Boxer and Jessica are expecting a baby! - Page 2
Forum Index > SC2 General |
rotta
5584 Posts
| ||
![]()
opterown
![]()
Australia54784 Posts
On January 21 2015 19:58 graNite wrote: I think that's irresponsible to become pregnant at 42. it's fine, you just need to take greater care with testing and so on, more likely than not no issues. i suppose you might be old or infirm when your kids grow up but yea | ||
NeThZOR
South Africa7387 Posts
| ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On January 21 2015 20:23 Vindicare605 wrote: I suppose a Dane could actually say that. Lots of shit you have that I wish we had. I'm from Canada and the USA :B It's more the phrase itself implies an expectancy that the norm in the US is thus the norm everywhere else where the 21st century is pretty much the emphasis of diverse norms and acceptances. | ||
![]()
Zealously
East Gorteau22261 Posts
On January 21 2015 19:58 graNite wrote: I think that's irresponsible to become pregnant at 42. Add 8-10 years and I would agree, but 42 doesnt seem crazy. On the higher end of standard, maybe, but irresponsible? Why? | ||
Penev
28456 Posts
On January 21 2015 20:52 Torte de Lini wrote: I'm from Canada and the USA :B It's more the phrase itself implies an expectancy that the norm in the US is thus the norm everywhere else where the 21st century is pretty much the emphasis of diverse norms and acceptances. I'd expect the US to be behind on these things tbh. Religion and marriage etc still being more relevant in the states than in (north west) EU.. | ||
Dingodile
4133 Posts
On January 21 2015 19:58 graNite wrote: I think that's irresponsible to become pregnant at 42. Cant believe that a german does (allow to) say this. You better look what is going on in Germany. | ||
shabby
Norway6402 Posts
On January 21 2015 20:53 Zealously wrote: Add 8-10 years and I would agree, but 42 doesnt seem crazy. On the higher end of standard, maybe, but irresponsible? Why? Its mostly about the risk for genetic abnormalities (something like 5-10x as high vs someone below 30), miscarriage (more than doubled) and such. Tbh it will probably be fine, the absolute risk is still quite low, maybe 2-3% for chromosone problems in the baby. I'm sure they will take every precaution to make sure Jessica and the baby is healthy. ![]() SC3 progamer hwaiting! | ||
graNite
Germany4434 Posts
On January 21 2015 20:53 Zealously wrote: Add 8-10 years and I would agree, but 42 doesnt seem crazy. On the higher end of standard, maybe, but irresponsible? Why? rate of down syndrome rises to 1/32 over 40 and that is only one risk | ||
Titusmaster6
United States5937 Posts
| ||
PhoenixVoid
Canada32739 Posts
| ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On January 21 2015 20:59 Penev wrote: I'd expect the US to be behind on these things tbh. Religion and marriage etc still being more relevant in the states than in (north west) EU.. precisely. read the statement after realizing that: "Are you living in the 21st century with the rest of us. That shit is NORMAL in the US." | ||
goiflin
Canada1218 Posts
Can't wait to see the prince dominate starcraft 3 with even more bunker rushes. | ||
![]()
digmouse
China6327 Posts
| ||
Holdenintherye
Canada1441 Posts
Will the kid grow up to be the starcraft 3 bonjwa? | ||
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
![]() | ||
rafaliusz
Poland482 Posts
On January 21 2015 20:30 algue wrote: No wonder Germany's birthrate is so low if people consider that once you turn 40 you've missed your chance to ever have children Tell us about birthrate in France. | ||
Ej_
47656 Posts
said the Pole | ||
![]()
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
On January 21 2015 19:58 graNite wrote: I think that's irresponsible to become pregnant at 42. I understand where you're coming from but I mean the life expectancy in Korea for women is like 83... Having your mom around for 40 years is pretty OK. | ||
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
Congrats to them! That kid is gonna have some sick micro. | ||
| ||