• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:37
CEST 16:37
KST 23:37
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20258Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202577RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced24BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time I offer completely free coaching services What tournaments are world championships?
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Dewalt's Show Matches in China BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 648 users

[D] The raven buff does not address TvZ issues - Page 22

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 20 21 22 23 24 48 Next All
If this thread can't remain civil then we'll have to close it. Thread will be moderated harshly from pg.3 onwards.
vthree
Profile Joined November 2011
Hong Kong8039 Posts
August 19 2012 17:31 GMT
#421
On August 20 2012 02:25 LuckyFool wrote:
MVP beat alot of VERY good zerg players in IEM, everyone really should go watch those replays with an open mind. I know I am.

I know one event alone doesn't mean much, but they start to add up, Taeja has pretty much been dominating lately so this just adds to the recent Terran win list.


Problem is DRG was probably the #1 player in the world before the Queen patch as well. Balanced should always be for the tip top players (pros) but not to the extent of like the top 5 players.

iAmJeffReY
Profile Joined August 2010
United States4262 Posts
August 19 2012 17:31 GMT
#422
On August 20 2012 02:28 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2012 02:27 iAmJeffReY wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:25 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:21 zmansman17 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:20 AngryMag wrote:
not 100% sure but I think Terran players won the last 4 offline events (Taeja's two tourney wins, Kas won the eastern Euro tournament with Korean participants and now MVP won IEM). I think these successes mean that eventual issues in in TvZ are atleast largely exagerated.

In my lowbob opinion, I do not see issues at all if I watch tournament play, there was only a period of Terrans adjusting to Zerg's multiqueen play postpatch.


Yes but have you looked at how many Terrans have won in the last 200 tournaments? Ok, so they won a few recent tournaments, but that is dwarfed by the results of many, many before it.



... Are you joking? Why do people say such stupid shit without ever looking into anything.

http://www.team-dignitas.net/articles/blogs/Starcraft-II/1474/Talking-Starcraft-2-Prize-Money-Part-1/

Oh hey, an article which proves you're an idiot, who'd of thought.

"On the quarterly graph we can see that Terran has spent almost the entire duration of competitive Starcraft 2 at the top of the earnings race between the three races, dropping only the 1st Quarter to Zerg (which was when Fruitdealer won his whopping GSL prize). "

Time to have a reality check and stop posting here, you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

"Terran : $1,362,778.00

Zerg : $927,790.00

Protoss : $740,394.00"

...Look at your graph. It goes until may 2012...before the patch... It's now middle of august 2012, so what... almost 3 months of tournaments, and games.


He said quote "200 tournaments" as in the past 200 tournaments. And if I recall, Terran won the last 4 events no? Doing what you said would actually raise the Terran threshold even higher...

so from release to may it is proven Terran has dominated SC2 professional scene, then we hit may + and terran wins 4 events in a row? :O Terran is COMPLETELY underpowered, throw your game away Zerg isn't balanced let's burn Blizzard HQ down.

But money for each tournament isn't the same... Hence why going off money earned isn't a solid way to prove anything. Win rates are far better to go off, as they're global and not a variable like the prizepool/tournament.

Nice aggression in all of your posts though. You're really fired up. Just pointing out the graph is old, and money earned is an awful way to show balance.

Unbiased biased terran abuser Jeffrey. Sorry for the rage, friend!
NeMeSiS3
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Canada2972 Posts
August 19 2012 17:33 GMT
#423
On August 20 2012 02:31 iAmJeffReY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2012 02:28 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:27 iAmJeffReY wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:25 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:21 zmansman17 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:20 AngryMag wrote:
not 100% sure but I think Terran players won the last 4 offline events (Taeja's two tourney wins, Kas won the eastern Euro tournament with Korean participants and now MVP won IEM). I think these successes mean that eventual issues in in TvZ are atleast largely exagerated.

In my lowbob opinion, I do not see issues at all if I watch tournament play, there was only a period of Terrans adjusting to Zerg's multiqueen play postpatch.


Yes but have you looked at how many Terrans have won in the last 200 tournaments? Ok, so they won a few recent tournaments, but that is dwarfed by the results of many, many before it.



... Are you joking? Why do people say such stupid shit without ever looking into anything.

http://www.team-dignitas.net/articles/blogs/Starcraft-II/1474/Talking-Starcraft-2-Prize-Money-Part-1/

Oh hey, an article which proves you're an idiot, who'd of thought.

"On the quarterly graph we can see that Terran has spent almost the entire duration of competitive Starcraft 2 at the top of the earnings race between the three races, dropping only the 1st Quarter to Zerg (which was when Fruitdealer won his whopping GSL prize). "

Time to have a reality check and stop posting here, you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

"Terran : $1,362,778.00

Zerg : $927,790.00

Protoss : $740,394.00"

...Look at your graph. It goes until may 2012...before the patch... It's now middle of august 2012, so what... almost 3 months of tournaments, and games.


He said quote "200 tournaments" as in the past 200 tournaments. And if I recall, Terran won the last 4 events no? Doing what you said would actually raise the Terran threshold even higher...

so from release to may it is proven Terran has dominated SC2 professional scene, then we hit may + and terran wins 4 events in a row? :O Terran is COMPLETELY underpowered, throw your game away Zerg isn't balanced let's burn Blizzard HQ down.

But money for each tournament isn't the same... Hence why going off money earned isn't a solid way to prove anything. Win rates are far better to go off, as they're global and not a variable like the prizepool/tournament.

Nice aggression in all of your posts though. You're really fired up. Just pointing out the graph is old, and money earned is an awful way to show balance.



Ok so let me get this straight, would you agree that since release (including post balance patch) Terran has won the most tournaments and most prize money, yet it is completely under powered against Zerg even though the last 4 events (even after the dreaded patch) shows Terrans winning. That is the argument we are hearing? Interesting, I suppose that is a valid viewpoint, you should balance for Blizzard.
FoTG fighting!
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-19 17:36:52
August 19 2012 17:35 GMT
#424
On August 20 2012 02:31 iAmJeffReY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2012 02:28 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:27 iAmJeffReY wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:25 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:21 zmansman17 wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:20 AngryMag wrote:
not 100% sure but I think Terran players won the last 4 offline events (Taeja's two tourney wins, Kas won the eastern Euro tournament with Korean participants and now MVP won IEM). I think these successes mean that eventual issues in in TvZ are atleast largely exagerated.

In my lowbob opinion, I do not see issues at all if I watch tournament play, there was only a period of Terrans adjusting to Zerg's multiqueen play postpatch.


Yes but have you looked at how many Terrans have won in the last 200 tournaments? Ok, so they won a few recent tournaments, but that is dwarfed by the results of many, many before it.



... Are you joking? Why do people say such stupid shit without ever looking into anything.

http://www.team-dignitas.net/articles/blogs/Starcraft-II/1474/Talking-Starcraft-2-Prize-Money-Part-1/

Oh hey, an article which proves you're an idiot, who'd of thought.

"On the quarterly graph we can see that Terran has spent almost the entire duration of competitive Starcraft 2 at the top of the earnings race between the three races, dropping only the 1st Quarter to Zerg (which was when Fruitdealer won his whopping GSL prize). "

Time to have a reality check and stop posting here, you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

"Terran : $1,362,778.00

Zerg : $927,790.00

Protoss : $740,394.00"

...Look at your graph. It goes until may 2012...before the patch... It's now middle of august 2012, so what... almost 3 months of tournaments, and games.


He said quote "200 tournaments" as in the past 200 tournaments. And if I recall, Terran won the last 4 events no? Doing what you said would actually raise the Terran threshold even higher...

so from release to may it is proven Terran has dominated SC2 professional scene, then we hit may + and terran wins 4 events in a row? :O Terran is COMPLETELY underpowered, throw your game away Zerg isn't balanced let's burn Blizzard HQ down.

But money for each tournament isn't the same... Hence why going off money earned isn't a solid way to prove anything. Win rates are far better to go off, as they're global and not a variable like the prizepool/tournament.

Nice aggression in all of your posts though. You're really fired up. Just pointing out the graph is old, and money earned is an awful way to show balance.


No it's not. The more money a tournament provides, the better the participants. In that way, unlike just looking at "who wins what tournament", you even get a quality factor in - even if it does only work for bigger data as it is a statistical arguement.
Who cares that some barely GM master player won the daily 50€ can't-even-reach-128participants tournament...
Bam Lee
Profile Joined June 2012
2336 Posts
August 19 2012 17:36 GMT
#425
i dont understand why people are so impatient. The pro players are trying out different stuff and trying out different builds. Give it some freaking time. TvZs are looking awy more "winable" now compared to before so just relax and see what the changes do.
Zoesan
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland141 Posts
August 19 2012 17:38 GMT
#426
Actually, that is a really dumb argument.

What is relevant should be looking at GSL winrates etc, where a lot of top players compete.
As people have already written: nestea won the GSL last year without dropping a map and had a whopping 19-0 record between may and august.
Yet everyone was crying about how overpowered terran was. So now the situation is reversed with zergs overall winning and a single terran still at the top and terran is still the overpowered race.

Yeah, nice double standards there.
Suffer the pain of discipline or suffer the pain of regret
ReaperCo
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden46 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-19 17:45:43
August 19 2012 17:41 GMT
#427
On August 20 2012 02:38 Zoesan wrote:
Actually, that is a really dumb argument.

What is relevant should be looking at GSL winrates etc, where a lot of top players compete.
As people have already written: nestea won the GSL last year without dropping a map and had a whopping 19-0 record between may and august.
Yet everyone was crying about how overpowered terran was. So now the situation is reversed with zergs overall winning and a single terran still at the top and terran is still the overpowered race.

Yeah, nice double standards there.

I dont think terran is overpowered but i think bad terrans think they are underpowered. I would say if you play like mvp does taking bases like he does and cutting of positions terran is op. But bad terrans cant do that.
-_-
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
United States7081 Posts
August 19 2012 17:45 GMT
#428
On August 20 2012 01:43 Zoesan wrote:
MVP with 4 GSL titles stomping mediocre foreigners.

In other news, china produces rice.


@blug: seeker missiles only cost a 200 gas unit and then take 3 minutes to build up, nope, no window there to get something done.

Show nested quote +
On August 20 2012 01:41 Scila wrote:
All of the information you wrote is true but has already been said for months. The problem is Blizzard doesn't real TL or anywhere else for that matter to decide on how to balance things. They have 2 guys making their own decisions, largely centered on making the game more "fun" and "fresh" so more people buy the games, rather than balancing it properly.


Not mutually exclusive with competitive balance


So, when Taeja wins he's just a transcendent Terran, and when MVP wins he's just on another level. I wonder what people will say when MKP wins a championship?
Jermstuddog
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2231 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-19 17:51:35
August 19 2012 17:48 GMT
#429
I have pointed this out in countless threads, and this seems to be another opportune time in this thread.

Zerg win rates have gone DOWN since 1.4.3 and the "OP queen" buff.

If trying to attribute any win rates to the 1.4.3 patch, we should all be complaining about the observer build time buff. Protoss as a whole has been on an absolute tear since then. Meanwhile, previously dominant Zergs like DRG and Stephano seem to be in a slump.

Tldr: considering how OP queens are, they sure don't seem to be helping anybody out.
As it turns out, marines don't actually cost any money -Jinro
Schnullerbacke13
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany1199 Posts
August 19 2012 17:51 GMT
#430
i think the queenbuff brought the fun back to zerg play .. it simply was not fun to always have to defend, be the victim, figure out what the terran/protoss plans to do early on. Anyway i agree that terran late game is weak, though theoretically the mule economy does not impose any limit to terran income .. however i think avilo is way too biased, getting broodlords out also requires a lot of time and is easily scoutable.
Given that hsm can be pretty game deciding, it should get nerfed if research times are buffed.
We already have enough "terrible damage" utilities which in general lead to a kind of luck based end game (=> vortex, fungals). I dislike it also as a spectator if one single action, be it the 'money' fungal or vortex or hsm decides the game within some seconds. Same applies to some other unit designs like blue flame hellion (can decide a game early on by extremely quick mass drone killing) baneling (can vaporate a marine army within a second not watching the army).
21 is half the truth
4Servy
Profile Joined August 2008
Netherlands1542 Posts
August 19 2012 17:51 GMT
#431
Win rates dont mean much, they never do.

ReaperCo
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden46 Posts
August 19 2012 17:52 GMT
#432
On August 20 2012 02:48 Jermstuddog wrote:
I have pointed this out in countless threads, and this seems to be another opportune time in this thread.

Zerg win rates have gone DOWN since 1.4.3 and the "OP queen" buff.

If trying to attribute any win rates to the 1.4.3 patch, we should all be complaining about the observer build time buff. Protoss as a whole has been on an absolute tear since then while previously dominant Zergs like DRG and Stephano seem to be in a slump.

Tldr: considering how OP queens are, they sure don't seem to be helping anybody out.

Queen cost 150 minerlas making 6 queens isnt worth it they are to slow for hellions to. So no its not that big
sickkungen
Profile Joined July 2012
Sweden179 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-19 17:56:52
August 19 2012 17:55 GMT
#433
Get rid of seeker missiles and add a modified version of irradiate. One that is casted only on biological units and not on other ravens. Also with limited area of effect range. Anyone?
vthree
Profile Joined November 2011
Hong Kong8039 Posts
August 19 2012 18:00 GMT
#434
On August 20 2012 02:52 ReaperCo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2012 02:48 Jermstuddog wrote:
I have pointed this out in countless threads, and this seems to be another opportune time in this thread.

Zerg win rates have gone DOWN since 1.4.3 and the "OP queen" buff.

If trying to attribute any win rates to the 1.4.3 patch, we should all be complaining about the observer build time buff. Protoss as a whole has been on an absolute tear since then while previously dominant Zergs like DRG and Stephano seem to be in a slump.

Tldr: considering how OP queens are, they sure don't seem to be helping anybody out.

Queen cost 150 minerlas making 6 queens isnt worth it they are to slow for hellions to. So no its not that big


The purpose of queens is to defend creep tumors and block ramps and defend vs early air harass. Not chasing hellions across the map to kill them.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
August 19 2012 18:00 GMT
#435
On August 20 2012 02:55 sickkungen wrote:
Get rid of seeker missiles and add a modified version of irradiate. One that is casted only on biological units and not on other ravens. Also with limited area of effect range. Anyone?


Or keep the missile and if needed (which doesn't seem like it is the case) adjust it sligthly?
ReaperCo
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden46 Posts
August 19 2012 18:03 GMT
#436
On August 20 2012 03:00 vthree wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2012 02:52 ReaperCo wrote:
On August 20 2012 02:48 Jermstuddog wrote:
I have pointed this out in countless threads, and this seems to be another opportune time in this thread.

Zerg win rates have gone DOWN since 1.4.3 and the "OP queen" buff.

If trying to attribute any win rates to the 1.4.3 patch, we should all be complaining about the observer build time buff. Protoss as a whole has been on an absolute tear since then while previously dominant Zergs like DRG and Stephano seem to be in a slump.

Tldr: considering how OP queens are, they sure don't seem to be helping anybody out.

Queen cost 150 minerlas making 6 queens isnt worth it they are to slow for hellions to. So no its not that big


The purpose of queens is to defend creep tumors and block ramps and defend vs early air harass. Not chasing hellions across the map to kill them.

Yes but air range isnt changed? So nothing is diffrent. If you scout banshee maybe you can get extra queens so you have 5 instead of 3.
Zergrusher
Profile Joined November 2011
United States562 Posts
August 19 2012 18:03 GMT
#437
guys


listen to me on this ok?

Look at the cast ranges of the ravens spells..... they are pathetic!


PDD and Auto turret cast range is 3!

Blizzard should buff the cast ranges to 6

Seeker missle cast range should be buffed from 6 to 8


Because right now any time you try yo deploy a spell from a raven(regardless of match up) your more then likey TO LOSE the raven itself.

Because simply the cast range is to short for all the spells.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
August 19 2012 18:06 GMT
#438
On August 20 2012 03:03 Zergrusher wrote:
guys


listen to me on this ok?

Look at the cast ranges of the ravens spells..... they are pathetic!


PDD and Auto turret cast range is 3!

Blizzard should buff the cast ranges to 6

Seeker missle cast range should be buffed from 6 to 8


Because right now any time you try yo deploy a spell from a raven(regardless of match up) your more then likey TO LOSE the raven itself.

Because simply the cast range is to short for all the spells.


And on the flip side it's spells are really good after deployed. It seems to work out, so why would you change them that drastically?
Bagi
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6799 Posts
August 19 2012 18:07 GMT
#439
On August 20 2012 02:48 Jermstuddog wrote:
I have pointed this out in countless threads, and this seems to be another opportune time in this thread.

Zerg win rates have gone DOWN since 1.4.3 and the "OP queen" buff.

If trying to attribute any win rates to the 1.4.3 patch, we should all be complaining about the observer build time buff. Protoss as a whole has been on an absolute tear since then. Meanwhile, previously dominant Zergs like DRG and Stephano seem to be in a slump.

Tldr: considering how OP queens are, they sure don't seem to be helping anybody out.

So because protoss are doing better against zergs, we should just ignore the TvZ match-up?

I'm sure you can go rant about this in the balance thread, however this thread was made to discuss TvZ.
ReaperCo
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden46 Posts
August 19 2012 18:09 GMT
#440
I would say something this is off topic but i have say it they should change Ghosts snipe range to was it was before but increase energy cost to 200.
Prev 1 20 21 22 23 24 48 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
14:00
Bracket Day 2 - Final
LiquipediaDiscussion
FEL
09:00
Cracow 2025
Clem vs Krystianer
uThermal vs SKillousLIVE!
Reynor vs MaNa
Lambo vs Gerald
RotterdaM2043
ComeBackTV 1801
IndyStarCraft 631
WardiTV397
CranKy Ducklings173
Rex161
3DClanTV 108
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 2043
IndyStarCraft 631
Rex 161
BRAT_OK 73
MindelVK 26
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 48390
Horang2 5568
EffOrt 1490
Barracks 1427
Larva 1245
Stork 759
BeSt 614
firebathero 486
Soulkey 258
Hyun 192
[ Show more ]
Rush 145
Last 113
Dewaltoss 105
sorry 78
Sharp 70
Movie 56
Shinee 55
sSak 48
Free 46
sas.Sziky 35
Shine 31
zelot 22
yabsab 17
Terrorterran 5
Dota 2
Gorgc5059
qojqva3680
XcaliburYe412
420jenkins244
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
fl0m1770
sgares373
oskar167
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor526
Other Games
B2W.Neo2060
Beastyqt1257
Hui .290
DeMusliM214
Fuzer 170
QueenE74
KnowMe43
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV37
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 5
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 51
• poizon28 12
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3316
• WagamamaTV784
League of Legends
• Nemesis3257
• Jankos1221
Upcoming Events
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3h 23m
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Wardi Open
20h 23m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 19h
WardiTV European League
2 days
Online Event
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL 20 Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.