• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 23:47
CET 05:47
KST 13:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13
Community News
[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation12Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship7
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview [TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle BW General Discussion What happened to TvZ on Retro? Brood War web app to calculate unit interactions [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro?
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2034 users

MLG statement on Providence Code S spot - Page 49

Forum Index > SC2 General
1158 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 47 48 49 50 51 58 Next
NHY
Profile Joined October 2010
1013 Posts
December 16 2011 14:17 GMT
#961
On December 16 2011 23:15 Skyreaper wrote:
Can some one give a link about official original agreement on LxP?


There isn't one online. There is a press release.
hmsrenown
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada1263 Posts
December 16 2011 14:19 GMT
#962
On December 16 2011 23:10 jellyjello wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 22:44 skipgamer wrote:
On December 16 2011 22:37 jellyjello wrote:
On December 16 2011 20:36 Soma.bokforlag wrote:
On December 16 2011 20:18 jellyjello wrote:
blame game in this thread is epic. it's highly entertaining. what's funny is that neither MLG nor GOM cares; they had already moved on.


you really think that GOM doesnt care that half the international community think they have acted in a stupid way?

they wont give naniwa his code s-spot back, they acted in affect and to stand up and say "we were wrong, sorry" now is indeed impossible, but i find it highly unlikely they will act in this manner again.

i would even say it is unlikely gom will keep having meaningless games in their tournaments, in that way naniwa may have done a e-sports a great favor


Go ahead and keep on waiting for GOM's "apology". In the meanwhile, there will be more GSLs and GSTLs, and who knows even KeSPA might jump in the SC2 market, and you know what, people will watch it over and over again, period.

This is not to say who is right or wrong in this whole drama. All major parties involved in this incident already came out with each of their own official statement, and they are now moving on to the next thing on their agenda, because you know, esports is a business entity and they can't simply cling on to what had happened. I had my own opinions on the whole matter and I've stated them more than once. I've read all official statements from all parties and understood their positions. And now I've moved on too.

This is not the end of the world for Naniwa or GOM. Nani will be back for GSLs and GOM will provide it to him. Nani didn't do any favors for GOM. If anything, Nani was the catalyst that caused this whole shit storm drama. But what is done is done. Seriously, how many dead horses can we beat on? There are a lot of people here who have such unrealistic views on the topic such as demanding that GOM needs to come out clean (what?) and apologize (yeah right...). Who are you to demand an apology from GOM? Technically speaking, GOM doesn't owe you guys anything. If you don't like the way GOM is doing their business, then all you need to do is stop supporting their products. If you feel that you are cheated out of something, then it is in your own right to sue them.

Argh.

The problem with this situation, is that there is nothing to stop GOM from doing it again, unless they issue an apology, admitting fault is incredibly important, even if there are no legal repercussions. Presently, a precedent has been set; there is now nothing to stop them from cancelling an agreement with MLG, IEM, NASL, or any other party with which they make an agreement in the future, without informing them of the change!

Let's assume Naniwa did not probe rush Nestea, he played a straight up game and lost. There is nothing to say GSL weren't going to, or couldn't have turned around and said "you aren't getting a code S spot." Despite him, MLG, his team, his fans, and the entire foreign community thinking that he had already earned it!

If you don't see the problem with that, then there's nothing else I guess I can say that will help you realise what is so inherently and utterly wrong with that situation.


It doesn't work like that. Reputation is something that's dear to GOM (or any other major business organizations). I don't doubt for a second that GOM has learned from this incident.

I'm gonna be honest and say I doubt it. GOM not giving out bans to CoCa while rescinding Nani's spot for either unilateral action without informing players involved or stretching rules for the sole purpose of punishing a specific action. If that's not a double standard I don't know what is. To pile on the issue, MC's antics and Keen's celebration are brushed off as players expressing themselves without disrespecting the other players, a rule on which Nani was punished (or not!)...yeah right.

I'll see GOM's action before I believe in their "professionalism".

PS: Rescinding a spot or prize (as is the case here) is a big deal, Nani earned the spot through spectacular playing abilities, and he had it taken away for a borderline discipline issue not stipulated in the rules. Unacceptable.
yeint
Profile Joined May 2011
Estonia2329 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 14:23:02
December 16 2011 14:20 GMT
#963
On December 16 2011 23:13 NHY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 22:32 yeint wrote:
On December 16 2011 22:17 NHY wrote:
On December 16 2011 22:05 yeint wrote:
On December 16 2011 21:57 NHY wrote:

The news article was not written after the tournament. It was written when NaNiwa made winners bracket final.

It seems that GOM didn't tell MLG specifically, but they did announce the change publicly.


Making the winners bracket final means he's the highest placing non-Code S player and that means he's earned Code S, no matter what. So they announced the change after Naniwa earned it.

Edit: The part where "it is within GSL's jurisdiction to adjust placement" is also the part of the agreement.


I'm not claiming they're not legally allowed to do what they did. I'm claiming what they did is incredibly unethical.


If you can't read the article because it is in Korean, then stop making assumptions. The article is about whether NaNiwa will be invited to GSL now that he is the highest non-code S player in Providence. It's not any kind of announcement. The announcement was a month ago.


The announcement a month ago didn't say a damn thing about GOM unilaterally ending the MLG/GSL exhange program, which explicitly stated that during all the 2011 pro circuit events, the highest placing non-Code S player would be awarded a Code S seed. All it said was that their format for code S was changing, and that format included two foreign seeds.


The so called agreement also states that 4 Koreans will be placed into Championsip Pool for all the 2011 pro circuit events. Where's your outrage at MLG for not keeping their exact word?


I already addressed this ridiculous point, but I'll do it again.

GOM doesn't care if 4 more Koreans get sent to the finals. It doesn't benefit them, it in fact hinders them by causing scheduling issues for players. Koreans being sent to MLG is the "What MLG wants" part of the deal. The "What GOM wants" part of the deal is getting foreign fan favorites seeded into Code S. Neither party represents actual players so they don't really give a shit who goes where, as long as viewer numbers increase.

Also, there is no championship pool at the finals. This was know from the start of the 2011 circuit.

4) He didn't earn it. What's the problem with saying that?


Because it's not true. The fact that GOM unilaterally decided they didn't feel like honoring the agreement that was made public doesn't mean they're not ethically bound to honor it. Naniwa, and everyone else, entered Providence with the knowledge that Code S seeding was part of the rewards offered. It was GOM's responsibility to publicize that this wasn't the case BEFORE the tournament, not make some statement in Korean once Naniwa was already in the finals.
Not supporting teams who take robber baron money.
Skyreaper
Profile Joined December 2011
70 Posts
December 16 2011 14:20 GMT
#964
On December 16 2011 23:17 NHY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 23:15 Skyreaper wrote:
Can some one give a link about official original agreement on LxP?


There isn't one online. There is a press release.

Wasn't this the original agreement on LxP? I'm really confused here.http://www.majorleaguegaming.com/news/mlg-and-the-gsl-create-groundbreaking-player-exchange-program
NHY
Profile Joined October 2010
1013 Posts
December 16 2011 14:21 GMT
#965
On December 16 2011 23:05 skipgamer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 22:50 jianming wrote:
On December 16 2011 22:44 skipgamer wrote:
On December 16 2011 22:37 jellyjello wrote:
On December 16 2011 20:36 Soma.bokforlag wrote:
On December 16 2011 20:18 jellyjello wrote:
blame game in this thread is epic. it's highly entertaining. what's funny is that neither MLG nor GOM cares; they had already moved on.


you really think that GOM doesnt care that half the international community think they have acted in a stupid way?

they wont give naniwa his code s-spot back, they acted in affect and to stand up and say "we were wrong, sorry" now is indeed impossible, but i find it highly unlikely they will act in this manner again.

i would even say it is unlikely gom will keep having meaningless games in their tournaments, in that way naniwa may have done a e-sports a great favor


Go ahead and keep on waiting for GOM's "apology". In the meanwhile, there will be more GSLs and GSTLs, and who knows even KeSPA might jump in the SC2 market, and you know what, people will watch it over and over again, period.

This is not to say who is right or wrong in this whole drama. All major parties involved in this incident already came out with each of their own official statement, and they are now moving on to the next thing on their agenda, because you know, esports is a business entity and they can't simply cling on to what had happened. I had my own opinions on the whole matter and I've stated them more than once. I've read all official statements from all parties and understood their positions. And now I've moved on too.

This is not the end of the world for Naniwa or GOM. Nani will be back for GSLs and GOM will provide it to him. Nani didn't do any favors for GOM. If anything, Nani was the catalyst that caused this whole shit storm drama. But what is done is done. Seriously, how many dead horses can we beat on? There are a lot of people here who have such unrealistic views on the topic such as demanding that GOM needs to come out clean (what?) and apologize (yeah right...). Who are you to demand an apology from GOM? Technically speaking, GOM doesn't owe you guys anything. If you don't like the way GOM is doing their business, then all you need to do is stop supporting their products. If you feel that you are cheated out of something, then it is in your own right to sue them.

Argh.

The problem with this situation, is that there is nothing to stop GOM from doing it again, unless they issue an apology, admitting fault is incredibly important, even if there are no legal repercussions. Presently, a precedent has been set; there is now nothing to stop them from cancelling an agreement with MLG, IEM, NASL, or any other party with which they make an agreement in the future, without informing them of the change!

Let's assume Naniwa did not probe rush Nestea, he played a straight up game and lost. There is nothing to say GSL weren't going to, or couldn't have turned around and said "you aren't getting a code S spot." Despite him, MLG, his team, his fans, and the entire foreign community thinking that he had already earned it!

If you don't see the problem with that, then there's nothing else I guess I can say that will help you realise what is so inherently and utterly wrong with that situation.


Tighter contracts can prevent this from happening again. It looks liek MLG and GOM agreed beforehand that they could do things like that.

It's irrelevant if they agreed beforehand that they could do things like that. They didn't let the players know! MLG were advertising that a Code S seed was a part of the prize for the tournament, therefore a Code S seed WAS a part of the prize for the tournament!!!

Perhaps even the onus may be on MLG, but I really doubt it. I'm sure if they did have an agreement it would have stated that should any changes be made to the agreement it would have to be communicated!

To take a prize away from someone because they broke rules in an unprecedented manner is fine... To say they had never earned the prize in the first place is wrong!

(feel like I've come full circle on my opinion, at least I know some more facts about the situation, but still, there is a massive problem with how it all went down.)


You can't look at Code S seed in LxP as a prize given out by MLG. GOM is giving the seed to the player, not MLG.
NHY
Profile Joined October 2010
1013 Posts
December 16 2011 14:22 GMT
#966
On December 16 2011 23:20 Skyreaper wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 23:17 NHY wrote:
On December 16 2011 23:15 Skyreaper wrote:
Can some one give a link about official original agreement on LxP?


There isn't one online. There is a press release.

Wasn't this the original agreement on LxP? I'm really confused here.http://www.majorleaguegaming.com/news/mlg-and-the-gsl-create-groundbreaking-player-exchange-program


That would be the press release version of it. An actual agreement would be 10 times longer.
skipgamer
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Australia701 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 14:28:27
December 16 2011 14:22 GMT
#967
On December 16 2011 23:22 NHY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 23:20 Skyreaper wrote:
On December 16 2011 23:17 NHY wrote:
On December 16 2011 23:15 Skyreaper wrote:
Can some one give a link about official original agreement on LxP?


There isn't one online. There is a press release.

Wasn't this the original agreement on LxP? I'm really confused here.http://www.majorleaguegaming.com/news/mlg-and-the-gsl-create-groundbreaking-player-exchange-program


That would be the press release version of it. An actual agreement would be 10 times longer.


^ wtf?

You're asking for something that only GOM and MLG would be privy to?

I think your opinions in this thread are now invalid.

On December 16 2011 23:25 NHY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 23:22 skipgamer wrote:
On December 16 2011 23:22 NHY wrote:
On December 16 2011 23:20 Skyreaper wrote:
On December 16 2011 23:17 NHY wrote:
On December 16 2011 23:15 Skyreaper wrote:
Can some one give a link about official original agreement on LxP?


There isn't one online. There is a press release.

Wasn't this the original agreement on LxP? I'm really confused here.http://www.majorleaguegaming.com/news/mlg-and-the-gsl-create-groundbreaking-player-exchange-program


That would be the press release version of it. An actual agreement would be 10 times longer.


^ wtf?

You're asking for something that only GOM and MLG would be privy to?

I think your opinions in this thread are now invalid.


Are you blind...? I didn't ask for it.


edit: My bad, I got you and Skyreaper confused. Sorry, there's a few conversations going on here


On December 16 2011 23:21 NHY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 23:05 skipgamer wrote:
On December 16 2011 22:50 jianming wrote:
On December 16 2011 22:44 skipgamer wrote:
On December 16 2011 22:37 jellyjello wrote:
On December 16 2011 20:36 Soma.bokforlag wrote:
On December 16 2011 20:18 jellyjello wrote:
blame game in this thread is epic. it's highly entertaining. what's funny is that neither MLG nor GOM cares; they had already moved on.


you really think that GOM doesnt care that half the international community think they have acted in a stupid way?

they wont give naniwa his code s-spot back, they acted in affect and to stand up and say "we were wrong, sorry" now is indeed impossible, but i find it highly unlikely they will act in this manner again.

i would even say it is unlikely gom will keep having meaningless games in their tournaments, in that way naniwa may have done a e-sports a great favor


Go ahead and keep on waiting for GOM's "apology". In the meanwhile, there will be more GSLs and GSTLs, and who knows even KeSPA might jump in the SC2 market, and you know what, people will watch it over and over again, period.

This is not to say who is right or wrong in this whole drama. All major parties involved in this incident already came out with each of their own official statement, and they are now moving on to the next thing on their agenda, because you know, esports is a business entity and they can't simply cling on to what had happened. I had my own opinions on the whole matter and I've stated them more than once. I've read all official statements from all parties and understood their positions. And now I've moved on too.

This is not the end of the world for Naniwa or GOM. Nani will be back for GSLs and GOM will provide it to him. Nani didn't do any favors for GOM. If anything, Nani was the catalyst that caused this whole shit storm drama. But what is done is done. Seriously, how many dead horses can we beat on? There are a lot of people here who have such unrealistic views on the topic such as demanding that GOM needs to come out clean (what?) and apologize (yeah right...). Who are you to demand an apology from GOM? Technically speaking, GOM doesn't owe you guys anything. If you don't like the way GOM is doing their business, then all you need to do is stop supporting their products. If you feel that you are cheated out of something, then it is in your own right to sue them.

Argh.

The problem with this situation, is that there is nothing to stop GOM from doing it again, unless they issue an apology, admitting fault is incredibly important, even if there are no legal repercussions. Presently, a precedent has been set; there is now nothing to stop them from cancelling an agreement with MLG, IEM, NASL, or any other party with which they make an agreement in the future, without informing them of the change!

Let's assume Naniwa did not probe rush Nestea, he played a straight up game and lost. There is nothing to say GSL weren't going to, or couldn't have turned around and said "you aren't getting a code S spot." Despite him, MLG, his team, his fans, and the entire foreign community thinking that he had already earned it!

If you don't see the problem with that, then there's nothing else I guess I can say that will help you realise what is so inherently and utterly wrong with that situation.


Tighter contracts can prevent this from happening again. It looks liek MLG and GOM agreed beforehand that they could do things like that.

It's irrelevant if they agreed beforehand that they could do things like that. They didn't let the players know! MLG were advertising that a Code S seed was a part of the prize for the tournament, therefore a Code S seed WAS a part of the prize for the tournament!!!

Perhaps even the onus may be on MLG, but I really doubt it. I'm sure if they did have an agreement it would have stated that should any changes be made to the agreement it would have to be communicated!

To take a prize away from someone because they broke rules in an unprecedented manner is fine... To say they had never earned the prize in the first place is wrong!

(feel like I've come full circle on my opinion, at least I know some more facts about the situation, but still, there is a massive problem with how it all went down.)


You can't look at Code S seed in LxP as a prize given out by MLG. GOM is giving the seed to the player, not MLG.


But MLG is awarding the seed.

If I enter a qualifier tournament, that says if I earn top 3 I will enter a bigger tournament, I expect to be given entry to that bigger tournament. Regardless of who is actually running that bigger tournament. Either the qualifier, or the bigger tournament needs to be held accountable.
Fjodorov
Profile Joined December 2011
5007 Posts
December 16 2011 14:23 GMT
#968

3) Naniwa didn't earn Code S spot. Either GOM is lying about it, in which case you can't make case 2) or GOM is telling the truth, in which case Naniwa didn't earn Code S spot. We also don't know what GOM did since Providence. I don't know personally what conversation took place between NaNiwa and GOM but I'd imagine that GOM told NaNiwa that he was going to get Code S spot for the next season. And for NaNiwa, it would not have occured to him to ask if it was specifically because of MLG/GSL exchange.


Why would Naniwa have any reason to suspect MLG were wrong about the prize they say he won at their tournament? A player shows up to a tournament, performs well enough to get second place. Tournament organisation, along with casters etc, tells player he has won a prize. Is it weird that the player actually thinks he has won the prize?!

NHY
Profile Joined October 2010
1013 Posts
December 16 2011 14:24 GMT
#969
On December 16 2011 23:19 hmsrenown wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 23:10 jellyjello wrote:
On December 16 2011 22:44 skipgamer wrote:
On December 16 2011 22:37 jellyjello wrote:
On December 16 2011 20:36 Soma.bokforlag wrote:
On December 16 2011 20:18 jellyjello wrote:
blame game in this thread is epic. it's highly entertaining. what's funny is that neither MLG nor GOM cares; they had already moved on.


you really think that GOM doesnt care that half the international community think they have acted in a stupid way?

they wont give naniwa his code s-spot back, they acted in affect and to stand up and say "we were wrong, sorry" now is indeed impossible, but i find it highly unlikely they will act in this manner again.

i would even say it is unlikely gom will keep having meaningless games in their tournaments, in that way naniwa may have done a e-sports a great favor


Go ahead and keep on waiting for GOM's "apology". In the meanwhile, there will be more GSLs and GSTLs, and who knows even KeSPA might jump in the SC2 market, and you know what, people will watch it over and over again, period.

This is not to say who is right or wrong in this whole drama. All major parties involved in this incident already came out with each of their own official statement, and they are now moving on to the next thing on their agenda, because you know, esports is a business entity and they can't simply cling on to what had happened. I had my own opinions on the whole matter and I've stated them more than once. I've read all official statements from all parties and understood their positions. And now I've moved on too.

This is not the end of the world for Naniwa or GOM. Nani will be back for GSLs and GOM will provide it to him. Nani didn't do any favors for GOM. If anything, Nani was the catalyst that caused this whole shit storm drama. But what is done is done. Seriously, how many dead horses can we beat on? There are a lot of people here who have such unrealistic views on the topic such as demanding that GOM needs to come out clean (what?) and apologize (yeah right...). Who are you to demand an apology from GOM? Technically speaking, GOM doesn't owe you guys anything. If you don't like the way GOM is doing their business, then all you need to do is stop supporting their products. If you feel that you are cheated out of something, then it is in your own right to sue them.

Argh.

The problem with this situation, is that there is nothing to stop GOM from doing it again, unless they issue an apology, admitting fault is incredibly important, even if there are no legal repercussions. Presently, a precedent has been set; there is now nothing to stop them from cancelling an agreement with MLG, IEM, NASL, or any other party with which they make an agreement in the future, without informing them of the change!

Let's assume Naniwa did not probe rush Nestea, he played a straight up game and lost. There is nothing to say GSL weren't going to, or couldn't have turned around and said "you aren't getting a code S spot." Despite him, MLG, his team, his fans, and the entire foreign community thinking that he had already earned it!

If you don't see the problem with that, then there's nothing else I guess I can say that will help you realise what is so inherently and utterly wrong with that situation.


It doesn't work like that. Reputation is something that's dear to GOM (or any other major business organizations). I don't doubt for a second that GOM has learned from this incident.

I'm gonna be honest and say I doubt it. GOM not giving out bans to CoCa while rescinding Nani's spot for either unilateral action without informing players involved or stretching rules for the sole purpose of punishing a specific action. If that's not a double standard I don't know what is. To pile on the issue, MC's antics and Keen's celebration are brushed off as players expressing themselves without disrespecting the other players, a rule on which Nani was punished (or not!)...yeah right.

I'll see GOM's action before I believe in their "professionalism".

PS: Rescinding a spot or prize (as is the case here) is a big deal, Nani earned the spot through spectacular playing abilities, and he had it taken away for a borderline discipline issue not stipulated in the rules. Unacceptable.


You know what is and what isn't there for Code S seed agreement or GSL agreement?
NHY
Profile Joined October 2010
1013 Posts
December 16 2011 14:25 GMT
#970
On December 16 2011 23:22 skipgamer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 23:22 NHY wrote:
On December 16 2011 23:20 Skyreaper wrote:
On December 16 2011 23:17 NHY wrote:
On December 16 2011 23:15 Skyreaper wrote:
Can some one give a link about official original agreement on LxP?


There isn't one online. There is a press release.

Wasn't this the original agreement on LxP? I'm really confused here.http://www.majorleaguegaming.com/news/mlg-and-the-gsl-create-groundbreaking-player-exchange-program


That would be the press release version of it. An actual agreement would be 10 times longer.


^ wtf?

You're asking for something that only GOM and MLG would be privy to?

I think your opinions in this thread are now invalid.


Are you blind...? I didn't ask for it.
hmsrenown
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada1263 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 14:28:56
December 16 2011 14:27 GMT
#971
On December 16 2011 23:13 NHY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 22:32 yeint wrote:
On December 16 2011 22:17 NHY wrote:
On December 16 2011 22:05 yeint wrote:
On December 16 2011 21:57 NHY wrote:

The news article was not written after the tournament. It was written when NaNiwa made winners bracket final.

It seems that GOM didn't tell MLG specifically, but they did announce the change publicly.


Making the winners bracket final means he's the highest placing non-Code S player and that means he's earned Code S, no matter what. So they announced the change after Naniwa earned it.

Edit: The part where "it is within GSL's jurisdiction to adjust placement" is also the part of the agreement.


I'm not claiming they're not legally allowed to do what they did. I'm claiming what they did is incredibly unethical.


If you can't read the article because it is in Korean, then stop making assumptions. The article is about whether NaNiwa will be invited to GSL now that he is the highest non-code S player in Providence. It's not any kind of announcement. The announcement was a month ago.


The announcement a month ago didn't say a damn thing about GOM unilaterally ending the MLG/GSL exhange program, which explicitly stated that during all the 2011 pro circuit events, the highest placing non-Code S player would be awarded a Code S seed. All it said was that their format for code S was changing, and that format included two foreign seeds.


The so called agreement also states that 4 Koreans will be placed into Championsip Pool for all the 2011 pro circuit events. Where's your outrage at MLG for not keeping their exact word?

The format before the change had MLG seed and it was gone for 2012. Instead there were 2 sponsor seeds.

Show nested quote +
1) They entered a deal through which they publicly declared that Code S seeding was part of the prize package of the MLG 2011 Pro Circuit.
2) They then unilaterally reneged on that for Providence, without making any effort to communicate this to the involved parties, i.e. MLG and the Western esports scene.
3) They made a random comment about "we haven't decided" after Naniwa earned this prize, and then sat on it for almost a month, until Naniwa offended their sensibilities.
4) At this point they said he doesn't get the seed, and that he had never earned the seed in the first place.

That's what I think they did to be called unethical.


1) Nothing there
2) It is up to GOM to decide Code S seed in MLG/GSL exchange, so yeah it was unilateral. When GOM announced their new format it included the change to Code S seed. They could've communicated better, but miscommunication is hardly unethical unless you believe it was done so deliberately to deceive people.
3) Naniwa didn't earn Code S spot. Either GOM is lying about it, in which case you can't make case 2) or GOM is telling the truth, in which case Naniwa didn't earn Code S spot. We also don't know what GOM did since Providence. I don't know personally what conversation took place between NaNiwa and GOM but I'd imagine that GOM told NaNiwa that he was going to get Code S spot for the next season. And for NaNiwa, it would not have occured to him to ask if it was specifically because of MLG/GSL exchange.
4) He didn't earn it. What's the problem with saying that?

GOM's unofficial spokesperson?

Oh boy. MLG held up their end of the bargain. Providence has its unique format from the start of the season. It is impossible that GOM is not aware of the special format before or during negotiations.

The announcement on gomtv.net in October mentioned only Blizzard Cup and GSL format. Not a word on the official press release was about the source of the Code S players.

If such statement that specified the current "seeding" plan was published only in Korean, then it shows either gross negligence to contempt to both foreign players and spectators alike.
ScareCrow`
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada88 Posts
December 16 2011 14:27 GMT
#972
You're in a large room, with a divider between two different sections of it. You are here because you were told that there would be $5 dollars up for grabs for someone that attended. There is an announcement made that only one side of the divider gets to hear, stating that instead of $5 dollars you now receive a hat worth $5.

At the end of the day, someone from the side that didn't hear the announcement is chosen to be the lucky winner. He gets a $5 hat. He's confused.

It's not wrong that this hat was now the prize, but not informing everyone involved that the hat was the prize is disrespectful.
diehilde
Profile Joined September 2008
Germany1596 Posts
December 16 2011 14:29 GMT
#973
GOM fucked up big time and without a huge apology to nani and the foreign community I dont think theyll ever regain whatever respect they had before. Also, they should ban some of the korean pros, especially Choya for their twitter comments if they really mean it with their "players need to behave professionally" argument. I mean he called nani "bastard" on his twitter, if that isnt worse than 6 probe rushing I dont know what is. Right now its all too clear that all GOM cares about is their profits and nothing else.
Savior: "I will cheat everyone again in SC2!" - SCII Beta Tester
yeint
Profile Joined May 2011
Estonia2329 Posts
December 16 2011 14:29 GMT
#974
On December 16 2011 23:27 ScareCrow` wrote:
You're in a large room, with a divider between two different sections of it. You are here because you were told that there would be $5 dollars up for grabs for someone that attended. There is an announcement made that only one side of the divider gets to hear, stating that instead of $5 dollars you now receive a hat worth $5.

At the end of the day, someone from the side that didn't hear the announcement is chosen to be the lucky winner. He gets a $5 hat. He's confused.

It's not wrong that this hat was now the prize, but not informing everyone involved that the hat was the prize is disrespectful.


I think it's wrong that the hat was made the prize after people got in the room. Because, really, no one said anything about the hat until November 21st, and even then what they said was that they're still deciding between the five bucks and the hat.

(love your analogy though )
Not supporting teams who take robber baron money.
Skyreaper
Profile Joined December 2011
70 Posts
December 16 2011 14:30 GMT
#975
I really want to see a original agreement if the agreement clearly says that Providence was included or not. Because a manger from GOM twitted that Providence wasn't included
yeint
Profile Joined May 2011
Estonia2329 Posts
December 16 2011 14:31 GMT
#976
On December 16 2011 23:30 Skyreaper wrote:
I really want to see a original agreement if the agreement clearly says that Providence was included or not. Because a manger from GOM twitted that Providence wasn't included


And MLG's CEO said it was in an official statement.

I'll take that over what some random dude from GOM tweeted.
Not supporting teams who take robber baron money.
skipgamer
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Australia701 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 14:48:15
December 16 2011 14:32 GMT
#977
On December 16 2011 23:30 Skyreaper wrote:
I really want to see a original agreement if the agreement clearly says that Providence was included or not. Because a manger from GOM twitted that Providence wasn't included

Really???

Do you have a link to this tweet, or can you quote it?

Because that's really interesting... And finally explains the misunderstanding!

It turns this into a "he said"-"she said" argument (and will probably result in people taking sides), but still... It could wrap it up at least.


edit: eagerly awaiting the tweet. (and going through the thread incase it was already posted) It really will make sense to me why GOM didn't talk to MLG about the seed from providence if they thought it wasn't included in the League Exchange Program all along.

double-edit: Actually, wtf am I thinking... GOM have said they changed the seed to be for the Blizzard Cup, not GSL, so they obviously had planned for the League Exchange Program to include providence.

I dunno, screw this whole situation, I'm assuming it will never go resolved.

My confidence on the level of e-sports professionalism even on the highest tier has dropped tenfold. Mr Chae, Sundance, they really are just kids playing in a big sand lot at the end of the day.
Shardz
Profile Joined August 2010
United States349 Posts
December 16 2011 14:37 GMT
#978
I agree with Naniwa getting some kind of punishment, but the fact that MLG was not notified about it beforehand is pretty bad.
Oh Hi
Fjodorov
Profile Joined December 2011
5007 Posts
December 16 2011 14:39 GMT
#979
I really dont get why GOM just dont see how it would benefit them to make a statement and apologize to MLG and to the players attending MLG providence. They dont even have to mention Naniwa. Quantic gaming and Naniwa knew what had to be done and came out with an apology when they had offended ppl. Im pretty sure Naniwa doesnt think what he did was truly wrong but he realises he offended ppl and thus did the professional thing. Now GOM has offended lots of ppl and they fail to live up to professional standards.
TeeTS
Profile Joined June 2011
Germany2762 Posts
December 16 2011 14:53 GMT
#980
On December 16 2011 23:39 Fjodorov wrote:
I really dont get why GOM just dont see how it would benefit them to make a statement and apologize to MLG and to the players attending MLG providence. They dont even have to mention Naniwa. Quantic gaming and Naniwa knew what had to be done and came out with an apology when they had offended ppl. Im pretty sure Naniwa doesnt think what he did was truly wrong but he realises he offended ppl and thus did the professional thing. Now GOM has offended lots of ppl and they fail to live up to professional standards.


Well you should give GOM some time to evaluate the situation and come up with a statement, since it also took MLG several days to do so. But yeah, it's a communication error. The Information was there, but it wasn't presented well enough for everyone in the western scene to realise. So yeah, an apology would be nice.
Prev 1 47 48 49 50 51 58 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 13m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 192
NeuroSwarm 162
Nina 112
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 1094
PianO 510
Larva 286
Bale 21
Noble 12
Dota 2
monkeys_forever504
League of Legends
JimRising 641
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0675
Other Games
summit1g14885
ViBE154
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1004
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 76
• Sammyuel 48
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra1343
• Lourlo531
• Stunt312
Other Games
• Shiphtur172
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
5h 13m
RSL Revival
5h 13m
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
7h 13m
Cure vs Reynor
Classic vs herO
IPSL
12h 13m
ZZZero vs rasowy
Napoleon vs KameZerg
OSC
14h 13m
BSL 21
15h 13m
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 5h
RSL Revival
1d 5h
Reynor vs sOs
Maru vs Ryung
Kung Fu Cup
1d 7h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 7h
[ Show More ]
BSL 21
1d 15h
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
IPSL
1d 15h
Dewalt vs WolFix
eOnzErG vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
1d 18h
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
BSL: GosuLeague
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
BSL: GosuLeague
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-07
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.