EPTGlobal Play Coming to StarCraft II - Page 14
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
SCG.StatiC
South Africa33 Posts
| ||
|
Isualin
Germany1903 Posts
| ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On November 10 2012 18:51 haitike wrote: Not too much. I used to play against Korean players (Im european) with very few ping, I could micro mutas  BW was not peer to peer, it was the lan latency plugin for chaos launcher (used in iccup, fish, etc.). Official battle.net was super laggy. Yeah I don't remember getting any. I could muta micro perfect (will for the most part at my low C level haha). | ||
|
LimitSEA
Australia9580 Posts
On November 10 2012 19:06 Isualin wrote: this doesn't change anything for me. i am only diamond on EU, so i dont need a harder challenge on any other server. even if i was better, ping issues would probably effect my gameplay. anyway, this should have been implemented ~2 years ago, before a lot of people bought KR accounts Yeah I get what you mean. I doubt I'll play any better or find much difference challenge wise, though the metagame may be different. The only real difference for me will be ping, since both SEA and NA have apparently got worse ping than KR for Australians. Seriously hoping this is the case so I can just play there all the time. | ||
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
| ||
|
bOneSeven
Romania685 Posts
| ||
|
[N3O]r3d33m3r
Germany673 Posts
PEOPLE! this is so that you can play with friends who are in NA when you are on EU or something, why would you play on the KR server??? challenge? lol only few care about that i will only ladder on EU. You always have the best pings on your home region, why sjouild i torment myself with higher ping? In LoL, i play with a ping of 14! beat that  the servers are in my country^^ | ||
|
Cortza
South Africa328 Posts
On November 10 2012 07:15 LOLingBuddha wrote: I like this, however, i somehow have a silly feeling that everyone is just going to play on the korean server? i mean it kind of depends on the lag you get i guess, but i would think most people would go where the competition is fiercest.. what do you guys think? I will try out the other servers purely out of curiosity. But lag will factor hugely. At least, when you play vs the koreans, you get the authentic experience I suppose. | ||
StarOFdadA
Hong Kong33 Posts
(But if you has more than one unlimited edition, you can not use it because of some "language problems" which are made by Blizzard) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/H8Jw4.jpg) | ||
|
TheManInBlack
Nigeria266 Posts
| ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8095 Posts
On November 10 2012 07:31 Archas wrote: I didn't think we had the technology for this. A wizard did it? | ||
|
kruxey
Bulgaria168 Posts
| ||
|
AcesAnoka
Belgium262 Posts
| ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
| ||
|
dynwar7
1983 Posts
I mean its good, but does this mean KR server can be filled with less-skilled players and therefore the "standard" of KR server is gone because anybody can play there? | ||
|
gosublade
632 Posts
| ||
|
igotmanatoblow
33 Posts
| ||
|
Scorch
Austria3371 Posts
| ||
|
xAdra
Singapore1858 Posts
However, my only qualm is this: The SEA server where I play in is a small yet tight knit community, with people who are generally well mannered. The skill levels are regarded by consensus to be stronger than NA/EU at lower levels, while equalizing at around diamond or so, and having less powerful grandmasters. If this option is opened up, many SEA players seeking to prove themselves elsewhere will probably go, making the already tiny community even smaller. Trolls from other servers will probably enter to smurf, making it less enjoyable for the low leagues. | ||
|
echobong
Canada92 Posts
| ||
| ||
