• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:17
CEST 00:17
KST 07:17
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202552RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams7Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 731 users

[D] The raven buff does not address TvZ issues - Page 22

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 20 21 22 23 24 48 Next All
If this thread can't remain civil then we'll have to close it. Thread will be moderated harshly from pg.3 onwards.
vthree
Profile Joined November 2011
Hong Kong8039 Posts
August 19 2012 17:31 GMT
#421
On August 20 2012 02:25 LuckyFool wrote:
MVP beat alot of VERY good zerg players in IEM, everyone really should go watch those replays with an open mind. I know I am.

I know one event alone doesn't mean much, but they start to add up, Taeja has pretty much been dominating lately so this just adds to the recent Terran win list.


Problem is DRG was probably the #1 player in the world before the Queen patch as well. Balanced should always be for the tip top players (pros) but not to the extent of like the top 5 players.

iAmJeffReY
Profile Joined August 2010
United States4262 Posts
August 19 2012 17:31 GMT
#422
On August 20 2012 02:28 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2012 02:27 iAmJeffReY wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:25 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:21 zmansman17 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:20 AngryMag wrote:
not 100% sure but I think Terran players won the last 4 offline events (Taeja's two tourney wins, Kas won the eastern Euro tournament with Korean participants and now MVP won IEM). I think these successes mean that eventual issues in in TvZ are atleast largely exagerated.

In my lowbob opinion, I do not see issues at all if I watch tournament play, there was only a period of Terrans adjusting to Zerg's multiqueen play postpatch.


Yes but have you looked at how many Terrans have won in the last 200 tournaments? Ok, so they won a few recent tournaments, but that is dwarfed by the results of many, many before it.



... Are you joking? Why do people say such stupid shit without ever looking into anything.

http://www.team-dignitas.net/articles/blogs/Starcraft-II/1474/Talking-Starcraft-2-Prize-Money-Part-1/

Oh hey, an article which proves you're an idiot, who'd of thought.

"On the quarterly graph we can see that Terran has spent almost the entire duration of competitive Starcraft 2 at the top of the earnings race between the three races, dropping only the 1st Quarter to Zerg (which was when Fruitdealer won his whopping GSL prize). "

Time to have a reality check and stop posting here, you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

"Terran : $1,362,778.00

Zerg : $927,790.00

Protoss : $740,394.00"

...Look at your graph. It goes until may 2012...before the patch... It's now middle of august 2012, so what... almost 3 months of tournaments, and games.


He said quote "200 tournaments" as in the past 200 tournaments. And if I recall, Terran won the last 4 events no? Doing what you said would actually raise the Terran threshold even higher...

so from release to may it is proven Terran has dominated SC2 professional scene, then we hit may + and terran wins 4 events in a row? :O Terran is COMPLETELY underpowered, throw your game away Zerg isn't balanced let's burn Blizzard HQ down.

But money for each tournament isn't the same... Hence why going off money earned isn't a solid way to prove anything. Win rates are far better to go off, as they're global and not a variable like the prizepool/tournament.

Nice aggression in all of your posts though. You're really fired up. Just pointing out the graph is old, and money earned is an awful way to show balance.

Unbiased biased terran abuser Jeffrey. Sorry for the rage, friend!
NeMeSiS3
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Canada2972 Posts
August 19 2012 17:33 GMT
#423
On August 20 2012 02:31 iAmJeffReY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2012 02:28 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:27 iAmJeffReY wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:25 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:21 zmansman17 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:20 AngryMag wrote:
not 100% sure but I think Terran players won the last 4 offline events (Taeja's two tourney wins, Kas won the eastern Euro tournament with Korean participants and now MVP won IEM). I think these successes mean that eventual issues in in TvZ are atleast largely exagerated.

In my lowbob opinion, I do not see issues at all if I watch tournament play, there was only a period of Terrans adjusting to Zerg's multiqueen play postpatch.


Yes but have you looked at how many Terrans have won in the last 200 tournaments? Ok, so they won a few recent tournaments, but that is dwarfed by the results of many, many before it.



... Are you joking? Why do people say such stupid shit without ever looking into anything.

http://www.team-dignitas.net/articles/blogs/Starcraft-II/1474/Talking-Starcraft-2-Prize-Money-Part-1/

Oh hey, an article which proves you're an idiot, who'd of thought.

"On the quarterly graph we can see that Terran has spent almost the entire duration of competitive Starcraft 2 at the top of the earnings race between the three races, dropping only the 1st Quarter to Zerg (which was when Fruitdealer won his whopping GSL prize). "

Time to have a reality check and stop posting here, you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

"Terran : $1,362,778.00

Zerg : $927,790.00

Protoss : $740,394.00"

...Look at your graph. It goes until may 2012...before the patch... It's now middle of august 2012, so what... almost 3 months of tournaments, and games.


He said quote "200 tournaments" as in the past 200 tournaments. And if I recall, Terran won the last 4 events no? Doing what you said would actually raise the Terran threshold even higher...

so from release to may it is proven Terran has dominated SC2 professional scene, then we hit may + and terran wins 4 events in a row? :O Terran is COMPLETELY underpowered, throw your game away Zerg isn't balanced let's burn Blizzard HQ down.

But money for each tournament isn't the same... Hence why going off money earned isn't a solid way to prove anything. Win rates are far better to go off, as they're global and not a variable like the prizepool/tournament.

Nice aggression in all of your posts though. You're really fired up. Just pointing out the graph is old, and money earned is an awful way to show balance.



Ok so let me get this straight, would you agree that since release (including post balance patch) Terran has won the most tournaments and most prize money, yet it is completely under powered against Zerg even though the last 4 events (even after the dreaded patch) shows Terrans winning. That is the argument we are hearing? Interesting, I suppose that is a valid viewpoint, you should balance for Blizzard.
FoTG fighting!
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-19 17:36:52
August 19 2012 17:35 GMT
#424
On August 20 2012 02:31 iAmJeffReY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2012 02:28 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:27 iAmJeffReY wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:25 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:21 zmansman17 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:20 AngryMag wrote:
not 100% sure but I think Terran players won the last 4 offline events (Taeja's two tourney wins, Kas won the eastern Euro tournament with Korean participants and now MVP won IEM). I think these successes mean that eventual issues in in TvZ are atleast largely exagerated.

In my lowbob opinion, I do not see issues at all if I watch tournament play, there was only a period of Terrans adjusting to Zerg's multiqueen play postpatch.


Yes but have you looked at how many Terrans have won in the last 200 tournaments? Ok, so they won a few recent tournaments, but that is dwarfed by the results of many, many before it.



... Are you joking? Why do people say such stupid shit without ever looking into anything.

http://www.team-dignitas.net/articles/blogs/Starcraft-II/1474/Talking-Starcraft-2-Prize-Money-Part-1/

Oh hey, an article which proves you're an idiot, who'd of thought.

"On the quarterly graph we can see that Terran has spent almost the entire duration of competitive Starcraft 2 at the top of the earnings race between the three races, dropping only the 1st Quarter to Zerg (which was when Fruitdealer won his whopping GSL prize). "

Time to have a reality check and stop posting here, you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

"Terran : $1,362,778.00

Zerg : $927,790.00

Protoss : $740,394.00"

...Look at your graph. It goes until may 2012...before the patch... It's now middle of august 2012, so what... almost 3 months of tournaments, and games.


He said quote "200 tournaments" as in the past 200 tournaments. And if I recall, Terran won the last 4 events no? Doing what you said would actually raise the Terran threshold even higher...

so from release to may it is proven Terran has dominated SC2 professional scene, then we hit may + and terran wins 4 events in a row? :O Terran is COMPLETELY underpowered, throw your game away Zerg isn't balanced let's burn Blizzard HQ down.

But money for each tournament isn't the same... Hence why going off money earned isn't a solid way to prove anything. Win rates are far better to go off, as they're global and not a variable like the prizepool/tournament.

Nice aggression in all of your posts though. You're really fired up. Just pointing out the graph is old, and money earned is an awful way to show balance.


No it's not. The more money a tournament provides, the better the participants. In that way, unlike just looking at "who wins what tournament", you even get a quality factor in - even if it does only work for bigger data as it is a statistical arguement.
Who cares that some barely GM master player won the daily 50€ can't-even-reach-128participants tournament...
Bam Lee
Profile Joined June 2012
2336 Posts
August 19 2012 17:36 GMT
#425
i dont understand why people are so impatient. The pro players are trying out different stuff and trying out different builds. Give it some freaking time. TvZs are looking awy more "winable" now compared to before so just relax and see what the changes do.
Zoesan
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland141 Posts
August 19 2012 17:38 GMT
#426
Actually, that is a really dumb argument.

What is relevant should be looking at GSL winrates etc, where a lot of top players compete.
As people have already written: nestea won the GSL last year without dropping a map and had a whopping 19-0 record between may and august.
Yet everyone was crying about how overpowered terran was. So now the situation is reversed with zergs overall winning and a single terran still at the top and terran is still the overpowered race.

Yeah, nice double standards there.
Suffer the pain of discipline or suffer the pain of regret
ReaperCo
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden46 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-19 17:45:43
August 19 2012 17:41 GMT
#427
On August 20 2012 02:38 Zoesan wrote:
Actually, that is a really dumb argument.

What is relevant should be looking at GSL winrates etc, where a lot of top players compete.
As people have already written: nestea won the GSL last year without dropping a map and had a whopping 19-0 record between may and august.
Yet everyone was crying about how overpowered terran was. So now the situation is reversed with zergs overall winning and a single terran still at the top and terran is still the overpowered race.

Yeah, nice double standards there.

I dont think terran is overpowered but i think bad terrans think they are underpowered. I would say if you play like mvp does taking bases like he does and cutting of positions terran is op. But bad terrans cant do that.
-_-
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
United States7081 Posts
August 19 2012 17:45 GMT
#428
On August 20 2012 01:43 Zoesan wrote:
MVP with 4 GSL titles stomping mediocre foreigners.

In other news, china produces rice.


@blug: seeker missiles only cost a 200 gas unit and then take 3 minutes to build up, nope, no window there to get something done.

Show nested quote +
On August 20 2012 01:41 Scila wrote:
All of the information you wrote is true but has already been said for months. The problem is Blizzard doesn't real TL or anywhere else for that matter to decide on how to balance things. They have 2 guys making their own decisions, largely centered on making the game more "fun" and "fresh" so more people buy the games, rather than balancing it properly.


Not mutually exclusive with competitive balance


So, when Taeja wins he's just a transcendent Terran, and when MVP wins he's just on another level. I wonder what people will say when MKP wins a championship?
Jermstuddog
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2231 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-19 17:51:35
August 19 2012 17:48 GMT
#429
I have pointed this out in countless threads, and this seems to be another opportune time in this thread.

Zerg win rates have gone DOWN since 1.4.3 and the "OP queen" buff.

If trying to attribute any win rates to the 1.4.3 patch, we should all be complaining about the observer build time buff. Protoss as a whole has been on an absolute tear since then. Meanwhile, previously dominant Zergs like DRG and Stephano seem to be in a slump.

Tldr: considering how OP queens are, they sure don't seem to be helping anybody out.
As it turns out, marines don't actually cost any money -Jinro
Schnullerbacke13
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany1199 Posts
August 19 2012 17:51 GMT
#430
i think the queenbuff brought the fun back to zerg play .. it simply was not fun to always have to defend, be the victim, figure out what the terran/protoss plans to do early on. Anyway i agree that terran late game is weak, though theoretically the mule economy does not impose any limit to terran income .. however i think avilo is way too biased, getting broodlords out also requires a lot of time and is easily scoutable.
Given that hsm can be pretty game deciding, it should get nerfed if research times are buffed.
We already have enough "terrible damage" utilities which in general lead to a kind of luck based end game (=> vortex, fungals). I dislike it also as a spectator if one single action, be it the 'money' fungal or vortex or hsm decides the game within some seconds. Same applies to some other unit designs like blue flame hellion (can decide a game early on by extremely quick mass drone killing) baneling (can vaporate a marine army within a second not watching the army).
21 is half the truth
4Servy
Profile Joined August 2008
Netherlands1542 Posts
August 19 2012 17:51 GMT
#431
Win rates dont mean much, they never do.

ReaperCo
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden46 Posts
August 19 2012 17:52 GMT
#432
On August 20 2012 02:48 Jermstuddog wrote:
I have pointed this out in countless threads, and this seems to be another opportune time in this thread.

Zerg win rates have gone DOWN since 1.4.3 and the "OP queen" buff.

If trying to attribute any win rates to the 1.4.3 patch, we should all be complaining about the observer build time buff. Protoss as a whole has been on an absolute tear since then while previously dominant Zergs like DRG and Stephano seem to be in a slump.

Tldr: considering how OP queens are, they sure don't seem to be helping anybody out.

Queen cost 150 minerlas making 6 queens isnt worth it they are to slow for hellions to. So no its not that big
sickkungen
Profile Joined July 2012
Sweden179 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-19 17:56:52
August 19 2012 17:55 GMT
#433
Get rid of seeker missiles and add a modified version of irradiate. One that is casted only on biological units and not on other ravens. Also with limited area of effect range. Anyone?
vthree
Profile Joined November 2011
Hong Kong8039 Posts
August 19 2012 18:00 GMT
#434
On August 20 2012 02:52 ReaperCo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2012 02:48 Jermstuddog wrote:
I have pointed this out in countless threads, and this seems to be another opportune time in this thread.

Zerg win rates have gone DOWN since 1.4.3 and the "OP queen" buff.

If trying to attribute any win rates to the 1.4.3 patch, we should all be complaining about the observer build time buff. Protoss as a whole has been on an absolute tear since then while previously dominant Zergs like DRG and Stephano seem to be in a slump.

Tldr: considering how OP queens are, they sure don't seem to be helping anybody out.

Queen cost 150 minerlas making 6 queens isnt worth it they are to slow for hellions to. So no its not that big


The purpose of queens is to defend creep tumors and block ramps and defend vs early air harass. Not chasing hellions across the map to kill them.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
August 19 2012 18:00 GMT
#435
On August 20 2012 02:55 sickkungen wrote:
Get rid of seeker missiles and add a modified version of irradiate. One that is casted only on biological units and not on other ravens. Also with limited area of effect range. Anyone?


Or keep the missile and if needed (which doesn't seem like it is the case) adjust it sligthly?
ReaperCo
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden46 Posts
August 19 2012 18:03 GMT
#436
On August 20 2012 03:00 vthree wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2012 02:52 ReaperCo wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:48 Jermstuddog wrote:
I have pointed this out in countless threads, and this seems to be another opportune time in this thread.

Zerg win rates have gone DOWN since 1.4.3 and the "OP queen" buff.

If trying to attribute any win rates to the 1.4.3 patch, we should all be complaining about the observer build time buff. Protoss as a whole has been on an absolute tear since then while previously dominant Zergs like DRG and Stephano seem to be in a slump.

Tldr: considering how OP queens are, they sure don't seem to be helping anybody out.

Queen cost 150 minerlas making 6 queens isnt worth it they are to slow for hellions to. So no its not that big


The purpose of queens is to defend creep tumors and block ramps and defend vs early air harass. Not chasing hellions across the map to kill them.

Yes but air range isnt changed? So nothing is diffrent. If you scout banshee maybe you can get extra queens so you have 5 instead of 3.
Zergrusher
Profile Joined November 2011
United States562 Posts
August 19 2012 18:03 GMT
#437
guys


listen to me on this ok?

Look at the cast ranges of the ravens spells..... they are pathetic!


PDD and Auto turret cast range is 3!

Blizzard should buff the cast ranges to 6

Seeker missle cast range should be buffed from 6 to 8


Because right now any time you try yo deploy a spell from a raven(regardless of match up) your more then likey TO LOSE the raven itself.

Because simply the cast range is to short for all the spells.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
August 19 2012 18:06 GMT
#438
On August 20 2012 03:03 Zergrusher wrote:
guys


listen to me on this ok?

Look at the cast ranges of the ravens spells..... they are pathetic!


PDD and Auto turret cast range is 3!

Blizzard should buff the cast ranges to 6

Seeker missle cast range should be buffed from 6 to 8


Because right now any time you try yo deploy a spell from a raven(regardless of match up) your more then likey TO LOSE the raven itself.

Because simply the cast range is to short for all the spells.


And on the flip side it's spells are really good after deployed. It seems to work out, so why would you change them that drastically?
Bagi
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6799 Posts
August 19 2012 18:07 GMT
#439
On August 20 2012 02:48 Jermstuddog wrote:
I have pointed this out in countless threads, and this seems to be another opportune time in this thread.

Zerg win rates have gone DOWN since 1.4.3 and the "OP queen" buff.

If trying to attribute any win rates to the 1.4.3 patch, we should all be complaining about the observer build time buff. Protoss as a whole has been on an absolute tear since then. Meanwhile, previously dominant Zergs like DRG and Stephano seem to be in a slump.

Tldr: considering how OP queens are, they sure don't seem to be helping anybody out.

So because protoss are doing better against zergs, we should just ignore the TvZ match-up?

I'm sure you can go rant about this in the balance thread, however this thread was made to discuss TvZ.
ReaperCo
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden46 Posts
August 19 2012 18:09 GMT
#440
I would say something this is off topic but i have say it they should change Ghosts snipe range to was it was before but increase energy cost to 200.
Prev 1 20 21 22 23 24 48 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 12h 43m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 215
StarCraft: Brood War
ivOry 10
Dota 2
monkeys_forever809
League of Legends
Dendi917
syndereN152
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1537
Stewie2K1005
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken54
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu598
Other Games
summit1g8099
FrodaN3245
tarik_tv1803
C9.Mang0208
PPMD37
ViBE10
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 56
• davetesta49
• musti20045 39
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 48
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade579
Other Games
• imaqtpie1592
• Shiphtur408
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
12h 43m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
15h 43m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 11h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 15h
CSO Cup
1d 17h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 19h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.