Where did all of the terrans go? - Page 10
Forum Index > SC2 General |
svefnleysi
Iceland623 Posts
| ||
Bommes
Germany1226 Posts
On March 11 2012 17:23 habeck wrote: Master here, i played like 5 or 6 tvts of my last 10 games so i don't know, there is more terrans then zergs i gues, Haha its the same for me, I hate TvT soooo much and I always get TvT. Everyone is telling me there are no terrans, but I get SO MUCH TvT. It got a bit more even in the last 10-20 games or so, but if I crunch my SC2Gears numbers TvT should still be my most played matchup. TvP is great though, on the current mappool I could play TvP all day long and never get bored ![]() | ||
SirHyoon
Australia46 Posts
| ||
Penecks
United States600 Posts
| ||
KrazyTrumpet
United States2520 Posts
| ||
Surili
United Kingdom1141 Posts
On March 11 2012 17:16 riff wrote: What evidence do you have to support this assertion? I want there to be a button, this just stamps this on posts here on Team liquid. | ||
tomatriedes
New Zealand5356 Posts
| ||
decaf
Austria1797 Posts
On March 11 2012 11:26 mazqo wrote: Well i got some stats from high masters/gm from EU server since 1.1.2012 Protoss account: Total games 730 - 317 PvP (43%) - 246 PvZ (34%) - 167 PvT (23%) Terran account: Total games 1157 - 461 TvP (40%) - 375 TvZ (32%) - 321 TvT(28%) As you can see there are less terrans in highmasters/gm. And my protoss account is ~top50-100 gm and my terran is rank100-200 master(sc2ranks, eu), which means i play higher level opponents with my protoss account, so there are more protoss and zergs in top top top of the ladder. Yes, i play a lot. Interesting, it's what I'm experiencing as well. | ||
Vralaren
Sweden130 Posts
Edit: I forgot to mention those 3 were zergs. Not a single toss! | ||
CaptainCharisma
New Zealand808 Posts
| ||
NeThZOR
South Africa7387 Posts
| ||
Raid
United States398 Posts
Honestly its disheartening to play terran when you know the strat you're playing will be possibly useless in the next patch. Terrans are probably the only race that has to revise their strat book over and over while other races can focus on reinforcing and perfecting a couple select strats. It's also more frustrating that the community around Terran has no love, Korean Terran players get the thumbs down. Its sad about mvp, because he was considered the greatest terran said he has hardly any fans because he plays terran. As a foreigner we have no real Terran foreign hero in any tournaments, in almost a year, only ones close were probably Jinro & Thorzain. I still enjoy playing terran because its the race that has the most interesting micro, matchups, and power in my opinion. I find that I am equally even in all my matchups. But for some reason at my skill level it feels like I have to play much better than my opponents because of how unforgiving micro can be and the late game. It makes losing much more painful and thus I have gone on couple month breaks everytime. This maybe why terran is so underepresented in this levels, its because its hard to feel that you are better, but lose because of how fragile your race's late game is. Ranking: Low Masters | ||
Vod.kaholic
United States1052 Posts
On March 11 2012 17:30 svefnleysi wrote: I love how Zerg's weakest match up is ZvP and Protoss' weakest match up is PvZ. It's weird, I've played the matchup from both sides and it has a lot to do with how comfortable you are with doing the right things consistently to get an advantage, and how aware you are of the game-state. I think that to get fully comfortable with the matchup from either side takes a lot of experience and a lot of work. A lot of the early to mid-game (including the first big move-out by toss) comes down to scouting and reaction, and the early lategame is very heavily influenced by what happened in the midgame. I think P and Z players both get frustrated because the midgame of the matchup is pretty hard. It's hard both to control it well, and in some cases hard to ascertain the position of both players and decide the best course of action. And between mutalisks/zerglings, pylons/warp prisms and the various deathballs that both races can field and the many many ways they have to get their deathballs, a lot of shit can go wrong for you. Both races have many options to field, and a lot of ways to recover, which makes it hard to consistently do the right things and makes it the hardest matchup for both races simultaneously. EDIT: Generally, when I win a ZvP or a PvZ it happens because I outdid my opponent in either scouting/control/harassment/macro when he was relatively clueless in what to do, but could very easily have done the right thing with more preparation or experience. And the majority of my losses from either side come from being under-prepared or reacting poorly to my opponent. So really, I understand how frustration arises from both sides here :/ | ||
Krejven
Sweden105 Posts
On March 11 2012 17:43 tomatriedes wrote: If a terran learnt how to 1-1-1 properly they could win 80-90% of their games up until diamond. I played against a terran in plat who did 1-1-1 and never harassed with his banshees just sat in his base until his push was ready to go and let me eco unmolested. How do you get to plat and not know how to do that? I tried switching to terran one time to see how difficult pulling off 1-1-1 was. I went 9-1 in my first 10 TvPs not even using the hotkeys (the only game I lost, I fucked up my wall off and let some DTs in). I play against terrans in plat who stim up my ramp when I'm still on one base without scanning. How do you even deserve to be in plat when you do brainless stuff like that and then try to call protoss imba? Almost no terrans at my level use drops properly- if you want to turtle to 200/200 and not harass why the hell choose terran? I played on the KR server and all the terrans play as aggressive as hell- they understand the match up so much better there. Terran is the mid-game aggression race- embrace that, learn to drop properly and I'm sure you'll win a lot more. If you "knew how to xxxxxx properly" you would not be in a low league. But the fact is that people below diamond do not play properly regardless of their race or they would not be there. Personally I played terran in sc broodwar and terran in sc2 until the recent patch when I realized that blizzard only want me to go marine marauder (a composition I hate) all game long. I said no thanks and now I'm one league higher up after switching to zerg. | ||
Defacer
Canada5052 Posts
On March 11 2012 17:30 svefnleysi wrote: I love how Zerg's weakest match up is ZvP and Protoss' weakest match up is PvZ. ZvP is a tough matchup for me, but my favorite. I feel like when I lose, I made enough mistakes that I deserved to lose, and when I win, I didn't just get lucky and I played well. It really feels balanced ... well, at least in my league. | ||
MortOrGuilt
United Kingdom23 Posts
I can play, lose or win TvT and TvZ and enjoy it, but if I lose a TvP it makes me horrificaly angry as at my ranking it feels like they have it so easy. | ||
genius_man16
United States749 Posts
On March 11 2012 11:49 forsooth wrote: I quit playing 1v1 ladder. Blizzard's constant nerfs to everything that isn't a marine or marauder finally got too much and I walked away. I was tired of tanks (and my other factory units) being useless in TvP, annoyed because of how much better bio TvT came after the blue flame nerf, and the ghost nerf was the final straw that made Blizzard's incompetence too much for me to take. Absolutely none of the patches have made SC2 a better game to play from a Terran perspective. We keep getting forced into more and more specific strategies and it's at the point where TvT is the only matchup left that allows for any sort of stylistic freedom in a standard game. TvP will forever be bio as long as colossus exists and tank damage sucks and TvZ is moving quickly toward mech being mandatory to stand a chance in the late game. Meanwhile, Protoss and Zerg continue to be able to utilize almost their whole tech tree (sans carriers) in every matchup but their own mirrors, which have remained pretty weird since day 1. You were getting hit with 1/1/1 all the time because a lot of us are fed up with TvP and how bad the matchup is on every level. When I used to play and I hit a Protoss on ladder, I'd flip my coin with a cheese, hope it worked, and move on in the hopes that I'd get a Terran or Zerg next so I could play a game that wasn't retarded by default. This pretty much sums up my feelings quite well, although I still play 1v1 because I wanna get into Master again. | ||
Spieltor
327 Posts
On March 11 2012 14:03 Shasta37 wrote: I'm not sure that these stats mean there are less terran players total. It does look like terran is the least played race at the moment probably for the reasons that have already been mentioned about high skill ceiling and late game issues with the race (reliance on tier 1 units and awful reinforce capabilities). I still think there is a large portion of the playerbase who play terran but I do believe they haven't been playing the game recently. I'm a masters terran and I know I haven't been playing the 1v1 ladder near as much as I have pre 1.4.3. I'm sure there are many terrans that are doing the same by either switching race for the moment or playing other games until the game changes. The current state of the game has made Starcraft 2 frustrating and annoying to play for terran right now. It's been said before that its expected that terran do all these tricks and somersaults in the early game and mid game to get far enough ahead of their opponents to just overwhelm them in stuff. While having the ability to do early game pressure is nice, the game shouldn't demand you to play that way to be balanced. A lot of the time, terrans who have very good macro mechanics and would like to play longer games with zerg and protoss sell themselves short on purpose because they understand that if the other player has the same caliber of mechanics they are at a disadvantage. We see this especially in the TvP matchup. Unfortunately, this makes for uninteresting (and frankly unfun) games for Terran to play, where each game the Terran player is wondering "Well, let's see if he knows how to hold this all-in or not". And so we have an entire race of players more or less playing games that really just depend on if their opponent makes some early game fatal mistakes. This can be fun occasionally (for the lulz) but gets stale pretty quick and doesn't make laddering to improve compelling. TL;DR Anyways, I didn't mean for this to be long but I think the race distribution is still quite healthy but you won't find the % of Terrans increasing anytime soon until Blizzard gives them a reason to want to play Starcraft 2 and not AllinCraft 2. if you think being forced into different various all ins gets stale, how about knowing uinless you do a picture perfect all in, you either lose, or you choose not to all in and do a very predictable long late game plan. You want to not all in every game. Zerg wants more options than 15-20 minute turtle till broods. | ||
RunningInSquares
United States215 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
| ||
| ||