• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:12
CEST 00:12
KST 07:12
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course12Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview7[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Progenitors8Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun13[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors16
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win1Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !11Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple0RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event12Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results1
StarCraft 2
General
MaNa leaves Team Liquid Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple
Tourneys
2026 GSL Season 2 Qualifiers Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! $5,000 WardiTV Spring Championship 2026 SC2 INu's Battles#16 <BO.9> Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 524 Death and Taxes Mutation # 523 Firewall
Brood War
General
Flashes ASL S21 Ro8 Review ASL Tickets to Live Event Finals? BW General Discussion Pros React To: Leta vs Tulbo (ASL S21, Ro.8) (Spoiler) Interview ASL Ro4 Day 2 Winner
Tourneys
[ASL21] Semifinals B [ASL21] Ro8 Day 4 [ASL21] Semifinals A [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game PC Games Sales Thread
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How EEG Data Can Predict Gam…
TrAiDoS
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1292 users

Call to Action: Balance Testing (2012/11/20) - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 General
1876 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 92 93 94 Next
MetalPanda
Profile Joined April 2012
Canada1152 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 02:59:10
November 21 2012 02:43 GMT
#61
I'm worried about Immortal sentry all-ins even more now...
But otherwise I like the change, but they also should do something about that all-in.
EDIT : I think it might just give a big edge to Protoss in both mid-game and late-game : having archon toilet available, infestors being more easily snipeable, losing the detectability for DT's, having archons to keep infestors at a distance...
I can't see this change being good.
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
November 21 2012 02:44 GMT
#62
On November 21 2012 11:43 zasg wrote:
Well the raven change kind of makes Muta's completely worthless, is this not just going to push zergs to either 'A' build more infestors (which should now be challenged fairly well with Ghosts) or 'B' rush broodlords asap? I love Mutas and this makes me sad

One Raven with a single Missile will not change anything in Mutalisk play, especially as you can just fly away from the Missile anyway.
Jimbo77
Profile Joined March 2011
139 Posts
November 21 2012 02:45 GMT
#63
FG is a very good change:
- Ghost can now launch more Nuclears without being afraid of just get fgled and revealed.
- DT are now hugely more viable at harassing and in army composition itself
- WP play++!! - is a really good change for.
- Same goes for Archons+

Zerg will now be forced to think ahead and not just spawn only one stupid unit to counter everything. Really good change!

Additionally, they'd better remove NP from game entirely and we would see more strategies which are now almost dead. (BC, Carriers)
Mephyss
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Brazil128 Posts
November 21 2012 02:46 GMT
#64
Fungal change would be great if they buffed hydras. Lair units vs protoss are already too limited. Going mutas is vulnerable to timings and Hydras just melt later.
SarcasmMonster
Profile Joined October 2011
3136 Posts
November 21 2012 02:47 GMT
#65
On November 21 2012 11:43 JJH777 wrote:
Zerg becomes incapable of holding a well controlled Protoss 3-base all-in if this change goes through. They really needed to do changes that ONLY affected the late game. All this is going to do is make killing before brood/infestor easier so we still won't see if it's actually possible for P to beat the composition.

The psionic change also barely effects TvZ which anyone who isn't extremely biased would admit is the bigger problem. Protoss has done fine overall in tournament play since the queen/ovie patch. Terran has done horribly. Literally MVP and Taeja are the only 2 terrans with great results since the queen patch.


I'd add ForGG to that list since he's literally more than 95% of his earnings were won post Queen patch.
MMA: The true King of Wings
Whatson
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United States5357 Posts
November 21 2012 02:47 GMT
#66
I like the changes, I think Blizzards trying to push Protosses to more templar chargelot focused mid-games
¯\_(シ)_/¯
avilo
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States4100 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 02:54:18
November 21 2012 02:48 GMT
#67
On November 21 2012 11:32 xAdra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2012 11:15 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
I think the Raven change is a good idea; I don't think the Infestor change is enough.

But what the hell do I know; I'm primarily Protoss.

Still gonna check it out though and listen to the experts' feedback

Exactly this.

The Raven buff will allow for significantly faster HSM-ravens, and not just those that the army carry along and babysit like some detection whore. Interesting games, both played and watched.

The infestor still has another glaring issue: Infested Terrans. I say nerf both, not just fungal.

Will still wait for the better players to give their feedback.


I am going to debunk this right now. I hope others read and inform themselves.

The raven buff does not allow for significantly faster HSMs. The time it takes for you to accumulate raven seeker energy is exactly the same as before. This change does not affect seeker missile at all. The only impact this has on the game are:

a) Terran spends 150/150 less than previously. Ravens exactly the same unreliable unit as they currently are.
b) The only arguable impact this has is if a player has a tech labbed starport very early in the game and has that 1 raven they make usually in TvT. You'll have a seeker missile with no research. Once again, this has no impact in lategame.

I repeat: Nothing changes lategame, ravens do not accumulate energy faster, you still are going to build a raven, and have to wait for seeker missile energy exactly the same as before.

I'm pretty disgusted personally because i know other pros understand the issue apparently better than blizzard does and blizzard seems to just be stubborn. I've also written page long posts on the pro forums describing in detail the exact problems with the raven and Terran lategame, vikings, etc, and none of it goes through or blizzard refuses to believe it's problems.

So I'll be writing an in depth post here on TL later analyzing exactly what the issue is with ravens, how this change does nothing to address TvZ lategame (in a meaningful way), and what blizzard should be doing to actually make the raven useful.

We see the consistency. "Baby steps on the most miniscule non-impacting raven change ever," but they will arbitrarily buff queen range and overlord speed. 8 months of Z/P dominating T - "it's fine."

It's disgusting. Don't worry Terrans and SC2 spectators - I got your back. I know i'll take a lil bit of flak for posting such thoughts while other players are too afraid to speak their thoughts, that's fine. I'll try to present them in an analytical manner so people don't see it as whining (which haters will regardless, don't care). We all want this game to be more balanced, and maybe for Terran to you know, not suck so hard.
Sup
vthree
Profile Joined November 2011
Hong Kong8039 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 02:54:09
November 21 2012 02:48 GMT
#68
On November 21 2012 11:43 zasg wrote:
Well the raven change kind of makes Muta's completely worthless, is this not just going to push zergs to either 'A' build more infestors (which should now be challenged fairly well with Ghosts) or 'B' rush broodlords asap? I love Mutas and this makes me sad


Even if there is no need to upgrade HSM, I don't think terrans will be making ravens to counter mutas...

Also, I agree with avilo here that making the HSM default without a upgrade doesn't really affect the late game since the 150/150 is very small issue in the late game. However, since HSM is default now, maybe we get get a Raven's upgrade which increases starting Raven energy or lower cost of HSM or increase energy regen for Ravens. I think they would make late game ravens more viable.
SynergySC2
Profile Joined February 2012
United States27 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 02:49:48
November 21 2012 02:49 GMT
#69
are ghost psionic units?
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26785 Posts
November 21 2012 02:50 GMT
#70
I'd change sentries so they can get fungalled again, but having fungal a bit less catch-all is good to see.

It still might work out horribly though, await with interest what comes out of these potential changes.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Whatson
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United States5357 Posts
November 21 2012 02:50 GMT
#71
On November 21 2012 11:47 SarcasmMonster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2012 11:43 JJH777 wrote:
Zerg becomes incapable of holding a well controlled Protoss 3-base all-in if this change goes through. They really needed to do changes that ONLY affected the late game. All this is going to do is make killing before brood/infestor easier so we still won't see if it's actually possible for P to beat the composition.

The psionic change also barely effects TvZ which anyone who isn't extremely biased would admit is the bigger problem. Protoss has done fine overall in tournament play since the queen/ovie patch. Terran has done horribly. Literally MVP and Taeja are the only 2 terrans with great results since the queen patch.


I'd add ForGG to that list since he's literally more than 95% of his earnings were won post Queen patch.

Because ForGG always goes for that pre-hive 2/3base timing
¯\_(シ)_/¯
.kv
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2332 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 02:51:56
November 21 2012 02:51 GMT
#72
On November 21 2012 11:49 SynergySC2 wrote:
are ghost psionic units?


Fungal Growth no longer affects Psionic units. (Sentry, High / Dark Templar, Archon, Warp Prism, Mothership, Ghost, Queen, Infestor)


Read and your question may be answered
oxxo
Profile Joined February 2010
988 Posts
November 21 2012 02:53 GMT
#73
Fungal change seems nice... but it still doesn't change the fact it's still a completely anti-micro, one hit = dead army, 0 skill spell. It's so boring to play with, against, and watch.

HSM change as avilo said is completely worthless.

I don't see how Blizzard is actually saying there is not a problem. The racial/tournament compositions for T are just as bad if not worse than for the other races during GomTvT. Hopefully it's a matter of not knowing what to do pre-HOTS and not a 'well they were good before...'
Lunareste
Profile Joined July 2011
United States3596 Posts
November 21 2012 02:54 GMT
#74
Maybe now Zergs won't be taking a 4 minute 3rd base, make minimal units until they see a move out, and still be able to hold sentry/immortal all in. It's too greedy, too easy for zerg to get to 70 drones and move into hive tech by the 12 minute mark.

Hopefully the fear of the strategy will encourage zerg slow down their tech to infestor/brood lord and make the games more diverse by having them invest more into army units in the early to mid game transition.
KT FlaSh FOREVER
JJH777
Profile Joined January 2011
United States4418 Posts
November 21 2012 02:55 GMT
#75
On November 21 2012 11:47 SarcasmMonster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2012 11:43 JJH777 wrote:
Zerg becomes incapable of holding a well controlled Protoss 3-base all-in if this change goes through. They really needed to do changes that ONLY affected the late game. All this is going to do is make killing before brood/infestor easier so we still won't see if it's actually possible for P to beat the composition.

The psionic change also barely effects TvZ which anyone who isn't extremely biased would admit is the bigger problem. Protoss has done fine overall in tournament play since the queen/ovie patch. Terran has done horribly. Literally MVP and Taeja are the only 2 terrans with great results since the queen patch.


I'd add ForGG to that list since he's literally more than 95% of his earnings were won post Queen patch.


I'm not comparing it to past success. I'm comparing it to the other races. If ForGG was a Protoss he wouldn't even be top 10 results wise. The fact that he is probably the number 3 Terran (going purely by results) since the queen patch just shows how pathetic Terran has done since then.
c0sm0naut
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1229 Posts
November 21 2012 02:56 GMT
#76
my predictions:

- leads to unintended balance consequences in PvZ
- protoss win rate vs zerg soars dramatically because fungal doesn't work on sentries, archons, warp prisms, etc
- tvz remains virtually the same except now the raven is slightly easier to field. this will seem like a big deal for a while but eventually people will remember that ravens are bad for other reasons, their affordability, HSM short range and need for multiple starports due to their slow build time and techlab requirement
SarcasmMonster
Profile Joined October 2011
3136 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 03:04:01
November 21 2012 02:58 GMT
#77
On November 21 2012 11:55 JJH777 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2012 11:47 SarcasmMonster wrote:
On November 21 2012 11:43 JJH777 wrote:
Zerg becomes incapable of holding a well controlled Protoss 3-base all-in if this change goes through. They really needed to do changes that ONLY affected the late game. All this is going to do is make killing before brood/infestor easier so we still won't see if it's actually possible for P to beat the composition.

The psionic change also barely effects TvZ which anyone who isn't extremely biased would admit is the bigger problem. Protoss has done fine overall in tournament play since the queen/ovie patch. Terran has done horribly. Literally MVP and Taeja are the only 2 terrans with great results since the queen patch.


I'd add ForGG to that list since he's literally more than 95% of his earnings were won post Queen patch.


I'm not comparing it to past success. I'm comparing it to the other races. If ForGG was a Protoss he wouldn't even be top 10 results wise. The fact that he is probably the number 3 Terran (going purely by results) since the queen patch just shows how pathetic Terran has done since then.


I think he would. He's earned $27,000 in the last 6 months (so $54,000 per year if he keeps it up). If you only count his earnings for the last 6 months, that's enough to put him #19 in the top of all time.

But he sits at #24 (#27 if you only count last 6 months) with his all time earnings because tends to earn more than lol.
MMA: The true King of Wings
Protosnake
Profile Joined September 2011
France295 Posts
November 21 2012 02:59 GMT
#78
On November 21 2012 11:54 Lunareste wrote:
Maybe now Zergs won't be taking a 4 minute 3rd base, make minimal units until they see a move out, and still be able to hold sentry/immortal all in. It's too greedy, too easy for zerg to get to 70 drones and move into hive tech by the 12 minute mark.

Hopefully the fear of the strategy will encourage zerg slow down their tech to infestor/brood lord and make the games more diverse by having them invest more into army units in the early to mid game transition.


You think FFE isnt greedy ?
The fast 3 base ZvP is a simple reaction to FFE, if you dont take that 3rd base you're all-in. That how it always worked, before Stephano created that build, every ZvP was a roach-muta all-in that led to an (uneeded and irrelevant) phoenix buff.
Even more since 2base Infestor cant hold Psionic based units push anymore (Not that it would be smart to all-in a zerg on 2 base)
aeroblaster
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United States422 Posts
November 21 2012 03:00 GMT
#79
On November 21 2012 11:18 phodacbiet wrote:
Not damage, does that mean no damage + root or just no root?

They're completely immune so no effect at all. Psionic units ignore it. The damage, root, everything.
If you want to catch a rabbit just hide behind a tree and make the sound of a carrot.
Psyclon
Profile Joined July 2010
Bulgaria2443 Posts
November 21 2012 03:01 GMT
#80
Sentries immune to fungal?

/insert Kayla McKale's face here/
Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds!
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 92 93 94 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 48m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
uThermal 430
NeuroSwarm 186
SpeCial 107
CosmosSc2 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 206
NaDa 6
Dota 2
monkeys_forever631
League of Legends
Doublelift3211
Counter-Strike
fl0m5969
Fnx 738
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox302
Other Games
summit1g5858
tarik_tv4906
Liquid`RaSZi1586
shahzam524
C9.Mang0236
Liquid`Hasu187
Livibee76
Mew2King44
ViBE24
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV616
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 73
• mYiSmile145
• musti20045 34
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• imaqtpie1572
• Scarra723
• WagamamaTV331
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
1h 48m
The PondCast
11h 48m
OSC
11h 48m
Replay Cast
1d 1h
RSL Revival
1d 11h
OSC
1d 14h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
BSL
2 days
GSL
3 days
Cure vs herO
SHIN vs Maru
[ Show More ]
BSL
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
GSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-05-12
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
KK 2v2 League Season 1
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
SCTL 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W7
YSL S3
Escore Tournament S2: W8
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
WardiTV Spring 2026
2026 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.