09:00:18
December 08 2020 08:57 GMT
#58
On December 08 2020 16:58 dbRic1203 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 08 2020 15:44 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On December 08 2020 15:19 hjpalpha wrote:
On December 07 2020 16:00 sudete wrote:
On December 07 2020 09:01 warnull wrote:
Well that's unfortunate for Scarlett.

It's also unfortunate that the combined ranking shenanigans is what prevented Scarlett from qualifying to Ro24 in the first place. The DH Winter NA groups were seeded via the combined ranking, which artificially inflated Scarlett's seed and deflated Neeb's seed, resulting in Scarlett playing vs Neeb earlier in the playoffs than otherwise possible.

- Using the combined ranking, Scarlett was seeded into one group, and Neeb into the other. This resulted in Scarlett meeting Neeb in the semifinals. Scarlett lost that match, and again vs Neeb in the lower bracket finals, finishing in 3rd place.

- If the correct ranking were used, Scarlett and Neeb would have been seeded into the same group. The playoff bracket structure ensures that Scarlett would not meet Neeb in the semifinals. If we assume Scarlett wins every Bo5 against players other than Neeb, then regardless of her result vs Neeb, Scarlett would finish the tournament in at least second place.

Scarlett winning 1st or 2nd in DH Winter NA would have given her enough points to secure a Ro24 seed.

https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/ESL_Pro_Tour/2020/21/Masters/Winter/NA


The big problem here is assuming that Scarlett necessarily wins "every bo5 against players other than Neeb". Even if she dodges Neeb until the finals, what makes us know for sure that she won't lose to Astrea before that? She did win the bo7 against Astrea during the previous NA final but lost the last 2 Bo5 prior to that.


No the Problem is that this years EPT Rules are pretty unfair.

The original plans that ESL/DH had for EPT were pretty good:
- giving points only at the offline events and ESL Open Cups and not at Challenger events like in WCS
- letting Global points from Koreans also count in the foreigner Standings
This most likely would have resulted in 10+ EU players, 20+ KR players, 3-4 NA/LatAm and 1 Chinese players qualifying. It would have been fair and performance based.

But Covid happened and ESL had to switch to a way worse System with regional divisions and a lot of Cross-Server play. Even though there basically was no other way it still is a very bad system compared to the orig. plans. On top of that i think they could have done a way better job with the prize pool and seed allocations (aka giving the lower regions like e.g. OC less money and way less seeds to Katowice 2021 because these regions do not have players that should compete at Katowice 2021 based on their skill).
Woth the current system we have a player like Lambo (and i am nit a fan of his, just using him as an example because he will most likely be the best player nit getting a seed to IEM) probably not qualifying while a player like Probe will qualify. Probe might be a pretty awsome person (from what i heard), but skillwise he is years away from Lambo.


The system doesn't have the sole goal of getting the 36 best players to Katowice (determining who the 36 best players are given covid is pretty difficult but that's besides the point)--it also has the goal of supporting local scenes. The original system helped local scenes through allocation of Masters tournament qualifiers, with this system it helps local scenes partly through seeds to Katowice. You might not like it, but giving Oceania one Ro36 seed and giving players from SEA something to aim for adds more value to the SCII scene than giving that seed to European number eight.

It's all very well to call for a "fair and performance based" system, but let's not forget that it's Europeans that have disproportionately benefited from years of region-locking away Korean players. It's a bit hypocritical to call for a purely performance-based system as soon as promoting local scenes is no longer advantageous for Europeans.

Yes.
We see the same System working in pretty much any other Major Sports event as well.
Fifa World Cup - the Spots are based on the contienent
Olympic games - some quotaa are based on world champs, some in continental championships

These Big events habe two goals, one is obviously determining the best competitor of the world, but the other one is giving every region a Chance to be in the spotlight, even just for a Brief Moment.

Thats why I firmly beliefe that Region locking has been a good thing in the past. And is good now as well. Because it gives lower regions a incentive to catch up. Like African countries in Football. Like oce in SC2. Like any non European Country besides China and USA at the olympic games.

World Championships with Players from 3 different countries are pretty meaningless to me, even if those are the top Players. It s meant to bring the whole world together.

I ve a background in a more traditonal Sport. Wider friends of meine have been at the olympic and I ve been competing at European and world championships as an amateur in an Non- Olympic Sport. So trust me on these analogies.


There are also many sports that use a point/earning based qualifying system to events with wild card spots from Open events. Sure I can understand that some prefer the system you described, I just prefer a completly performance based one.

Btw. if we are talking about FIFA: I think FIFA, that corrupt conglomerate, should be kicked out of existence.
LiquipediaSCV ready | SC2-Liquipedia Admin, reviewer and editor | Wax called me a Liquipedia wizard in one of his articles for 2019 WCS Standings
jojomi
Profile Joined December 2020
10 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-12-08 14:16:55
December 08 2020 14:03 GMT
#59
So NA Qualifies by winning....Nothing? Yeah thats not fair, they deserve more spots
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2655 Posts
December 08 2020 15:05 GMT
#60
On December 08 2020 17:57 hjpalpha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 08 2020 16:58 dbRic1203 wrote:
On December 08 2020 15:44 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On December 08 2020 15:19 hjpalpha wrote:
On December 07 2020 16:00 sudete wrote:
On December 07 2020 09:01 warnull wrote:
Well that's unfortunate for Scarlett.

It's also unfortunate that the combined ranking shenanigans is what prevented Scarlett from qualifying to Ro24 in the first place. The DH Winter NA groups were seeded via the combined ranking, which artificially inflated Scarlett's seed and deflated Neeb's seed, resulting in Scarlett playing vs Neeb earlier in the playoffs than otherwise possible.

- Using the combined ranking, Scarlett was seeded into one group, and Neeb into the other. This resulted in Scarlett meeting Neeb in the semifinals. Scarlett lost that match, and again vs Neeb in the lower bracket finals, finishing in 3rd place.

- If the correct ranking were used, Scarlett and Neeb would have been seeded into the same group. The playoff bracket structure ensures that Scarlett would not meet Neeb in the semifinals. If we assume Scarlett wins every Bo5 against players other than Neeb, then regardless of her result vs Neeb, Scarlett would finish the tournament in at least second place.

Scarlett winning 1st or 2nd in DH Winter NA would have given her enough points to secure a Ro24 seed.

https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/ESL_Pro_Tour/2020/21/Masters/Winter/NA


The big problem here is assuming that Scarlett necessarily wins "every bo5 against players other than Neeb". Even if she dodges Neeb until the finals, what makes us know for sure that she won't lose to Astrea before that? She did win the bo7 against Astrea during the previous NA final but lost the last 2 Bo5 prior to that.


No the Problem is that this years EPT Rules are pretty unfair.

The original plans that ESL/DH had for EPT were pretty good:
- giving points only at the offline events and ESL Open Cups and not at Challenger events like in WCS
- letting Global points from Koreans also count in the foreigner Standings
This most likely would have resulted in 10+ EU players, 20+ KR players, 3-4 NA/LatAm and 1 Chinese players qualifying. It would have been fair and performance based.

But Covid happened and ESL had to switch to a way worse System with regional divisions and a lot of Cross-Server play. Even though there basically was no other way it still is a very bad system compared to the orig. plans. On top of that i think they could have done a way better job with the prize pool and seed allocations (aka giving the lower regions like e.g. OC less money and way less seeds to Katowice 2021 because these regions do not have players that should compete at Katowice 2021 based on their skill).
Woth the current system we have a player like Lambo (and i am nit a fan of his, just using him as an example because he will most likely be the best player nit getting a seed to IEM) probably not qualifying while a player like Probe will qualify. Probe might be a pretty awsome person (from what i heard), but skillwise he is years away from Lambo.


The system doesn't have the sole goal of getting the 36 best players to Katowice (determining who the 36 best players are given covid is pretty difficult but that's besides the point)--it also has the goal of supporting local scenes. The original system helped local scenes through allocation of Masters tournament qualifiers, with this system it helps local scenes partly through seeds to Katowice. You might not like it, but giving Oceania one Ro36 seed and giving players from SEA something to aim for adds more value to the SCII scene than giving that seed to European number eight.

It's all very well to call for a "fair and performance based" system, but let's not forget that it's Europeans that have disproportionately benefited from years of region-locking away Korean players. It's a bit hypocritical to call for a purely performance-based system as soon as promoting local scenes is no longer advantageous for Europeans.

Yes.
We see the same System working in pretty much any other Major Sports event as well.
Fifa World Cup - the Spots are based on the contienent
Olympic games - some quotaa are based on world champs, some in continental championships

These Big events habe two goals, one is obviously determining the best competitor of the world, but the other one is giving every region a Chance to be in the spotlight, even just for a Brief Moment.

Thats why I firmly beliefe that Region locking has been a good thing in the past. And is good now as well. Because it gives lower regions a incentive to catch up. Like African countries in Football. Like oce in SC2. Like any non European Country besides China and USA at the olympic games.

World Championships with Players from 3 different countries are pretty meaningless to me, even if those are the top Players. It s meant to bring the whole world together.

I ve a background in a more traditonal Sport. Wider friends of meine have been at the olympic and I ve been competing at European and world championships as an amateur in an Non- Olympic Sport. So trust me on these analogies.


There are also many sports that use a point/earning based qualifying system to events with wild card spots from Open events. Sure I can understand that some prefer the system you described, I just prefer a completly performance based one.

Btw. if we are talking about FIFA: I think FIFA, that corrupt conglomerate, should be kicked out of existence.

I just took Fifa as an example, because it s well known. I personally agree on your take on them as an orgainsation as well.
MaxPax
hjpalpha
Profile Joined August 2017
Germany339 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-12-10 19:07:26
December 10 2020 07:41 GMT
#61
UPDATE

The following can also be found on Liquipedia at (Wiki)User:CynicalDeath/sandbox/2. (The display varies a bit, but the information is the same as of 2020-12-10, we will update that page though!)

Mathematically qualified to the Ro24

KR
  • TY
  • Rogue
  • Maru
  • Stats (possibly military???)
  • INnoVation
  • Trap
  • Zest (possibly military???)
  • Cure (Cure can theoretically still not qualify via the KR Standings, but in that case he is mathematically safe to qualify to the Ro24 via the Combined Standings.)
EU
  • Reynor
  • Serral
  • Clem
LatAm
  • SpeCial
CN
  • TIME


Mathematically qualified to the Ro36, but can still qualify to the Ro24

KR
  • PartinG
  • Dark
  • Solar
  • DongRaeGu
  • Armani
EU
  • Big Gabe
  • ShoWTimE
NA
  • Astrea
  • Neeb


Qualified to the Ro36

Asia
  • Nice
  • Has


At the moment in a Ro36 seed and can still qualify to Ro24

KR
  • sOs
EU
  • Elazer
NA
  • Scarlett


At the moment in Ro36 seeds

KR
  • Dream
  • Hurricane
  • Bunny
  • RagnaroK
EU
  • uThermal
LatAm
  • Kelazhur
OC
  • Probe


Can (theoretically) still qualify

KR (only Koreans listed)
ByuN*, Zoun, Patience, TaeJa, Creator, Bomber, Prince, Spear, NaTuRal, Super, kiwian

EU
Lambo*, MaNa*, MarineLorD, PtitDrogo, SKillous, Gerald, Vanya, Denver, souL, Bly, Hellraiser, Harstem, Stephano

NA
Future

LatAm, CN and OC
Everyone from these regions can theoretically still qualify for the Ro36. But one is safe to assume that none of these players will achieve many points from the DHM Last Chance event nor win many ESL Open Cups, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

*: has a somewhat realistic chance

Combined Standings Shenanigans
Apart from several Koreans theoretically the following 3 players could also still qualify to the Ro24 via the Combined Standing Shenanigans:
  • HeRoMaRinE
  • ShoWTimE
  • Elazer
For more information take a look at our Combined Standings page: (Wiki)ESL Pro Tour/2020/21/Standings/Combined

LiquipediaSCV ready | SC2-Liquipedia Admin, reviewer and editor | Wax called me a Liquipedia wizard in one of his articles for 2019 WCS Standings
Harris1st
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Germany6900 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-12-10 13:28:50
December 10 2020 13:28 GMT
#62
Since there is no LR thread yet

+ Show Spoiler +
Protoss OP confirmed:
Parting 3:0 TY
Stats 3:2 Inno
Trap 3:0 Maru

Don't take it too serious
Go Serral! GG EZ for Ence. Flashbang dance FTW
ilax30
Profile Joined November 2019
720 Posts
December 10 2020 14:18 GMT
#63
Damn, Bunny qualifying after wins over Byun and Maru, thats big
Shathe
Profile Joined July 2017
Hungary422 Posts
December 10 2020 18:32 GMT
#64
Still disgusted by the fact that ST1 didnt yield points.
Harris1st
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Germany6900 Posts
December 11 2020 08:52 GMT
#65
On December 11 2020 03:32 Shathe wrote:
Still disgusted by the fact that ST1 didnt yield points.


Might have gotten Dark and Solar that Ro24 seed secured but other than that, I don't see any real changes?
Go Serral! GG EZ for Ence. Flashbang dance FTW
hjpalpha
Profile Joined August 2017
Germany339 Posts
December 11 2020 16:21 GMT
#66
On December 11 2020 17:52 Harris1st wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 11 2020 03:32 Shathe wrote:
Still disgusted by the fact that ST1 didnt yield points.


Might have gotten Dark and Solar that Ro24 seed secured but other than that, I don't see any real changes?


The orig rules had it so that everyone that played in ST1 would have gotten points, EXCEPT the top4, they were supposed to only get the invite to GSL S1

So for Dark and Solar it would have had a negative effect, not a positive one.
LiquipediaSCV ready | SC2-Liquipedia Admin, reviewer and editor | Wax called me a Liquipedia wizard in one of his articles for 2019 WCS Standings
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2655 Posts
December 11 2020 18:01 GMT
#67
On December 12 2020 01:21 hjpalpha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 11 2020 17:52 Harris1st wrote:
On December 11 2020 03:32 Shathe wrote:
Still disgusted by the fact that ST1 didnt yield points.


Might have gotten Dark and Solar that Ro24 seed secured but other than that, I don't see any real changes?


The orig rules had it so that everyone that played in ST1 would have gotten points, EXCEPT the top4, they were supposed to only get the invite to GSL S1

So for Dark and Solar it would have had a negative effect, not a positive one.

Yeah, but the originall rules were the dumbest thing ever seen, so I gues Harris was referring to a "normal" standart, reasonable point allocation, similar to ST 2. IMO that would have been way way WAY better than both what is in place now and what was suggested first..
MaxPax
hjpalpha
Profile Joined August 2017
Germany339 Posts
December 18 2020 10:15 GMT
#68
UPDATE

As you can see in the below attached Screenshot we now have mathematically secured the Ro24 seeds (all under the assumption Zest and Stats can play of course), including the extra Seed from the Combined Standings that goes (as expected) to the Koreans.

[image loading]


For the Ro36 most is determined too. Only a few slots are still (theoretically) open:
  • Lambo can still (theoretically) overtake uThermal by winning all of the remaining ESL Open Cups (in all regions) that still give points.
  • Zoun can still (theoretically) overtake Bunny by accumulating at least 105 points from the remaining ESL Open Cups (120 theoretically possible) and Bunny getting eliminated in the first Round of DHM Last Chance and not earning ESL Open Cup points.
  • Cham can still (theoretically) overtake Kelazhur by accumulating at least 115 points from the remaining ESL Open Cups (120 theoretically possible) and Kelazhur not earning ESL Open Cup points.
  • In the Oceania standings theoretically RiSky, EnDerr and Seither can still overtake Probe, but as none of these players is likely to earn any points from ESL Open Cups and none of them qualified for DHM Last Chance this seed will go to Probe most likely.
  • In the China standings theoretically Jieshi, XY, MacSed and Silky can still overtake Cyan, but again as none of these players is likely to earn any points from ESL Open Cups and none of them qualified for DHM Last Chance this seed will go to Cyan most likely.

[image loading]


So after the next set of ESL Open Cups uThermal, Bunny and Kelazhur will (most likely) have mathematically secured their Ro36 seed and there will only be 2 remaining open slots (CN & OC), which are (most likely) gifted to Probe and Cyan.

As always you can find more information on Liquipedia:
  • (Wiki)IEM Katowice/2021/Round of 36
  • (Wiki)IEM Katowice/2021
  • (Wiki)ESL Pro Tour/2020/21/Standings (with links to each Regions standings)

LiquipediaSCV ready | SC2-Liquipedia Admin, reviewer and editor | Wax called me a Liquipedia wizard in one of his articles for 2019 WCS Standings
Zzzapper
Profile Joined September 2011
1793 Posts
December 18 2020 10:43 GMT
#69
On December 18 2020 19:15 hjpalpha wrote:
For the Ro36 most is determined too. Only a few slots are still (theoretically) open:
  • Lambo can still (theoretically) overtake uThermal by winning all of the remaining ESL Open Cups (in all regions) that still give points.
  • Zoun can still (theoretically) overtake Bunny by accumulating at least 105 points from the remaining ESL Open Cups (120 theoretically possible) and Bunny getting eliminated in the first Round of DHM Last Chance and not earning ESL Open Cup points.
  • Cham can still (theoretically) overtake Kelazhur by accumulating at least 115 points from the remaining ESL Open Cups (120 theoretically possible) and Kelazhur not earning ESL Open Cup points.
  • In the Oceania standings theoretically RiSky, EnDerr and Seither can still overtake Probe, but as none of these players is likely to earn any points from ESL Open Cups and none of them qualified for DHM Last Chance this seed will go to Probe most likely.
  • In the China standings theoretically Jieshi, XY, MacSed and Silky can still overtake Cyan, but again as none of these players is likely to earn any points from ESL Open Cups and none of them qualified for DHM Last Chance this seed will go to Cyan most likely.


So except for the extremely unlikely scenario where Zoun wins almost all the open cups, the Last Chance tournament offers no last chances at all?
fLyiNgDroNe
Profile Joined September 2005
Belgium4001 Posts
December 18 2020 11:02 GMT
#70
On December 18 2020 19:43 Zzzapper wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2020 19:15 hjpalpha wrote:
For the Ro36 most is determined too. Only a few slots are still (theoretically) open:
  • Lambo can still (theoretically) overtake uThermal by winning all of the remaining ESL Open Cups (in all regions) that still give points.
  • Zoun can still (theoretically) overtake Bunny by accumulating at least 105 points from the remaining ESL Open Cups (120 theoretically possible) and Bunny getting eliminated in the first Round of DHM Last Chance and not earning ESL Open Cup points.
  • Cham can still (theoretically) overtake Kelazhur by accumulating at least 115 points from the remaining ESL Open Cups (120 theoretically possible) and Kelazhur not earning ESL Open Cup points.
  • In the Oceania standings theoretically RiSky, EnDerr and Seither can still overtake Probe, but as none of these players is likely to earn any points from ESL Open Cups and none of them qualified for DHM Last Chance this seed will go to Probe most likely.
  • In the China standings theoretically Jieshi, XY, MacSed and Silky can still overtake Cyan, but again as none of these players is likely to earn any points from ESL Open Cups and none of them qualified for DHM Last Chance this seed will go to Cyan most likely.


So except for the extremely unlikely scenario where Zoun wins almost all the open cups, the Last Chance tournament offers no last chances at all?


thats ironic. I guess comes next Monday, when mathematical chances will no longer exist, the Last Chance will officially become the "Just play for money, bro" tournament
Drone is a way of living
hjpalpha
Profile Joined August 2017
Germany339 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-12-18 14:23:41
December 18 2020 14:02 GMT
#71
On December 18 2020 20:02 fLyiNgDroNe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2020 19:43 Zzzapper wrote:
On December 18 2020 19:15 hjpalpha wrote:
For the Ro36 most is determined too. Only a few slots are still (theoretically) open:
  • Lambo can still (theoretically) overtake uThermal by winning all of the remaining ESL Open Cups (in all regions) that still give points.
  • Zoun can still (theoretically) overtake Bunny by accumulating at least 105 points from the remaining ESL Open Cups (120 theoretically possible) and Bunny getting eliminated in the first Round of DHM Last Chance and not earning ESL Open Cup points.
  • Cham can still (theoretically) overtake Kelazhur by accumulating at least 115 points from the remaining ESL Open Cups (120 theoretically possible) and Kelazhur not earning ESL Open Cup points.
  • In the Oceania standings theoretically RiSky, EnDerr and Seither can still overtake Probe, but as none of these players is likely to earn any points from ESL Open Cups and none of them qualified for DHM Last Chance this seed will go to Probe most likely.
  • In the China standings theoretically Jieshi, XY, MacSed and Silky can still overtake Cyan, but again as none of these players is likely to earn any points from ESL Open Cups and none of them qualified for DHM Last Chance this seed will go to Cyan most likely.


So except for the extremely unlikely scenario where Zoun wins almost all the open cups, the Last Chance tournament offers no last chances at all?


thats ironic. I guess comes next Monday, when mathematical chances will no longer exist, the Last Chance will officially become the "Just play for money, bro" tournament


Last Chance Qualifiers were significant regarding Qualification, the event itself will not change anything (because of how the Qualifiers went) regarding this. It might shuffle the standings a bit though (as in for the seeding during IEM) but it will not change who qualified.

Also CN and OC will not be mathematically determined on Monday (OC one week later and CN with the last set of ESL Open Cups that give points toward the 2020/21 Standings)
LiquipediaSCV ready | SC2-Liquipedia Admin, reviewer and editor | Wax called me a Liquipedia wizard in one of his articles for 2019 WCS Standings
1 2 3 4 All last
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 36m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 287
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 7942
PianO 2072
Larva 449
Leta 433
Shinee 51
Sacsri 22
Noble 17
Dota 2
ODPixel438
NeuroSwarm113
League of Legends
JimRising 689
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1357
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor223
Other Games
summit1g12331
SortOf96
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick29184
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH352
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2106
League of Legends
• Jankos2335
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2h 36m
RSL Revival
2h 36m
Classic vs Clem
FEL
7h 36m
Elazer vs Spirit
Gerald vs MaNa
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
10h 36m
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Wardi Open
1d 3h
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Epic.LAN
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
HSC XXVII
NC Random Cup

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.