|
On February 10 2013 11:50 Sakray wrote:Show nested quote +NITRIXdaisuki @NITRIXdaisuki Anyone know how long it took for tournament hackers to be forgiven? He basically said he hacked during tournaments. Just permaban him from every tournament.
Surely it will just be a case of him making a new account and repeating the same actions... continues to be sad times for online tournaments
|
On February 10 2013 11:01 Dundron2000 wrote: i don't believe for a second any sponsor told him to do this. its ridiculous. what would be the motiv? there is none. he's just trying to divert the blame from himself. secondly, so what if someone told him to cheat? if he said yes then he completely lacks integrity. its still his problem that he cheated. Motives here are obvious, more recognition for him (thus the sponsor) more people want to be tutored by him. More people want him to play with them. Basically their are many reasons to do this from a sponosr perspective. He was already a great player without them so I doubt this is on his end, that said I'm awaiting his response.
|
On February 10 2013 11:42 stew_ wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2013 11:31 YumYumGranola wrote:On February 10 2013 09:36 crbox wrote:On February 10 2013 09:18 YumYumGranola wrote:On February 10 2013 08:56 crbox wrote:On February 10 2013 08:36 YumYumGranola wrote: I really don't feel that the lifetime ban is justified when you consider his actions. I mean, that's what sAviOr and other progamers got from KeSPA for the match fixing scandal, and they literally broke the law. To my knowledge KeSPA hasn't handed out any other lifetime bans to any other persons. The punishment should fit the crime, and I don't think the precedent set to date justifies a lifetime ban for something which wasn't even done in a tournament.
One thing I think people should consider is that if mob justice is NOT a good thing. In fact a lynching would probably be worse for the eSports community than any number of map-hackers on ladder. One of the big problems facing SC2 is that there is a marked lack in professionalism on the part of teams and tournament organizers. Say what you will about KeSPA, but having a governing body to set the standards for how tournaments and teams are to be run is extremely important from a business perspective. After all, if prospective sponsors and networks are doing their research and all they see is a disjointed community with teams operating under different standards of professionalism, tournaments and teams getting accused of not paying their bills, and mob mentality when it comes to settling disputes, they're going to want to stay well away from it. If a punishment is going to be handed down, there has to be an established body which is able to gather information, and determine the severity of the punishment based on a published code of conduct. This body needs to have some kind of control or leverage over affiliated tournaments to ensure that they follow their decisions. It needs to be consistent, fair, and ultimately professional. This is not middle school where we can as a group all swear we won't invite Daisuki to our birthday parties anymore. This has literally nothing to do with KeSPA and sAviOr's case. Daisuki hacked on ladder. He might lose his sponsorship (to be confirmed) and Blizzard might ban his account(s). He has no relation with KeSPA whatsoever and I don't believe organizations have spoken on whether or not they were gonna ban him from offline event. Like you said above KeSPA was completely different, there was some big money involved lol... I agree that the circumstances of the two events are completely different, but just pointing out that I can't recall any other instance in which a player has received a lifetime ban, which is what a lot of people are calling for. My overall point was that I don't think it would be a good thing if tournament organizers and teams all ban Daisuki as a knee-jerk reaction to some large negative community reaction to this specific instance, especially when players with more serious transgressions have been given a pass in the past. I am arguing that there should be some code of conduct and associated penalties for transgressions that tournament organizers and teams can agree to which should be applied in instances like this. In every other major professional sport in the world punishments are at least partly regulated by governing bodies, and if we truly believe that eSports should be a professional scene I don't see a reason why it should be any different. I understand your train of thoughts. Like I said in my post above (addressed to you), I don't think organizations have even begun to speculate about a lifetime ban or any ban for that matter. If you read what I wrote, we're talking about a BLIZZARD BAN of ONLINE ACCOUNTS (I put those in caps so you have an easier time reading it.) I don't think Daisuki will be banned from LANs, you can't really hack there anyways and he's still a decent player. The only concern would be online qualifiers and tournaments, where organizers will need to look closely to his play for any suspect actions. Also SC2 is very different from any other "sports" because if someone cheats in sports, by taking steroids, they get banned because there's no way to stop once you start... Daisuki didn't hack in a tournament, so as far as they are concerned, they have no reason to ban him. I would be very surprised if MLG banned Daisuki as he is not even that known. Well obviously his Blizzard accounts with which he has cheated should be banned. Map-hacking is clearly a violation of Blizzard's Terms of Use Agreement (Item 2.A) and therefore his account licenses should be revoked once Blizzard has reviewed the evidence. This only applies to licensed accounts with which he has been proven to have cheated, as each license carries it's own exclusive Terms of Use Agreement. If that was really all that was being discussed I don't know why we needed a 30 page thread, except for it maybe to be an echo chamber for people to talk about how disappointed they are. However, my original post was made in response to quite a rather large number of posts thus far which have been calling for a complete ban of the professional scene. While you correctly pointed out that no tournament organizers have taken any disciplinary actions yet, that statement in and of itself is completely irrelevant. My post wasn't addressed to MLG, it was addressed to the members of this forum who were actively speculating about complete competitive bans for Daisuki. Sorry for any confusion caused on my end, but I don't think there was any need for all caps data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" . i'm not sure, i think just the fact that a known maphacker is allowed to participate in their tournament tarnishes the said tournament's reputation as is... this kind of action should not be acceptable under any consequences, so the punishment for this should not be light as well.
I don't disagree with that sentiment. What I disagree with is the manner in which such a ban should be administered. My original post was related to the need for a body which professional players are ultimately answerable to with clearly states rules and penalties. Otherwise what you have is tournaments selectively punishing players, largely based on the level of public reaction to their actions. Also, my original posts were more specifically directed to people asking for permanent bans, which I don't think is warranted given the implications and past precedent set by issues like this.
|
Anyone see him post this back in the Spades hacking thread? That last paragraph is great LOL
|
On February 10 2013 11:58 vectorix108 wrote:Anyone see him post this back in the Spades hacking thread? That last paragraph is great LOL
Wow this is just... lol.
I wonder if all pro-hackers have some sort of secret channel or code that they abide by, in an attempt to protect one another from the community.
|
On February 10 2013 11:54 docvoc wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2013 11:01 Dundron2000 wrote: i don't believe for a second any sponsor told him to do this. its ridiculous. what would be the motiv? there is none. he's just trying to divert the blame from himself. secondly, so what if someone told him to cheat? if he said yes then he completely lacks integrity. its still his problem that he cheated. Motives here are obvious, more recognition for him (thus the sponsor) more people want to be tutored by him. More people want him to play with them. Basically their are many reasons to do this from a sponosr perspective. He was already a great player without them so I doubt this is on his end, that said I'm awaiting his response.
no. thats a possible motive, but not a probable one. among other things cheating seriously damages your marketability and popularity. anyways, the point doesn't need to be argued because there is no evidence anyone told him to cheat. Diasuki insinuated the possibility that someone told him to. but why should we listen to him? he's a proven cheater so it's no stretch to assume he might lie if he thought it would help his case.
|
On February 10 2013 11:50 Sakray wrote:Show nested quote +NITRIXdaisuki @NITRIXdaisuki Anyone know how long it took for tournament hackers to be forgiven? He basically said he hacked during tournaments. Just permaban him from every tournament.
Agreed. - with the permaban part, I didn't see him confessing tournament cheating..
I really am baffled about some users saying that only ladder ban or only tournament, or even a temporary ban would be enough.
With so many gamers out there, trying to get in to GM, trying to qualify for a tournament, working their ass off to get better.. Why would you be soft towards a confessed cheater? Nobody forced him, he never came forward. He cheated players on ladder, players trying to get good results, training and putting effort in their builds/mechanics only to be cheated upon.
Then he got Caught. Caught, as in 'doing it till today'. The OP did great work, can't be stressed enough. He caught an live cheater, cheating while he did his research. He gathered evidence, caught the cheater, the cheater puts down an half-arsed apology and we should temporarily ban him? Why? To keep his spot in tournaments where non-cheaters are seeing their spot being given away to a non-remorseful player who cheated his fellow-community members?
Why be lenient towards a player who cheated his fans, his competition, the ladder system and his viewers. I don't get it. It was his decision to cheat, nobody forced him. And like most of us know; you made your bed Daisuki, now lie in it.
|
On February 10 2013 12:02 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2013 11:58 vectorix108 wrote:Anyone see him post this back in the Spades hacking thread? That last paragraph is great LOL Wow this is just... lol. I wonder if all pro-hackers have some sort of secret channel or code that they abide by, in an attempt to protect one another from the community.
HAHAHAH.. oh god..
|
If the punishment for hacking was more severe, there would be less hackers.
|
On February 10 2013 12:19 vesicular wrote: If the punishment for hacking was more severe, there would be less hackers. Aye, people need to be made examples of or the message will not sink in and this bullshit will continue.
|
On February 10 2013 11:57 YumYumGranola wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2013 11:42 stew_ wrote:On February 10 2013 11:31 YumYumGranola wrote:On February 10 2013 09:36 crbox wrote:On February 10 2013 09:18 YumYumGranola wrote:On February 10 2013 08:56 crbox wrote:On February 10 2013 08:36 YumYumGranola wrote: I really don't feel that the lifetime ban is justified when you consider his actions. I mean, that's what sAviOr and other progamers got from KeSPA for the match fixing scandal, and they literally broke the law. To my knowledge KeSPA hasn't handed out any other lifetime bans to any other persons. The punishment should fit the crime, and I don't think the precedent set to date justifies a lifetime ban for something which wasn't even done in a tournament.
One thing I think people should consider is that if mob justice is NOT a good thing. In fact a lynching would probably be worse for the eSports community than any number of map-hackers on ladder. One of the big problems facing SC2 is that there is a marked lack in professionalism on the part of teams and tournament organizers. Say what you will about KeSPA, but having a governing body to set the standards for how tournaments and teams are to be run is extremely important from a business perspective. After all, if prospective sponsors and networks are doing their research and all they see is a disjointed community with teams operating under different standards of professionalism, tournaments and teams getting accused of not paying their bills, and mob mentality when it comes to settling disputes, they're going to want to stay well away from it. If a punishment is going to be handed down, there has to be an established body which is able to gather information, and determine the severity of the punishment based on a published code of conduct. This body needs to have some kind of control or leverage over affiliated tournaments to ensure that they follow their decisions. It needs to be consistent, fair, and ultimately professional. This is not middle school where we can as a group all swear we won't invite Daisuki to our birthday parties anymore. This has literally nothing to do with KeSPA and sAviOr's case. Daisuki hacked on ladder. He might lose his sponsorship (to be confirmed) and Blizzard might ban his account(s). He has no relation with KeSPA whatsoever and I don't believe organizations have spoken on whether or not they were gonna ban him from offline event. Like you said above KeSPA was completely different, there was some big money involved lol... I agree that the circumstances of the two events are completely different, but just pointing out that I can't recall any other instance in which a player has received a lifetime ban, which is what a lot of people are calling for. My overall point was that I don't think it would be a good thing if tournament organizers and teams all ban Daisuki as a knee-jerk reaction to some large negative community reaction to this specific instance, especially when players with more serious transgressions have been given a pass in the past. I am arguing that there should be some code of conduct and associated penalties for transgressions that tournament organizers and teams can agree to which should be applied in instances like this. In every other major professional sport in the world punishments are at least partly regulated by governing bodies, and if we truly believe that eSports should be a professional scene I don't see a reason why it should be any different. I understand your train of thoughts. Like I said in my post above (addressed to you), I don't think organizations have even begun to speculate about a lifetime ban or any ban for that matter. If you read what I wrote, we're talking about a BLIZZARD BAN of ONLINE ACCOUNTS (I put those in caps so you have an easier time reading it.) I don't think Daisuki will be banned from LANs, you can't really hack there anyways and he's still a decent player. The only concern would be online qualifiers and tournaments, where organizers will need to look closely to his play for any suspect actions. Also SC2 is very different from any other "sports" because if someone cheats in sports, by taking steroids, they get banned because there's no way to stop once you start... Daisuki didn't hack in a tournament, so as far as they are concerned, they have no reason to ban him. I would be very surprised if MLG banned Daisuki as he is not even that known. Well obviously his Blizzard accounts with which he has cheated should be banned. Map-hacking is clearly a violation of Blizzard's Terms of Use Agreement (Item 2.A) and therefore his account licenses should be revoked once Blizzard has reviewed the evidence. This only applies to licensed accounts with which he has been proven to have cheated, as each license carries it's own exclusive Terms of Use Agreement. If that was really all that was being discussed I don't know why we needed a 30 page thread, except for it maybe to be an echo chamber for people to talk about how disappointed they are. However, my original post was made in response to quite a rather large number of posts thus far which have been calling for a complete ban of the professional scene. While you correctly pointed out that no tournament organizers have taken any disciplinary actions yet, that statement in and of itself is completely irrelevant. My post wasn't addressed to MLG, it was addressed to the members of this forum who were actively speculating about complete competitive bans for Daisuki. Sorry for any confusion caused on my end, but I don't think there was any need for all caps data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" . i'm not sure, i think just the fact that a known maphacker is allowed to participate in their tournament tarnishes the said tournament's reputation as is... this kind of action should not be acceptable under any consequences, so the punishment for this should not be light as well. I don't disagree with that sentiment. What I disagree with is the manner in which such a ban should be administered. My original post was related to the need for a body which professional players are ultimately answerable to with clearly states rules and penalties. Otherwise what you have is tournaments selectively punishing players, largely based on the level of public reaction to their actions. Also, my original posts were more specifically directed to people asking for permanent bans, which I don't think is warranted given the implications and past precedent set by issues like this.
kespa... :o
|
On February 10 2013 12:26 Goibon wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2013 12:19 vesicular wrote: If the punishment for hacking was more severe, there would be less hackers. Aye, people need to be made examples of or the message will not sink in and this bullshit will continue.
Definitely agreed. History has a way of repeating itself if nothing changes. In BW, there was absolutely 0 benefit for hacking, besides maybe you got some undeserved attention you otherwise wouldn't have gotten, yet anytime a new method for finding hackers was discovered, there was always a long list of competitive players that were caught. If SC 2 is a professional sport, why wouldn't there be at least just as many players cheating now? People that hacked in the past and were forgiven/got away with it should consider themselves lucky.
If every competitive player is given a second chance, what you're essentially saying is, every competitive player is entitled to at least 1 get out of jail free card. So, pick your spots to cheat, and if you mess up and get found out, just repent like the others, whether you mean it or not. Not everyone naturally has integrity. If you're not going to force it upon them, they're simply going to be stealing spots and money from legit players. When do you decide to draw a line? If someone cheats in the first place, they're saying they're not good enough. If they feel that way, they're probably not that great and it's really not a big loss for the community whether they become legit or not. Plus, even if a player apologizes and is forgiven, he could still hack but just not be as negligent about disguising it.
In short, the scene is too lenient. There's more to life than SC 2, so until they're banned from other things... I personally wouldn't be crying over them not having a second chance at one of many things in life.
|
On February 10 2013 12:08 State wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2013 12:02 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On February 10 2013 11:58 vectorix108 wrote:Anyone see him post this back in the Spades hacking thread? That last paragraph is great LOL Wow this is just... lol. I wonder if all pro-hackers have some sort of secret channel or code that they abide by, in an attempt to protect one another from the community. HAHAHAH.. oh god..
LOLLL so he has been maphacking/hacking for almost a year now? LOLLLL
LOLLLL oh god...please banish this guy from SC2 community
|
On February 10 2013 12:50 ChoDing wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2013 12:08 State wrote:On February 10 2013 12:02 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On February 10 2013 11:58 vectorix108 wrote:Anyone see him post this back in the Spades hacking thread? That last paragraph is great LOL Wow this is just... lol. I wonder if all pro-hackers have some sort of secret channel or code that they abide by, in an attempt to protect one another from the community. HAHAHAH.. oh god.. LOLLL so he has been maphacking/hacking for almost a year now? LOLLLL LOLLLL oh god...please banish this guy from SC2 community
If his spiel about being "forced" by NITRIX is true, he got the sponsorship around May, according to this http://i.imgur.com/RyDaSYu.png in the Name Change thread.
If it isn't, then it's possible he may have felt pressured after the time he made that post about hacking being wrong.
In either cases, it's pretty bad, but the past is past and he is banned, so there's nothing left to discuss here. Regardless of his motives, he screwed up majorly, and probably aggravated his sponsor big time.
|
On February 10 2013 12:26 Goibon wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2013 12:19 vesicular wrote: If the punishment for hacking was more severe, there would be less hackers. Aye, people need to be made examples of or the message will not sink in and this bullshit will continue.
Except the vast majority of hackers aren't seeking a professional career, and the amount of professionals that have hacked recently is exactly 2.
|
On February 10 2013 13:01 Blisse wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2013 12:50 ChoDing wrote:On February 10 2013 12:08 State wrote:On February 10 2013 12:02 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On February 10 2013 11:58 vectorix108 wrote:Anyone see him post this back in the Spades hacking thread? That last paragraph is great LOL Wow this is just... lol. I wonder if all pro-hackers have some sort of secret channel or code that they abide by, in an attempt to protect one another from the community. HAHAHAH.. oh god.. LOLLL so he has been maphacking/hacking for almost a year now? LOLLLL LOLLLL oh god...please banish this guy from SC2 community If his spiel about being "forced" by NITRIX is true, he got the sponsorship around May, according to this http://i.imgur.com/RyDaSYu.png in the Name Change thread. If it isn't, then it's possible he may have felt pressured after the time he made that post about hacking being wrong. In either cases, it's pretty bad, but the past is past and he is banned, so there's nothing left to discuss here. Regardless of his motives, he screwed up majorly, and probably aggravated his sponsor big time.
I think you linked the wrong image there. (It's the image from my post)
|
looks like blizzard "took action" with regards to the accusations. interesting
|
On February 10 2013 13:02 Najda wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2013 12:26 Goibon wrote:On February 10 2013 12:19 vesicular wrote: If the punishment for hacking was more severe, there would be less hackers. Aye, people need to be made examples of or the message will not sink in and this bullshit will continue. Except the vast majority of hackers aren't seeking a professional career, and the amount of professionals that have hacked recently is exactly 2.
I think it's a lot more likely that there are more high ranking players that are hacking that haven't been found out, rather than we have found them all and the number is 2. How about the guy mentioned in this thread... how long has he been hacking for? Last week, would you have said "but there's only 1 hacker?" Spades was hacking in BW. He probably always hacked in SC 2, yet how long did it take to gather enough evidence against him in SC 2? Part of the reason you need such a harsh penalty is because the scene is awful at finding out hackers that are trying whatsoever to not make it blatant. Everything can come down to "I wasn't watching him play at his house, so it's inconclusive."
|
wow nice evidence lets make him wish he touched a mouse before.
|
Man, admitting to it takes all the fun out of a witch hunt. I had my pitchfork and torch all ready to go -_-
|
|
|
|