| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Rollora
2450 Posts
On January 21 2015 19:58 graNite wrote: I think that's irresponsible to become pregnant at 42. Life expectancy is about 80 in your country RIGHT NOW, you don't know how it is in 40 yrs, propably closer to 90. So the parents can maybe celebrate the kids 50th birthday. Or did you mean birth risks and higher risk for some illnesses? | ||
|
kc2siq
United States319 Posts
At her age, the chance of miscarriage is dangerously high at 40-50%, hope it really works well for her. | ||
digmouse
China6330 Posts
On January 22 2015 01:52 Rollora wrote: Life expectancy is about 80 in your country RIGHT NOW, you don't know how it is in 40 yrs, propably closer to 90. So the parents can maybe celebrate the kids 50th birthday. Or did you mean birth risks and higher risk for some illnesses? Technically yes, higher age pregnancy significantly increase the risk of birth defect related diseases and it takes longer for the mother to recover, but since Jessica and Boxer are a successful and wealthy family they sure will use better medical care to lower the risk as far as possible, it's not really something to worry about these days. | ||
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
| ||
|
robopork
United States511 Posts
| ||
|
Boundz(DarKo)
5311 Posts
| ||
|
Rollora
2450 Posts
On January 21 2015 20:30 algue wrote: No wonder Germany's birthrate is so low if people consider that once you turn 40 you've missed your chance to ever have children First they all want a carreer When they are 40 they suddenly feel they miss something in their life. But then they think 40 is too old. That is why in countries where education and career is something normal people won't achieve anyways have a healthy birthrate. | ||
|
Rollora
2450 Posts
On January 22 2015 01:54 digmouse wrote: Technically yes, higher age pregnancy significantly increase the risk of birth defect related diseases and it takes longer for the mother to recover, but since Jessica and Boxer are a successful and wealthy family they sure will use better medical care to lower the risk as far as possible, it's not really something to worry about these days. I know you are right, still I hope I get "lucky", because I am planning something ... | ||
|
Wuster
1974 Posts
On January 22 2015 01:54 digmouse wrote: Technically yes, higher age pregnancy significantly increase the risk of birth defect related diseases and it takes longer for the mother to recover, but since Jessica and Boxer are a successful and wealthy family they sure will use better medical care to lower the risk as far as possible, it's not really something to worry about these days. Exactly, rich and famous people don't have to live by the same rules as the rest of us. In the US advanced maternal age is 35 btw. So this isn't normal in the US either, but it's not unheard of. Also, in parts of Asia, advanced maternal age is 30(!). | ||
|
neptunusfisk
2286 Posts
On January 22 2015 01:50 SilverJohnny wrote: honestly man I don't agree with it it but there's a difference between choosing to hurt your own wrist and have a shitty career and choosing something risky to create a new person who might be disabled for life. But you arent hurting anyone: the baby you make when 40 is another baby than the one you could have had earlier | ||
|
digmouse
China6330 Posts
On January 22 2015 02:18 Wuster wrote: Exactly, rich and famous people don't have to live by the same rules as the rest of us. In the US advanced maternal age is 35 btw. So this isn't normal in the US either, but it's not unheard of. Also, in parts of Asia, advanced maternal age is 30(!). Actually it's not that expensive for ordinary people either, generally early 40s aren't dangerous any more. You see plenty of ordinary US mothers giving birth to a child these days. | ||
|
LongShot27
United States2084 Posts
| ||
|
D-light
Finland7364 Posts
| ||
|
SC2Toastie
Netherlands5725 Posts
I put 10 bucks on 12 years of age. | ||
|
ROOTFayth
Canada3351 Posts
On January 22 2015 01:50 SilverJohnny wrote: honestly man I don't agree with it it but there's a difference between choosing to hurt your own wrist and have a shitty career and choosing something risky to create a new person who might be disabled for life. the risks aren't THAT high that you should not consider having children at 42 lol not to mention there are people who are disabled who are much happier than people that are perfectly healthy, it's pretty irrelevent | ||
|
dangthatsright
1160 Posts
| ||
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On January 22 2015 02:18 Wuster wrote: Exactly, rich and famous people don't have to live by the same rules as the rest of us. In the US advanced maternal age is 35 btw. So this isn't normal in the US either, but it's not unheard of. Also, in parts of Asia, advanced maternal age is 30(!). In Switzerland, everyone gets that medical treatment thanks to national health insurance... | ||
|
Starecat
940 Posts
But anyway if true congratz to the couple. | ||
|
ddayzy
259 Posts
On January 21 2015 19:58 graNite wrote: I think that's irresponsible to become pregnant at 42. It is also irresponsible to get pregnant when you are young, don't have steady job for both parents, poor, uninformed, uneducated, living in a country which doesn't have the best health care available and to get pregnant at all. It's probably also irresponsible to get kids if you are so miserable that your respons to happy news is "That sucks, you should feel really guilty about this". | ||
|
shid0x
Korea (South)5014 Posts
PS : Reading some of you guys reactions gave me aids. Never expected TL to be so cancerous sometimes. | ||
| ||
|
|
HomeStory Cup
ShoWTimE vs sOs
Serral vs Reynor
Zoun vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Lambo
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
The PondCast
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
|
|
|
EPT
