EPTWe Must Fight For The Carrier - Page 92
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Nyarly
France1030 Posts
| ||
|
Gladiator6
Sweden7024 Posts
| ||
|
Pisko.
United States214 Posts
| ||
|
-BCNPalomino-
United States45 Posts
| ||
|
DontNerfInfestors
Spain280 Posts
IDK if its gonna be buffed but i hope :D | ||
|
SCMothership
United States187 Posts
| ||
|
CPTBadAss
United States594 Posts
| ||
|
NicolBolas
United States1388 Posts
On September 17 2012 00:17 CPTBadAss wrote: It's so great to see that a thread like this actually had an impact and that people stuck it out to the end. Can't wait to see more carrier action in HotS Had an impact? Do you honestly believe that the presence or absence of this thread did anything for or against the Carrier? If it had an "impact", it would only be indirectly, by serving as a place where people who like the Carrier would get together and help steel their resolve by reminding them that there were like-minded people. Don't fool yourself into thinking that any thread directly caused Blizzard to do anything. | ||
|
rd
United States2586 Posts
On September 17 2012 01:54 NicolBolas wrote: Had an impact? Do you honestly believe that the presence or absence of this thread did anything for or against the Carrier? If it had an "impact", it would only be indirectly, by serving as a place where people who like the Carrier would get together and help steel their resolve by reminding them that there were like-minded people. Don't fool yourself into thinking that any thread directly caused Blizzard to do anything. TBH if it did affect them I doubt they'd admit it directly. Either way didn't they say it was because of HotS feedback saying they thought the Tempest was too hard and the Carrier was too easy? | ||
|
Hds
France200 Posts
| ||
|
ejozl
Denmark3395 Posts
Then we have Phoenix which has +vs light, Voidray +vs armored AND +10% vs massive, Tempest which has 30+20 vs massive and Carrier with 2x5+1 massive. | ||
|
Big-t
Austria1350 Posts
| ||
|
Pisko.
United States214 Posts
| ||
|
TzTz
Germany511 Posts
On September 17 2012 05:11 Pisko. wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Rqx8s2qKXM I hope someone at blizzard watches this video, it's very well done, carriers were so awesome in Broodwar, when if not now bring this back? | ||
|
xPrimuSx
92 Posts
| ||
|
ShatterZer0
United States1843 Posts
On September 17 2012 05:11 Pisko. wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Rqx8s2qKXM BW carrier range is 8 release 12 leash, SC2 Carrier range is 7 release and 14 leash. Just for clarification. 7 was chosen over 8 because 7 range allows for, theoretically, 2 volleys of Viking AA attack per 1 volley of graviton catapult. | ||
|
magicallypuzzled
United States588 Posts
| ||
|
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
On September 17 2012 06:28 magicallypuzzled wrote: if the carrier was worth keeping in the game it shouldn't need changing if it does need changing then it shouldn't be kept in game. its a simple yes or no question is it worth keeping or not? Terrible logic. With this logic, the Phoenix, Reaper, Battlecruiser, Hydralisk, Raven, and several other units would either already be gone or on the chopping block during this beta. | ||
|
PardonYou
United States1360 Posts
On September 17 2012 06:28 magicallypuzzled wrote: if the carrier was worth keeping in the game it shouldn't need changing if it does need changing then it shouldn't be kept in game. its a simple yes or no question is it worth keeping or not? So no balances would ever be needed, if I read that correctly? | ||
|
Darkong
United Kingdom418 Posts
On September 17 2012 06:28 magicallypuzzled wrote: if the carrier was worth keeping in the game it shouldn't need changing if it does need changing then it shouldn't be kept in game. its a simple yes or no question is it worth keeping or not? If we followed that logic since the WOL beta the only units left would be the medivac and the zerg larvae. | ||
| ||
