EPTWe Must Fight For The Carrier - Page 93
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
magicallypuzzled
United States588 Posts
| ||
|
TheManInBlack
Nigeria266 Posts
On September 17 2012 06:40 magicallypuzzled wrote: phoenix/reapers,battlecruisers,hydralisk, all of them were worth taking with no changes the changes were a matter of being more worth it or less worth it. the carrier as stands either apparently isn't worth it at all or is and people say it isn't either admit its worth it or let it go. I was magically puzzled at this post. | ||
|
acrimoneyius
United States983 Posts
On September 17 2012 06:34 Darkong wrote: If we followed that logic since the WOL beta the only units left would be the medivac and the zerg larvae. The medivac speed was reduced a long time ago...wut? | ||
|
ClanRH.TV
United States462 Posts
On September 17 2012 06:40 magicallypuzzled wrote: phoenix/reapers,battlecruisers,hydralisk, all of them were worth taking with no changes the changes were a matter of being more worth it or less worth it. the carrier as stands either apparently isn't worth it at all or is and people say it isn't either admit its worth it or let it go. I was stupified by it. For an american his grammar is that of a 4 year old. | ||
|
magicallypuzzled
United States588 Posts
| ||
|
Zombo Joe
Canada850 Posts
Have you ever seen Goody play TvP back when he Meched? He had so much trouble with Carriers he would dot the map with missile turrets in preparation for Carriers or Colossus. | ||
|
radscorpion9
Canada2252 Posts
On September 17 2012 06:49 magicallypuzzled wrote: i guess i have not been very clear. i just don't see the value of fighting for something that apparently isn't even usable in its current form. why demand something comeback and change rather i don;t know just something different? Its just an iconic unit that everyone wants to see come back, more or less because it was pretty cool to see in action and they feel it represents the protoss race well (like battlecruisers for terran, or hydras for zerg). Its true that generally they didn't work (one instance against mech doesn't really cut it), but I think the idea is that people want to find a way to *make* it work. Heart of the swarm beta is probably the best time to test those ideas out. | ||
|
rd
United States2586 Posts
On September 17 2012 06:40 magicallypuzzled wrote: phoenix/reapers,battlecruisers,hydralisk, all of them were worth taking with no changes the changes were a matter of being more worth it or less worth it. the carrier as stands either apparently isn't worth it at all or is and people say it isn't either admit its worth it or let it go. That's a very easy, yet short-shorted comparison to make when you consider the perspective that you have complete foresight into how those units' buffs resolved. You can't possibly claim to know how the Carrier would turn out, nor is it fair to place the onus upon everyone else you would argue. It's not black and white. Stop trying to make it out to be. On September 17 2012 07:04 radscorpion9 wrote: Its just an iconic unit that everyone wants to see come back, more or less because it was pretty cool to see in action. Its true that generally they didn't work (one instance against mech doesn't really cut it), but I think the idea is that people want to find a way to *make* it work. Heart of the swarm beta is probably the best time to test those ideas out. If mech makes a comeback in HotS it'll actually be a mainstay in lategame PvT, and unlike it's Tempest counterpart it can both fight and kick the shit out of vikings. It's the marines that give Carriers problems. PvZ lategame they're extremely viable but the current metagame allows Zerg to ramp to a sick economy, which means they might produce upwards of 20-30 corruptors simultaneously whom then snap the carriers in half. If the Tempest were to replace the Carrier in WoL it would be destroyed two times harder with it's sub-optimal DPS. PvP lategame is evolving and may one day reach a point where Carriers become the apex lategame go-to unit after the Colossus. | ||
|
perser84
Germany399 Posts
| ||
|
rd
United States2586 Posts
On September 17 2012 07:12 perser84 wrote: the carrier is now in the hots beta isnt it time to close this topic ? nope, it may still get axxed on release. | ||
|
SarcasmMonster
3136 Posts
On September 17 2012 07:12 perser84 wrote: the carrier is now in the hots beta isnt it time to close this topic ? We still want this | ||
|
Bobgrimly
New Zealand250 Posts
On September 17 2012 07:16 SarcasmMonster wrote: We still want this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Rqx8s2qKXM Drop tempest and do that! Only reason to have tempest is cause blizzard doesn't know how to fix carrier and are trying to give depth to protoss air. This is the answer not the tempest. | ||
|
KaasZerg
Netherlands927 Posts
Terran had goliaths. It was a battle of positioning and maneuvre who would win. There would also be switch ups in unitcompositions. You could kills the goliaths and overpower the terran. Or you could snipe tanks and roll over the goliaths with a rounds off dragoons. Terran could snipe your observers and swoop in with a suprise wraithswitch. A round of templar could storm the goliaths. Upgraded marines and valkyries were the best interceptorkillers lol. Zerg could counter with scourge if there was not enough corsair cover. Plague, swarm in combo with hydra. Why am I talking about broodwar? I didn't see such interesting dynamics in WoL. The hardcountersystem doesn't leave much room for multiple possible counters that are somewhat interesting. edit awesome video sarcasmmonster. It explains a lot. | ||
|
flyingnimbus
Canada16 Posts
On September 17 2012 05:11 Pisko. wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Rqx8s2qKXM Excellent video. It provides great in-depth analysis about what changes need to be made with the current carrier. Instead of derailing the thread, it would be better to focus our efforts on spreading awareness for this video so that people, namely Blizzard, know exactly what buffs the carrier needs to be completely viable. Reddit, bnet forums, State of the Game - gogogo! Since they made the effort to keep the carrier in HotS, the next logical step is to implement these proposed changes. Blizzard listened to us once; let's make that happen again. CARRIER HWAITING! | ||
|
i)awn
United States189 Posts
On September 17 2012 07:16 SarcasmMonster wrote: We still want this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Rqx8s2qKXM This is a great video demonstrating a catastrophic blunder Blizzard did in SC2. They had such a great unit with great micro and great decision making and they just turned it into something far less interesting. This really deserves a thread on its own especially that the carrier is now back in HoTS. | ||
|
RodrigoX
United States645 Posts
| ||
|
Basileus
United States103 Posts
hopefully blizzard will pay attention to tyler at least. | ||
|
SarcasmMonster
3136 Posts
http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/6606291001 | ||
|
Basileus
United States103 Posts
| ||
|
ejozl
Denmark3559 Posts
| ||
| ||
