• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:37
CEST 10:37
KST 17:37
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch0Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
NaDa's Body Soulkey on ASL S20 BW General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D [ASL20] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Borderlands 3 General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1642 users

TLnet Map Contest 14 Finalists - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
50 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 All
ThunderJunk
Profile Joined December 2015
United States694 Posts
February 13 2020 08:46 GMT
#41
Blackburn definitely gets my vote. That map is sick!!! Would use for a ThunderLeague.
I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25665 Posts
February 13 2020 10:11 GMT
#42
On February 13 2020 10:37 ThunderJunk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2020 23:22 Wombat_NI wrote:
On February 12 2020 15:10 Harris1st wrote:
On February 12 2020 08:17 Wombat_NI wrote:
On February 12 2020 06:22 brickrd wrote:
On February 12 2020 00:56 Superouman wrote:
On February 11 2020 15:20 Nightmarjoo wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
At a first look Beckett Industries looks pretty good.

The standard/macro maps all look the same as each other and as most of the maps from the last few seasons. I dunno why you guys are obsessed with giving away 5 bases for free, with 7+ bases per player, only 2-players, and worst of all, an even number of paths.

I'm not a fan of Blackburn, but the other rush maps seem ok; though if any make it into the ladder pool I have no idea how good their gameplay will actually turn out.

On February 11 2020 07:25 Superouman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2020 05:18 Howard_Kao wrote:
Why does all maps look familiar and dull, I thought we're gonna have some crazy maps under the topic of adrenaline rush

Anything not familiar and dull gets vetoed to death. Just look at Zen, only the natural is unusual and the map is barely played.

You know I'm not terrified of "interesting" features; I loved Turbo Cruise and I liked Winter's Gate for example, but Zen is extremely uncomfortable to play on. The 2nd nat entrance is occasionally annoying, but normally you just block it off and rally to your 3rd and it's almost like the nat is normal. What makes the map hell to play on is the tiny misshapen main bases, especially in conjunction with the cliff face that turns into an expo, annoying pathing due to a thousand different mineral blocks, and how tight the map is as a whole. I think the tightness would be ok without the mineral blocks, and the layout as a whole would be more easily taken in without the cramped main, nat, and 3rd. All together these traits make for a typically unpleasant game, not the "innovative" feature of the 2nd nat entrance.

I want to like the map, it definitely stands out among the mappool of the last few seasons, but after playing a ton of games on the map I found I enjoyed sc2 much more after vetoing it.

However, I promise you can have traits that differentiate a map from its peers without hurting the gameplay.


Yeah i made too many mistakes on Zen

On February 12 2020 00:49 brickrd wrote:
i don't understand the point of putting accelerators in choke points. choke points are hard to move through, but you made them easier to move through, so it's just a less chokey choke point? pretty uninspired.



AZGs on chokes change the properties of the choke. It's more or less desirable depending on the stage of the game.

With a small army, it is only a boost because the army doesn't get spaghettified.

With a large army, the army gets spaghettified but still gets through the choke at a normal pace.

Setting a concave is very easy for battles with medium and large armies. But if the defender's army to too small, the attacker can still break through with a few less hits taken.

So depending on the time of the game, the size of the attacker and the defender's armies will vary and you won't use those chokes the same in the early, mid and late game.

________________

By the way, in this TLMC, there are 5 first time finalists.
- Agaton
- CharactR
- robeng
- Insidioussc2
- insidious_bombardier

This amount is crazy. The future of sc2 melee map making is safe.


sounds like a bunch of theorycraft you made up

But that’s the beauty of theorycraft!

Personally I think there could be more interesting uses of something like accelerating/slowing fields, namely make a variant that is directional.

Maybe while entering from one side it accelerates you through, decelerates if entering from the other side. Then you could have relatively long chunks of movement modifying fields.

So controlling the entrances could be used more tactically and battle over, you could try to establish a position in front of one and speed up reinforcements from your rear. Or have them controllable and require units on them to active them, like a Xel’Naga tower.

Or a player could be looking to control it to slow a push through a choke.

I mean I’m just spitballing of course. But say a bio-tank parade pushing kind of style could be made strong or weak depending on how the fields would be controlled.

I feel at present they’re just things that make you move faster or slower through chokes at present and that’s about it really.


The directional idea is kinda weird to play I guess, but the "take control" idea is nice!


On February 12 2020 11:19 ThunderJunk wrote:
I'm annoyed that every single finalist features spawns in the corners, and similar expansion layouts.

Beautiful maps though.


I agree. There is only one map that has same side spawns to bring a bit of excitement. All the others look a bit boring

There is a fine line between interesting and gimmicky but I quite like the look of that one.

It’s a shame I just never think they really get maps and pools right, and I have long thought ladder and how it works plays into this.

There’s not much room for experimentation and things get a bit same, I’ve long felt the map pool should have more maps full stop, with more vetoes.

Or more maps and a set of vetoes for each of your matchups. As a Protoss player I’ve had to veto many a map that made for great macro PvT matches because it was too Zerg favoured was generally the pattern with me, but I’m sure others have had differing experiences.

Then over a ladder season you can get a sense with ladder data of what the good, balanced maps tend to be for each specific matchup and feed those into tournament matches too.

As it has long been, IMO there aren’t enough maps in the pool, it gets stale and sometimes the interesting maps get rotated out too quickly, ones people are tired of stick around forever and there isn’t a huge amount of room for experimentation in the current pool.

Trying to make every map as close to 50/50 for every single matchup is a thankless task and it inevitably leads to really similar maps. I’d love to see what map makers could do with maps tailored for making the best TvT map possible as their remit, or whatever particular matchup.

There’s other things could be done too, experimental maps could give you special portraits and stuff to encourage people to give them a proper try.


I appreciate your thoughts here.

I want more super out-there maps (e.g., Dasan Station, Klontas Mire, etc.) Most of my fun in playing Starcraft2 comes from making my own creative adaptations and unique build orders. I'd much rather have slightly or somewhat imbalanced maps that are fun to discover then a map pool of 7 balanced maps that all look and play basically the same. I know I'm not alone in this. Shoot, if I could have 7 weird maps, I'd take it. I'll compromise with less, but come on, None!? Whaatever...

That said, the mapmakers did a great job making beautiful maps, so congrats to the finalists.

Yeah for sure, I think the map makers do great jobs with the straight jacket they have to operate with, just would be cool if it were loosened a bit.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
capacityex
Profile Joined June 2019
27 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-02-13 18:09:05
February 13 2020 18:03 GMT
#43
i live near blackburn so that wins surely

have to agree that these are just standard maps. I suppose this is what we get got having 3 different races, but im sure we accept that some maps are better for some races. Maybe we could have it IF its deemed map x is better for X race, then you are awarded +10 mmr extra for winning on it as a bonus? Might stop a lot of crying, but i know this may have its issues. i too enjoyed the game when crazy shit was afoot. remember the days of shakuras and that where people found really op places to put units, you kinda played around NOT letting that happen . . .meh i thought it was kinda cool, it was like 2nd objectives and all that shit you scream for these days . . . .they did it back then without knowing.
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
February 13 2020 20:07 GMT
#44
On February 13 2020 19:11 Wombat_NI wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 13 2020 10:37 ThunderJunk wrote:
On February 12 2020 23:22 Wombat_NI wrote:
On February 12 2020 15:10 Harris1st wrote:
On February 12 2020 08:17 Wombat_NI wrote:
On February 12 2020 06:22 brickrd wrote:
On February 12 2020 00:56 Superouman wrote:
On February 11 2020 15:20 Nightmarjoo wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
At a first look Beckett Industries looks pretty good.

The standard/macro maps all look the same as each other and as most of the maps from the last few seasons. I dunno why you guys are obsessed with giving away 5 bases for free, with 7+ bases per player, only 2-players, and worst of all, an even number of paths.

I'm not a fan of Blackburn, but the other rush maps seem ok; though if any make it into the ladder pool I have no idea how good their gameplay will actually turn out.

On February 11 2020 07:25 Superouman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2020 05:18 Howard_Kao wrote:
Why does all maps look familiar and dull, I thought we're gonna have some crazy maps under the topic of adrenaline rush

Anything not familiar and dull gets vetoed to death. Just look at Zen, only the natural is unusual and the map is barely played.

You know I'm not terrified of "interesting" features; I loved Turbo Cruise and I liked Winter's Gate for example, but Zen is extremely uncomfortable to play on. The 2nd nat entrance is occasionally annoying, but normally you just block it off and rally to your 3rd and it's almost like the nat is normal. What makes the map hell to play on is the tiny misshapen main bases, especially in conjunction with the cliff face that turns into an expo, annoying pathing due to a thousand different mineral blocks, and how tight the map is as a whole. I think the tightness would be ok without the mineral blocks, and the layout as a whole would be more easily taken in without the cramped main, nat, and 3rd. All together these traits make for a typically unpleasant game, not the "innovative" feature of the 2nd nat entrance.

I want to like the map, it definitely stands out among the mappool of the last few seasons, but after playing a ton of games on the map I found I enjoyed sc2 much more after vetoing it.

However, I promise you can have traits that differentiate a map from its peers without hurting the gameplay.


Yeah i made too many mistakes on Zen

On February 12 2020 00:49 brickrd wrote:
i don't understand the point of putting accelerators in choke points. choke points are hard to move through, but you made them easier to move through, so it's just a less chokey choke point? pretty uninspired.



AZGs on chokes change the properties of the choke. It's more or less desirable depending on the stage of the game.

With a small army, it is only a boost because the army doesn't get spaghettified.

With a large army, the army gets spaghettified but still gets through the choke at a normal pace.

Setting a concave is very easy for battles with medium and large armies. But if the defender's army to too small, the attacker can still break through with a few less hits taken.

So depending on the time of the game, the size of the attacker and the defender's armies will vary and you won't use those chokes the same in the early, mid and late game.

________________

By the way, in this TLMC, there are 5 first time finalists.
- Agaton
- CharactR
- robeng
- Insidioussc2
- insidious_bombardier

This amount is crazy. The future of sc2 melee map making is safe.


sounds like a bunch of theorycraft you made up

But that’s the beauty of theorycraft!

Personally I think there could be more interesting uses of something like accelerating/slowing fields, namely make a variant that is directional.

Maybe while entering from one side it accelerates you through, decelerates if entering from the other side. Then you could have relatively long chunks of movement modifying fields.

So controlling the entrances could be used more tactically and battle over, you could try to establish a position in front of one and speed up reinforcements from your rear. Or have them controllable and require units on them to active them, like a Xel’Naga tower.

Or a player could be looking to control it to slow a push through a choke.

I mean I’m just spitballing of course. But say a bio-tank parade pushing kind of style could be made strong or weak depending on how the fields would be controlled.

I feel at present they’re just things that make you move faster or slower through chokes at present and that’s about it really.


The directional idea is kinda weird to play I guess, but the "take control" idea is nice!


On February 12 2020 11:19 ThunderJunk wrote:
I'm annoyed that every single finalist features spawns in the corners, and similar expansion layouts.

Beautiful maps though.


I agree. There is only one map that has same side spawns to bring a bit of excitement. All the others look a bit boring

There is a fine line between interesting and gimmicky but I quite like the look of that one.

It’s a shame I just never think they really get maps and pools right, and I have long thought ladder and how it works plays into this.

There’s not much room for experimentation and things get a bit same, I’ve long felt the map pool should have more maps full stop, with more vetoes.

Or more maps and a set of vetoes for each of your matchups. As a Protoss player I’ve had to veto many a map that made for great macro PvT matches because it was too Zerg favoured was generally the pattern with me, but I’m sure others have had differing experiences.

Then over a ladder season you can get a sense with ladder data of what the good, balanced maps tend to be for each specific matchup and feed those into tournament matches too.

As it has long been, IMO there aren’t enough maps in the pool, it gets stale and sometimes the interesting maps get rotated out too quickly, ones people are tired of stick around forever and there isn’t a huge amount of room for experimentation in the current pool.

Trying to make every map as close to 50/50 for every single matchup is a thankless task and it inevitably leads to really similar maps. I’d love to see what map makers could do with maps tailored for making the best TvT map possible as their remit, or whatever particular matchup.

There’s other things could be done too, experimental maps could give you special portraits and stuff to encourage people to give them a proper try.


I appreciate your thoughts here.

I want more super out-there maps (e.g., Dasan Station, Klontas Mire, etc.) Most of my fun in playing Starcraft2 comes from making my own creative adaptations and unique build orders. I'd much rather have slightly or somewhat imbalanced maps that are fun to discover then a map pool of 7 balanced maps that all look and play basically the same. I know I'm not alone in this. Shoot, if I could have 7 weird maps, I'd take it. I'll compromise with less, but come on, None!? Whaatever...

That said, the mapmakers did a great job making beautiful maps, so congrats to the finalists.

Yeah for sure, I think the map makers do great jobs with the straight jacket they have to operate with, just would be cool if it were loosened a bit.

My favorite pre-WCS tournament series was SC2 ProLeague, by far. It was a testbed for all kinds of off-the-wall map ideas, impeccably executed by the big Korean mapmakers. That's where Korhal Sky Island, Outboxer, King Sejong Station, and so many more awesome ideas got tested out, and proven to be good or imbalanced. We haven't really gotten anything like that to replace it since.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Moonerz
Profile Joined March 2014
United States449 Posts
February 13 2020 20:12 GMT
#45
On February 14 2020 05:07 NewSunshine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 13 2020 19:11 Wombat_NI wrote:
On February 13 2020 10:37 ThunderJunk wrote:
On February 12 2020 23:22 Wombat_NI wrote:
On February 12 2020 15:10 Harris1st wrote:
On February 12 2020 08:17 Wombat_NI wrote:
On February 12 2020 06:22 brickrd wrote:
On February 12 2020 00:56 Superouman wrote:
On February 11 2020 15:20 Nightmarjoo wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
At a first look Beckett Industries looks pretty good.

The standard/macro maps all look the same as each other and as most of the maps from the last few seasons. I dunno why you guys are obsessed with giving away 5 bases for free, with 7+ bases per player, only 2-players, and worst of all, an even number of paths.

I'm not a fan of Blackburn, but the other rush maps seem ok; though if any make it into the ladder pool I have no idea how good their gameplay will actually turn out.

On February 11 2020 07:25 Superouman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2020 05:18 Howard_Kao wrote:
Why does all maps look familiar and dull, I thought we're gonna have some crazy maps under the topic of adrenaline rush

Anything not familiar and dull gets vetoed to death. Just look at Zen, only the natural is unusual and the map is barely played.

You know I'm not terrified of "interesting" features; I loved Turbo Cruise and I liked Winter's Gate for example, but Zen is extremely uncomfortable to play on. The 2nd nat entrance is occasionally annoying, but normally you just block it off and rally to your 3rd and it's almost like the nat is normal. What makes the map hell to play on is the tiny misshapen main bases, especially in conjunction with the cliff face that turns into an expo, annoying pathing due to a thousand different mineral blocks, and how tight the map is as a whole. I think the tightness would be ok without the mineral blocks, and the layout as a whole would be more easily taken in without the cramped main, nat, and 3rd. All together these traits make for a typically unpleasant game, not the "innovative" feature of the 2nd nat entrance.

I want to like the map, it definitely stands out among the mappool of the last few seasons, but after playing a ton of games on the map I found I enjoyed sc2 much more after vetoing it.

However, I promise you can have traits that differentiate a map from its peers without hurting the gameplay.


Yeah i made too many mistakes on Zen

On February 12 2020 00:49 brickrd wrote:
i don't understand the point of putting accelerators in choke points. choke points are hard to move through, but you made them easier to move through, so it's just a less chokey choke point? pretty uninspired.



AZGs on chokes change the properties of the choke. It's more or less desirable depending on the stage of the game.

With a small army, it is only a boost because the army doesn't get spaghettified.

With a large army, the army gets spaghettified but still gets through the choke at a normal pace.

Setting a concave is very easy for battles with medium and large armies. But if the defender's army to too small, the attacker can still break through with a few less hits taken.

So depending on the time of the game, the size of the attacker and the defender's armies will vary and you won't use those chokes the same in the early, mid and late game.

________________

By the way, in this TLMC, there are 5 first time finalists.
- Agaton
- CharactR
- robeng
- Insidioussc2
- insidious_bombardier

This amount is crazy. The future of sc2 melee map making is safe.


sounds like a bunch of theorycraft you made up

But that’s the beauty of theorycraft!

Personally I think there could be more interesting uses of something like accelerating/slowing fields, namely make a variant that is directional.

Maybe while entering from one side it accelerates you through, decelerates if entering from the other side. Then you could have relatively long chunks of movement modifying fields.

So controlling the entrances could be used more tactically and battle over, you could try to establish a position in front of one and speed up reinforcements from your rear. Or have them controllable and require units on them to active them, like a Xel’Naga tower.

Or a player could be looking to control it to slow a push through a choke.

I mean I’m just spitballing of course. But say a bio-tank parade pushing kind of style could be made strong or weak depending on how the fields would be controlled.

I feel at present they’re just things that make you move faster or slower through chokes at present and that’s about it really.


The directional idea is kinda weird to play I guess, but the "take control" idea is nice!


On February 12 2020 11:19 ThunderJunk wrote:
I'm annoyed that every single finalist features spawns in the corners, and similar expansion layouts.

Beautiful maps though.


I agree. There is only one map that has same side spawns to bring a bit of excitement. All the others look a bit boring

There is a fine line between interesting and gimmicky but I quite like the look of that one.

It’s a shame I just never think they really get maps and pools right, and I have long thought ladder and how it works plays into this.

There’s not much room for experimentation and things get a bit same, I’ve long felt the map pool should have more maps full stop, with more vetoes.

Or more maps and a set of vetoes for each of your matchups. As a Protoss player I’ve had to veto many a map that made for great macro PvT matches because it was too Zerg favoured was generally the pattern with me, but I’m sure others have had differing experiences.

Then over a ladder season you can get a sense with ladder data of what the good, balanced maps tend to be for each specific matchup and feed those into tournament matches too.

As it has long been, IMO there aren’t enough maps in the pool, it gets stale and sometimes the interesting maps get rotated out too quickly, ones people are tired of stick around forever and there isn’t a huge amount of room for experimentation in the current pool.

Trying to make every map as close to 50/50 for every single matchup is a thankless task and it inevitably leads to really similar maps. I’d love to see what map makers could do with maps tailored for making the best TvT map possible as their remit, or whatever particular matchup.

There’s other things could be done too, experimental maps could give you special portraits and stuff to encourage people to give them a proper try.


I appreciate your thoughts here.

I want more super out-there maps (e.g., Dasan Station, Klontas Mire, etc.) Most of my fun in playing Starcraft2 comes from making my own creative adaptations and unique build orders. I'd much rather have slightly or somewhat imbalanced maps that are fun to discover then a map pool of 7 balanced maps that all look and play basically the same. I know I'm not alone in this. Shoot, if I could have 7 weird maps, I'd take it. I'll compromise with less, but come on, None!? Whaatever...

That said, the mapmakers did a great job making beautiful maps, so congrats to the finalists.

Yeah for sure, I think the map makers do great jobs with the straight jacket they have to operate with, just would be cool if it were loosened a bit.

My favorite pre-WCS tournament series was SC2 ProLeague, by far. It was a testbed for all kinds of off-the-wall map ideas, impeccably executed by the big Korean mapmakers. That's where Korhal Sky Island, Outboxer, King Sejong Station, and so many more awesome ideas got tested out, and proven to be good or imbalanced. We haven't really gotten anything like that to replace it since.


100% agree the large sample size of competitive games we could get from Proleague was so useful for figuring out map balance as well as what map concepts worked. I do think though there should be a majority of standards maps in a pool and then a couple with unique features that are more geared towards a certain play style or certain build types. By implementing these types of maps you could introduce some variety to the game without having to make overall balance changes.
FBTsingLoong
Profile Joined April 2018
China410 Posts
February 14 2020 00:07 GMT
#46
No more dark map,plz.
TyInnoMaruByunAlive,TIMBA
TiberiusA
Profile Joined February 2017
United States39 Posts
February 14 2020 02:16 GMT
#47
On February 14 2020 09:07 FBTsingLoong wrote:
No more dark map,plz.

I agree. And this black and pink theme has been a consistent thing now since Blackpink, but it was only cool the first time, imo.
Vilder
Profile Joined February 2020
1 Post
February 25 2020 21:27 GMT
#48
Such a hard pick since all the maps are beautiful.
lunafraga
Profile Joined February 2012
United States35 Posts
March 03 2020 18:06 GMT
#49
Hard rain is a Must.
Timing can kill speed.
virpi
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Germany3598 Posts
March 03 2020 23:52 GMT
#50
On February 14 2020 09:07 FBTsingLoong wrote:
No more dark map,plz.

Tastes are different, e.g. I really hate bright maps as they put more strain on my eyes. I insta-veto every snowy map, no matter how good it's supposed to be for my race.

@thread: Some of the maps look amazing, especially "Ecostation" has a beautiful balance of colors.
first we make expand, then we defense it.
royalroadweed
Profile Joined April 2013
United States8301 Posts
March 04 2020 00:54 GMT
#51
Nice to see no more dark emo maps.
"Nerfing Toss can just make them stronger"
Prev 1 2 3 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 23m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech80
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 2131
Bisu 379
Dewaltoss 77
JulyZerg 50
sorry 47
ToSsGirL 47
HiyA 37
Nal_rA 28
Sharp 26
ajuk12(nOOB) 14
[ Show more ]
SilentControl 10
Free 9
Dota 2
XcaliburYe177
boxi98147
NeuroSwarm114
League of Legends
JimRising 444
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss573
olofmeister478
Stewie2K402
allub130
Other Games
C9.Mang0262
XaKoH 155
Trikslyr9
trigger1
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick603
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 44
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 32
• Light_VIP 19
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos874
• Stunt685
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
1h 23m
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
Map Test Tournament
2h 23m
The PondCast
4h 23m
RSL Revival
1d 1h
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
1d 18h
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
1d 23h
RSL Revival
2 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Online Event
3 days
[ Show More ]
Wardi Open
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
LiuLi Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.