| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
AxiomBlurr
786 Posts
These changes are good...so is the fact you cry babies are going to quit playing... The tank buff will make early Blink Stalker play significantly weaker (a good thing) - It will also make Roach busts weaker ( a good thing). The Oracle buff gives the Oracle more longevity (a good thing). The WM nerf means heavy ling play is more feasible v T ( a good thing). All those positives easily cancel out any negatives... | ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24239 Posts
| ||
|
DinosaurJones
United States1000 Posts
I wonder how many even tried the test map | ||
Heyoka
Katowice25012 Posts
| ||
|
SamirDuran
Philippines895 Posts
| ||
|
awesomoecalypse
United States2235 Posts
| ||
|
Dismay
United States1180 Posts
| ||
|
( bush
321 Posts
| ||
|
Faust852
Luxembourg4004 Posts
On November 12 2013 08:54 awesomoecalypse wrote: The whining about the Oracle change reminds me of all the whining about Warp Prism buff, which turned out to be a great change that made SC2 vastly better and more watchable. There were almost no whine about it, it was an underused unit and even terrans where kinda glad about it. Oracle is already imbalanced and will be much more in the future. | ||
|
SuperYo1000
United States880 Posts
| ||
|
Nightsz
Canada398 Posts
| ||
|
ImperialFist
790 Posts
| ||
|
RaZorwire
Sweden718 Posts
On November 12 2013 08:53 Heyoka wrote: The oracle change is cool but I'm super confused by it...they said explicitly at that SC2 panel this weekend that they didn't think people would be able to appreciate better micro tools when asked about that LaLush video. At the very least it seems inconsistent. AFAIK that's not what they said; their point (according to Cloacken's comment afterwards, at least) was that they preferred for micro that is more visually apparent and easier to understand rather than something that relies on complex hidden mechanics. | ||
|
awesomoecalypse
United States2235 Posts
On November 12 2013 08:54 SamirDuran wrote: didn't DK saw what an oracle can be when it was putted in the hands of good protoss players such as sOs? You mean getting picked off or shut down almost right away in nearly every game? If the motivation behind the Oracle buff is that it is too slow and fragile for even very skilled players to consistently keep it alive, then sOs' games were a decent demonstration of that being the case. Of course, I think basing everything one one tournament is more than a little sily. But if you look around at Protoss play in general on the pro level, Oracles as a unit that remains alive and active throughout the game isn't really something we see almost ever. | ||
|
awesomoecalypse
United States2235 Posts
On November 12 2013 08:56 Faust852 wrote: There were almost no whine about it, it was an underused unit and even terrans where kinda glad about it. Oracle is already imbalanced and will be much more in the future. There was a ton of whine about it, particularly from Terrans who were butthurt that Vikings could no longer catch Prisms. | ||
|
Faust852
Luxembourg4004 Posts
On November 12 2013 08:57 awesomoecalypse wrote: You mean getting picked off or shut down almost right away in nearly every game? If the motivation behind the Oracle buff is that it is too slow and fragile for even very skilled players to consistently keep it alive, then sOs' games were a decent demonstration of that being the case. Of course, I think basing everything one one tournament is more than a little sily. But if you look around at Protoss play in general on the pro level, Oracles as a unit that remains alive and active throughout the game isn't really something we see almost ever. If it wasn't good, sOs wouldn't have done it 7 games in a row at Blizzcon. | ||
|
Nerevar
547 Posts
I also hope that more details of the 2.1 patch beta come out soon. I'm eager to hear what the remastered BW music sounds like. | ||
|
ZAiNs
United Kingdom6525 Posts
On November 12 2013 08:57 awesomoecalypse wrote: You mean getting picked off or shut down almost right away in nearly every game? If the motivation behind the Oracle buff is that it is too slow and fragile for even very skilled players to consistently keep it alive, then sOs' games were a decent demonstration of that being the case. Of course, I think basing everything one one tournament is more than a little sily. But if you look around at Protoss play in general on the pro level, Oracles as a unit that remains alive and active throughout the game isn't really something we see almost ever. Yea, it's insanely hard to keep an Oracle alive. sOs' Oracles barely did anything in the Bomber series, in the Polt series they did good in 1 or 2 games and nothing in the others. I think it's pretty awesome now, if you're good enough you can clip a Mutalisk flock with Revelation and escape. | ||
|
Liman
Serbia681 Posts
| ||
|
suicideyear
Ivory Coast3016 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
OSC
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Serral vs Bunny
ByuN vs GgMaChine
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
