• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:31
CEST 14:31
KST 21:31
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 28423 users

MPQ Modding Shutdown Petition - Page 14

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 16 18 Next All
Marti
Profile Joined August 2011
552 Posts
July 27 2012 16:02 GMT
#261
On July 28 2012 00:07 Assirra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 00:01 Marti wrote:
On July 27 2012 22:39 Assirra wrote:
On July 27 2012 22:37 trbot wrote:
On July 27 2012 21:40 iRaYP wrote:
On July 27 2012 20:58 Tantaburs wrote:
Question: If it is possible to switch models is it possible to make say the DT model the same as the Odin model so you can see it without detection. Cause if so then that seem like a reason to stop it.


I would like this answered by the "pro mod" group


Even if this is possible by modifying MPQ files, why does it matter? Someone can run any map hack and achieve the same effect (or one much stronger), and this map hack will NOT need to modify MPQ files to offer its functionality.

You know this a major backfire on the whole point right?
First it was "only good things come of it" and now its "yea you can do cheating with it but who cares, its possible otherwise aswell"
Do you never lock the door since there always will be people who get it open anyway? Cause that is exactly what you are saying now.


Right, because you can't see a dt without editing MPQ files ? You can't see an observer floating above your army ? It might not be easy but the WHOLE POINT OF THE CLOACK IS NOT TO MAKE IT INVISIBLE TO THE PLAYER. THE POINT OF THE CLOACKING ABILITY IS THAT YOU NEED DETECTION TO BE ABLE TO SEE IT. And frankly, when a drone dies, ( slashed by a DT ) you can see it can't you ?

Yes, only good comes out of the freedom of modding, which, in SC2, is already fairly limited. And again for those who don't bother to read, this does not prevent maphacking.

Did you really just compared the faint glimps you see of a cloacking unit compared to lets say a model swap to a battlecruser which is impossible to miss?
Yea i am done here, people are simply delusional and desperate while ignoring the bad side of this.


Yeah dts and every other cloacked units SHOULD BE FAR MORE VISIBLE. The problem here isn't with the modding part, it's the game part. Why aren't those units more visible in the first place ? IF they were supposed to be invisible to the player THEN MAKE THEM INVISIBLE, instead of just very slightly visible. It's simple, no model instead of a model + an invisible texture. And IF they are supposed to be visible then make them a bit more visible, so you don't have to " guess " if there's an observer above your army, and can clearly see it if there is one.

#adun giveafuck - - - "Did this guy just randomly finger me?" - Sayle
Tom Cruise
Profile Joined July 2012
Denmark482 Posts
July 27 2012 16:04 GMT
#262
On July 28 2012 01:02 Marti wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 00:07 Assirra wrote:
On July 28 2012 00:01 Marti wrote:
On July 27 2012 22:39 Assirra wrote:
On July 27 2012 22:37 trbot wrote:
On July 27 2012 21:40 iRaYP wrote:
On July 27 2012 20:58 Tantaburs wrote:
Question: If it is possible to switch models is it possible to make say the DT model the same as the Odin model so you can see it without detection. Cause if so then that seem like a reason to stop it.


I would like this answered by the "pro mod" group


Even if this is possible by modifying MPQ files, why does it matter? Someone can run any map hack and achieve the same effect (or one much stronger), and this map hack will NOT need to modify MPQ files to offer its functionality.

You know this a major backfire on the whole point right?
First it was "only good things come of it" and now its "yea you can do cheating with it but who cares, its possible otherwise aswell"
Do you never lock the door since there always will be people who get it open anyway? Cause that is exactly what you are saying now.


Right, because you can't see a dt without editing MPQ files ? You can't see an observer floating above your army ? It might not be easy but the WHOLE POINT OF THE CLOACK IS NOT TO MAKE IT INVISIBLE TO THE PLAYER. THE POINT OF THE CLOACKING ABILITY IS THAT YOU NEED DETECTION TO BE ABLE TO SEE IT. And frankly, when a drone dies, ( slashed by a DT ) you can see it can't you ?

Yes, only good comes out of the freedom of modding, which, in SC2, is already fairly limited. And again for those who don't bother to read, this does not prevent maphacking.

Did you really just compared the faint glimps you see of a cloacking unit compared to lets say a model swap to a battlecruser which is impossible to miss?
Yea i am done here, people are simply delusional and desperate while ignoring the bad side of this.


Yeah dts and every other cloacked units SHOULD BE FAR MORE VISIBLE. The problem here isn't with the modding part, it's the game part. Why aren't those units more visible in the first place ?


..cuz they're cloaked, not invisible.
Disengaged
Profile Joined July 2010
United States6994 Posts
July 27 2012 16:06 GMT
#263
On July 28 2012 01:02 Marti wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 00:07 Assirra wrote:
On July 28 2012 00:01 Marti wrote:
On July 27 2012 22:39 Assirra wrote:
On July 27 2012 22:37 trbot wrote:
On July 27 2012 21:40 iRaYP wrote:
On July 27 2012 20:58 Tantaburs wrote:
Question: If it is possible to switch models is it possible to make say the DT model the same as the Odin model so you can see it without detection. Cause if so then that seem like a reason to stop it.


I would like this answered by the "pro mod" group


Even if this is possible by modifying MPQ files, why does it matter? Someone can run any map hack and achieve the same effect (or one much stronger), and this map hack will NOT need to modify MPQ files to offer its functionality.

You know this a major backfire on the whole point right?
First it was "only good things come of it" and now its "yea you can do cheating with it but who cares, its possible otherwise aswell"
Do you never lock the door since there always will be people who get it open anyway? Cause that is exactly what you are saying now.


Right, because you can't see a dt without editing MPQ files ? You can't see an observer floating above your army ? It might not be easy but the WHOLE POINT OF THE CLOACK IS NOT TO MAKE IT INVISIBLE TO THE PLAYER. THE POINT OF THE CLOACKING ABILITY IS THAT YOU NEED DETECTION TO BE ABLE TO SEE IT. And frankly, when a drone dies, ( slashed by a DT ) you can see it can't you ?

Yes, only good comes out of the freedom of modding, which, in SC2, is already fairly limited. And again for those who don't bother to read, this does not prevent maphacking.

Did you really just compared the faint glimps you see of a cloacking unit compared to lets say a model swap to a battlecruser which is impossible to miss?
Yea i am done here, people are simply delusional and desperate while ignoring the bad side of this.


Yeah dts and every other cloacked units SHOULD BE FAR MORE VISIBLE. The problem here isn't with the modding part, it's the game part. Why aren't those units more visible in the first place ? IF they were supposed to be invisible to the player THEN MAKE THEM INVISIBLE, instead of just very slightly visible. It's simple, no model instead of a model + an invisible texture. And IF they are supposed to be visible then make them a bit more visible, so you don't have to " guess " if there's an observer above your army, and can clearly see it if there is one.



Yea . . . . . no . . . . .

Lol
FeyFey
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany10114 Posts
July 27 2012 16:10 GMT
#264
i like this model swap question, you just remove the cloak effect. Problem with file editing is that Blizzard doesn't know if it is something good or bad and can't check them by hand. While hacks are something not many write, making them easier to mass detect.
But if it really replaces just parts of the mpq file if it detects a change, they could actually whitelist parts of the files, that could be changed. Doubt they make this effort though and it would kill the stronger team color mod anyway, as it falls under the helps you while playing category.
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
July 27 2012 16:16 GMT
#265
I don't know why you think seeing cloaked units is hard. It's not, no matter what the model size is. Besides, most people reflexively scan their army because they assume that there will be an Observer over it by a certain time. Being able to see invisible units isn't exactly a skill, nor is it something I think merits much reward.
bonifaceviii
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada2890 Posts
July 27 2012 16:36 GMT
#266
On July 28 2012 01:02 Marti wrote:
Yeah dts and every other cloacked units SHOULD BE FAR MORE VISIBLE. The problem here isn't with the modding part, it's the game part. Why aren't those units more visible in the first place ? IF they were supposed to be invisible to the player THEN MAKE THEM INVISIBLE, instead of just very slightly visible. It's simple, no model instead of a model + an invisible texture. And IF they are supposed to be visible then make them a bit more visible, so you don't have to " guess " if there's an observer above your army, and can clearly see it if there is one.

Hahaha what
Stay a while and listen || http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=354018
Kasu
Profile Joined April 2011
United Kingdom345 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-27 16:48:43
July 27 2012 16:47 GMT
#267
I think this thread would've been a lot better if you had put even one sentence about the other side of the issue - for example, why Blizzard are banning it, or what potential benefits there are. As it is, you merely state your own opinion and expect people to agree with it without giving them the information to make up their own mind.

Edit: Not saying that losing the mods that are cited isn't a blow, but its obviously not the only thing to consider.
trbot
Profile Joined June 2012
Canada142 Posts
July 27 2012 16:58 GMT
#268
On July 27 2012 22:39 Assirra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 27 2012 22:37 trbot wrote:
On July 27 2012 21:40 iRaYP wrote:
On July 27 2012 20:58 Tantaburs wrote:
Question: If it is possible to switch models is it possible to make say the DT model the same as the Odin model so you can see it without detection. Cause if so then that seem like a reason to stop it.


I would like this answered by the "pro mod" group


Even if this is possible by modifying MPQ files, why does it matter? Someone can run any map hack and achieve the same effect (or one much stronger), and this map hack will NOT need to modify MPQ files to offer its functionality.

You know this a major backfire on the whole point right?
First it was "only good things come of it" and now its "yea you can do cheating with it but who cares, its possible otherwise aswell"
Do you never lock the door since there always will be people who get it open anyway? Cause that is exactly what you are saying now.


It's really not what you're claiming it is... It's very simple. Virtually every maphack in existence functions without touching MPQ files. When you make MPQ files impossible to mod, anyone using a maphack will say "trololo business as usual."

It's like saying don't bother locking the front door if you're missing the entire front facing wall of your house.
Talanthalos
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany153 Posts
July 27 2012 17:23 GMT
#269
Good for the game, that blizzard disables these cheats.
willoc
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada1530 Posts
July 27 2012 17:43 GMT
#270
On July 28 2012 00:06 Roxor9999 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 00:01 Marti wrote:
On July 27 2012 22:39 Assirra wrote:
On July 27 2012 22:37 trbot wrote:
On July 27 2012 21:40 iRaYP wrote:
On July 27 2012 20:58 Tantaburs wrote:
Question: If it is possible to switch models is it possible to make say the DT model the same as the Odin model so you can see it without detection. Cause if so then that seem like a reason to stop it.


I would like this answered by the "pro mod" group


Even if this is possible by modifying MPQ files, why does it matter? Someone can run any map hack and achieve the same effect (or one much stronger), and this map hack will NOT need to modify MPQ files to offer its functionality.

You know this a major backfire on the whole point right?
First it was "only good things come of it" and now its "yea you can do cheating with it but who cares, its possible otherwise aswell"
Do you never lock the door since there always will be people who get it open anyway? Cause that is exactly what you are saying now.


Right, because you can't see a dt without editing MPQ files ? You can't see an observer floating above your army ? It might not be easy but the WHOLE POINT OF THE CLOACK IS NOT TO MAKE IT INVISIBLE TO THE PLAYER. THE POINT OF THE CLOACKING ABILITY IS THAT YOU NEED DETECTION TO BE ABLE TO SEE IT. And frankly, when a drone dies, ( slashed by a DT ) you can see it can't you ?

Yes, only good comes out of the freedom of modding, which, in SC2, is already fairly limited. And again for those who don't bother to read, this does not prevent maphacking.

So it is ok that one player gets an advantage just because he edited some file?


Exactly. I certainly don't want to continuously be looking for current/updated Mods just so I can remain at equal competitiveness with people who do use them. In fact, I don't want to *have* to use mods at all.

Just ask yourself this: Do they let people use Mods in tournaments?
Be bold and mighty forces will come to your aid!
Assirra
Profile Joined August 2010
Belgium4169 Posts
July 27 2012 17:53 GMT
#271
On July 28 2012 01:58 trbot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 27 2012 22:39 Assirra wrote:
On July 27 2012 22:37 trbot wrote:
On July 27 2012 21:40 iRaYP wrote:
On July 27 2012 20:58 Tantaburs wrote:
Question: If it is possible to switch models is it possible to make say the DT model the same as the Odin model so you can see it without detection. Cause if so then that seem like a reason to stop it.


I would like this answered by the "pro mod" group


Even if this is possible by modifying MPQ files, why does it matter? Someone can run any map hack and achieve the same effect (or one much stronger), and this map hack will NOT need to modify MPQ files to offer its functionality.

You know this a major backfire on the whole point right?
First it was "only good things come of it" and now its "yea you can do cheating with it but who cares, its possible otherwise aswell"
Do you never lock the door since there always will be people who get it open anyway? Cause that is exactly what you are saying now.


It's really not what you're claiming it is... It's very simple. Virtually every maphack in existence functions without touching MPQ files. When you make MPQ files impossible to mod, anyone using a maphack will say "trololo business as usual."

It's like saying don't bother locking the front door if you're missing the entire front facing wall of your house.

Again, maphacking got nothing to do with this subject, stop using it to shove the blame on. I never ever mentioned maphacks.
What i mentioned were simply model swaps and what you could do with them.
Just because you can maphack doesn't make this kind of cheating (if you use it that way) fine.
Zandar
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Netherlands1541 Posts
July 27 2012 17:57 GMT
#272
On July 27 2012 22:10 Denzil wrote:
How people can oppose modding I'll never know.


I oppose it from an e-sports point of view. I want to be sure everyone has the same client software.
I like what modders do for games like skyrim, but for SC2? Not so much.
If mpq editting makes DT's 100% visible that's more than enough already for me not to allow it.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
Kazeyonoma
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2912 Posts
July 27 2012 18:06 GMT
#273
I'm not opposing modding so to speak, i think it is good, but you have to remember that Blizzard has to first and foremost make sure exploitation and hacks aren't coming through this, hence this change. It was probably found that some loophole or security problem came through with MPQ modding and while there are definite pros to modding, the cons probably outweigh them. What we CAN hope for however, is that blizzard implements something through their arcade, that allows safe modding by utilizing their tools which can set up modifications for you but are first run through their system. That or if it's something really good and universally touted like STC, they can implement it in the game under the options menu.

I'm sorry but allowing someone to have boxer on their loadout screen is cool and all, but if it means it can help take even 10 hackers off the ladder, then i support the security feature. I think a better solution to this rather than petition the MPQ re-update that will be occuring to ensure only authorized blizz files are used, is to suggest a means for you to change your screen/etc without having to modify the MPQ itself. like having a "load screen" folder that SC2 will default look to to load images, that blizzard could probably implement, and allow people who want customizations to continue to do so. As for the bigger mods like STC/etc, if you instead petition that the usefulness of certain mods should be implemented, you have a better chance. As it stands, simply telling blizzard to not go forward with this security update (cuz lets face it that's what this is about), so that you can continue to mod, it's just not going to happen. They don't want to stop you from modding, as evident from Browder himself stating that STC is cool, but their hands are tied here.
I now have autographs of both BoxeR and NaDa. I can die happy. Lim Yo Hwan and Lee Yun Yeol FIGHTING forever!
Okiesmokie
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada379 Posts
July 27 2012 18:06 GMT
#274
It has been against the EULA/ToS since the beginning. If you really cared about the time you've put into it, you wouldn't have begun modding in the first place.
imPermanenCe
Profile Joined July 2011
Netherlands595 Posts
July 27 2012 18:12 GMT
#275
Don't really care either way. Petitions mostly won't work, though :\ gl with it.
Micro at its best is like an elegant dance between two people trying to achieve a similar end.
Iksf
Profile Joined March 2011
United Kingdom444 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-27 18:15:02
July 27 2012 18:13 GMT
#276
If you hadn't noticed maphackers are running unchecked anyway, no one would bother using a model edit to reveal DTs when they could much easier just use a maphack.

WoW was exactly the same when they cracked down on this, hackers were totally unaffected, modders were screwed. One of the main reasons i stopped playing WoW.
Assirra
Profile Joined August 2010
Belgium4169 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-27 18:15:59
July 27 2012 18:15 GMT
#277
On July 28 2012 03:13 Iksf wrote:
If you hadn't noticed maphackers are running unchecked anyway, no one would bother using a model edit to reveal DTs when they could much easier just use a maphack

stop using this as a excuse really, it got nothing to do with the subject.

And in wow it go to points where people simply removed walls out of dungeons enabling them to rush stuff.
Iksf
Profile Joined March 2011
United Kingdom444 Posts
July 27 2012 18:22 GMT
#278
Forcing them to instead use one of the 50 noclip hacks you can find in 10 seconds on google.......
Magnious
Profile Joined December 2010
United States68 Posts
July 27 2012 18:23 GMT
#279
I am up for anything that stops hacks from being implemented, even if mods like this need to be shut down. I know it's sad, and I wish it wouldn't happen...but I would rather have these shut down, than hacks plaguing the ladder. If Blizzard does do this, I hope they incorperate some type of color mod into the system for color blind people to use.
The Past is only the Future with the Lights On
Rah
Profile Joined February 2010
United States973 Posts
July 27 2012 18:23 GMT
#280
If protoss models were like that Dark Protoss screenshot I'd like them more as a race, although it's obviously not good visibility for pros. Too bad this change will kill that, definitely something I'd DL.
Streaming on twitch. http://www.twitch.tv/rahsun86
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 16 18 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PondCast
10:00
Episode 50
CranKy Ducklings60
Liquipedia
GSL Code S
09:30
Ro8 - Group B
Zoun vs herOLIVE!
Crank 407
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko480
Crank 407
Harstem 214
Hui .127
ProTech98
MindelVK 29
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 14014
Hyuk 7398
Sea 3544
EffOrt 426
Mini 340
Stork 311
Last 225
Soulkey 217
Snow 162
Zeus 152
[ Show more ]
Light 127
TY 91
ToSsGirL 58
Pusan 56
hero 44
Barracks 39
Sea.KH 39
sas.Sziky 37
sorry 34
Nal_rA 33
sSak 32
Movie 29
Rush 29
Yoon 22
Icarus 15
JulyZerg 15
HiyA 11
scan(afreeca) 11
IntoTheRainbow 11
SilentControl 7
Noble 5
zelot 4
ivOry 4
Dota 2
qojqva1505
XcaliburYe585
XaKoH 342
boxi98282
Fuzer 274
Counter-Strike
byalli166
edward66
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor161
Other Games
singsing2553
B2W.Neo1097
C9.Mang0572
crisheroes419
DeMusliM413
Mew2King144
ArmadaUGS54
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream12328
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Airneanach6
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis5012
• Jankos1257
Other Games
• WagamamaTV153
Upcoming Events
OSC
8h 29m
Replay Cast
11h 29m
OSC
11h 29m
WardiTV Invitational
22h 29m
OSC
1d
Korean StarCraft League
1d 14h
SOOP
1d 20h
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
1d 21h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 22h
Cheesadelphia
2 days
[ Show More ]
CSO Cup
2 days
GSL Code S
2 days
Rogue vs TBD
TBD vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
5 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.