| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
It feals like Kespa is deciding once again for the players. But maybe i'm wrong and didn't understand quite right the OP. I feal a player association is needed when i see threads like this. But again. Maybe my english is too bad to understand and i'm being paranoid. | ||
|
6NR
United States1472 Posts
| ||
|
endy
Switzerland8970 Posts
On August 08 2012 14:27 EtherealDeath wrote: Hmm so what about 1) Leaving a GSTL team, being teamless for a while, then joining a kespa team (as opposed to direct transfer), or 2) Join a foreign team, contract ends after a few months, join kespa team 3) Go teamless, get a personal sponsor for a while, join kespa team And the other way around as well. Or does it mean the moment you get slapped with the GSTL tag, you can't join a Kespa team regardless, even if you leave the team in the meanwhile? I think this is still possible. M18M just joined LighT, and I'm pretty a GSTL team can hire him later. | ||
|
ProxyKnoxy
United Kingdom2576 Posts
On August 08 2012 19:30 FFW_Rude wrote: Correct me if i'm wrong but ... Players had not been ask the question didn't they ? It feals like Kespa is deciding once again for the players. But maybe i'm wrong and didn't understand quite right the OP. I feal a player association is needed when i see threads like this. But again. Maybe my english is too bad to understand and i'm being paranoid. This is good for the players | ||
|
Krogan
Sweden375 Posts
| ||
|
Iplaythings
Denmark9110 Posts
No, this is good for the teams, not for the individual players (as in nothing changed for the players really, but they could've easily had a more beneficial agreement). Allright I feel like I'm complaining too much, gonna exit this thread now | ||
|
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
I wonder how good the Kespa players will be by then (probably dominating). | ||
|
MonDeW
Denmark369 Posts
| ||
|
Sumahi
Guam5609 Posts
| ||
|
Thehealbus
38 Posts
I'm sure kespa players could leave if they wanted to. | ||
|
Haydin
United States1481 Posts
| ||
|
yeint
Estonia2329 Posts
On August 08 2012 19:57 MonDeW wrote: This is kinda odd. I don't know much about Kespa, but they must have some very odd fundementals or power complexes, because this is just weird. Why couldn't you trade players from the same league? For once I don't think it's odd at all. It benefits both GOM and KeSPA. GOM teams have an advantage in skill/experience in SC2, so poaching could happen mutually. Basically a one year moratorium on player transfers is not a big deal. | ||
|
ShatterZer0
United States1843 Posts
| ||
GTR
51507 Posts
On August 08 2012 20:31 ShatterZer0 wrote: I wonder what will end up happening to SlayerS? I mean, BoxeR MADE SKT.... It'd feel REALLY weird watching a SlayerS vs SKT match with BoxeR and iloveoov on opposite ends of the field. Eh, while he was the face of SKT since their acquirement of 4U, his influence pretty much diminished within the company after he left for the military. | ||
|
crbox
Canada1180 Posts
| ||
|
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
| ||
|
Opera
France469 Posts
I think KeSPA hopes its players will be better than eSF players in October 2013  | ||
|
Boundz(DarKo)
5311 Posts
| ||
|
skeldark
Germany2223 Posts
Now their players have to own. If not, No one will be left by 2013 to watch them. | ||
|
Chunhyang
Bangladesh1389 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
OSC
Solar vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Krystianer
Spirit vs TBD
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
OSC
OSC
IPSL
Dewalt vs Bonyth
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Replay Cast
Patches Events
|
|
|
EPT
