• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 17:02
CET 23:02
KST 07:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge2[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation14Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA17
StarCraft 2
General
SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death
Brood War
General
Data analysis on 70 million replays soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft 2v2 maps which are SC2 style with teams together? What happened to TvZ on Retro? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group A - Sat 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine About SC2SEA.COM
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Health Impact of Joining…
TrAiDoS
Dyadica Evangelium — Chapt…
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2004 users

2018 IEM PyeongChang qualifiers and details - Page 6

Forum Index > SC2 General
102 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 All
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany16017 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-12-02 08:44:53
December 02 2017 08:42 GMT
#101
On December 02 2017 15:40 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2017 22:35 Charoisaur wrote:
On December 01 2017 07:12 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On December 01 2017 07:04 Charoisaur wrote:
On December 01 2017 04:18 OHGRinho wrote:
My opinion on the European Qualifier:

I think the split is because of Olympia to ensure to have as many nations in there as possible. But the region split within Europe is bollocks. The european pro scene is already quite diverse in nationalities. The problem is, the southern region (as it is determined by ESL) is pretty much non-existent and the east is also underwhelming. And therfor very good players have to be left out.

If you take a look at the standings of the 2017 WCS circuit, you have to scroll down to rank 56 to find Ryu from Italy as the only representative of the southern region. There is no other player in there. The next guy could probably be Reynor, if he is allowed to play, but that's it.

On the other hand, we will have players like Showtime(Nat. GER/ WCS Rank 11), Nerchio(PL/5), Elazer(PL/2), uThermal(NL/14), Harstem(NL/22)...compete for the single central european slot.

In the North Serral (FIN/3), Snute (NOR/4), Namshar (SWE/18) and Zanster (SWE/29) will compete for one spot.

The West are our french guys DnS (35) and PtitDrogo (16) (Stephano is already registered for Africa).

And in the East I could only find Bly (UKR/27) and PiliPili (KAZ/38), but no other competition.

So...the hard qualifiers in Europe will only be the North and the Central region. The rest is going to be rather boring until the semi finals. For some guys even a cupcake, while others have to fight hard for their spot. And that's why I think this is bollocks. For europe it would have been enough with one or two open qualifiers for a maximum of 4 spots overall. Give the Koreans the 5th spot and IEM PyeongChang would have much more quality of play - which is important too.

The one positive thing I can see in this format is, that it probably encourages a couple of players to try their luck. Who knows, we maybe find a gem or two. But I wouldn't expect it.


The point isn't to have the best players there, they want players from lots of different regions.
If they wanted just the best players it would be all korean.


Ehhh... there's still a difference between aiming for diversity and rewarding local scenes, and blindly dividing up regions where scenes don't even exist. Even if you had a single qualifier with 5 spots for all of Europe you'd probably still end up with 4 different countries, and better players.

I don't understand your point. Yes the regions with barely existing scenes get charity spots - but so does Europe as a whole. If they wanted better players it would be all korean but it's not the point of this tournament to get the best players. They want to give players from weaker regions a chance too.

Complaining about the fact that the weaker regions in Europe get charity spots at the expense of EU North and EU Central while finding it ok that EU North and EU Central get charity spots at the expense of Korea seems extremely hypocritical to me.


You're being deliberately obtuse. Let's assume that IEM wants to promote regional diversity and sportive universality, goals very much in line with Olympic values (yes we know you fundamentally disagree with these goals). Dividing tournament spots among regions where there are active scenes, among Korea, Europe, China, the Americas achieves this moreso than a purely meritocratic qualifier system, and to its credit does help foster local scenes. Splitting spots among the different regions of Europe doesn't do any additional fostering, since the wider European scene is quite integrated, and there isn't any noticeable for example Southern European Starcraft scene distinct from the European scene.

Show nested quote +
On December 02 2017 14:01 ParksonVN wrote:
On December 01 2017 21:51 Musicus wrote:
On December 01 2017 15:06 Clazziquai10 wrote:
5 players from EU, 2 from KR... Lol?

5 spots for 50 nations is indeed not fair.

Why does a single small nation like SK get 2???

I guess just because they are the host nation? Seems stupid to me... Lol.


Leave alone players’ qualities, SK should get more becoz they have the largest player base. EU has like 30 nations but how many of them actually have progamers? and how many % of population care about SC2 ? Answer these.


Korea does not have the largest player base. EU ladder has roughly three times more people than Korean ladder.

Of course it does additional fostering. Ryu from the southern region as well as Bly/Pilipili from EU East get a chance to qualify for a big event they otherwise wouldn't have. This is good for the local scenes.

Same as giving players like Uthermal or Nerchio a chance to qualify for WESG (which they wouldn't have if it was one global qualifier) by giving guaranteed spots for Europe. It's exactly the same - Giving players from weaker regions spots to foster local scenes. EU central/north is weaker than KR and EU East/south are weaker than EU Central/North.
Why should EU Central/North be given charity spots but not EU South/East?
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-12-02 09:06:39
December 02 2017 09:05 GMT
#102
On December 02 2017 17:42 Charoisaur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2017 15:40 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On December 01 2017 22:35 Charoisaur wrote:
On December 01 2017 07:12 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On December 01 2017 07:04 Charoisaur wrote:
On December 01 2017 04:18 OHGRinho wrote:
My opinion on the European Qualifier:

I think the split is because of Olympia to ensure to have as many nations in there as possible. But the region split within Europe is bollocks. The european pro scene is already quite diverse in nationalities. The problem is, the southern region (as it is determined by ESL) is pretty much non-existent and the east is also underwhelming. And therfor very good players have to be left out.

If you take a look at the standings of the 2017 WCS circuit, you have to scroll down to rank 56 to find Ryu from Italy as the only representative of the southern region. There is no other player in there. The next guy could probably be Reynor, if he is allowed to play, but that's it.

On the other hand, we will have players like Showtime(Nat. GER/ WCS Rank 11), Nerchio(PL/5), Elazer(PL/2), uThermal(NL/14), Harstem(NL/22)...compete for the single central european slot.

In the North Serral (FIN/3), Snute (NOR/4), Namshar (SWE/18) and Zanster (SWE/29) will compete for one spot.

The West are our french guys DnS (35) and PtitDrogo (16) (Stephano is already registered for Africa).

And in the East I could only find Bly (UKR/27) and PiliPili (KAZ/38), but no other competition.

So...the hard qualifiers in Europe will only be the North and the Central region. The rest is going to be rather boring until the semi finals. For some guys even a cupcake, while others have to fight hard for their spot. And that's why I think this is bollocks. For europe it would have been enough with one or two open qualifiers for a maximum of 4 spots overall. Give the Koreans the 5th spot and IEM PyeongChang would have much more quality of play - which is important too.

The one positive thing I can see in this format is, that it probably encourages a couple of players to try their luck. Who knows, we maybe find a gem or two. But I wouldn't expect it.


The point isn't to have the best players there, they want players from lots of different regions.
If they wanted just the best players it would be all korean.


Ehhh... there's still a difference between aiming for diversity and rewarding local scenes, and blindly dividing up regions where scenes don't even exist. Even if you had a single qualifier with 5 spots for all of Europe you'd probably still end up with 4 different countries, and better players.

I don't understand your point. Yes the regions with barely existing scenes get charity spots - but so does Europe as a whole. If they wanted better players it would be all korean but it's not the point of this tournament to get the best players. They want to give players from weaker regions a chance too.

Complaining about the fact that the weaker regions in Europe get charity spots at the expense of EU North and EU Central while finding it ok that EU North and EU Central get charity spots at the expense of Korea seems extremely hypocritical to me.


You're being deliberately obtuse. Let's assume that IEM wants to promote regional diversity and sportive universality, goals very much in line with Olympic values (yes we know you fundamentally disagree with these goals). Dividing tournament spots among regions where there are active scenes, among Korea, Europe, China, the Americas achieves this moreso than a purely meritocratic qualifier system, and to its credit does help foster local scenes. Splitting spots among the different regions of Europe doesn't do any additional fostering, since the wider European scene is quite integrated, and there isn't any noticeable for example Southern European Starcraft scene distinct from the European scene.

On December 02 2017 14:01 ParksonVN wrote:
On December 01 2017 21:51 Musicus wrote:
On December 01 2017 15:06 Clazziquai10 wrote:
5 players from EU, 2 from KR... Lol?

5 spots for 50 nations is indeed not fair.

Why does a single small nation like SK get 2???

I guess just because they are the host nation? Seems stupid to me... Lol.


Leave alone players’ qualities, SK should get more becoz they have the largest player base. EU has like 30 nations but how many of them actually have progamers? and how many % of population care about SC2 ? Answer these.


Korea does not have the largest player base. EU ladder has roughly three times more people than Korean ladder.

Of course it does additional fostering. Ryu from the southern region as well as Bly/Pilipili from EU East get a chance to qualify for a big event they otherwise wouldn't have. This is good for the local scenes.

Same as giving players like Uthermal or Nerchio a chance to qualify for WESG (which they wouldn't have if it was one global qualifier) by giving guaranteed spots for Europe. It's exactly the same - Giving players from weaker regions spots to foster local scenes. EU central/north is weaker than KR and EU East/south are weaker than EU Central/North.
Why should EU Central/North be given charity spots but not EU South/East?


Considering EU east/south a different scene than the rest of EU and an analogous situation to the split between Europe and Korea takes healthy doses of self-delusion. Face it you're just upset because your precious Koreans go shafted by this qualifier system (the fact that Koreans got screwed over by this qualifier split doesn't make your arguments any less spurious).
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany16017 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-12-02 09:51:48
December 02 2017 09:33 GMT
#103
On December 02 2017 18:05 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2017 17:42 Charoisaur wrote:
On December 02 2017 15:40 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On December 01 2017 22:35 Charoisaur wrote:
On December 01 2017 07:12 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On December 01 2017 07:04 Charoisaur wrote:
On December 01 2017 04:18 OHGRinho wrote:
My opinion on the European Qualifier:

I think the split is because of Olympia to ensure to have as many nations in there as possible. But the region split within Europe is bollocks. The european pro scene is already quite diverse in nationalities. The problem is, the southern region (as it is determined by ESL) is pretty much non-existent and the east is also underwhelming. And therfor very good players have to be left out.

If you take a look at the standings of the 2017 WCS circuit, you have to scroll down to rank 56 to find Ryu from Italy as the only representative of the southern region. There is no other player in there. The next guy could probably be Reynor, if he is allowed to play, but that's it.

On the other hand, we will have players like Showtime(Nat. GER/ WCS Rank 11), Nerchio(PL/5), Elazer(PL/2), uThermal(NL/14), Harstem(NL/22)...compete for the single central european slot.

In the North Serral (FIN/3), Snute (NOR/4), Namshar (SWE/18) and Zanster (SWE/29) will compete for one spot.

The West are our french guys DnS (35) and PtitDrogo (16) (Stephano is already registered for Africa).

And in the East I could only find Bly (UKR/27) and PiliPili (KAZ/38), but no other competition.

So...the hard qualifiers in Europe will only be the North and the Central region. The rest is going to be rather boring until the semi finals. For some guys even a cupcake, while others have to fight hard for their spot. And that's why I think this is bollocks. For europe it would have been enough with one or two open qualifiers for a maximum of 4 spots overall. Give the Koreans the 5th spot and IEM PyeongChang would have much more quality of play - which is important too.

The one positive thing I can see in this format is, that it probably encourages a couple of players to try their luck. Who knows, we maybe find a gem or two. But I wouldn't expect it.


The point isn't to have the best players there, they want players from lots of different regions.
If they wanted just the best players it would be all korean.


Ehhh... there's still a difference between aiming for diversity and rewarding local scenes, and blindly dividing up regions where scenes don't even exist. Even if you had a single qualifier with 5 spots for all of Europe you'd probably still end up with 4 different countries, and better players.

I don't understand your point. Yes the regions with barely existing scenes get charity spots - but so does Europe as a whole. If they wanted better players it would be all korean but it's not the point of this tournament to get the best players. They want to give players from weaker regions a chance too.

Complaining about the fact that the weaker regions in Europe get charity spots at the expense of EU North and EU Central while finding it ok that EU North and EU Central get charity spots at the expense of Korea seems extremely hypocritical to me.


You're being deliberately obtuse. Let's assume that IEM wants to promote regional diversity and sportive universality, goals very much in line with Olympic values (yes we know you fundamentally disagree with these goals). Dividing tournament spots among regions where there are active scenes, among Korea, Europe, China, the Americas achieves this moreso than a purely meritocratic qualifier system, and to its credit does help foster local scenes. Splitting spots among the different regions of Europe doesn't do any additional fostering, since the wider European scene is quite integrated, and there isn't any noticeable for example Southern European Starcraft scene distinct from the European scene.

On December 02 2017 14:01 ParksonVN wrote:
On December 01 2017 21:51 Musicus wrote:
On December 01 2017 15:06 Clazziquai10 wrote:
5 players from EU, 2 from KR... Lol?

5 spots for 50 nations is indeed not fair.

Why does a single small nation like SK get 2???

I guess just because they are the host nation? Seems stupid to me... Lol.


Leave alone players’ qualities, SK should get more becoz they have the largest player base. EU has like 30 nations but how many of them actually have progamers? and how many % of population care about SC2 ? Answer these.


Korea does not have the largest player base. EU ladder has roughly three times more people than Korean ladder.

Of course it does additional fostering. Ryu from the southern region as well as Bly/Pilipili from EU East get a chance to qualify for a big event they otherwise wouldn't have. This is good for the local scenes.

Same as giving players like Uthermal or Nerchio a chance to qualify for WESG (which they wouldn't have if it was one global qualifier) by giving guaranteed spots for Europe. It's exactly the same - Giving players from weaker regions spots to foster local scenes. EU central/north is weaker than KR and EU East/south are weaker than EU Central/North.
Why should EU Central/North be given charity spots but not EU South/East?


Considering EU east/south a different scene than the rest of EU and an analogous situation to the split between Europe and Korea takes healthy doses of self-delusion. Face it you're just upset because your precious Koreans go shafted by this qualifier system (the fact that Koreans got screwed over by this qualifier split doesn't make your arguments any less spurious).

I'm just glad players like Ryu get a chance to compete on a big stage. What does that have to do with me being upset that koreans got screwed?

and why do you think it isn't an analogous situation?
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Prev 1 4 5 6 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 58m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
UpATreeSC 340
SteadfastSC 161
ForJumy 51
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 15332
Calm 2800
firebathero 118
Dewaltoss 83
NaDa 37
League of Legends
Trikslyr73
Counter-Strike
fl0m5731
allub158
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu461
Other Games
Grubby5623
FrodaN2009
Beastyqt630
shahzam373
C9.Mang0127
Mew2King116
ZombieGrub37
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream243
Other Games
Algost 5
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• kabyraGe 163
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Eskiya23 22
• FirePhoenix8
• mYiSmile18
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota2906
League of Legends
• Doublelift3371
• TFBlade1110
Other Games
• imaqtpie1176
• Shiphtur269
Upcoming Events
OSC
58m
Wardi Open
13h 58m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 2h
Replay Cast
1d 10h
Wardi Open
1d 13h
OSC
1d 14h
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
OSC
3 days
[ Show More ]
LAN Event
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

SOOP Univ League 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.